By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I don't remember the name of the package, but I didn't order it, and as a result I didn't get the auto wipers, dual-setting mirrors, seats and what-have-you, among other things. It's not as if I have it and won't use it. I chose not to get it.
OTOH, an option that is 100% electronic and would appear to cost the manufacturer absolutely nothing extra, like the message centre, is useful to me, with very little downside. As we've discussed in the past, Ford made a choice to stiff the V6 possessors by not offering the message centre display. I'm quite confident all the hardware is in place.
It's not entirely accidental that our family's most recent vehicle purchase was of a vehicle not made by Ford, or any other American manufacturer. Yes, I know about content, and this one is 95%+ not in North America.
And the hardware does not exist to add the message center to the V6s. The wiring harness is not there. It could be, but they chose to take it out. I suppose it saves a couple of bucks. I agree it seems silly not to have it on the V6 when you can get it on cars costing half as much but that's marketing for you.
Jerry: I jumped on the minivan bandwagon before it existed; we bought an '86 Voyager (two years after the concept was introduced), and replaced it in '94 with a Caravan. With 140K miles (and well-publicized transmission "issues") on it, it deserves its retirement.
Since it's my wife's car, she absolutely gets to pick & chose to go with . . . (drum roll) . . . an SUV. Did I jump right up and go for an Explorer? Uh, no.
We bought a Pathfinder, from the company that built my 240Z that I backed off the showroom floor with 6 miles on it, and drove 223K miles. It's got a fair amount of the stuff that makes me worry, but I'm fairly confident that it'll still be working long after it might have been, given another source.
I feel sorry for your wife the first time that auto acts up......
(just poking fun - don't get offended)
We looked at Xterras also, which can be had with a manual, but (like the LS) if you really want one with 4WD and other options, it's a special order. Besides which, the engine makes 60 (count 'em) fewer horsepower and gets the same fuel mileage. That 3.5 litre Nissan motor looks like a winner to me, which was also part of the equation.
Either way, we've got it, and I'll have a shot at selling the ol' minivan for a couple large sometime in the next few months. Other than the slushbox, it was a pretty damn stout vehicle. We definitely got good value. . .but for that $2K transmission rebuild. . .and the follow-up $600 reseal. . .and it's leaking as we speak.
And to Buckwheat (another blast from the past on this board), thanks for the link. It said pretty much what several of us have been preaching here and other places for awhile. Rather than paste a bunch of the quotes, I'll just go with the subtitle: "Needed: Products, styling, identity" Other than that, though, everything's just fine.
Given the retrospective season, hello to Ray, who's apparently considering another LS. Given his well-documented desire for power and recent experience with a car from a company I've grown enamored of over the past couple of years (at least for rentals in Europe), I'll be very interested in how it all turns out. Keep us posted, Ray.
Take care, guys.
but if you have fog / frost the auto setting doesn't appear to be the best option. I guess that the exception?
Akirby, I've never tested with the heat, but can confirm that after sitting in the hot sun with the ATC at set at 68, the A/C came on at full speed when I started the car last summer.
The auto setting will cool the car MUCH faster when the temp setting is dropped to 60. This will force the blower to maximum and open the recirculation door. I've tryed it. It works.
Does she have her own car she can use? I'm often driving for other friends and always make sure I place all settings as they were. Then again, different politics since it's friendship and you can't divorce them
Soundls like something that could be corrected by adding climate control setting to the user memory along with seat, steering wheel, mirror, pedal positions.
No, No, NO!!!!! I tried this on the heat setting (have to assume it would work the same for cooling). When the temp is on 85 the fan is about 3/4 speed. Moving it from 80 - 85 didn't change it. When you move it to 90 it goes to maximum and it's very obvious. It will not go to maximum speed on anything other than 60 or 90.
Sorry, had to say it. I'll go burn my eyes out with a glowing ember...
Allen, I'm with you. I've tried it as well. VERY noticable difference, especially when that recirc. door opens in the summer!
Could be; I don't follow them that closely.
Save the glowing ember for something serious.
Thanks to all who contribute on this board!
- Ray
Enjoying the 'new ride', (dual) climate control, heated / cooled seats, and all . . .
Welcome back.
Nav. system?
I assume you're all set with X-plan ... right?
Fine w/X-plan, thanks.
My Y2K was the same exterior color – and the interior trim color was similar.
Cheers,
- Ray
Who would have enjoyed Vivid Red, had it been available . . . Oh, well.
I am in Duluth.
Coffee some Saturday?
- Ray
Any excuse to drive the new car - but to get a pic of 2 autumn red 2003 LS-s . . .
But mine's a 2000.....
Congrats on your new LS.
I am currently in the market for 2002 LS8. I test drove 3 and they all had the same smell as the car warmed up (I live in Chicago, it's winter). It smelled like oil burning and it's strong. No smell under the hood but in the car. Could it be the heated seats and the leather heating up?
I have narrrowed the choice down to an 01 LS8, sport model, with everything, including AdvanceTrak, with 35000 miles, certified pre-owned by LM dealer for $20000. The other car is an 00 I30t, CPO, 45000 miles, for $18500. Both are black on black. I like the historic reliability of the I30. I realize they are two different cars, and believe I could be happy in either one. I am leaning towards the LS, however, and would like a little convincing. Please walk me through the price comparisons, long term ownership (my current car is an 83 280z, I keep cars forever!), and anthing else you deem relevant. Thanks.
Better yet you could read through the thousands of discussions here, and the comparisons to 540. I30 just doesn't come close. Please read the posts. It will save all of us much time. I think you have the answers you need but if you need affirmation I am giving it to you. Buy the LS it winds hands down, style,performance,design, reliability (maybe onpar to I30 maybe not but quite good anyway). Best of Luck.
I agree the I30 is a much different car. As I drove it I wanted to be "wowed" by driving an Infiniti but it didn't really happen. I am not sure how to make a "practicality" decision, but I am clouded by Japanese reliability. The I30 looks good, especially black over black, but the excitement level just isn't there. I am annoyed that the I30, being a year older and with 10000 more miles is essentially the same price as the LS. And the LS stickered for about $10000 more than the infiniti when new. I could say that the LS is the better buy because it cost more, is newer, less miles. But why does the LS depreciate at a much faster rate than the Infiniti? Is that a reflection of the overall reputation of Japanese cars versus American cars, or is it a reflection of the LS itself, or the I30 itself?
I am not like some of the posters who claim to have owned and driven 15 or 20 cars over time. I buy one car and keep it forever. That's what makes a car buying decision for me so important.
I have a Word document with comments about the LS. If you want a copy email me at LobsenzA@Rose-Grp.com
Resale value has a lot to do with customer preception. I just read an article (don't remember where it was) that said customer perceptions of reliablilty is getting seriously out of line with what reliably really is.
Specifically the article said that most people percieve import brands to be more reliable than the really are. They also preceive Ford, GM & Chrysler to be less reliable than they really are.
The article singled out the Mercury brand as the one brand that has the greatest dispartity between perceived and actual reliablilty. That is, most people perceive Mercurys to be unreliable where warranty and repair claims say that the Mercury brand is very relaible. I think Lincoln suffers from a similar mis-perception. I had a 2000 LS V8 and had very few problems with it. In fact the only problems I really had with it were created by the dealer's service dept. when I had them do some of the upgrades to it (rear half shafts etc.)
Of course, I'm not sure I believe that story - it's probably just Ford "thrifting" them out, to save $10 per car.....
How many miles on your '00 Sport? How well is it now performing? Have you had any durability problems?
Gary