By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Regarding the original poster's comment about never buying a Honda again...well, let's face it. No one expects a transmission to fail on a 3 year old car. Add to that the fairly common string of posts here about Honda transmission issues. Adding in the "hassle factor" (car is out of commission, arguing with the dealer, setting up a rental or what-have-you), I can't blame the person for saying they won't buy another one.
People say that all the time - I've said it about my Honda dealer (a more arrogant and condescending sales department I have never seen) although I would still buy another Honda if it fit my needs, albeit from any other dealership than my current one. I see it all the time on a bunch of the boards here on Edmunds.
But, stuff happens to the very best of cars. I'm just happy to hear Honda did the "right thing" in this case.
Unfortunatly, a decision that was not appreciated by the owner.
A transmission should last longer than that providing a 17 year old didn't use it to drag race.
I don't think the poster deserves this kind of criticism. Did they indicate the car had been abused in some way. I think transmissions should last up to 70000 before random failures start happening. Honda has had some problems with transmissions. This is something they should take care of. People expect transmissions to equal the reputation the car earned during the 90s.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
that said...i imagine there are people like myself that expect that should the transmission fail, they aren't looking at a $2K-4K (or more) repair bill.
the thing is - transmissions are failing (many manufacturers) even when vehicles are being driven carefully and the maintenance schedules are followed.
it's plain good business for a manufacturer to stand behind the product. that builds brand loyalty and maintains a quality, customer-centric image.
if the transmission portion of the vehicles longevity is questionable, the manufacturer needs to make it much less painful for the owner to get the problem fixed, or work to develop a more bullet-proof sub-system that doesn't fail early.
Am not sure the tranny was EVER flushed or even drained...
My mechanic was not sure what I am talking about when mentioning Honda having "their own tranny"... Why, doesn't Toyota have their own, and so do GM and Ford, he asked...
Well, he's right actually... What's so special about Honda's?
BTW, he flushed my tranny with the Honda ATF and THE CAR DOES SHIFT SMOOTHER, ESPECIALLY WHEN DOWN-SHIFTING!
Together with 2 new tires, replacing a 6 years old pair that was in good shape but VERY noisy... HEY, MY GOOD OLD '95 ACCORD NOW RUNS ALMOST AS SMOOTH AS MY BRAND NEW '05 ACCORD!!!
When I was 17 or 18, I distroyed the transmission in my parent's three year old Buick one night. I limped it home, parked it in the garage and went to bed.
The next day I heard my parents talking about how the Buick wasn't "shifting right".
I kept my mouth shut and got away with it but I do think about that long ago night.
One of those things I'm not proud of.
I am shocked that you weren't closely interrogated at that point... :surprise: I know I would have been under similar circumstances!
The following week, while driving home from a date in the VW, I hit a skunk.
That REALLY got my dad's attention the next morning!
I apologize for my error. I didn't realize we were serving as Dr. Phil's confessions about your past transgression. I also hurt my dad's manual transmission by letting a girl friend shift. She didn't have it all the way in gear and it chipped a tooth when I let out on the clutch. Oh the memories.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
That's the kind of reliability I expect. But I don't think anyone builds cars like that anymore.
Was it Toyota that had the ad campaign searching for cars that had the most mileage?
I would test the door lock switch first. My guess is the control unit is failing.
I will be giving the car away next month when the inspection is up.
As to manual transmissions, again front wheel drive vehicles complicate their assumed less stressful lives. The need for compact packages also means smaller working parts. Gears aren't that big a problem, but the synchronizers which allow shifting without double-clutching, take a lot more stress in doing their job since they have to be smaller, too, in these compact packages.
In the interest of efficiency and environmental concerns, we're demanding midgets to take on the work of longshoremen. Anyone desiring ultimate transmission life in modern cars should take the normal service recommendation of having its fluid changed out at 100,000 mile intervals with a grain of salt. Consider using the severe service schedule of 30,000 miles instead.
People didn't expect them to last 200,000 miles and they didn't! It was a pretty normal thing to have your Powerglide or Hydramatic overhauled at 70,000 miles.
That was pretty much the norm. Same with engines. A car with 100,000 miles was considered "worn out" and they were!
RD
I have a new '05 Accord LX bought in june 2005.
I am experiencing the same forward jerk problem at lower gears especially when the car is changing to a higher gear.
Just wondering if you had a chance to resolve the problem and what it might have been ?
Ajay
So is this "operating as it should be"???
I could really use the help. Thanks for your time.
We remember things differently. Back in the "old days" the Chrysler Torqueflights were the best out there. The old 4 speed Hydramatics were tough too. The later Roto-Hydramatics were trouble. The cast iron Powerglides were pretty good but the aluminum Powerglides that cane out in 1962 would go through clutches around 60-70,000 miles. I had one. Chevy made a junk automatic called a Turboglide from 1957-1961. Pure junk. Most got converted to a Powerglide.
Nowadays, it's pretty rare to lose a transmission before 100,000 miles When they do, people come here and complain. Funny, though because Chrysler products seem to be the worst now.
This is true for ANY car: Basically, the AC needs to go on, 'cause the idea is to DRY the air in the car and thus get rid of the fog on the inside of the windshield and the rest of the windows.
Also, it's a good way to keep your AC system in good shape, by activating it periodically during the Winter, instead of leaving it "dead" for several long months.
Don't worry about it too much. Usually you don't need to drive with the Defrost on for a long time, anyhow.
i think someone with a failure, or two (or more) of the transmission before 100K has every right (regardless of manufacturer) to come here and complain. and it's useful for people reading the forums to know that these failures are occurring.
personally, i'm a proponent of a system that would force manufacturers to reveal to the public the incident metrics for service of components such as these. that way, the low-performers in terms of parts longevity would have more motivation to improve manufacturing quality, and design. if a tranny goes at 100 or 150, i DO expect a manufacturer to pick up a good deal of the tab. the replacement shouldn't cost 20% (or MORE) of a new vehicle.
isell, to be honest, i'm not sure i understand why honda didn't put the towing package ATF cooler on all ODYs, but that is just me.
i agree with haefr on his observations about compactness, passages, functionality, lower volume of coolant / lubricant, less surface area and location for lowered cooling efficiency...
You bring up a good point...100,000 miles is a LOT of miles and 150,000 miles is even longer. Do you really expect a car manufacturer to warranty a car for that long?
What is reasnoble to you? 300,000 miles? I'm just curious.
From a manufacturer's standpoint, it's tempting to dismiss a 2% transmission failure rate because "...after all, we're succeeding 98% of the time..." Not quoting any maker in particular, but I've been in business long enough to hear this statement from mid and top management of companies I've worked for.
Hyundai's recent quality obsession http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_20/b3883054.htm
is but one of a number of assaults on Honda's business. Who's to say that if Honda doesn't shrink defect rates soon enough, that a number of us will be defecting ?
Massive sales and new car technology must be contributing to Honda's (and others') defect rates, but, at the end of the day, most consumers will buy the high-value, high-quality product.
I want to keep buying Honda for many reasons (its smart minimalism, for one) - that's why I'd rather badger it for higher standards than making excuses for it.
i think 150-200K is very reasonable. if the transmission is replaced, i expect the manufacturer to warranty the replacement / rebuilt for the same number of years for the orginal, no ifs ands or buts...
regardless of when it fails, i expect the manufacturer to make the replacement / rebuild a reasonably inconveniencing and priced exercise.
when the fail rate or longevity is questionable, i do not expect the dealerships to be making money on the consumer. the dealership deserves to be compensated from appropriate supports provided from the manufacturer and not to pass the costs along to us.
I guess I don't understand...you expect a car to last forever and if something happens to break, even after extreme miles, you expect it to be fixed for free?
Maybe I misunderstood you?
"Roto-Hydramatic"? Never heard of it. (;)) Are you referring to the torque converter-equipped 3-sp "Turbo-Hydramatic" transmissions that replaced the original fluid-coupling equipped 4-sp Hydramatics in the sixties? The only reliability problems I've come across with Turbo-Hydramatics were units supplied to Cadillac Division that had variable-vane torque converters that varied torque multiplication on demand. These special torque converters didn't prove reliable in recreational trailer towing - a pastime a significant number of pre-SUV era Caddy owners engaged in. The goal of high initial torque multiplication during acceleration followed by more efficient engine operation once speed was attainted became a reality with a later GM development: lockup torque converters whch are now standard across the board on automatic transmissions.
Anyway, enough strolling down memory lane. Let's talk about Hondas!
Your dealer is correct, BUT there is a way to reprogram the control panel to function exactly the way you wish it to. The process requires neither disassembly, nor the use of any tools (well, other than the ignition key in the ignition switch...), and it's completely reversible back to the control panel's current operational status at any time. Follow the instructions at the address below for a one minute step-by-step.
crv16, "Honda Accord Sedan" #17856, 14 Sep 2005 8:12 am
Mrbill
Told him that regardless, folks on the internet have gotten "goodwill" replacements from HoA. He/dealership relented, albeit with said $50 labor charge.
After reading up a bit on this problem, it appears that center console lighting (audio, HVAC, seat heater switches) is controlled by a high-defect module nestled inside the audio headunit which, in turn, connects to a "multiplex" wiring system (multiple functions on minimal wiring). Nothing wrong with the audio unit per se, but the center lighting module just happens to be integrated with it.
The multiplex system was also upgraded during the headunit change.
Tip: Print posts on subject to show dealer, ask for multiplex update, and assert zero payment. The way these goodwill accommodations go, the dealer gets 100% reimbursement from HoA.
Especially a long term customer who doesn't just use a dealer for warranty work.
And, I asked the shop about this problem and I was told..." Yeah, I think we've had one or two come in with this problem"
Not that widespread.
If a part is defection for one person, it is defective for another. If the dealer will have the factory cover it for one, they should have it covered for another.
The idea that you should be blackmailed to bring your car in for service rather than saving money yourself is awful. I do all my own oil changes and other service. I deserve to be treated equal with any other owner with the same defect.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
If, on the other hand it's a car long out of warranty and the dealer (not the factory) is going to have to pay for the repair that may be different story.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
You know your store will be the one eating the repair bill.
Two customers...
One go's to Jiffy Lube and the discount chains for everything except the things they aren't smart enough or equipped to fix.
The other customer has three Hondas. All three are maintained by the book at your store.
It's not a matter of "holding that against you". It's a matter of simply making a business decision.
That's all I'm saying...
Thanks
I need to get spark plugs and timing belt done in Atl. Any recommendations on where to do it and pricing?
Thanks,
Aaron
anng3@hotmail.com
i expect the transmission to outlast the engine. if the serviceable life of the engine is 200-250-280K with excellent care, yes i expect the transmission to still be operating properly when it too is cared for in an excellent prescribed (or better) manner.
if and/or when it fails, regardless of the mileage, i expect the dealership to make it financially reasonable for it to be fixed or replaced. it should not cost 20% of the purchase price of the vehicle to do so.
if it dies before 250K lets say, and the owner wishes to get it fixed or replaced, i expect the manufacturer to make it a non-painful exercise (time, inconvenience, money) for the owner.
never ever do I believe I wrote (or even implied) "free".
honda needs to make bullet-proof transmissions of the highest quality and performance in keeping with many other aspects of their designs...yes, that is my expectation. if they fail, my expectation is the manfacturer will take care of the customer...yes, that is my expectation too. to some extent, we see this being done by honda, and it is re-assuring to a degree.
i'd like and expect all manufacturer's to do the same, but honestly, this expectation for honda in particular is a bit self-serving, since that's all my wife and i drive (unless we must rent).
On the alternator, make sure it's not just a broken drive belt; it will cause the same "all dash lights on" scenario.
Motor mounts - unless there's heavy thudding and clanking from the engine area during acceleration, they should still be good at 90k. Racing and otherwise driving the car hard, especially if it's a manual transmission, could however break the mounts prematurely.
All told, here's a rough repair estimate:
1) Timing Belt & Water Pump Replacement: $550
2) Alternator: $350
3) Engine Mounts: $750
Total: $1650
The job list is fairly common for a reputable Honda specialist shop. I'd make sure that they have liability insurance though in case something goes wrong.
Try bidding out the work to 3 shops for the best deal too.
And soon, the car will stop running. Check if the alternator puts out 14V+ at the battery while the engine is running.
Call different Honda dealers to give you the estimate on t-belt & water pump. The difference could be 100+ between dealers.
Has anybody had this happen? Is something wrong, or will tranny fluid change help things?