By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
225/45/17 vs 205/55/16
I am not sure about other creature comforts. Seats in the Golf were cloth. Other stuff (techno-gadgets and other distractions) mean little to me, so I didn't even explore those.
I like wagons, though, so more space is good if I'm not giving up fuel economy to do it! :shades:
However you did hit the nail on the head as the Jetta Wagon does VERY well mpg wise for all that extra space volume. If you drive that thing loaded to the gills, you will lose mpg, but that is both logical and obvious.
There is still a chance Subaru will bring their diesel boxer engine to the USA. Then you could have your wagon, diesel with AWD.
Mazda says they are on track to bring diesel to USA in late 2012 or early 2013.
The arrival date of the new Skyactiv-D powered Japanese car was confirmed by spokesman Jeremy Barnes.
What has yet to be revealed is exactly what model will receive the diesel powerplant, although speculation is that the new CX-5 crossover will get the nod, while cars like the Mazda 3 and 6 could follow.
The 2.2-liter four-cylinder is capable of around 160 hp with over 300 lb-ft of torque, handily besting VW’s TDI mill. Perhaps the most attractive aspect of the Skyactiv-D engine, however, is that while it delivers excellent torque at low rpm it doesn’t fall on its face as the revs rise. In fact, it redlines at 5200 rpm, as opposed to 4500 rpm in most diesel engines, delivering more of that Mazda zoom-zoom quality.
Mazda diesel 2013
Yeah, we never got a 2 door model. For the price of that new diesel 4 door, you could import your own old Euro 2 door in as-new condition and have enough money to maintain it for decades, and buy a nice diesel car too.
I am leaning toward ordering a ML 350 BlueTEC in White Diamond with Almond beige leather. With the premium electronics package. Not sure if I would like that phony leather being pushed these days. That would be about $55k. Half the price of a G and probably better handling and more comfortable. Being made in Alabama should not have a long lead time.
As far as I'm concerned, no manual means it doesn't exist.
A G55 attracts a certain set of tastes that don't match mine.
This is just a SWAG and FYI on ADD BLUE consumption, from what I can gather both from real world and capacity and consumption estimates. I am further guessing the consumption is usually more.
The Touareg has an add blue tank of 4.5 gal (128 oz) and estimated to go 15,000 miles per full tank.
There are two sizes, 2.5 gal and .5 gal containers.
Both cars have about identical performance, I always wondered what the mpg difference would be in that case, compared to the slow diesel vs. fast gasser situation we usually encountered.
So for example the TDI Touareg gets 22% better (EPA H) mileage (28 vs 23) and 53% more torque. (406 vs 265 # ft) I would swag a similar ratio for the F350.
By averaging the 12 mileage reports on the EPA site for the ML diesel models sold from 2007 the overall is 24.7 MPG combined.
I am swaging you would be VERY close. Having since gotten out of the 500 miles tire, suspension, brake pads and rotors breaking in phase, (thank heavens) and combined aggressive turbo and engine break in, it posted 36 mpg, as posted in another message, I am closer to normal speeds (still doing slightly more aggressive turbo and engine break in) and am posting 31/32 mpg on a 26 gal tank. I think another reason why I like this crossover SUV (TDI 8 speed A/T) is it looks like 2,200 rpm/5,000 (44% of) redline? @ 80 mph. :shades:
If you are going to write a big check and you have EPA numbers over HERE, and one anecdote from a neighbor over THERE, I'd bet on the EPA.
As for MPG, you have to look at GALLONAGE to calculate your own advantage to buying a vehicle. It's not about what everyone else is getting, it's about what you get NOW with your old vehicle as opposed to what you're likely to get with your NEW vehicle, and how many gallons saved that means in a year.
So person A who buys a 42 mpg vehicle to replace their 18 mpg vehicle has done very well in gallonage. The Person B who trades in a 32 mpg vehicle for a 42 mpg, the SAME 40 mpg vehicle, hasn't done very well at all.
And yes, it's all about gallons. I smile when folks complain their 40 mpg-rated car is 'only' getting 37 mpg. Way different than an 18 mpg car getting 15 mpg...
Gallons per year is slam dunk x say 10 years or even per 100,000 miles. So say 15,000 miles per year/ 15-17 and 28-30= 1000-882 gals and 536-500 gals.
This is a good example of how superficial quantitative data can lead one astray.
This is why I think that people switching from gasser SUVs to diesel SUVs will benefit much more than people switching from gasser mini-cars to diesel minicars.
I never used to really care about mpg when I was a kid. Then I began driving my grandparents old '73 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham (3 feet longer than a Suburban and just as heavy) with a 472 cube V-8. 27.5 gallon gas tank and I rarely got 250 miles out of it. Flooring it up a steep hill it seemed like you could see the fuel gauge moving. Gas was about $1.30 back then (mid 80's) and i had t think about every trip and how much gas I was going to use.
It didn't take long for me to decide a needed to buy my own car. Wound up with a '80 Scirocco stick shift (8 feet shorter than the caddy and about 1/3 of the weight - 1,950 lbs). Manual steering, stick shift, manual windows etc. 76 hp 1.6 liter. It could beat the Caddy in acceleration, and I could get 40 mpg if I was carefull (speeds were slower - 55 mph limit). Put 100,000 additional miles on the car and never got less than 30 mpg on a tank. To top it all off gas dropped down to the mid 70's per gallon.
Long story short I went from stressing about every little trip because of the cost, to not caring at all about what I was spending on gas. I highly recommend the guzzler to sipper switch.
anyone here with actual-fact-knowledge confirm or correct that?
Another option is importing a 20 year old diesel from Canada. Not sure if you can do the same from Europe.
http://inertialabs.com/Diesel-Import-CAN.htm
I'm not following. I don't see the difference, and I believe I mentioned it here in this thread before.
Let's take, as an example, the decrease I have seen swapping my GTI for the 135i.
GTI: 28mpg average... or 535.7 GPY
135i: 26mpg average or 576.9 GPY
mpg=7.15% decrease
GPY=7.15% decrease
GPY, however, took extra calculating; wherease mpg was simply dividing the 2 numbers my car already provides me. So why is GPY more informative??
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
If you know your math gpy offers no more info than mpg for percentage increases, but it makes it more apparent. For instance to many people a 10 mpg improvement is the same, when in fact it is far from that. Going from 10 to 20 mpg (100% improvement in mpg) is much more beneficial than going from 40 to 50 mpg (25% improvement). GPY or $PY makes this more apparent.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
How does THAT work?? The price of gas changes daily!
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
With GPY as a measure, one might realize that going from 15 to 18 mpg in fact saves you 177 gallons a year over 15,000 miles.
To save 177 gallons, a person who now drives a car getting 30 mpg would have to buy one getting 45 mpg.
Now, true...the person owning the 30 mpg vehicle had a much smaller fuel bill to begin with.
the point is that with GPY, your relative budget planning can make more sense. You need to save say $700 bucks a year in fuel so that it pays for your insurance---okay, so you only have to go from 15 mpg to 18 mpg---you don't have to buy a used Toyota Echo.
In other words, you don't have to make drastic changes or impulsive leaps toward 30 mpg to accomplish reasonable goals.
If you know you get 20 miles to a gallon and you know the mall is 20 miles away, then you may decide to hit the local neighborhood store instead of spending $4 just to drive to the mall.
It's hard for a lot of people to make that connection.
Dollars per mile? Miles per dollar? That may help VW sell more TDIs.
Kramers per tank.
Still, funny.
Way cool about the arctic white and beige interior. It looks like an order will have to be made at the factory, albeit with your name on it, when you pull the trigger ! I am getting the feeling that is a pretty rare combination across these three diesel competitors. (BMW X5 35D, MB ML 350 Bluetec, VW Touareg TDI) Since you are closer to the Las Vegas dealers, it might be worth a call to the Henderson, NV dealer. They seemed pretty rock and roll.
You really should spring for something that lets you do overseas delivery. :shades: