By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
some service departments create issues that shouldn't be there. i'm pretty sure i've been through that(not lincoln), but it's kind of hard to tell. funny though, after i got ugly with service management, about the 4th time for the same issue(a leak), the reocurring problem has not happened since.
I recently had to replace the No. 6 coil-on-plug unit just before warranty expired because my dealer saw that it was ever so slightly performing less than 100% (98% effciency where Lincoln spec says NOT to replace it until it's functioning less than 75%). I'd say my dealer had my interests at heart.
I've trophied in each of the 2003 AZ SCCA Solo II Autocross seasons (Spring and Fall) running in a the local Street Tire 1 category as an F-stock car. On a handicapped basis, I've beaten all but one Z06 Corvette drivers (at least 5). The LS most definitely runs with the big dogs, and I haven't lost to a 5 series BMW yet (and there have been a few).
The real kicker to me, though, is the fact that this is still a luxury sedan, and not a kidney busting sports car. I drive it everyday with nary a problem in more than 4 years of steady service. This car has been THE MOST reliable vehicle I've ever owned, and that includes 2 Mazdas, and 2 Nissans (1 sports car and minivan each).
I only wish Lincoln would show more support for the DEW98/LS platform and continue to refine and improve it. The potential in this platform is abundant while the S-Type misses on several points. Lincoln's future plans are beginning to scare me away. I want to believe in them, but hope is fading.
"Ford Uses Car Few Will Buy In Super Bowl Ads
Ford said Thursday it will run two ads for the GT supercar during the pre-game
of the Super Bowl. By bypassing the actual game broadcast, the company says it
is spending its money wisely because, says Ford Division marketing communication
manager Rich Stoddart, attention wanes from the kickoff on.
Two TV spots, one 30-seconds and one 60-seconds, will run that are little more
than video postcards of the screaming, growling GT, which "goes on sale" this
summer for a sticker of $139,995, though dealers who actually sell them to
customers instead of keeping them for their own garages are sure to charge more.
Still, it seems odd that Ford wouldn't at least mingle in images or teasers of
the 2005 Mustang, a car the young men watching the pre-game will actually be in
a position to buy in the fall. It's not the first iffy advertising move made by
Ford Division chief Steve Lyons. Last year, Lyons introduced "If you haven't
looked at Ford lately, look again," ad slogan. It was meant to play off the
infamous "Have You Driven a Ford Lately" tagline of yore, but has come a cross
as an apologetic "please pick me" plaintiff cry in Ford's Centennial year, a
year that should have had a more prideful, celebratory advertising tenor."
http://www.thecarconnection.com
The GT is all about building up Ford's image - not about selling GTs. They're already sold.
...Can anyone tell me what changed with Job Order #2 other than the $160.00 price difference?...
I've noticed there are a couple of TSBs which specifically address issues with production before 5/15/03. It seems likely Job Order #2 production began on 5/16/03 and may have addressed those issues. Can anyone confirm?
Do a search on the Lexus GS board & you'll see.
Which post caused the "damage"?
Just like they've done with the LS. :-)
Personally, I don't mind them keeping the LS on the quiet side. Just makes it that much more of a surprise.
-Paul
Advertising the GT doesn't seem that dumb to me - sure I'll never buy one, but I still enjoy seeing one burn up the road, and it sends a message about Ford that the competition can't match right now. It's being very well received by the critics and exposure is what it was made for. Not to sell, and certainly not to make a profit.
As long as our elders dominate L-M showrooms, L-M will continue to Geritol the product selection. Catera was a lame vehicle. The first CTS was a lame vehicle. The 2nd generation CTS is arguably at parity if not a step above the LS. And then the CTS-V adds insult to injury. But sometimes money (and a plan) does wonders.
In the case of the LS, L-M needs to decide if they are going to build a car of the future or Frankenstein from the parts bin.
What little advertising money is left for Lincoln to splurg on, they rather use on vehicles that make a larger profit, such as Navigator, Town Car and Avaitor. Unfortunately "Old Detroit" thinking reigns supreme at Ford when it revolves to marketing these vehicles.
Travel Well? Sounds more like an advertising stunt for American Tourister luggage. And that itself should give you an idea of who they are trying to target....Traveling? The LS is a driver's car, NOT some limo conversion.
IN the next coming months a few more upper executives will get fired/released/etc (choose your politically correct word for this) and I'm hoping it's part of the "Old Detroit" crowd that still looms there.
Let's hope with the introduction of the Mark LT (rediculous name) pick-up (which will probably only receive marketing at the start only), that a different marketing tactic is used. And personally, if they killed the TOWN Car (which is really the only vehicle that doesn't carry the engineering traits of the other's) it would resolve the anchor Ford has to feeding the needs of the older demographics. Hence, more freedom for marketing.
I purchased 2 Lincoln LS's and 1 Mercury Cougar in the last 4 years, so I am very familiar with the L-M dealers near me.
I'd say its about 50-50 with the L-M dealers and the LS. That is about half of the 8 dealers I've visited seem to embrace the LS and actively try to sell it. The other half seem to regard the LS with disdain and do not seem very happy with the more knowledgeable customers who are interested in the LS. These dealers appear to want comatose customers who are know nothing about cars nor how to buy them. That is they desire customers who are easier to take advantage of and many LS customers are out of these dealer's comfort zone.
Job 2 was March 3, 2003
Changes were:
The addition of the wood trim option for the V8 sport model.
The addition of the side air curtian air bag option.
The end of Apspen Green Paint
The re-appearance of Vivid Red Paint
There are a couple of other changes that occurred in 2003 that were not part of Job 2. May 15, updated PCM code. Sometime in April the DVD Navigation system was updated.
To me, I think it's a case in point of how the "old timers" at Ford/Lincoln-Mercury are out of touch with the American car buying public. Despite all the negatives associated with Jac Nasser, at least he had the foresight to allow Jim Rogers (then VP of Lincoln Marketing) to move Lincoln's headquarters away from the stuffy confines of Dearborn for the sunny skies of Irvine, CA. Nasser was also at the helm when the LS/DEW98 was originally conceived. Why not also give him some of the credit for Lincoln's introduction of the Navigator, which has been an absolute success story and created the Luxury SUV category. Since his abrupt departure, Lincoln's been left adrift . . . no new product buzz, no building on past success.
Billy Ford and Lincoln brass . . . what's the plan? Please don't tell me you ONLY want to dress-up lesser vehicles and pass them off as "American Luxury." Lincoln AND Mercury need distinct platforms that represent higher levels of refinement from the Ford brand. Mercury should be the middle ground that "dresses-up" Ford models on their low end, and "strips-down" Lincoln models on their high end. With this approach, it would seem that the LS could be more widely sold in a more stripped fashion, similar to how it can be purchased in Canada (cloth seats, fewer power accessories, etc.)
Enough of my rant . . . I still LOVE my '00 V8 Sport. It's been the most reliable car I've ever owned through it's first 4 years of service.
Ford had to update their trucks since that's their bread and butter. Then they had to redo their mainstream cars because they were neglected for so long. Now they can at least put some money back into Lincoln-Mercury although I'm sure it's much less than the $2B planned back in 2001.
This dealer also had a service lane marked "Lincoln owners only." Of course it was almost totally ignored by the F150/Taurus crowd.
BTW, nice to see you around Chris. I missed getting in a few shots at you, for what my Marlins did to your Bankees ;-)
Fantom(Gary) - good to hear from you. I've been waiting to hear from you about that subject . . . the knife is still in, so go ahead and turn it just a little bit more, lol. As the saying goes, wait 'til next year my friend!
Speaking of the Navigator and Lincoln's woes, the Navigator cannot be ignored as it is a big seller and an even bigger cash cow for Ford. However, I consider the Navigator in the same vein as a Town Car. Sure, it's demographic is younger, but it is the same type of vehicle. That is it is big and cushy. Lincoln and Cadillac need one or two vehicles like that as there are some customers(young and old) who simply want a big, cushy riding sedan or SUV. Trouble is, that should not be all or most of your product. Cadillac is getting away from this as once the next-gen STS bows later this year, the Deville and Escalade will be their only true land yauchts. For performance, they will have the CTS, CTS-V, STS(probably an STS-V down the road), the XLR, and the SRX which is a car based SUV. Lincoln has the LS and that is it. And the LS as good as it is, is in it's 5th year of production now. So what is Lincoln getting ready to roll out? Luxury truck number two, the Mark LT. First off, what an abortion of the Mark name. While the LT looks to be more practical than the Blackwood and much closer to Cadillac's Esalade EXT, a Mark it is not!!! Now the Mark X is much more my kind of car. Build the Mark X and a modern day Continental and Lincoln might get back on track. And while the T-car will probably be with is for some time, at least put the 32 valve DOHC 4.6 in it.
Even insiders at Ford hate the Mark LT name, and they didn't invite me to the focus group to name this truck (I was involved in the naming of the Aviator, which originally, Lincoln wanted to name the Navigator 4.6) or I would have protested vehemently, I assure you.
I agree, really another Lincoln truck is probably not the best idea for Lincoln at this time, and likely won't be a huge seller, as I may add, neither is the Escalanch! But, it is what they could get out quickly and cheaply, and will make maximum profit, which Ford desperately needs right now to survive. So, I'm hoping it sells, and perhaps Lincoln will get a dime or two from the proceeds to develop the Mark X or Navicross.
For only the past two or so years have the lamentations been prominent. Three years ago quite a few of us were still basking in the pleasure of the 6 Jan 01 gathering, sponsored in part by Edmunds (surprisingly enough, in retrospect).
Nice hearing from everyone.
What club??
I do know that it relates to both age and mileage. Can anyone help me out?
The engine oil life can be reset to less than 100% on an oil change by following the procedure in the owner's manual. It works. I am not sure if that feature is available for the air filter or not.
I found that the air filter does is not excessively dirty when I changed it the first time (the second change was done by the dealer so I didn't see it).
I hope that helps....
Thanks again for the assistance.
BTW, did u ever get an Aviator?
G
Aviator acquisition in progress . . .