Lexus IS 350 and IS 250

1969799101102131

Comments

  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    December isn't a hot car sales month but the IS will still be pretty fresh. January is one of the worst usually -especially last week of January. If you don't need the car badly, let the hype die down and the natural market forces will drive the prices down.

    By April/May you should be able to deal easily.
  • gtoskylinegtoskyline Member Posts: 68
    I think IS350 will sell well (the fastest is always a strong point), but not their 250s.

    Fist time? Lexus' price > BMW :)

    Lexus will beat BMW's price soon. (3 months at most)
  • jsk97vmijsk97vmi Member Posts: 2
    I ran into the same problem with my IS-300 when I brought it in for the 15K service and the price was $330. I had the manager list me all of the prices...it goes to $420 at 30K, $880 at 60K and $1600 at 90K. What I found is that you can go to a local Toyota dealership and get service on your IS for their service prices on an Avalon (about 25% cheaper). You get the same oil and the same Toyota filter....the only difference is that they dont wash your car.
  • 1violinist1violinist Member Posts: 338
    the only difference is that they dont wash your car.

    My Toyota dealer is next to a car wash; sometimes they give me a free coupon!
  • joemalejoemale Member Posts: 28
    I really liked the car, and the look appealed to me more in person
    than on in the internet. Not crazy about the faux wood though.
    The car had some zip but the car had to work a bit to respond.
    It did not feel as torquey as an Audi A4 2.0 and certainly not as
    powerful as a C320. It felt similar to the Acura TSX.
    This is not bad. I simply don't like the styling of the new BMW 3-series.
    That leaves:
    A4, TSX, TL, C class, IS
    Personally, I love the looks of the G35 coupe the best, but
    it suffers with mediocre gas mileage.
    But back to the IS. Unless you pay big bucks, you don't get
    memory seats, a rear sunshade, zenon, folding rear seats, and an easy entry feature
    which I have on my 5 year old C class.
    You also have to get the navigation system to upgrade the stereo system.
    That's an extra 1800.
    I'm leaning towards the Audi.
  • JBaumgartJBaumgart Member Posts: 890
    "Lexus will beat BMW's price soon. (3 months at most)"

    Well it won't be Lexus beating BMW's prices within the next three months. I seriously doubt you will ever see Lexus lowering its MSRP for these cars, except perhaps in special sales events (December to remember), or lease deals if demand proves to be softer than expected. They might also re-package some of the options to make them "fresher" and to stimulate demand that way. But in the short term the only discounting will be done by the dealers, and then only as needed in order to move inventory.

    Someone above mentioned that the IS series will be the top selling model in the Lexus lineup. This may be true, but I have my doubts since I see it as more of a niche vehicle that's not ideally suited for your average Lexus buyer. For most of their customers on a "budget" (everything's relative) I see the ES line (in addition to the RX) remaining more appealing to the average Lexus buyer. I'd probably feel differently if the IS had more room in the back seat area.
  • 1violinist1violinist Member Posts: 338
    I see the ES line (in addition to the RX) remaining more appealing to the average Lexus buyer.

    Well, if this is the 2007 Lexus ES350 it would be even more appealing.
  • tpo1tpo1 Member Posts: 8
    Looked at IS250 AWD today, did not bother to drive though. Headroom (with sunroof) and backseat space are too tight for me. I'm a 6 footer.
  • rjorge3rjorge3 Member Posts: 144
    I am glad you to see your post legar, I have been debating to switch to a cheaper gas on my lease car (2005 Audi A4), but I was afraid to do so because I did not want any "potential damage" to any internal parts by using a cheaper gas. But a friend of mine that have been leasing for years always tease me that I am given money away to a car that I am not even thinking of keeping it (I am planning to keep leasing every 36 months). interesting enough, I also has a 1994 Toyota celica that I bought brand new back then, but I always use premium gas in it since I will always keep it (for sentimental reason).

    So my question to you and the group is. Did you always use the cheapest gas for your leased cars? Did you ever had any problems when you returned them?

    Thanks

    R
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Your A4 requires premium for a reason. If you use a lower grade of fuel your engine will produce less power and you'll most likely get worse mileage, thus negating any savings anyway.

    Consider this:

    Your car averages 25 mpg on 12 gallons for a range of 300 miles. $3.20 a gallon = $38
    On a lower grade of fuel averaging 24 mpg, it takes 12.5 gallons for a 300 mile range. $3.00 a gallon x 12.5 gallons which equals $37.50.

    You saved 50 cents and you car produces less power. Where's the win in that? We're talking about $2-3 extra per fillup.

    Why did you lease a performance sedan if you don't want it to perform? Is it just about the badge?
  • sunilbsunilb Member Posts: 407
    Did anyone else notice the full-page ad in Monday's WSJ for "The New IS"?

    It was striking... they did not mention the 350 once! The whole ad (with limited text) only discussed the IS250 and AWD. I found that really odd
  • generalmalaisegeneralmalaise Member Posts: 3
    I agree, I test drove the IS350 today with the sport package. Everything was great except the headroom and the back seat. I'm 6'2" and was rubbing the edge of the sunroof. I won't be sitting in the back seat at all, however, nobody but a kid or the skinniest woman could fit behind me.

    The salesman told me that I could get it without a sunroof, although in Canada I don't know if you can get a luxury package without a sunroof.
  • 1violinist1violinist Member Posts: 338
    I guess they thougth the 350 had enough publicity already!
  • mbzfan06mbzfan06 Member Posts: 15
    Thanks HOST... every little input helps to get Edwards.com... :) up to speed.
  • gstoisgstois Member Posts: 65
    "I really liked the car, and the look appealed to me more in person
    than on in the internet. Not crazy about the faux wood though."

    The wood is not faux on this car.
  • harrybush00harrybush00 Member Posts: 76
    I have a Toyota and they have raised their service prices to ridiculous prices within the past year or so. I was quoted $500 (ouch!!) for a 30K mile service on a Solara. It's a shame that Lexus is also seemingly following this trend. Maybe a 325i over the IS250 is, dare I say it, a bargain, when considering the first 4 years of service are paid for.
  • g17g17 Member Posts: 45
    Unless you are a mechanical moron, you should be able to change the oil yourself, if its not a dealer included service..... ;)
  • rjorge3rjorge3 Member Posts: 144
    Thanks, blue, I actually saw your post after I had posted mine. I guess it makes sense what you've indicated. I did the math and I put on average 15 to 20 gallons per week and at a price difference of 0.20 per gallon the savings ($208 per year [.20x20gallonsx52 weeks=$208]) do not justify a lesser power output.

    Changing to premium!!!

    R
  • kmg68kmg68 Member Posts: 108
    HOST

    Can they at least post invoice pricing??
  • fitguyfitguy Member Posts: 220
    As a guy who worked in an auto shop for 5 yrs out of high school, and self-maintained over 20 vehicles over the course of 32 years, plus boats/small engines/etc, I'm definitely "mechanically inclined". I stopped changing my own oil this year and here's why: To change the oil in my Mazda (at the dealer, even) costs 25 bucks. To do it myself costs 15 (6 qts. @ 1.75 + filter @ 4.00). With drive-in service at dealer, time is about the same. To have to put the car on ramps, get filthy, then dispose of waste oil to save 10 bucks is rediculous. My time is worth 50.00/hour. Granted, when I drove older vehicles it was good to get underneath and check things over, but with new vehcles under warranty, a waste of time. Anyways, off topic a bit- the reason I popped on this thread was to say the IS250/350 sure look nice- I'm going to have to drive one, then post on "Chronic Car Buyers" to help alleviate my sickness! :)
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,242
    As I mentioned previously, hosts do not have any control over the pricing information on the main site - we simply host the forums. Please use the "help" link at the top of this page to submit questions to our pricing team.

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • gstoisgstois Member Posts: 65
    Sorry for the random thoughts, but I can't resist.

    I swear I paid around $40k for my loaded 325is in 1995 after I factor in the 17"Anteras that I had the dealer swap out.

    Our 528i was around $45k in 1998.

    I left BMW for a few reasons. 1) I had too many reliability problems with both cars. 2) I was sick of needing to replace the brakes every 15 to 20k miles. 3) Customer service at the dealer sucked, 4) My dealer did not negotiate much on the price of the new cars

    My GS300 stickered at $45k in 2001 and we got it for $500 over invoice, so I think we paid around $40k. The brakes and tires lasted around 50k miles. I did take it in every 5k miles and paid for the service. The dealer always takes off 10% of the bill when I schedule over the internet. When I factor in the ease of getting a loaner car and the balancing and rotation of the tires, etc that came with the service, it's not too bad.

    The irony is that 10 years after buying my 325is, I am buying the IS350 that will probably eat up brakes and tires and cost me more to maintain that the BMW I griped about above.

    All said and done, when I consider how much more I am getting for approx $40k with the IS350, compared to what I got 10 years ago with the 325is, it blows me away.

    I've got a bad taste in my mouth for BMW, so I didn't even bother driving the 330i. I actually prefer the handling and feel of Lexus since I drive so much and the Lexus is so much less fatiguing to drive. I'll gladly pay a premium for the Lexus which to me is clearly worth it.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    That's pretty presumptious. Mechanical ability may be present but many other factors may not be there - time, physical ability, suitable location for performing oil change, extra equipment needed for such a task.

    Given that most of us can type and read, it seems there may be other mitigating factors as to why we wouldn't perform our own oil changes.
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    You know, kids, provided they are following the guidleines set out in your owner's manual, any competent independent mechanic can perform your routine services without endangering your warranty or your vehicle. Stay with someone you trust and save your documentation. I don't see a compelling reason to visit your local stealership for service unless you have a warranty claim, or unless you can't find a tech you trust, or if your trusted tech is more expensive (yeah, right).

    My favorite wrench has an interval service checklist he attaches to to the paper work. It oulines everything to be completed in the service. Never has the manual specified something that wasn't on his list.

    Aside from that rather obvious tidbit of advice, be reminded that your local Lexus shop subcontracts some its functions to other local shops and even to national or regional mobile services.
  • mvs1mvs1 Member Posts: 462
    With all the plastic they use to cover the wood on every car...does it even matter if it's real or faux??? It all looks fake anyway.
  • toydriver1toydriver1 Member Posts: 11
    I currently drive a '03 ES. Have had issues with transmission since new. Rough shifting, hesitation especially in stop and go traffic. Lexus says "due to electronic throttle design, catalytic converter and transmission software". blah, blah, blah.
    (well discussed on ES forum)

    My questions are for those of you who have driven the new IS:

    Is there ANY hesitation or rough shifting whatsoever ???

    Any first impressions from those who have driven the IS250 AWD ??? enough power ??
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Theres a lot of people who have driven the IS250 AWD, from the Lexus Events around the country, and now, off dealer lots. Try browsing through the last 5 pages of posts, you'll find info, but I doubt those who have already posted are going to jump at the chance to repeat themselves.

    ~alpha
  • nance2nance2 Member Posts: 6
    Waited anxiously for the is350 before deciding what to buy. I will get the BMW 330xi-final decision. I live in CT and the day I test drove the car in the rain it skid 2 times and the salesman asked me to slow down- I never even hit 50 mph. He told me I was better off in a 250. drove the G35 immediately after through wet leaves fast- the car stops on a dime. still prefer the BMW and now I can buy it knowing it is the best choice for me and the IS 350 is for sunny nice days of which we don't have a lot here. Beautiful interior on the 350, boring exterior though-not sexy at all-looks like all the other Lexus.
  • nance2nance2 Member Posts: 6
    I had to make the same decision and i have to tell you the 350 skids on wet roads,
    even at low speeds, Im getting the 330xi
  • robot78robot78 Member Posts: 1
    "FWIW, I was told (probably by a well meaning but misinformed salesperson) that you must get the 1200 basic luxury package on the IS350 before one can get the 3700 sport package. By my math that's 41k. Shrug.

    This could be a case of a dealer who only orders X, Y or Z if you order V (basic premium) first."

    I think this is dependent on the dealer allocations from Lexus; and varies based on the geographic region. For example, if you use the build your Lexus feature on the Lexus website, you have different option packages available based upon what zip code you enter. Unfortunately, it appears that most of the cars that Lexus is shipping have very little variation in terms of available options.

    IMDO, I think the option packages are way overpriced. The base prices are not too unreasonable, esp for the 350. I still think 30K plus is high for a 204 hp car in today's market. Like others, I don't like the way the options are bundled. I'm leaning toward Lexus over a BMW at this point; but at least with the Bimmer, you can pick and choose individual options.
  • harrybush00harrybush00 Member Posts: 76
    yeah, but Lexus shouldn't be charging more than $100 for an oil change every 5000 miles either. :mad:
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    What do you mean "skid"? Given that all accounts point to the VDIM being overly agressive, I have hard time understanding what you mean, especially since it cant be shut off. Do you mean that you were able to spin the tires on take off or the car actually LOST GRIP around wet turns? Did the VDIM then activate? If you were actually skidding, you should have triggered the system's intervention.

    ~alpha
  • harrybush00harrybush00 Member Posts: 76
    Maybe this is because the IS had summer tires? Lexus.com in my area shows all the IS to have summer tires.
  • gstoisgstois Member Posts: 65
    I can certainly appreciate the desire to save a dime. For me, the convenience of the dealer is worth the extra money. I can't afford to wait around and need a loaner car. Also, call me anal, but I believe the service record is now integrated into the NAV system which I like. Also, I'm a firm believer in spending a little extra if it means that I am working with someone with "deeper pockets" in case anything goes wrong.
  • jsk97vmijsk97vmi Member Posts: 2
    I just recently filled my IS-300 up with premium and within a couple minutes of leaving the gas station, the engine started vibrating and missing. Luckily I was close to the dealorship and they found water in the gas. They drained about 6 gallons out of the tank and told me to just keep putting "gas dry" into the tank and that it should eventually wear off. The technican told me that the previous vibrations/misses as well as any small misses in the future would have no harm on the engine. Does anyone have an opinion about this? I'm on my third tank of gas now since the issue and I still notice an engine miss here and there. Due to all of this the check engine light has stayed on which deactivates the traction control. I have no idea whether or not the computer will reset itself which will turn the check engine light off?
  • pezbabypezbaby Member Posts: 7
    I've been lurking and read almost every post in this forum. I currently drive a 2000 RX300 and it's very practical for trips to Costco in the Philadlephia suburbs, but I'm looking for something sportier and more modern. I'm a single 28 yo "up-and-coming" woman, so a luxury sport sedan suits my lifestyle more appropriately.

    I love Lexus. I have to admit there is something "sexy" about German cars, but it's not that sexy to have to deal with maintenance issues. I have never owned a BMW, but I have driven them and had a VW Cabrio with no problems. I actually enjoy taking my Lexus in for service. The last time I was there (oct 13th) I saw the IS's and was instantly in love with it. I couldn't find a salesman to let me drive one...well, honestly, I didn't ask. I figured if I was allowed to drive it, they'd volunteer to take me since they saw me eyeing them up.

    Well, I did get a mechanic(!) to let me take a 350 for a test drive....in the rain, no less! I loved it. It really felt like I was in some kind of hovercraft. It's definitely a smooth ride and feels like a bullet gliding in the air. I was smitten, but it felt like somewhat of a waste to have all that power and not "feel" the road peeling away under the car. I am not a gearhead (obviously...if I owned a VW Cabrio) , but I can appreciate power. To not use the power, it's like drinking fine wine with a straw. You are missing some of the "flavor" by not letting it roll on your tongue and experiencing it to the fullest.

    I really wanted to love this car, and I do, but it's missing something that I liked in the IS300 that is also in the BMW.

    I keep going back and forth.
    BMW 325xi....
    pros: comes in AWD and manual. You don't have to get leather (given the choice, I prefer not to pay extra for dead animal in my car.) The driving experience, of course. This car is also much faster despite having a similar engine. The included service is a nice touch as well, although I know they can be stingy about what's covered under warranty and what's not. My friend had issues getting her brakes replaced....they claimed it was her driving and was not covered. She also had weather stripping come off, which they also wanted her to pay for, but her boyfriend called and got them to cover that.

    cons: there is the reliability factor. And I'm one of those people that thinks the taillights are ugly, but I think the rest of the car is gorgeous. Then there is the price of the car.

    Lexus IS 250 AWD....
    pros: Beautiful interior, less expensive, the Lexus service is great and you can also get it serviced at Toyota dealerships which are generally closer and cheaper if you don't mind a Corolla loaner (I know I'm not the only one that does this.) You don't have to pay extra for paint or the cool key thing. The gas mileage is great.

    cons: the dreaded backseat (although admittedly I've never had anyone in the backseat of my RX300, so I guess this isn't a huge issue), the mandatory parking assist option....basically, my con list is short and they aren't that big of a deal. Maybe I'll like having parking assist since I parallel park so much.

    the agony!
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    People should do what makes them comfortable, as far as I'm concerned, so I can make no argument whatsoever against your (sound) reasoning!

    I was just answering a mild complaint on dealership costs with some common sense. I have run across what I find an alarming and unreasonable fear of outside servicing on the majority of Lexus threads and indeed on a couple of BMW threads (those ones are usually smacked down pretty hard by the real Roundel pilots). For anything under warranty, any glitch or a service code or system hiccup, I wouldn't consider going anywhere else. That's absolutely what they are there for. But for routine maintenance, there is nothing that qualifies my Lexus shop to get my dime, other than the loaner, over and above a top-notch independent. For routine fluids and filters and pads and paper, the Toyota-trained boys and girls in the Lexus bays know nothing that an good indy can't regularly execute. I don't count Oil Changers and the like as good or even so-so, it is important to note.

    Not to say I haven't used my Lexus shop for maintenance. The loaner is of questionable value sometimes. I get either an ES330 or RX330, and frankly, unless I have to make local trips away from the office that day, I'd rather not have to drive them! ;)
  • texasmerqtexasmerq Member Posts: 86
    Well I finally got the time to drive the new IS and now I have mixed feelings. Overall they are very nice cars (all cars in this segment are though.)

    First the good stuff. I like they way the IS looks a lot more in person. The only color they had was black on both cars. I would personally prefer a metallic or pearl finish on the car but overall it looked good in black. I don't however see the point of having 3 types of silver. The 350 had the Cashmere interior which looked pretty good in it's own right but I preferred the light gray interior in the 250 or a black interior to it. Both cars were equipped without the wood thank God. The Nav system screen looked very good a with a very clear hi-res screen. The standard radio was better than most factory radios.
    Getting on with the car itself I would have preferred that Lexus has kept the clear or smoked lenses for the tail lights as that was the IS trademark. I personally have no idea why Lexus put 4 doors on this car as the backseat is virtually uninhabitable by anyone other than small children (I'm 6'4"/ 215lbs.) They would have done better and gotten much less slack for making this a 2+2 coupe. The key fob thing is pretty cool although, I've used one before, I'm just making a note of that.

    Well onto the drive. IMO I don't see the point in Lexus having the 250 at all. There marketing team is way off for thinking that people will wanna sacrifice performance at the expense of gadgets. I think most want both. The 3L engine found in the GS should have been the base engine and provides similar fuel economy. The 2.5L just doesn't cut it for me and I couldn't honestly justify spending 38K for a 200hp car optioned the way I would want it (Sport package/ Nav/ ML) over a similarly equipped and about equally powered Acura TSX. That's about a 10K premium.

    The 350 on the other hand is very good in it's own right. I can see why a lot of people will like this car although I think asking 42K+ OTD is a bit much for this car. I would say 40K would be a fair price OTD with sport package, nav and ML. The straight line acceleration on this car is great- although I don't believe it's quite 5.3 seconds fast. The original 5.6 claim seems a bit more realistic to me. I was allowed to push it quite a bit before the salesman freaked out around 127mph. The car was extremely stable at that speed to my delight.

    My biggest faults with the IS are these. First get rid of the automatic. Although it shifts resonably smooth while in the "D" position, when you swith to "S" to use the paddles this thing lags. One particular shift that stood out took about 2-3 seconds to complete after I flicked the paddle. The DSG that Audi uses or even the SMG 2 from the e46 M3 would provide much better performance if an automated transmission is in order for the driver. Second they SHOULD have a manual transmission for this car (IS350.) Why it didn't launch with one I have no real idea. Third for the love of God why put a great engine like the 3.5L in a car when you can barely hear the exhaust note. The IS is supposed to be the "anti-Lexus" car. If it's gonna be this tame then why bring it out when you already have a great selling and nearly equally priced car in the ES? Fourth and foremost this car NEEDS some steering wheel feedback. It's supposed to be a sports sedan and ride a little rough. The "floaty" steering feels like I was driving my dad's Cadillac DTS. I know many Lexus owners probably don't wanna hear that but that was the first feeling that came to mind while driving this car. I think that VDIM needs a bit more calibration also... I had my first VDIM experience in a sweeping turn I normally take at around 65mph in my car which is FWD no less. I got the 350 up to about 72mph before VDIM started braking for me.

    As a control I also test drove a BMW 330i (again,) a G35 Coupe (again,) an Audi A4 2.0T Quattro, and an Acura TSX (again) on the same day. Like many magazines state from a driveabilty basis the BMW is STILL the standard. The G35 "feels" the fastest and hands down has the best exhaust note by far. The Audi A4 feels a lot more powerful than the 200hp claim and has the best interior IMO. The TSX may be one of the few FWD cars that make me not really miss RWD (it was equipped with the A-Spec sport suspension.) I can definately recommend the IS350 to anyone but I can't say the same for the IS250 unless they replaced the 2.5L for the 3L engine(40 extra horses can change your view.) All in all though if Lexus makes the changes I suggested they could make a very good car into an excellent "driver's" car and the "true" 3-series fighter that they promised us. As it stands now the IS' biggest competitor is the MB C-Class, Acura TL and Lexus ES. The G35 is still the best "3 fighter" on the market. If Acura would switch to RWD and add about 50hp to the TSX I would have to change that statement.

    Oh yeah... WOOT WOOT on my first post!!! ;)
  • texasmerqtexasmerq Member Posts: 86
    Well I drove the IS250/ 350 RWD. I can say that left to shift on its own that the AT is reasonably smooth. In "sequential" mode (aren't all AT sequential) this thing can lag depending on vehicle speed. As far as the !S250 AWD having enough power, well that's a very subjective opinion. The IS250 RWD had adequate power for everyday driving but for the money or if acceleration isyour concern you will do better elsewhere. The AWD version should be just a bit slower than the RWD version on account of the extra weight. The Audi A4 Quattro felt faster when I drove it and the G35 is a fast car although it doesn't have the best fuel economy or the best interior in this segment.
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,242
    Don't forget tonight's member-to-member chat - it's open mic night, so come and discuss whatever's on your mind.

    6-7pm PT/9-10pm ET. Drop by for live chat with other members. Hope you can join us!

    kirstie_h

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • killerbunnykillerbunny Member Posts: 141
    IMO I don't see the point in Lexus having the 250 at all. There marketing team is way off for thinking that people will wanna sacrifice performance at the expense of gadgets.

    IMO people should investigate the background before they conclude.

    The IS250 brings a huge performance INCREASE comparing to the car it replaces: IS200. America is not the only place Lexus does business. There are places in Europe and Asia where the cost of fuel is double or triple that of the US.

    Both IS200 and IS300 are replaced by far more powerful successors. What are you complaining about. :mad:
  • texasmerqtexasmerq Member Posts: 86
    I am very well aware of the IS200 in Japan but the problem is we are talking about the American market. A new IS300 with 245hp makes more sense as the American market won't care about the foreign market IS200. People here remember the IS300 from last generation. The IS250 IMO is a regression in performance in every area except fuel consumption when compared to the IS300. FWIW 102hp is a huge jump in performance between models also. Like it or not another IS300 with the 245hp engine makes a lot more sense anyway you cut it... especially when you mention price with options. Like I said it's a lot easier to swallow a 38K 245hp car v. a 38K 204hp car.

    That's what I'm complaining about. :)
  • oacoac Member Posts: 1,594
    BMW 325xi....
    pros: comes in AWD and manual. You don't have to get leather (given the choice, I prefer not to pay extra for dead animal in my car.) The driving experience, of course. This car is also much faster despite having a similar engine.


    Not correct. The 325i has a 3.0L I-6 engine, while the IS250 has a 2.5L V-6 motor.
  • oacoac Member Posts: 1,594
    Like I said it's a lot easier to swallow a 38K 245hp car v. a 38K 204hp car.

    That's what I'm complaining about.


    Do you recall how long BMW has been selling a 180-ish HP car (e46 325i, 525, 528i) for the mid-$30K's and higher ??? The e90 325 has a 3L 215HP motor and sells for the mid-to higher $30K range, do you find that price reasonable ? BMW fans continue to buy these cars despite their low HP rating, why ? Handling and performance. The BMW fans will also tell you its not all about HP, eh ? So Lexus is also not all about HP. Its the total package.... luxury, sport, finesse, reliability, style, features and safety....and Yes, BRAND recognition. All of these come at a price...
  • aab4aab4 Member Posts: 39
    Did you read my post Here it is:

    Thanks for you honest posting.

    I drove the IS 350, BMW 330i, and G35X.

    Tough choice, love the interior, and of course reliability of Lexus, but to me anyway, too much of an luxury sport versus sport luxury like BMW, if you know what I mean.

    BMW and Infiniti just felt better to drive, more fun. Lexus was not far behind just
    didn't feel as tight.

    Here is my dilemma. I like all 3.

    Infinity G35X with AWD, at around 34-36K loaded, is my # 1, because of price, AWD, and rear seat is bigger. Close to invoice, been out 3 years or so, very reliable.

    BMW 330i was # 2, a great car to drive fast, really the benchmark, and around 39-42K loaded. But new model, and BMW as most manufacturers usually have some problems first year, including Lexus.

    Lexus 330i, the most luxurious, and tops in reliability, I like the looks, and it is quick.However Sport Package with Additional Options is $6,845.00 on their Web Site. That brings it up to 43K without any other options or taxes and dealer fees.
    So 46K sounds about right. Sticker was 45K +. Didn't really negotiate.

    I agree with the assessment the IS 350 is a heck of a car, much better than the previous model, but I think Lexus is pricing themselves out of the market. I always thought BMW would cost more.

    Tough choice??? I always wanted a Beemer, and always wanted a Lexus, otherwise I would of bought the G35X.

    I will test drive all three again, take my time, and see what happens.

    !!!!!!!Latest news!!!!

    My neighbor's son is BMW mechanic.

    He said new 330i will have problems first year, software, new engine, new transmission, etc. And stay away from iDrive electronics.

    Don’t buy first year. He also mentioned all Manufacturers have problems first year,
    In fact Toyota just had a major recall in Japan. And Lexus has had recalls.

    Since I drive to NY in winter, and IS350 doesn’t have AWD, Infiniti G35X gives me
    What I need. Much closer feel to BMW than Lexus, great reliability, AWD, and
    Fully loaded mid 30’s.

    Test drive the G35X, I think you might really like it. It is very nice, not quite as luxurious as Lexus, but not many are.

    Good luck!!
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    Bingo.

    The 250 is in no way a more capable performer than the car it directly replaces here in the States. We are forced into a compromise to make the platform more saleable elsewhere. The 250 is the replacement for the IS300 with the 350 being a whole new ball of wax.

    Again, Bingo.
  • killerbunnykillerbunny Member Posts: 141
    I am very well aware of the IS200 in Japan but the problem is we are talking about the American market. A new IS300 with 245hp makes more sense as the American market won't care about the foreign market IS200. People here remember the IS300 from last generation. The IS250 IMO is a regression in performance in every area except fuel consumption when compared to the IS300. FWIW 102hp is a huge jump in performance between models also. Like it or not another IS300 with the 245hp engine makes a lot more sense anyway you cut it... especially when you mention price with options. Like I said it's a lot easier to swallow a 38K 245hp car v. a 38K 204hp car.

    Another IS300 makes sense to you, but not to Lexus. 3.0L is simply too large for a base engine in Europe and Asia. They don't want to produce 3 models 500cc apart. The 3rd engine choice, IMO, will come as IS500.

    With this update, Amercian buyer get a beefed up IS300 in the IS350 and get an alternative they never had before:the IS200/250.

    BTW, at 38K there's the 306hp IS350 (with real leather, mind you).
  • texasmerqtexasmerq Member Posts: 86
    The major problem in your theory is that you are talking about a totally different generation of cars. What the market demands today v. 7 years ago is totally different and to suggest differently is a fault on your part. While the e90 has 215hp it's about a second faster from0-60 based on both manufacturer's official specs. That has more to do with the extra weight in the IS. At the current size about 245hp would be needed to match the straight line acceleration of the e90 325i. I understand that brand is a determining factor in price but at the same time you have to be sensible about what competition is offering and what you are giving, especially since the IS has not developed the performance reputation the 3 series already has. Do you honestly think there would be as many G35 on the road if they didn't undercut the BMW by so much? The same can be said for the first generation IS300. The whole thing about the IS300 was getting 90% of the 330i performance at a 325i price. I understand Lexus isn't all about performance, they also have the luxury, higher perceived reliability, and the rest of your points are subjective (style, features, finesse, and pretty much all the vehicles are reasonably safe.)

    Now if you can't agree with my opinion about the IS250 with options being overpriced and underperforming so be it. You just can'y throw "sport" into the conversation when this car is getting dusted by most other cars on the road because of the weight factor.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    aab4, If you have the time (or are planning a vacation) you might want to consider Euro Delivery on the 330i/330xi.

    I know with the features I prefer a 330i ED comes out to 35.5 v. 41k msrp. Looking at that price, plus free maintenance, I see a massive savings compared to the IS350 (over 6k).

    I've got several friends living there so if I go back to BMW, I can make it a 2-3 week European vacation with my own "rental". Again, this comes down to if you're looking to travel to Europe then ED can be a lifesaver (and make the vacation easier).
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.