Options

Edmunds Members - Cars and Conversations (Archived)

1134313441346134813493158

Comments

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I dropped collision on the Mini and the old Dodge truck--just comprehensive on the Mini and just basic on the truck.

    They are expendable and I'm $600 bucks to the good.

    I have been parking the Mini under an old tree, but so far, no luck. :p
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,748
    ab348 said:
    Oh boy. That's worrisome. I liked him.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,460
    It's a good old boys club, he'll land elsewhere with a dose of goofy model name nomenclature and a whiff of arrogance.
    ab348 said:
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Cadillac needs to go back to its roots---seriously. Big, poofy, glitzy barges and SUVs. People are now driving well into their 80s and they don't care as much about prestige and public image-------and, a lot of them still have money.

    I'll never dance in Swan Lake, and Cadillac can't build a Mercedes or BMW, so forget it.
  • bwiabwia Member Posts: 2,913
    ab348 said:

    The problem with Cadillac is Cadillac. It wants to reposition itself as a luxury "sports" sedan a la BMW and Audi, but alas, it has missed the mark. A 100 years of brand equity was further destroyed when De Nysschen moved  Cadillac's HQ to NYC without anything tangible to show for it... except for his new nomenclature CTS-3, 4, 5 and CTS 6.


  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,697
    jmonroe said:

    xwesx said:

     Well you better get that cruise diesel soon take a road trip somewhere to get it though 

    That's about the only way a I roll!

    Let's see... my 2010 Forester was in Seattle, so about 2,200 miles. The 2013 Passat was Ohio (4,000), then the Q7 in Texas (5,500), and the 2013 Forester in Illinois (about 4,500, with a deviation getting home in order to visit family in Oregon).

    So, yeah, hopefully I can get a good length trip in to bring the next car home. Just enough to stretch its highway legs a bit. :)
    WOW, I thought I was kinda weird going out of state to get cars. Got my last three cars like that. Two in Ohio and the latest one, the '15 Genny in Fairfax VA, (just outside of DC). Driving those distances from an eastern suburb of the Burgh is about my limit. Having to get an oil change after driving back home with a new car is, well, waaaay beyond my limit. You may even have to check the tires for wear after the trips you make. :'( I heard Son #1, who lives about 10 miles from me, say one time, that he'd go as far as Chicago to get a car but he'd only have to check the washer fluid after a trip like that.

    I gather Alaskan dealers are tough to deal with, at least for you.

    jmonroe
    Well, there is the dealer mentality of having a captive audience (which they somewhat do since so many local folks are willing to pay full MSRP for even common cars), but then there is also the relative scarcity of some types of vehicles. The last three (Passat, Q7, and Forester) were simply unobtanium anywhere in the state. And, of course, if you *could* find one, you had a population size of exactly one from which to choose. The VAG products were both diesel, and that's just a rare bird in a state with a population of ~700,000.

    Our Forester is a replacement for the 2010 Forester, and my wife wanted "the same car," which meant there were color, option, and transmission requirements that made finding a common Alaskan car not so common after all.

    However, since I really enjoy taking long road trips, the distance to find the cars was no deterrent for me at all. In fact, on the Forester, @nyccarguy actually went and looked at one an hour away from him all the way on the east coast! Ultimately, I ended up getting the "same car" in Illinois, but I would have had no qualms about traveling the extra miles to buy the CT car.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • jmonroejmonroe Member Posts: 8,989

    ab348 said:

    Michaell said:


    last year we hired a 25 year old in the same job I'm doing at about 1/5th less money that I was hired at over 10 years earlier. Based on the last few years of wage increases it will be at least 10 years to get to where I was over 10 years ago.

    I am just waiting it out to retirement.

    My former employer is on a similar kick.

    The CEO calls it the "no collar workforce".

    I call it borderline age discrimination.
    I hate to sound like a cranky old man (wait, what?) but I despair for this generation. I had a young lady, very nice, whom I inherited in my last job from her boss who got fired and who I replaced in his role while keeping my previous one. She had been there 4 or 5 years by then. I had always found her pleasant and personable but never had to work with her.

    She was doing media relations and would have a nervousness/anxiety attack whenever she had to field a question or god forbid do an on-camera piece. Keep in mind this is something she allegedly was trained to do in school.

    OK, not everyone is cut out for that, lets find something else. So we reassigned her to event management. Nope, that didn't work either, too much for her to juggle, deadlines stressed her out.

    Next I tried her in internal communications, internal website, newsletter, etc. A disaster. It became a black hole, stuff went in, very little came out.

    I retired at that point.

    She hung on a while longer doing god knows what and I notice now she has moved to a govt job where she is responsible for employee engagement and internal workforce opinion surveys. I suspect that will not work out either.

    How many chances does such a person expect before they get the message they need to find something else they can actually do? The sad part is I suspect she thinks she is doing great.

    I find many 20-somethings I deal with in various businesses very unimpressive. But occasionally I find someone in that same age group who blows me away with how good they are. So I don't know if it is a generational thing or just poor education and training.
    I tend to blame it on the "self-esteem" movement---as a consequence many Americans think they are a lot better than they really are. That leads to a sense of entitlement and takes the "fire out of their belly" as Lee Iacocca used to say.

    Now everyone's kid is a genius.

    No, little Mozart writing concertos at age 12 was a genius.
    Because the coach said, "line up kid's...here's your participation trophy".

    It's not working.

    jmonroe

    '15 Genesis V8 with Ultimate Package and '18 Legacy Limited 6 cyl

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,436
    I don't pay much more than Mike, and I got 3 cars, full coverage, and a kid on the policy. Going to save a bundle in a few months when I drop one car, and she goes off on her own insurance.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,748
    Caddy didn't miss the mark. By commonly found accounts (both professional and nonprofessional), the CTS and ATS are tremendous drivers' cars, especially in V sport and V trims. But it still has the wrong badge to be popular enough.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,316
    bwia said:
    The problem with Cadillac is Cadillac. It wants to reposition itself as a luxury "sports" sedan a la BMW and Audi, but alas, it has missed the mark. A 100 years of brand equity was further destroyed when De Nysschen moved  Cadillac's HQ to NYC without anything tangible to show for it... except for his new nomenclature CTS-3, 4, 5 and CTS 6.




    Well, I would argue that 100 years of brand equity was destroyed starting in the '70s when they just became a bigger and more tarted up Chevy with more plastic wood and plastichrome and maybe a better grade of crushed velour on the seats. You can't sell those kind of soft, floaty cars like they were building up to 2003 or so any more.

    Their current fleet is pretty good in terms of matching up with BMW and M-B except for the SUVs, but they are getting there on those too. I think the nomenclature bit is a red herring - do anyone's model names resonate with people any more? The problem in many markets is the dealer network and the legacy reputation that still carries on. You can't sell an old man's car to many younger buyers, but you can do the reverse.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • nyccarguynyccarguy Member Posts: 17,516
    xwesx said:

    jmonroe said:

    xwesx said:

     Well you better get that cruise diesel soon take a road trip somewhere to get it though 

    That's about the only way a I roll!

    Let's see... my 2010 Forester was in Seattle, so about 2,200 miles. The 2013 Passat was Ohio (4,000), then the Q7 in Texas (5,500), and the 2013 Forester in Illinois (about 4,500, with a deviation getting home in order to visit family in Oregon).

    So, yeah, hopefully I can get a good length trip in to bring the next car home. Just enough to stretch its highway legs a bit. :)
    WOW, I thought I was kinda weird going out of state to get cars. Got my last three cars like that. Two in Ohio and the latest one, the '15 Genny in Fairfax VA, (just outside of DC). Driving those distances from an eastern suburb of the Burgh is about my limit. Having to get an oil change after driving back home with a new car is, well, waaaay beyond my limit. You may even have to check the tires for wear after the trips you make. :'( I heard Son #1, who lives about 10 miles from me, say one time, that he'd go as far as Chicago to get a car but he'd only have to check the washer fluid after a trip like that.

    I gather Alaskan dealers are tough to deal with, at least for you.

    jmonroe
    Well, there is the dealer mentality of having a captive audience (which they somewhat do since so many local folks are willing to pay full MSRP for even common cars), but then there is also the relative scarcity of some types of vehicles. The last three (Passat, Q7, and Forester) were simply unobtanium anywhere in the state. And, of course, if you *could* find one, you had a population size of exactly one from which to choose. The VAG products were both diesel, and that's just a rare bird in a state with a population of ~700,000.

    Our Forester is a replacement for the 2010 Forester, and my wife wanted "the same car," which meant there were color, option, and transmission requirements that made finding a common Alaskan car not so common after all.

    However, since I really enjoy taking long road trips, the distance to find the cars was no deterrent for me at all. In fact, on the Forester, @nyccarguy actually went and looked at one an hour away from him all the way on the east coast! Ultimately, I ended up getting the "same car" in Illinois, but I would have had no qualms about traveling the extra miles to buy the CT car.
    By the way, nothing was better than the look on the guy's face when I told him I'm test driving the car for a friend of mine from Alaska that I met online!

    2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,436
    I got that look when I stopped at a BMW by me to look at a car for a guy from Colorado. Whose last name I don't think I even knew at the time.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,353
    edited April 2018
    qbrozen said:

    Caddy didn't miss the mark. By commonly found accounts (both professional and nonprofessional), the CTS and ATS are tremendous drivers' cars, especially in V sport and V trims. But it still has the wrong badge to be popular enough.

    The "Standard of the World" was run into the ground in the '80s; you can lose a carefully cultivated brand image in less than a decade- and it usually takes 15 years or more to rebuild or establish one

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    qbrozen said:

    Caddy didn't miss the mark. By commonly found accounts (both professional and nonprofessional), the CTS and ATS are tremendous drivers' cars, especially in V sport and V trims. But it still has the wrong badge to be popular enough.

    The people who buy Cadillacs don't want a "driver's car" and the people who want "a driver's car" don't want a Cadillac.

    "Know your audience" is my advice.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,766
    Cadillac is hurting on the CUV/SUV front and I read he wanted to still concentrate on cars.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • driver100driver100 Member Posts: 32,594
    edited April 2018
    jmonroe said:

    ab348 said:

    Michaell said:


    last year we hired a 25 year old in the same job I'm doing at about 1/5th less money that I was hired at over 10 years earlier. Based on the last few years of wage increases it will be at least 10 years to get to where I was over 10 years ago.

    I am just waiting it out to retirement.

    My former employer is on a similar kick.

    The CEO calls it the "no collar workforce".

    I call it borderline age discrimination.
    I hate to sound like a cranky old man (wait, what?) but I despair for this generation. I had a young lady, very nice, whom I inherited in my last job from her boss who got fired and who I replaced in his role while keeping my previous one. She had been there 4 or 5 years by then. I had always found her pleasant and personable but never had to work with her.

    She was doing media relations and would have a nervousness/anxiety attack whenever she had to field a question or god forbid do an on-camera piece. Keep in mind this is something she allegedly was trained to do in school.

    OK, not everyone is cut out for that, lets find something else. So we reassigned her to event management. Nope, that didn't work either, too much for her to juggle, deadlines stressed her out.

    Next I tried her in internal communications, internal website, newsletter, etc. A disaster. It became a black hole, stuff went in, very little came out.

    I retired at that point.

    She hung on a while longer doing god knows what and I notice now she has moved to a govt job where she is responsible for employee engagement and internal workforce opinion surveys. I suspect that will not work out either.

    How many chances does such a person expect before they get the message they need to find something else they can actually do? The sad part is I suspect she thinks she is doing great.

    I find many 20-somethings I deal with in various businesses very unimpressive. But occasionally I find someone in that same age group who blows me away with how good they are. So I don't know if it is a generational thing or just poor education and training.
    I tend to blame it on the "self-esteem" movement---as a consequence many Americans think they are a lot better than they really are. That leads to a sense of entitlement and takes the "fire out of their belly" as Lee Iacocca used to say.

    Now everyone's kid is a genius.

    No, little Mozart writing concertos at age 12 was a genius.
    Because the coach said, "line up kid's...here's your participation trophy".

    It's not working.

    jmonroe
    And what happened to "failing". Kids learn something when they fail, like what not to do.(Agreed 12X now)

    2017 MB E400 , 2015 MB GLK350, 2014 MB C250

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,748
    edited April 2018



    The people who buy Cadillacs don't want a "driver's car" and the people who want "a driver's car" don't want a Cadillac.

    "Know your audience" is my advice.

    Except me. And the others who bought a V Sport or V. ;b
    Some folks don't care about the badge, only what is under it. Sadly, that population is too small.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • driver100driver100 Member Posts: 32,594
    edited April 2018
    I like the looks of a Cadillac......but it is risky, I know I love driving a European car, so why chance getting a Caddie and then regreting it. Plus, I'll get killed on the trade-in if I want to come back again.

    Not much upside to trying one....but, lots of downside. I wonder how many other Euro car owners feel the same.

    Besides my wife would disown me if I bought a Caddie, I know what she would be thinking;

    2017 MB E400 , 2015 MB GLK350, 2014 MB C250

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,748
    Same downsides to Euro, IMHO. I've run the numbers before: a CTS and 5-series depreciate similarly. Neither is a smart buy new.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • bwiabwia Member Posts: 2,913
    edited April 2018
    Edit...

    Cadillac is not an aspirational brand except for the Escalade. Yet their list price is as high or even higher than genuine luxury models.

    American auto makers are not aiming for highest and best quality at the high end nor the lowest price at the low end. Since they can't effectively compete at either end of the spectrum their defacto strategy is the mass market for average vehicles at average price and quality. In baseball one cannot win with such a strategy. 
  • jmonroejmonroe Member Posts: 8,989
    driver100 said:

    jmonroe said:

    ab348 said:

    Michaell said:


    last year we hired a 25 year old in the same job I'm doing at about 1/5th less money that I was hired at over 10 years earlier. Based on the last few years of wage increases it will be at least 10 years to get to where I was over 10 years ago.

    I am just waiting it out to retirement.

    My former employer is on a similar kick.

    The CEO calls it the "no collar workforce".

    I call it borderline age discrimination.
    I hate to sound like a cranky old man (wait, what?) but I despair for this generation. I had a young lady, very nice, whom I inherited in my last job from her boss who got fired and who I replaced in his role while keeping my previous one. She had been there 4 or 5 years by then. I had always found her pleasant and personable but never had to work with her.

    She was doing media relations and would have a nervousness/anxiety attack whenever she had to field a question or god forbid do an on-camera piece. Keep in mind this is something she allegedly was trained to do in school.

    OK, not everyone is cut out for that, lets find something else. So we reassigned her to event management. Nope, that didn't work either, too much for her to juggle, deadlines stressed her out.

    Next I tried her in internal communications, internal website, newsletter, etc. A disaster. It became a black hole, stuff went in, very little came out.

    I retired at that point.

    She hung on a while longer doing god knows what and I notice now she has moved to a govt job where she is responsible for employee engagement and internal workforce opinion surveys. I suspect that will not work out either.

    How many chances does such a person expect before they get the message they need to find something else they can actually do? The sad part is I suspect she thinks she is doing great.

    I find many 20-somethings I deal with in various businesses very unimpressive. But occasionally I find someone in that same age group who blows me away with how good they are. So I don't know if it is a generational thing or just poor education and training.
    I tend to blame it on the "self-esteem" movement---as a consequence many Americans think they are a lot better than they really are. That leads to a sense of entitlement and takes the "fire out of their belly" as Lee Iacocca used to say.

    Now everyone's kid is a genius.

    No, little Mozart writing concertos at age 12 was a genius.
    Because the coach said, "line up kid's...here's your participation trophy".

    It's not working.

    jmonroe
    And what happened to "failing". Kids learn something when they fail, like what not to do.(Agreed 12X now)
    "Failing"!! You had to remind me of 5th grade, huh? :@

    You have a hellava way of agreeing with someone but I understand all too well what you mean.

    BTW, you gotta stop counting the agreements. I'm not so sure you're smart enough to count as high as it's going to get. :p

    jmonroe

    '15 Genesis V8 with Ultimate Package and '18 Legacy Limited 6 cyl

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,237
    qbrozen said:

    Same downsides to Euro, IMHO. I've run the numbers before: a CTS and 5-series depreciate similarly. Neither is a smart buy new.

    I'd be hesitant to buy either out of warranty too.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited April 2018
    qbrozen said:



    The people who buy Cadillacs don't want a "driver's car" and the people who want "a driver's car" don't want a Cadillac.

    "Know your audience" is my advice.

    Except me. And the others who bought a V Sport or V. ;b
    Some folks don't care about the badge, only what is under it. Sadly, that population is too small.
    It's not about the car itself---that's kind of the point. Cadillac can't live off people like you.

    Is CUE still god-awful or is it better now?
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,681
    edited April 2018
    Today is tax day.
    To all those commenting that folks should file electronically, I looked up the info now and all the forms I need to file and other requirements mean that I could have filed electronically. Lots of typing, but I could have done it.

    I guess I just like paper filing and like harrassing them with return receipts proving I sent the stuff to them.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,766
    @laurasdada
    I asked one of my kids who lives in the Cleveland area about local income taxes.
    Depending where you live, you might have to file returns for the location you work in and another for the location where you live.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • tbirdmarcotbirdmarco Member Posts: 3,838
     Well very interesting above guys 
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,018
    @Mr_Shiftright

    I agree with you 100% on Caddy.  They should concentrate on making 4 cars

    1 - A soft cushy FWD Midisze. Isolated from the road with the corporate 3.6 V6 Think Avalon or ES350

    2 - Buick Enclave / RX350 Clone 

    3 - large RWD sedan that can be a limo.  Need fleet sales 

    4 - Escalade (cant kill that one). 

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • jmonroejmonroe Member Posts: 8,989

    @laurasdada
    I asked one of my kids who lives in the Cleveland area about local income taxes.
    Depending where you live, you might have to file returns for the location you work in and another for the location where you live.

    This is what happens when you help in putting out a river fire.

    jmonroe

    '15 Genesis V8 with Ultimate Package and '18 Legacy Limited 6 cyl

  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,766
    @tjc78,
    The Aviator could be a game changer.
    Cadillac doesn't have anything to compete with that.
    As soon as it was announced, one of my kids was asking me about buying a CPO.
    It won't even be on sale for a while!
    Could be just a rumor, but read that the Escalade is going to get IRS due to new Navigator.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    tjc78 said:

    @Mr_Shiftright

    I agree with you 100% on Caddy.  They should concentrate on making 4 cars

    1 - A soft cushy FWD Midisze. Isolated from the road with the corporate 3.6 V6 Think Avalon or ES350

    2 - Buick Enclave / RX350 Clone 

    3 - large RWD sedan that can be a limo.  Need fleet sales 

    4 - Escalade (cant kill that one). 

    That's a good list! Cadillac should definitely stay out of the prestige market and move to entry level lux or maybe the lower end of the full-size Lexus.

    If you think about it, this makes sense. What has always been the criticism of Cadillac these past 20 years?

    That the car is never any nicer than it had to be.

    So make 'em only as nice as they need to be, and only as competent as they need to be.

    Cadillac buyers probably won't be driving too much on the Autobahn, They want to set cruise control at 75 mph and arrive safe and relaxed. Celebs and athletes aren't going to do Paris-Dakar or the Carrera-PanAmericana. Just get me to the theater or arena on time in a nice cushy leather seat and an isolated environment.

    And there's always airports, weddings and prom nights.

    If kudos in performance-oriented automotive magazine articles were the only thing selling cars, then the Camry wouldn't even exist.


  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,018
    @tjc78, The Aviator could be a game changer. Cadillac doesn't have anything to compete with that. As soon as it was announced, one of my kids was asking me about buying a CPO. It won't even be on sale for a while! Could be just a rumor, but read that the Escalade is going to get IRS due to new Navigator.
    I guess the Aviator is Explorer based?  Nice looking rig and yes Caddy has no true competitor to that. 

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • coldinohiocoldinohio Member Posts: 170
    Cadillac just fired deNyshccen or he left....
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,748
    tjc78 said:
    @Mr_Shiftright

    I agree with you 100% on Caddy.  They should concentrate on making 4 cars

    1 - A soft cushy FWD Midisze. Isolated from the road with the corporate 3.6 V6 Think Avalon or ES350

    2 - Buick Enclave / RX350 Clone 

    3 - large RWD sedan that can be a limo.  Need fleet sales 

    4 - Escalade (cant kill that one). 
    So you want them to be Lincoln? That strategy isn't working too well for Ford.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,748
    edited April 2018
    The people who buy Cadillacs don't want a "driver's car" and the people who want "a driver's car" don't want a Cadillac. "Know your audience" is my advice.
    Except me. And the others who bought a V Sport or V. ;b Some folks don't care about the badge, only what is under it. Sadly, that population is too small.
    It's not about the car itself---that's kind of the point. Cadillac can't live off people like you. Is CUE still god-awful or is it better now?
    I never had any issue with CUE. Not sure why people complained about it. Chrysler uconnect has always been praised by comparison, yet we have exactly the opposite experience. Uconnect is frustrating. The sync in my Ford is pretty good but still glitches once in a while (like tonight where it was showing me it was playing mysic off my phone yet FM radio was coming out the speakers). My Infiniti worked well enough but wasn't exactly cutting edge. Given the added benefit of controlling features of CUE from my phone when away from the car, I'd have to give it the nod as the best system I have owned thus far.

    as a side note, my Caddy had the nicest interior of any car I have ever owned.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,018
    edited April 2018
    I not sure of sales figures, but based on the amount I see the MKZ and MKX outsell the CTS and XT5.

    I agree the Caddies are more engaging cars, but I have to also agree with Shifty that they should go back to their roots.  

    Soft and cushy has worked for Lexus for a long time. 

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,460
    I don't know if I can see complaints about nomenclature as invalid. People howled when DeNysschen pulled the same trick at Infiniti, and I can't say I believe Infiniti would be a going concern at all without its CUVs/SUVs and fleet volumes - Q50 can't pull the weight alone (I see more Lambos than Q70s). IMO he used the exact same playbook at Caddy that he used at Infiniti - it didn't work for the former, and I don't think was working for the latter.

    Dealer experience might need work, too. From what I can see, they aren't quite up to par with the Germans, around here anyway, not to mention Lexus.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,316
    tjc78 said:

    I not sure of sales figures, but based on the amount I see the MKZ and MKX outsell the CTS and XT5.

    I agree the Caddies are more engaging cars, but I have to also agree with Shifty that they should go back to their roots.  

    Soft and cushy has worked for Lexus for a long time. 

    The MKZ outsells the CTS but the XTS outsells both of them.

    The XT5 sells about 50% more units than the MKX.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • abacomikeabacomike Member Posts: 12,388
    Caddy didn't miss the mark. By commonly found accounts (both professional and nonprofessional), the CTS and ATS are tremendous drivers' cars, especially in V sport and V trims. But it still has the wrong badge to be popular enough.
    The people who buy Cadillacs don't want a "driver's car" and the people who want "a driver's car" don't want a Cadillac. "Know your audience" is my advice.
    The market niche for Cadillac was always the middle aged to older aged buyer in search of a cruiser for the highway as well as elegance.  That has changed since the 1980’s and 1990’s.

    The brand continues to attract the older clientele, however their advertising is aimed at the 20-40 year old population segment.  Their quality control has improved and their use of up-to-date technology is impressive.  The ATS and CTS are in need of some major design improvements as these models retain the same basic design as those of the latter part of the first decade of this century.

    Their SUV’s are sharp looking and even the ATS and CTS models continue to be attractive.  I agree with Shifty that people do not necessarily go to Cadillac dealerships to buy a “true” driver’s car.  They go there for luxury and elegance at an affordable price.  Their performance “V” models are impressive power cars - but for that same price ($92,000+) there is stiff competition from German manufacturers.

    But I still have to compliment the Cadillac Division for turning around the entire line - manufacturing and technology.  In fact, GM is building excellent vehicles in all its Divisions.


    2024 Genesis G90 Super-Charger

  • nyccarguynyccarguy Member Posts: 17,516
    GM does build some nice vehicles.  There are a few things that they need to do better.  I’m specifically talking about my Dad’s 2018 Yukon.  Build quality is excellent.  Things seem to be screwed together nicely.  His truck stickers at $65,000.  At this price point, GM should be embarrassed at the stock floor mats that come with it.  I’ve held wet napkins with more substance.  I also believe they should make Xenon lights standard (they are only on the Denali models).  Maybe make the Denali models with LED lights and give the lesser SL & SLTs Xenon Lights.

    2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD

  • driver100driver100 Member Posts: 32,594
    qbrozen said:

    Same downsides to Euro, IMHO. I've run the numbers before: a CTS and 5-series depreciate similarly. Neither is a smart buy new.

    They do depreciate similarly....on paper, but, I have a feeling that if you bring a Cadillac in to trade on a new MB or BMW they won't want it as much as they would one of their own. They use any excuse, to give you less.

    2017 MB E400 , 2015 MB GLK350, 2014 MB C250

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,748
    edited April 2018
    abacomike said:
    Caddy didn't miss the mark. By commonly found accounts (both professional and nonprofessional), the CTS and ATS are tremendous drivers' cars, especially in V sport and V trims. But it still has the wrong badge to be popular enough.
    The people who buy Cadillacs don't want a "driver's car" and the people who want "a driver's car" don't want a Cadillac. "Know your audience" is my advice.
    The market niche for Cadillac was always the middle aged to older aged buyer in search of a cruiser for the highway as well as elegance.  That has changed since the 1980’s and 1990’s.

    The brand continues to attract the older clientele, however their advertising is aimed at the 20-40 year old population segment.  Their quality control has improved and their use of up-to-date technology is impressive.  The ATS and CTS are in need of some major design improvements as these models retain the same basic design as those of the latter part of the first decade of this century.

    Their SUV’s are sharp looking and even the ATS and CTS models continue to be attractive.  I agree with Shifty that people do not necessarily go to Cadillac dealerships to buy a “true” driver’s car.  They go there for luxury and elegance at an affordable price.  Their performance “V” models are impressive power cars - but for that same price ($92,000+) there is stiff competition from German manufacturers.

    But I still have to compliment the Cadillac Division for turning around the entire line - manufacturing and technology.  In fact, GM is building excellent vehicles in all its Divisions.


    Just to clarify: M5 starts $20k higher than a CTSV

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • driver100driver100 Member Posts: 32,594
    Some older people think Cadillac means I have 'made it".
    They think a BMW or MB is one of those furrin cars......like a Fiat or something.
    I know of a few people who buy Lincolns, because it gets them into a premium brand, for a small extra price.

    2017 MB E400 , 2015 MB GLK350, 2014 MB C250

  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,697
    edited April 2018
    tjc78 said:

    I guess the Aviator is Explorer based?  Nice looking rig and yes Caddy has no true competitor to that. 

    I doubt many people remember it, but the Aviator nameplate existed a while ago (10-15 years? I don't recall) as a rebadged Explorer. That was back when Mercury was around, too, so you had Explorer, Mountaineer, and Aviator, which were all identical except perhaps their light assemblies and grilles. Mountaineer may have even been identical in those, too. I remember a friend bough a Mercury Mountaineer in 2001, which he had for a long time, and I think it was only different from an Explorer in which logo was on the front and back. That's what killed the Mercury division - there was literally nothing to set it apart from Ford.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,018
    xwesx said:
    I guess the Aviator is Explorer based?  Nice looking rig and yes Caddy has no true competitor to that. 
    I doubt many people remember it, but the Aviator nameplate existed a while ago (10-15 years? I don't recall) as a rebadged Explorer. That was back when Mercury was around, too, so you had Explorer, Mountaineer, and Aviator, which were all identical except perhaps their light assemblies and grilles. Mountaineer may have even been identical in those, too. I remember a friend bough a Mercury Mountaineer in 2001, which he had for a long time, and I think it was only different from an Explorer in which logo was on the front and back. That's what killed the Mercury division - there was literally nothing to set it apart from Ford.
    I remember it which is why I immediatey asked if the new one was Explorer based.   I think the old one had an engine choice that was exclusive too.  

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,436
    just watched a couple of Jetta preview drive videos. sounds impressive. If I was shopping large compact sedans soon, this is probably at the top of the list.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,316
    abacomike said:


    The ATS and CTS are in need of some major design improvements as these models retain the same basic design as those of the latter part of the first decade of this century.

    Their SUV’s are sharp looking and even the ATS and CTS models continue to be attractive.

    Quite incorrect on the design/platform of the ATS/CTS. They are on the Alpha platform which had its debut in 2012.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Alpha_platform

    The latest version of the Camaro is now on this platform as well.

    As was said, they have been trying to move the image from the gold chain/white belt & shoes set to one closer to BMW/M-B/Audi. Whether they will ever be able to do that is an open question. But IMO the cars themselves are not the problem. I could see this coming with Johan though as he is not a GM kind of guy.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • abacomikeabacomike Member Posts: 12,388
    qbrozen said:
    abacomike said:
    Caddy didn't miss the mark. By commonly found accounts (both professional and nonprofessional), the CTS and ATS are tremendous drivers' cars, especially in V sport and V trims. But it still has the wrong badge to be popular enough.
    The people who buy Cadillacs don't want a "driver's car" and the people who want "a driver's car" don't want a Cadillac. "Know your audience" is my advice.
    The market niche for Cadillac was always the middle aged to older aged buyer in search of a cruiser for the highway as well as elegance.  That has changed since the 1980’s and 1990’s.

    The brand continues to attract the older clientele, however their advertising is aimed at the 20-40 year old population segment.  Their quality control has improved and their use of up-to-date technology is impressive.  The ATS and CTS are in need of some major design improvements as these models retain the same basic design as those of the latter part of the first decade of this century.

    Their SUV’s are sharp looking and even the ATS and CTS models continue to be attractive.  I agree with Shifty that people do not necessarily go to Cadillac dealerships to buy a “true” driver’s car.  They go there for luxury and elegance at an affordable price.  Their performance “V” models are impressive power cars - but for that same price ($92,000+) there is stiff competition from German manufacturers.

    But I still have to compliment the Cadillac Division for turning around the entire line - manufacturing and technology.  In fact, GM is building excellent vehicles in all its Divisions.


    Just to clarify: M5 starts $20k higher than a CTSV
    Appreciate the clarification, Q, however one cannot compare a CTSV to an M5 in terms of handling and stability.  The $20,000 price differential is pocket change when considering the purchase of a muscle car, IMO.  20% more for an M5 over a CTSV is worth higher out of pocket costs.  Even the E63 is a preferred pick over the CTSV at 20% more, IMO.

    2024 Genesis G90 Super-Charger

  • driver100driver100 Member Posts: 32,594
    Wasn't the early Explorer matched with a Mercury Tribute....but the Tribute engine really came from Mazda?
    I always liked the Milan styling over the Fusion.

    2017 MB E400 , 2015 MB GLK350, 2014 MB C250

This discussion has been closed.