Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
I think it was called Osborne Oldsmobile GMC. I had my oil changed there. It didn't look like they had any traffic at all in the showroom. I would seriously check on that $2000 rebate. Sounds like we are talking about $28,000 plus car here. I will check on the availability of the rebate. The financing is basically free money and the 5 year warranty is a big plus.
Oh yeah, the rebate is completely seperate from the deal he negotiates, provided the dealer is not contributing.
my understanding is that the 0.9% is in lieu of the standard $2,000 rebate. he can have one or the other, but not both. i also note that out here in california, the dealers are offering their own heavy discounts for the end of the year models as well, as heavy as $3,500-$4,000.
for what it's worth.
Nice to hear Saturn may be getting Intrigue's next evolution. I have no problem buying a Saturn mid-size though I will always wish it was an Oldsmobile.
Bryan
The Intrigue GL has pwr seat adjusters, sunroof, heated seat, 3.5L engine, steering wheel touch controls. The dealer paid $24,484 on 12/9/99 - been on his lot over a year - and with dealer rebates and my $1,500 Olds rebate priced it to me at $20,700. The Intrigue GLS, at another dealer, is loaded with sunroof, decklid spoiler, precision control system, Bose radio with CD, and the GOld package. The invoice is $26,240 and the window says $24,450 with rebates but not my $1,500. THe car was a sales car and has 4,000 miles. I believe the price should be lower but how much is the question? I have test driven both. Who can help me? Either answer here or email at my profile address. I will take calls at 888.479.0430 because $2,000 in rebates go off 1.2.01. Also what can anyone tell me about the other models I am looking at? Thanks.
Let me know.
I think PCS (like the original Aurora) is a renamed Caddy feature that started a few years back.
It is a nice feature and allows for better draining of the engine. As an added bonus, for any EarthFirst members, paper filters are better for our Earth Mother (gag)
Guess which car was the only one to make it up the hill? You guessed it: my 3.5 liter GL with Traction Control. The Camry only made it up by being pulled behind a 4WD Chevy pickup. The Accord spent the entire vacation at the bottom of the hill.
You just have to love it.
If olds could have gotten just 25% of the people who shopped Accord and Camry into the car then we
wouldn't be talking about the death of olds.
Also they should make it mandatory for olds' salesmen to put potential customers in the car,
take it up to exactly 30 mph and then floor it up to 70 mph. Nobody would buy a accord or camry after that test ride.
The first time I first get onto highway after buying. And thus missed to demonstrate to the salesman the warped brake rotors.
With the next car I asked and insisted. The salesmen agree every time, but rather reluctantly. Never was permitted to test-drive the cars for more than one exit, and only the one selected by the salesmen.
Aurora: 3.5 and the 4.0
Intrigue: GL with and without PCS, GLS with and without PCS
I think I put a total of 25 miles on each of the cars named above. That has got to be the best way to sell a car because... it worked!
They trusted me to not wrap the car around a barrier fence and driving each of those cars over the same roads, back-to-back, let me make an informed decision. That's a winner.
Now if I could get the idiots at GM to rethink their blunt axe way of trimming their losses, I'd be even happier.
sitting on the hot rotor in the same place for an extended period of time. It seems to work for a lot of people.
In my camaro, which has a manual transmission, i take my foot off the brake at stoplights. I now have 200,000 miles on the original rotors!!
Have any of you floored it a 70 mph?? The 70-90 mph charge is almost as fun as the 30-70 mph ride.
Like most people that bought the autobahn package I experienced continuous problems with the 98 in the steering and warped rotors. I also had the problem with the under-dash panel coming loose and a slight gap in the air vents. Other than those problems, the car was a great commute at over 35,000 miles per year. I drove desert, LA traffic, and many trips to the snow without problems.
I bought another Intrigue primarily because I thought the rotors had given the car a bad reputation and that I could take advantage of the 0.9% financing for 5 years. Really a great deal! However, I drove a mountain road to work and immediately discovered that the new intrigue felt unstable in the curves. I discovered that the car had been sitting on the lot so long in the desert heat that the tires were coming apart.... got them replaced... then I started to notice that the gaps on the 2000 air vents were far worse than the 98. Also the passenger airbag cover looked like it was fitted by a guy with a hammer.....The dealship will be replacing the dash this month....At the same time they will be replacing an alternator that allows the headlights to dim every now and then.The service dept. knew all about this problem..... I did not expect this car to be perfect.... I bought a 100,000 mile commuter warranty that I intend to use, but the fit and finish on this car is no where near as good as the 98.... Also, no 10 minute oil change places carry the new oil filter....special order....and the only real difference I've found with the new engine design is that the front end scrapes the street entering and exiting the same driveway I had no problems with in the 98....
Between the lack of interest in quality control and GM's poor marketing, it is easy to understand why more people arent giving GM a chance.... The sad thing is that I think the Olds division is about the best GM has to offer. Anybody drive an impala lately?
despite all this, I still think the car is a basic winner . It is a lot of car for the money and it does alot right!
It takes a really bad management to allow such a strong division to die...
Do you prefer the 3.5L to the 3800?
Sorry to hear you are having problems, so much for the 2000s having all the bugs worked out. What is the build date on your intrigue and when did you take delivery.
I totally agree with your last comment about bad mangement and Olds. The pity is that these guys will probably get promoted because they proved their ability cut their losses with Olds.
I change my own oil because I've never trusted the 10 minute guys to get it right. When I've changed the oil in the 3.5, I notice that it does take a while to get 6 quarts of oil from the engine and I don't know if the production line mentality of most 10 minute shops would let the engine totally drain. The other good thing about this engine is that the filter can be removed without munging up the suspension pieces like the 3800 did.
You talked about the scraping from the front end in your '00 when entering your driveway. I can say that mine is in the same boat. However, I've also noticed that the air dam for the 3.5 is taller than the old 3800 in order to direct more air up into the radiator. Since you and I both drive in the mountains and deserts of LA, I think that you'll remember your 3800 running at or near the halfway indicator on your temperature 'gage'. The 3.5 runs just above the 1/4 mark to well below the 1/2 mark. GM could have recalibrated the thermostat, but I think that our 3.5 engine runs that much cooler because of the all aluminum engine and more cooling air being directed to the radiator.
My alternator will be replaced this month because of the same problem you mentioned, but I haven't seen the dash gaps you have. The trim guy at my dealer noticed one of the interior trim pieces wasn't quite right so he ordered the replacement and installed it.
This is a fine car and I don't expect it be as 'perfect' as an LS430, but it does not deserve what happened to it because the lunatics at GM didn't realize they had some very nice jewels in the corporate crown that WAS General Motors.
Remember a few years ago when Michael Moore tried to get the CEO's of the big three to change the oil in a car. The president of Ford pulls up in a Explorer and changes the oil in about 10 minutes, gets back in and drives off. Do you think GM's current president could do that?
The 3.5L with a supercharger would be awesome.
Top end AND low end power plus refinement for less than a V8.
Put me on the list.
1. I'll look at a Catera/CTS if it has the 3.5l and it doesn't run over $35,000.
2. I'll wait to see the new mid-lux platform from GM. Probably the successor to the Regal if it gets the 3.5l and the interior is brought into this century.
3. Passat has to make the list. It did the last time around.
4. Audi A-4. I may have just passed the $35,000 limit.
5. 300M (or N), if DaimlerChrysler's quality doesn't deteriorate due to its financial problems.
dwg
dwg
GM could surprise me with the next Catera or next gen W-bodies, but I'm not holding my breath. I have not liked their recent 2000+ efforts style wise except for the Aurora (Aztek, Monte, 2000 Sunfire, Saturn LS and SC). 2000 Cateras are selling for $36cdn brand new right now.
If things go well for me then it may be Lincoln LS time. If I transfer to my company's Barbados branch, I'll drive a scooter or something.
The first car I told about is a 98 Malibu. I bought it used, one year old, with 15k on odometer. The rotors already were warped, but then I did not realize what the brake pulsation means. Thought it is ABS.
Drove it with the warped rotors for another 7-8k miles, than had to replace the brakes. Now had put another 15k miles; everything is fine.
By the way, I am braking almost exactly as you told. Not for the rotors sake, but to be sure to not overshoot. Better to brake early and then crawl to the intersection.
You see, I first learned to drive when I was 45. Not the age to take risk.
As to the fast acceleration from 70 to 90, I did it only couple of times, to break-off from tailgaters. The both times it was rather to 96 than 90, up-hill.
I like the sensation, but would not repeat it intentionally. We have a 65 mph speed limit on most highways. This is the official number; practically 75 mph is OK, but not much more. 90 is definitely off-limit.
Both cases happened the next week or two after we bought our new car - a close cousin of your Olds Intrigue, mid-size Buick Regal.
Buick have a very smooth ride. I did not feel its speed and did not realize that the acceleration from to 95, up-hill, takes only about 2 seconds. No flooring: did the manoeuvre at 3600 rpm, the performance shift mode was off.
As my Intrigue is just less than a year old, it will be around for 5-6 years. Buy then everything will have changed and who knows what car I'll look at. If things go well, perhaps a Cadillac CTS and if not quite so well the upcoming Saturn mid-size replacements or Nissan Maxima. Who knows.. maybe even a cookie cutter Accord?? Jgriff would be proud!
0.9% for 36 Mos
2.9% for 48 Mos
3.9% for 60 Mos (All offers require a minimum 20% down)
I think this car is a true bargain in the near luxury class and with GM's 'free money' I almost break even with the financing costs on my Impala LS Vs. the '01 Aurora.
I haven't driven the V-6 Aurora, but based on some reviews, they seem to critize the handling dynamics of this car. Anyone has any 'real world' experience with this car? I love the styling, the fit and finish seems to be top notch (I have sit inside one but never driven it)and the excellent safety scores this model has received by the Insurance Institute for Highway safety.
Also the prospect of a longer powertrain warranty (5 Years/60K Miles)the idea of upgrading to the Aurora 3.5 seems very palatable. (Further reduces any reliability risks involved with the purchase)
As long as GM provides full parts and service support after Olds is gone, I don't really care. Ditto for re-sale value. Domestics and most cars are not to be looked upon as long term investments so 're-sale' is not paramount to me.
Am I crazy by doing this?
Pros and Cons on the 3.5 Aurora??
I appreciate your comments.
teo: Aside from the hit you will take on the Impala, buying an Aurora sounds fine. I have driven only the 3.5, but my impressions were very positive. It is truly a nice car!
While I don't know your personal reasons for optioning for the V6 I highly recommend test driving both V8 and V6 before making a decision. I drove the 3.5 a couple of times and was greatly impressed. Very smooth, liquid feel, more quiet than the 3.5 Intrigue, super comfortable. But then I drove the V8... OH, MAMMA!!! What a difference! The sound of the V8 is just hypnotic. If you thought power was instant in the 3.5, the 4.0 is even more so. Not that it is faster than the 6 but the smoothness and immediate power combine to make it feel like a TRUE luxury car. I think the 17" rims on the V8 also help create that feeling.
That doesn't mean the V6 is inferior by any means. I was convinced I could by one after driving only the V6. I guess it's like the saying, You can't miss what you've never had. If you drive only the V6, you'll fall in love an be more than happy. If you drive the V8 and the sticker shock doesn't hurt too much, you'll fork over the money and never look back.
Since this is the Intrigue forum I'll mention something about it. My wife and I have been "observing" how GM is working the rebates. We suspect that by this time next year incentives will be higher than they are now, similar to what they did the final year of the Aurora classic. With that thinking, we're hoping to get a '01 Aurora so cheap the cops with put out an APB on us. Or, we'll get the '02 Intrigue with the additions harlanc said will be on them. That's what our initial thought is.
FYI: A base MDX (nicely eqt. leather, seats 7) is 34k (US). It will handle 4x8 sheets of plywood w/ no problem. Dollar for dollar & options it will match up to any SUV.
Don’t automatically assume by A “Label” that something is too expensive or cheap for that matter. Heck the new Aurora price ranges from 30 to plus 40k. Heck maybe the GLS sticker price of +30k is what scared some people from seriously looking at an Intrigue. I thought Acura was out of my price range, but my CL is 2k [MSRP] cheaper than a fully loaded Intrigue [not to mention some of the other extras].
I thought the 6 handled well, but was a bit underpowered, using the Intrigue's engine to lug around a heavier car. The 8 solved the power problem (though wasn't impressive in that regard) but didn't handle as well, being (nose-)heavier still. In other words, neither Aurora had the "balance" I was looking for.
(Plus the Intrigue is a lot better looking, IMHO.)
I ended up getting a Grand Prix GTP, saying a fond farewell to my Intrigue last week. I like the GTP a lot, but the Intrigue has it beat in some areas. Intrigue's ergonomics are better, Intrigue offers a cassette as well as CD in the radio, Intrigue has automatic temperature control, and PCS. (On the other hand, the GP's supercharged 3800 KICKS [non-permissible content removed]!)
I remain convinced that the Intrigue is one of the best sedans in GM's history. It deserved a better fate, but then again, "that's business."
mkco : Congrats on the Grand Prix! We will miss you around here but having had a 98 Grand Prix, I know you will like it. I would love to try out a GTP.
I think the next generation Intrigue will end up at Saturn. I really hope it happens.