Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
Thank you.
It was a test drive folks. Do I need to define test?
And, you might need to do this when the blue lights start flashing in your rear view mirror and you need to quickly clear the smoke from the cabin
Can you get all-season tires on the 18" standard? or do they only come with performace summer tires?
I have been considering adding a second changer in the rear for MP3 and other CDs, keeping only DVDs in the front changer.
Others pointed out that today's cars are so well insulated and airtight the air has no where to go but back out as pressure builds. Notice how the rear windows are split and the smaller back portion does not open. Thus, the small opening might make for a more extreme resonance.
Not a problem as I ordered a black /camel / auto / navi today. $1200 off MSRP. My '91 Legend will seem really old for the next 3 weeks...
Poorly design cars have a lot of air turbulence around them, so the smooth flow over the opening will not form. Only when the air flow is smooth can you make this happen. You can cut it a bit by opening one of the front windows a little. This lets air flow OUT the back window. spoiling the smooth air flow and cutting the effect.
So you drive while impaired? Smart. Remind me to stay away from Atlanta.
My Central Ohio dealer has noted that there is little demand here for the 6 speed manual on the TL. They original ordered 20% with the 6 speed. Now they order significantly less 6 speeds and may go to special order only.
I was originally shopping for a Lexus RX330 but after I test drove a 6-Spd TL, I'm 'smitten'. We're looking to replace our 97 4Runner Limited and decided we'll get an entry level luxury Sedan for my daily commute.
What ticked me off was that the dealership in Orlando doesn't seem to care much about customers. True, I told the guy I'm there only for a test drive but the guy didn't take my number, didn't bother to follow up. Perhaps because TLs are in demand these days. He did explain every feature of the car and how it compares with the G35 though, to be fair to him.
Now contrast this with the Lexus dealership where we test drove both a manual IS and the ES. They made us comfortable, sat down to discuss if they could do anything to make me buy the car and I've already received couple of phone calls following up.
Is this typical Acura dealer customer service? Am I missing something? Is it part of their mind-games where they expect to 'soften' the customer by behaving that way? Or is Lexus really losing the race?
Of course, I don't have to buy there. But just wondering if people had similar experience. I got better response from Toyota even when the '04 Sienna's were hugely in demand and low on supply.
He was polite and professional. I received a brochure with a business card attached, and he took the time to answer every question I asked, even when I hesitated between questions trying to process the next one. There was no limit on the test drive time; I decided when it was over.
I will go back the next time I am in the market again for a car, but I am enjoying the TL.
That said, I would suspect that your Lexus salesman had not yet made quota.
The idea of spending $1,800 for 18" wheels and 40 series ZR rated tires on a FWD sedan is absolutely nuts, IMHO. It's not going to transform a front heavy car into a BMW 5 series. It's going to marginally improve the FWD handling and force you to spend $800 every 20-25k miles in replacement tires.
I'm not a tire cheapskate, as my planned purchase next week of Bridgestone Pole Position W rated tires at $200 each should prove. But they are going on my Honda S2000, not my Nissan Maxima. The latter of which has served as a very sporty sedan for 150k miles on 3 sets of $400 per set tires.
Spend your money as you wish, but if you really want performance and handling above all, you might want to consider buying a 330i Performance or, better yet, an M3. Even a lowly 325ci will run handling circles around a TL, no matter how many $ thousands are spent on tire upgrades.
P.S. I'm not a BMW lover, either, having never owned one. I just know the difference between the best available FWD "sporty" sedan and one of the best available true RWD sport sedans on the market. And the difference isn't in the rubber.
I have had similar experiences with Toyota so it may depend more on the policy of the dealer rather than the actual car brand you buy.
LOL on your comments about the BMW 325ci. 14 of them just got whipped by a TSX in the SCAA opening race. The 330i and the TL are certainly close enough in every aspect to be rated a dead heat except the 330i costs a lot more for no added value. You are correct in saying the difference isn't in the rubber...but in fact where is the difference other than the price ?
25K is about normal life for an 18" summer performance tire.
Your performance may actually decrease by adding 18" tires.. Certainly, they will weigh more, increasing unsprung weight and possibly negatively affecting off-the-line acceleration.
And the cost is unreal. Another poster just replaced the 18" stock rear tires on his BMW 330i at costco and got a "deal". $480 OTD for the TWO tires.
Habitat is right on the money. 18" and larger tires are all about the looks, not the performance.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I am assuming you mean the wheel will weigh more on the 18" as the tire shouldn't weigh more.
I guess 18" tires cost more and that is always puzzling...less material costs more.
Example:
stock 325i has 205/55-16 tires.
sport 325i has 225/45-17 tires.
The wheels and tires are both heavier, though you are correct, most of it is in the wheels.
Your LSZs are great tires.. I have LS-H on my Acura Legend, and love them... but, I recommend against 18" tires in all cases.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
My previous comment was perhaps more directed at the fiscal prudence of replacing stock 17" wheels with 18" ones and going with summer compound 40 series high performance tires. That is certainly overkill, IMO, and, in the case of cars that don't have world class suspensions or near 50/50 weight balance, may actually be counterproductive. According to the manager of my local tire shop, when driven with "enthusiasm" FWD cars have a tendency to plow into curves and wear the tread edge of soft compound tires more quickly, which can in turn lead to handling problems or at least premature replacement.
You dont need to have wider rims and tires to keep rolling diameter:
TL 17" - 235/45-17
TL 18" - 235/40-18
raher, The gay from tire shop is right, but dont forget RWD when driven with "enthusiasm" have tendency to oversteer and spin rear wheel, so rear tires would not less as long.
I'm not sure I have the right one. I have a TL w/Navi. The trunk tray they sent me doesn't fit the the contours of the trunk. The edges of the tray don't extend to the walls of the trunk. Also,
I think holes need to be cut to accomodate the cargo net?? The holes don't fall on top of the cargo net buttons located on the floor of the trunk. Also, the tray say's "ACURA", shouldn't it say "TL"? Thanks in advance.
Sounds like you were sent the wrong tray in my opinion. Maybe a tray for the TSX?
Here is the best analogy I can give, which you can agree with or not.
I'm a 8-10 handicapper in golf which is the auto equivalent of a TL. Most of my friends are 10-30. (the equivalents of TL's down to Kia's) One particular 25 handicapper spends about $2,000+ every year on new technology clubs. He has more money than common sense - or golfing skills. He is the equivalent of my old Datsum B210. From a "performance" perspective, his expenditures are a waste of money. He thinks hitting the ball 300 yards is better than hitting it 260. I would claim not if it's landing in the wrong zip code.
If you want to extract the maximum performance out of a TL, perhaps spending $1,800 on wheels and tires is one way to try. But I would respectfully suggest that no FWD sedan is going to match a high performance, well balanced RWD sedan in handling, regardless of tires, suspension upgrades, etc. It's 60%+ front weight biased. It has torque steer. It just defies some basic handling principles. And, while it's likely that my B210 friends $2,000 per year on golf clubs would produce better results in my hands, it's not going to turn me (a TL) into Tiger Woods (an M5).
P.S. My friend with the deep pockets is happy showing off his new clubs every spring. So maybe the $2,000 is worth it in his mind - which I guess is all that really matters.
By your reasoning, if 18" is better than 17", then you might as well get 20" wheels with 30 series tires. At some point, it is all about looks...
And the 18" tires are wider, even if they have the same section width.. I checked Bridgestone
S-03 on tirerack..
235/45-17.. tread width 9.4"
235/40-18.. tread width 9.7"
If the TL doesn't handle well enough for a front-driver with 235/45-17s, it won't get any better by putting bigger tires on it. The new GTO, which is rear wheel drive and has a 350 HP engine only has 245/45-17.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I'm with kyfdx, if the TL with standard 17" 235/45's doesn't handle well enough, putting even lower profile, higher performance, softer compund tires on it will more likely result in premature replacement than improved performance. Especially given that there isn't an equivalent sport suspension to go along with the tire upgrade. It wasn't long ago that 60 series tires were considered high performance low profile.
P.S. In checking R&T, there are only a handful of sports cars that achieve a higher slalom speed than the 2002 Honda S2000. Nothing by BMW/M, Audi or Mercedes/AMG does. No version of the 911 does; the only Porsche that does is the Boxster S. The only Ferrari's that do are the Enzo and 360 Modena (Spider doesn't). And the S2000 came standard with 205/55 front and 225/50 rear tires on 16" wheels. In 2004, they jumped to 17" wheels and the slalom speed remained exactly the same. 18" wheels on a FWD TL?? If I were on a budget, I'd be much more inclined to spend $2,000 on the best navigation system in the industry than fruitlessly trying to improve what is already very adequate handling on a FWD sedan.
You right about you golf friend, better clubs wont make him a golfer if fe does not know how to play. Same with cars if you can't drive you will endup racking you car weather it's Enzo or Civic. on the other hand if you can drive, 18" rims and tires can make all the difference, think of it this way Woods with cheap clubs will most likely loose to Woods with good clubs.
You right wider tires take away some performance, but it does add handling. Plus TL has enof power to take on wider, heavier tires. Tl does handle well enof for 17' and if you add 18" it well handle even better.
I still plan on upgrading to the Turanza LS-Z tires
and will try to do a partial trade. Has anyone had
any experences with trading new tires ??
I believe the original equipment tires are almost expensive as the LS-Zs.. If you could trade for the difference in price, plus maybe $25 a tire for the switch out, I think that might be the best you can hope for. I'd do my shopping well before I got the car though.
I'd be inclined to take an extensive test drive before I decided to do that though. It seems that most posters here only have a problem with the flat-spotting, that goes away within 2-3 miles. This is a pretty small sample of people. I'd want to try them out for myself. You might decide they aren't so bad.. Even if you only got 20K out of them, you'll probably be farther ahead financially than trying to switch them out.
Even the crappiest tires I ever had, I got through 20K before ditching them.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Mini Cooper S 69.5 MPH
Honda S2000 69.3 MPH
Acura RSX Type S 66.8 MPH
BMW M5 66.4 MPH
Acura TL stock (17” Potenza RE 030) 65.8 MPH
BMW 330i 65.4 MPH
How could the inferior FWD non-world class suspension Mini be faster (by a little) than the superior RWD Honda S2000? How could the inferior FWD Acura RSX be faster than the superior RWD BMW M5 and 330i? How could the inferior FWD Acura TL be faster than the superior RWD BMW 330i?
R&T has a sidebar on page 66 of the A-Spec. Maybe fans of the TL can persuade them to test it and see how it stacks up to the other cars such as the M5 or Mini. Even though it has 600+ pounds more than the Mini, how close could it come to the Mini, or could it beat it?
On kind of a related topic, I believe that front-engine RWD cars are not world class in auto racing. Just look at the dinosaurs in NASCAR. State of the art racing (F1,INDY-IRL,CART) abandoned front-engine RWD approx 30+ years ago. In fairness, I understand that their drive train configuration would be difficult/impossible to adapt to a 4-door passenger car.
As for the Mini-Cooper, maybe that's a lesson on making cars as short as possible, rather than making tires as big and wide as possible!
Thanks.
Also, these tests are done with professional drivers at 10/10ths.. It really doesn't measure how easy it is to drive the car fast at 9/10ths on public roads.
For instance, I had an '84 911 that I'm sure would provide top times in a simulated racing environment, but I'd be darned if I could get over 7/10ths of the performance out of it, for fear of lift-throttle oversteer and my insurance rates. It was still the best car I ever had, even at 7/10ths, but I bet I could leave it behind on a twisty mountain road with my wife's 325i Sport.
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Since R&T publishes slalom speeds, we presume they have standardized the course configuration and length (700 ft) and timing equipment. Presume they also use professional test/race drivers driving at 10/10ths. I think that they publish their test procedures from time-to-time and it would be interesting to read these again. So, knowing the slalom capabilities of cars driven by professionals, how does that translate to drivers of average and above average capabilities?
A key question could be: is there a linear relationship between the slalom data for a 10/10ths driver to a 7/10ths (or 5/10ths) driver?
In other words, would the ranking of cars by slalom in the previous post stay the same if we had 5/10ths drivers doing the tests?
What would the slalom numbers be for the Acura TL and S2000, Mini, BMWs, Acura RSX if a driver with only 5/10ths abilities were to do the tests?
Have never driven a Porsche 911, but understand that earlier vintages were unforgiving and it was easy to overdrive one's capabilities and/or do something foolish and swap ends. kydfx seems to be saying that a BMW 325i is more forgiving than an old 911. How forgiving is a BMW vs a TL? Did Consumer Reports testers kind of hint at this?
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
regards,
kyfdx
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I mean, if you're always shifting at ~3K RPM for each gear can the automatic transmission somehow learn that instead of shifting at lower RPMs?
While we're on the subject, the manual recommends to shift as follows:
1 -> 2 over 0 mph
2 -> 3 over 9 mph
3 -> 4 over 18 mph
4 -> 5 over 37 mph
For those of you who do use the Seq mode, do you guys actually follow this? At 40 mph, I'm usually still on 4th gear.
Anyway, I've had the TL for 3 weeks now and I've had no problems (no rattling, flatspotting, etc.)thus far. I'm still in the break-in period and TRYING real hard not to go beyond 60 mph but it's tough. Esp. when it feels like the car is 'telling' you to go faster. (It is soooo easy to get to 60 that by the time you realize you should check your speedometer to make sure you're not speeding in a 40 mph zone, it's already too late.)
Ro
Dallas, TX
04 TL - Silver with Black Interior
PS. Bluetooth works well with SonyEricsson T610 (T-Mobile)
I've had a 1995 Maxima SE 5-speed for 151k miles on the original clutch and, contrary to what the owner's manual might say and the MPG gurus would suggest, I rarely shift below 3,500-4,000 rpms for everyday driving. And I have averaged over those 151k miles approximately 24.1 mpg. At my 120k mile service a while back, the dealership did a compression test and found all cylinders within spitting distance of a brand new car.
My theory - right or wrong, but shared by at least one friend who is much more mechanically inclined than me (i.e. M.S. in ME & Materials Science from Duke) is that shifting gears too soon produces a lugging effect and more strain on the engine than shifting in the upper half of the rev band. In the old days, that could lead to carbon build up as too much fuel went unburned. Even with the newfangled engine management systems, I think dropping a car down to less than about 2,000-2,200 rpms after a shift seems to produce a bit of shudder if you then need to accelerate quickly.
In cars like the new TL where the horsepower is quite a bit higher than the torque and the red line is well above 6,000 rpms, I would not be shifting a 6-speed at anything less than about 4,000 rpm, unless I am really lollygagging. My S2000 is even worse, and I never run the engine below about 3,500 rpm even after a shift.
My other analogy is a human bicycle. While in theory you burn less energy putting the bike in a very high gear, unless you are at about 70+ rpms of the pedals, any attempt to accelerate quickly requires you to use much more muscle torque and is likely to pull a hamstring, especially if you are my age.
While even I don't advocate or recommend running an engine out to redline at every shift, I think shifting before you get much past 50% of redline has the potential to do more harm than good in the long run.