Subaru Impreza WRX

13031333536224

Comments

  • seamdoggieseamdoggie Member Posts: 5
    Your Subaru dealer should have a flyer, about the size of a book mark, with all the options displayed in there. There is the best pic of the carbon trim in there. I had trouble deciding between the 2 options. To be honest, I did not love either one, but the silver looked too light and too cheap. The carbon Trim was slightly better, but noit worth $350. However, I sucked it up and payed the 350 for the carbon b/c it would annoy me everytime I saw the silver if I didn't. Don't stress the coice too hard though b/c there will most likely be after market trim packages that you can add to the car.
  • ruskiruski Member Posts: 1,566
    I am too lazy for a stick. :)

    I need an auto that produces good acceleration.
  • wonderdudewonderdude Member Posts: 7
    alright clown...you've had your fun here. now please leave and bother some other forum. trust me ruski, you will get much more satisfaction (i.e., vicious flame responses) if you go to a mustang forum and start saying that your GTP is gonna smoke a cobra!
  • nematodenematode Member Posts: 448
    bedabi: Then you are a smart person. Unless one has an excess of funds 0-60 runs in a turbo 2.0 are not great for your wallet or retirement account.

    Launches in the WRX are easy. I did not mean to imply that to get good acceleration one had to do clutch dumps. I was talking about getting the fastest 0-60 times. AND yes they are bad for your clutch unless you are an expert. I'm not. If I had a WRX I probably would have alredy fried my clutch.
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    You can dump on Mustang, Camaro and Maxima clutches all day long ( I've done it). Why is the WRX clutch so sensitive?
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    Does the clutch really wear out that fast? 3-4 hard starts and the clutch is fried?

    I've owned 3 Mustang GT's and never smoked a clutch. The first two were in my teenage years and I beat the heck out of them for many miles (100k on one of them).

    The WRX does have AWD which means the tires won't spin so the clutch will slip more. But 3-4 starts and it's fried???

    Does anyone out there have real world experience with this? Is the clutch plate covered by the warranty at all?
  • imturboimturbo Member Posts: 4
    Your clutch is not going to go up in smoke near as fast as you are acting. Just dont ride it a whole lot and you will be fine (for instance-half in half out half gas on a hill). If you cant drive a stick that great, use the e-brake when taking off going uphill.
    As far as good launches go; try my advice in #1600. I've had several satisfied people use this technique and they all swear by it---AND it is VERY clutch freindly!!!
    And corkfish, think about how many cars you listed that are AWD. You need to realize that none of those cars have anywhere near the technology as Subaru when it comes to traction. Somethings got to give somewhere, and it sure as hell aint gonna be tire slippage!
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    I got the car to launch quickly with Zero lag and very little clutch slip. Thanks for the info imturbo.

    I don't understand why anyone would complain about turbo lag in everyday driving? This is my first turbo and I don't even notice it most of the time. Just learn to keep the rpm's up and don't be afraid to hit the redline. That's the fun of a small, high revving engine. Most people who own cars like this never redline the engine. What's the sense of owning a fast car if your not going to use it? Peak HP comes on at 6000rpm so go for 7200 and have some fun. The mechanics of the WRX engine can handle much more than what it's tuned for in the states.
  • kostamojen2kostamojen2 Member Posts: 284
    One cool thing about the Auto in the rex is that with the gated shifter designed the way it is, its really easy to downshift to third when at speed to get some quick power, even easier than in the Stick :D
  • mmm3587mmm3587 Member Posts: 4
    Yeah, right. In the time it takes the auto to kick down and do whatever mumbo-jumbo an auto transmission does on a power downshift, anyone skilled driver in a manual has already down a perfect rev-matched clutchless downshift. Well, maybe not everybody, but even a boring old regular single-clutch downshift is faster than an automatic downshift unless it's done deliberately slow.

    Sounds like you've never driven a manual. You should try it sometime. I'm amazed that people who love cars and driving can not hate automatics in all but the most extreme situations.
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    Yes, the turbo must be spooled first before releasing the clutch. But any owner will tell you that your usual clutch release will bog the engine down to about 1500 RPMs and you'll have to wait the 1-2 seconds it takes for your RPMs to rise to 3000 RPMs again. It's especially frustrating when the likes of aggressive cab drivers or high torque monster SUVs take me at the light and immediately cut me off in my lane (a too common occurrence in NYC).

    As for my feathering the clutch, I should have been more specific. Yes, intrigue3, keeping a clutch half in with the engine reved is definitely bad, sorry if I seemed to be advising it. What I meant was that I let the clutch out a little more slowly than usual at first, but as soon as it catches, I let it out completely very quickly while stepping on the gas. This seems to work pretty well and avoid "the bog".

    Corkfish and pdefina, yeah, I never had a problem beating on my Maxima's clutch. But then again, my Maxima's front wheels slipped ALL the time on quick launch attempts -- even in second gear at 25-30 mph! I haven't experienced any wheel slippage in my WRX. And because of it, I do definitely feel that the tranny takes the brunt of more torque pressure than a 2WD car. Even when I quickly downshift to pass, especially to third, I feel the tranny shake a bit as the high rev torque immediately hits the pavement. While I felt something similar in my Maxima, it wasn't as pronounced. I really have no idea just what the limits of the WRX's transmission is (ie, what and when the clutch is fired), but given the extra stress I actually "feel" is being placed on the tranny with my butt sensor, I'm trying to modify my driving habits to match RPMs better on shifts, whereas the Maxima was more forgiving (not to mention more slippage, a strong pull to the right on hard acceleration, torque steer, lack of independent suspension, no seat bolstering, etc, etc, etc). (By, God, I do miss that sweet Maxima engine, though!)
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    I agree with pdefina, I dpn't have a problem with this "turbo lag" at all. Once you're above 3300 RPMs, it's very easy to keep it there. Besides, my eyes are on the dash display all the time since it's still difficult to tell how fast I'm going because this car is so quick and stable.

    In fact, as I've said in prior posts, I think there's a big advantage to the turbo not engaging till 3300 RPMs, especially in tight city driving conditions where more precision is needed, and for better mileage. I usually keep my revs pretty low, unless I'm on the highway, below 3000 RPMs, and I've gotten 20 mpg on all city driving (nothing to scoff at in NYC). But then again, on a day of busy highway driving where I was whizzing through every free lane I saw with the turbo kicking, I got about 14.5 mpg! Gotta pay to play, I guess.
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Soo-young: Your 14.5 low mileage marks makes my 15.6 look great! You're right though...staying in the turbo (especially in city driving) will reduce one's mileage considerably, add the need for prem gas and, well, "gotta pay to play", to quote you. :-) For the flip side comparison, I've gotten a high of 22.46 w/only about 200 miles on the odometer and about a 30% city/ 70% freeway split. I have about 1820 miles on my WRX now.

    Stephen
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    I beat the heck out of this car every time I drive it and I've been averaging 21mpg city/highway.

    Today I pulled up beside a taurus SHO v8 and the guy immediatly floored it. I was surprized that the WRX could pull away from a v8 at highway speeds but I guess the taurus SHO is no screamer anyways. I can't wait to encounter a BMW 323 or 330. FUN!!!
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    Yeah, the low mileage can be accounted for by the fact that I spent the entire day on NYC freeways downshifting and flooring it practically every five minutes.

    As much as I like to drive quickly though, I don't like putting other people at needless risk by driving recklessly. I see quite a few BMWs and Audis on NYC freeways and I've noticed that their respective drivers exhibit certain behavior patterns.

    Every driver of a new BMW 330ic drives like a teenager with attention deficit disorder, zipping in and out of tight lanes, blatantly cutting people off. I don't even try to keep up with them. 330 and 323 sedans are more often than not pretty sedate drivers with automatic trannies. I've encountered a few M3 drivers who are willing to play without going all out recklessly, I think b/c they tend to be older like me (32 y.o.). I had a lot of fun the other day tailing a M3 sedan through twisties in the Grand Central Parkway. Since BMW hasn't made an M3 sedan in a while with the gobs of HP they have now in the new coupe, it was pretty easy for me to keep up.

    As for Audis? They're a dime a dozen here, especially A4s. And they ALL seem to be driven by people no younger than 60. They just don't want to play. I've run into a couple of S4s, but that was in bumper to bumper traffic.

    Of course, these are just some casual observations of mine. They're not meant to mean anything!
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    I like to play but I really don't care who wins. So I'm not apt to pull off dangerous stunts to keep my ego inflated. Only play when it's safe.
    I'm 33 with a wife and two precious boys. I don't want to leave them behind just yet!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Darn, I was just going to ask you to put me in your will. For the WRX, of course! ;-)

    -juice
  • patchin1patchin1 Member Posts: 9
    Why would you want a totaled WRX?

    One day old Silver WRX 5 sp Wagon
    72 miles.... :o)
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    Ok. Looks like I'll have to drive a little faster. Do you mind Blaze Yellow?
  • mpinkhammpinkham Member Posts: 1
    I apologize if this has been touched upon already, but I have just really gained a big interest in the WRX.
    I am going to go test drive one this weekend, and I'm sure they're not going to take me for a highway trip. I was just curious...
    1. How well does the car ride at highway speeds (70-80 mph)?
    2. I remember on the Impreza 2.5 message board, there was a lot of talk regarding the smoothness of overall ride.. Anyone have opinions on this?
    Thanks all.
  • kostamojen2kostamojen2 Member Posts: 284
    mmm: Its faster cause theres no clutch involved and its a really small throw down to third... I dont know about the electronics though, but when my friend was doing it in his car it was instantaneous :P

    mpin:
    1. When your doing 85, it feels like your going 35 :D

    2. Smooth as a baby's bottom :D
  • osfan456osfan456 Member Posts: 8
    Decisions, decisions. I have been enviously eyeing both the Subaru Impreza WRX and the yet to be released SVT Ford Focus. There seem to great advantages for both cars. The WRX being the obvious better preformer of the two, but the SVT isn't all that bad either. THe WRX is a little bit pricier, but that turbocharger sounds pretty good. I was thinking of getting on the waiting list for the SVT, but when Subaru announced the WRX, I changed my mind pretty quick. So what do you guys think? Does the WRX's performance outweigh the slightly cheaper Focus?

    Come discuss this topic on a new board. It's called SVT Ford Focus vs. Subaru Impreza WRX and it's under the Hatchback category. I hope to hear from you guys. You seem to know your stuff. Hopefully you can help me, and possibly others, make a few decisions.
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    I'd go with the WRX. Beyond simple power/performance (I have no numbers for the Focus SVT) the WRX' AWD makes the car safer than the Focus, which pumps all its power to the front wheels.

    It's just my impression (again, it's been some time since I read that article about the Focus SVT) that the two are comparable in terms of brakes, safety (altho Subies may have an edge in crash protection) and fun accessories (CD, etc)

    It's personal preference. Try your best to get comparable test drives in the cars (tough to do as dealers guard them well) that simulate your normal driving needs, and decide from that.

    I was lucky enough to find a dealer willing to work with me and my time frame, who let me have a test drive even though I told him I was only 1/2 way to my down payment (should have rest of it by end June). I got some highway time and was amazed at how much better it rides etc at cruising speed than my current vehicle, a Neon ACR (admittedly not the most compliant of suspensions, but corners well for a cheap FWD)

    DjB
  • seamdoggieseamdoggie Member Posts: 5
    WHAT FINANCE RATES HAVE YOU GUYS BEEN COMING ACROSS FOR THE WRX AT 60 MONTHS? EVERYONE SHOULD LIST WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN OFFERED TO GIVE BUYERS SOME AMMUNITION WHEN NEGOTIATING THEIR BEST PRICES, B/C LET'S FACE IT, IT IS HARD TO GET THE DEALER TO BUDGE OFF MSRP
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    osfan- Hmmmm, Fix Or Repair Daily vs Subaru's reputation for reliability? Remind me again why you're considering the SVT?

    -Frank P.
  • aquickyaquicky Member Posts: 4
    My Red WRX is supposed to be at the dealership by the middle of May. Only a couple of days more to wait. I went to a Subaru dealership that had a wagon (I got a sedan). The dealer didn't let me test drive since I wasn't completely serious at the time to purchase one. I then went to another (near where I go to school) and I was looking at it and the dealer offered to let me drive it right then. I did some highway driving with it, and I was to 65 in no time. It will take a little driving to get used to the ride. I can't wait!!!
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    I drove a contour SE v6 5sp. and was very impressed with the performance. It handled great and felt pretty quick. The SVT will be even better.
    BUT...

    The WRX has AWD which makes a huge difference in corners, off the line and in the snow. The contour was very noisy and gave a much harder ride. Make sure you pay attention to this during the test drive.

    You know what though. Research the reliability and durability of both cars. Consider price and all that stuff. Then, if you don't find any reasons not to buy either one, buy the car that puts a SMILE on your face when your behind the wheel.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Why a totalled WRX? For the engine. Can you imagine the US' first Forester turbo?

    I'll take any color, body style, I'm not picky! ;-)

    I think the SVT will be a fine performance vehicle. Just look at the 2000 320hp Cobra. I mean 305hp. Oops, they didn't make a 2000 model, uh...

    -juice
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    I'm in NJ, about 20 miles west of Newark. I've checked Summit and Sovereign, and been offered 8.94 and 8.99 (respectively)

    Omega Financial in central PA (my home area, and my mom works there) is offering 8.80 over 60.

    DjB
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,769
    just look at bankrate.com

    there are places that are much cheaper than that in Jersey.

    Even the dealership I'm buying from told me he could get me 8% if I wanted, but i said no for now because I'm anticipating getting slightly over 7 from one of the online places.

    If you're wondering about online lenders, I use lendnetwork for my wife's car and have had 9 problem-free months so far.

    But, it all depends on your credit. You gotta take what YOUR best offer is. I know my sister's boyfriend just bought a car and couldn't get better than 11.9%.

    But, bruticus, if you got offered 8.99 from Sovereign, I'm willing to bet you could do better elsewhere. I find they are typically a half to a full point more than what I can get online.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • klkrauseklkrause Member Posts: 96
    Doesn't anyone use credit unions? I can get 6.49% for up to 60 months - that's their standard rate.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,769
    is above that. It all depends on who you have.

    eloan is claiming 7.27% as of today.
    My credit union is at 7.

    Not a big difference in my case.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    My savings bank is usually slightly lower than my credit union.
    Yep, and then there's the internet.
    Dennis
  • bearbear1bearbear1 Member Posts: 16
    I applied for, and received, a 36 month loan for a new WRX at 6.9% from Peoplefirst.com You should be able to do as well, perhaps even better. Why don't you log on to auto financing on either Edmunds or Bluebook car prices.
  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    ...at 6-7pm Pacific/9-10 pm Eastern. Hope to see you there!
    http://www.edmunds.com/chat/subaruchat.html



    Drew
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
  • cwaligoracwaligora Member Posts: 16
    The Focus SVT supposedly should do 0-60 in 7.0 sec. according to the manufacturer.

    My credit union is offering 7.0% for 60 month and 7.5% for 72 month loans.
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    I'm no fan of ford, but I'd wait to throw stones at any other car when it comes to reliability for this model. Ask anyone who owns a Subaru how many times they've had to have the clutch replaced. The service manager at a local Subaru dealership said that if I was going to buy one, better get an automatic cause ( and I quote) "this thing will eat clutches like potato chips". I'm still thinking of buying one because I think it might be worth it anyway.
  • bearbear1bearbear1 Member Posts: 16
    Hasn't it occurred to you guys/gals from reading the many posts on these wrx message boards that a very large number of wrx owners are thrashing the **** out of their machines! How can anyone expect a clutch to give long service with the kind of drop-clutch take-offs I read about here. I am sure that any make of car, given that treatment, would give up their clutches in a hurry. Isn't there any respect for this machinery?
  • kostamojen2kostamojen2 Member Posts: 284
    The SVT is going to be great, but its more in the SI/SE-R/RT/MP3/Etc. cadigory... Sub $20k FWD fun cars that do about 7 second 0-60.

    The WRX is a league above, and definatly worth the money considering the great all around ride, the AWD, the sub 6 second 0-60, the excellent handling, the practicality, the reliability, etc... That extra 3-5 grand is worth it in every way!
  • pattim3pattim3 Member Posts: 533
    One word - AMEN!

    Patti
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    What I have trouble comprehending is how a vehicle like the WRX, which is intended for weekend racing (the dealer I'm going to buy from says the current Subaru promo in this area is a 1yr membership in SCCA) can have a clutch that can't take hard driving.

    I'm in a Neon ACR now, and many who own those cars use them as daily driver AND weekend racer, and in prowling the Neon forums I've not heard of many people complaining of early clutch death.

    If the WRX does indeed have problems w/ clutch life, then shame on Subaru. At least they should offer an upgraded clutch assembly as a factory option. And, if clutch life is a problem, as soon as I have the money I'll have the dealer install a beefed-up aftermarket clutch assembly.

    DjB
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    1st, I don't think there is a "clutch problem". Crazy driver problem .. maybe.

    The WRX, unlike other performance cars, has no outlet for drop clutch 3500rpm starts. That is to say, other cars will spin the wheels under those conditions. The WRX can't. Something has to give! The weak link is probably the clutch. Having said that, I can't imagine myself sitting on asphalt and reving the engine to 3.5k and letting the clutch go. That's stupid !! Do that a bunch of times and you deserve what you get.

    If you "beef up" the clutch you're just relocating that energy someplace else less desireable in the drivetrain.
    - hutch
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Hutch- Excellent points (as usual).

    -Frank P.
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    I think we are all aware of the risk to our clutches should we engage in high RPM drop-the-clutch launches. I personally try to take more care with my transmission now than my old trade-in car (1999 Maxima stick). But if another owner wants to mess with his or her car, that's their business. I'm sure they know the risk. Look over on i-club and you'll see that people have already begun to modify their cars with turbo boost controllers, intake modifications, suspension upgrades, new wheels, etc, etc, many of which will void the warranty. But again, their cars, their risk. Frankly, I'm a little more appalled at the way people have boasted of the abuse they were able to lay out on test cars.
  • FrankMcFrankMc Member Posts: 228
    as a daily driver and they don't have any unusual clutch problems. (Actually I don't remember any of them replacing their clutch at all). My 2 manual Subaru are at about 70k with no clutch problems (but I haven't had any 5000 RPM launches either.)

    Frank
  • klkrauseklkrause Member Posts: 96
    I have a 2.5GT with 103,000 miles and no clutch problems.
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    Nobody on this board has yet to reveal any clutch problems!!! So far, this is ALL just speculation and completely unwarranted at that. We'll all find out in a few years if the clutch wears out too fast on this car but for now NOBODY knows.

    P.S. With my driving habits I'll be the first to report on it, I'm sure.

    P.S.S. What's all this talk about respect for the machine? It's just a car! and a fairly inexpensive one at that. If I felt the need to preserve this thing for 10 years I wouldn't bother buying one. The whole appeal of the WRX is it's speed and handling. If your not going to use them, buy an automatic Maxima and you'll be much happier...
  • bedabibedabi Member Posts: 149
    I may try to take it easier on my clutch than before, but don't get the idea I don't push my car! I throttle steer in just about every turn, speed thru twisting on ramps and perform downshift blastoffs pedal to the metal at just about every freeway opening. I can't help it, this car just BEGS me to! Just TRY to take it easy while driving this warthog, you can't!
  • pdefinapdefina Member Posts: 14
    I think the first thing I'm gonna do is change the springs. This car would benefit ALOT from firmer, lower springs. About 2" lower would be nice. Probably need to change the shocks or the suspension could be under damped with firmer springs. I'll do the springs first and if it needs shocks I'll thow on some KYB's. This car is little too mushy and leans a little too much in the turns for my taste. I hope the ride doesn't degrade too much as it rides like a cloud right now. Anyone else considering this?
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    was designed to be as such due to its rally heritage. It was designed for a variety of surfaces (and w/the rally car) and some of them not paved. It wasn't designed to be a track car like an Integra R-Type or such. Of course, you can make this way if you choose which is the beauty of the WRX...it's adaptable. I, for one, am not lowering my WRX height but will look into a rear 18mm sway bar for starters.

    Stephen
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.