Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Questions About Auto Insurance and Accidents

15657596162107

Comments

  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Sir, don't give up until you have filed a formal and written complaint with your state insurance commissioner and that would be the state in which their ommission occurred. :mad: Sgt.
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    A few hundred dollars to get an expert's opinion in writing may be a good deal. Call and talk to them if you are interested.
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    Of course a person would have to prove the loss. Evidence is needed to support the claim and prove it to at least a more likely than not degree; a preponderance of the evidence would need to support it. Expert testimony in some form would be that evidence in my examples.
    You say actual loss must be proved? If the term actual loss means the car must actually be sold to figure the DV, then the problem is how much the car was worth before the accident. It can only be estimated. A guess. That is problematic as it still requires a step of faith by the fact finder. Unless the owner sold the car just before the accident and then sold it again after all repairs were completed (and how could he?) , what actual numbers would there be to figure the DV?
    Your gut says 40% is absurd? That does not matter one iota. Unless your gut is called as an expert witness, that is. Even an expert's gut would not be good evidence. Some comparable car sales figures are needed if you are trying to persuade someone. A car sales manager or auction house could help with that. Used car guides might be used too.
    In a way, DV is similar to accepting cash in lieu of repair. Property damages can be proved and collectible even if the repairs are not done. When a person smashes into your car, and it is his fault, you can expect to recover the estimated cost of the repairs whether or not you decide to get the car repaired, or sell it, or drive it off a cliff. It makes no difference.
    Many, maybe even most new car dealerships do not even want a trade-in if it has had severe damage. They don't want to knowingly re-sell a car like that to any customer of theirs.
  • gmccardlegmccardle Member Posts: 35
    That's my next step, SGT. I'm not ready to give up the fight yet. It may make them think twice before they do this to someone else.

    Thanks for the support.
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,934
    What state are you in?

    I'm in CA and found the Insurance Commissioner to be feeble and powerless to help me. Perhaps Bristol West and Eastwood Insurance were fined for their transgressions, but I'll never know nor can I find out what punishment, if any, was doled out because of their "clerical examiner error," that they admitted to in writing.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • cccompsoncccompson Member Posts: 2,382
    Am I missing something here? As I understand your situation, your car has now been repaired, correct?

    And the cost of the repairs escalated significantly as additional damage was discovered during the repair process, correct?

    If this is your situation, sorry, it happens sometimes.

    Now, if I've read your posts wrong and they have yet to start fixing the vehicle, then your course is simple: don't authorize the work, fight a bit, and the vehicle will be totalled.
  • levan53levan53 Member Posts: 2
    On Monday my perfectly good and drivable 97 Grand AM SE was rear-ended by a Chevy Colorado truck and pushed into a F-150 truck. The Grand Am ended up looking like a metal accordion. The Chevy driver is at fault.

    I am a Florida resident.

    I planned on driving the GA until I or it fell apart. The accident has deprived me of this. With the KBB value under $3,000, I will be the one who loses the most, although I was not at fault. Can I somehow recoup the future value/personal worth of the GA? I have to buy another car, which I hadn't planned on. I have to shop the dealers which takes time away from my normal schedule, which I hadn't planned on. The KBB value will in NO WAY replace the car. I am innocent, not at fault, yet I am being punished for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. If I sue the Chevy driver, am I limited to a small claims court? I am mad as hell.:mad: TIA for your help.
  • gmccardlegmccardle Member Posts: 35
    I've been told my car has been repaired, but then again I've heard that before from the repair shop. They've been stringing me along for weeks.
  • mikefm58mikefm58 Member Posts: 2,882
    Can I somehow recoup the future value/personal worth of the GA? I have to buy another car, which I hadn't planned on. I have to shop the dealers which takes time away from my normal schedule, which I hadn't planned on. The KBB value will in NO WAY replace the car. I am innocent, not at fault, yet I am being punished for being in the wrong place at the wrong time

    In the infamous words of Bill Gates as he addressed a graduating class, "Sometimes life just sucks, get used to it". Without any injuries, all you're going to get is the value of the GA at the time of the accident, lost wages, and maybe a rental for a month. I'm assuming the at fault driver was insured.
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    I completely sympathize your situation as we have a 94 & a 95 that has never even been scratched, but if what happened to you happens to us I would look extensively for a similar vehicle in similar condition. They are rare, but they are out there. Check out like kind vehicles on E Bay, you may just find what you are looking for in FL. Good Luck.
  • joe131joe131 Member Posts: 998
    You won't get any voluntary payment for the time and inconvenience of shopping for a replacement car. And don't count on the other guy's company paying for a rental car after they make what they think is a fair total loss offer either. If they are feeling generous, they may pay you for a day or two extra, meaning after they offer you the settlement.
    If you can provide documentation and a convincing argument as to why your particular Grand Am is worth more than what they think it is worth, then you have a chance of getting them to make a higher offer. If their final offer is still way too low, you can file a small claims lawsuit against the other driver for up to the limit in whatever that court is called in your area. No doubt it is more than $3000, so you could offer the judge your proof for the car's value and the rental expenses you've had to pay. Itemize ALL your car damage related expenses and document them. You might get lucky.
    The problem is you'd be without your car and without payment for quite a while until your case is heard. Also, if you choose to pay your own money for a rental, it will be at the risk of not getting any of it back after the trial. Why? Because the judge may decide the company's total loss and rental offer to you was fair in the first place. Then you are out a good wad of cash, including your filing and trial costs.
    Check out your options with a lawyer who knows the law in your area, or research it yourself. You probably won't need (and in many cases are prohibited from having) a lawyer in small claims court.
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,202
    "...I am being punished..."

    You should punish them back. As you felt the impact you should have thrown yourself out of the car and laid on the pavement screaming "My career with the Ballet is over!" Next, call one of the "heavy hitter" lawyers you see on TV at 3a.m. and sue everybody in sight. :P The great American lawsuit lottery, don't ya love it? :sick:

    Seriously, having an older car totaled is a pain. My own 97 was dinged in a parking lot a few months ago and I was worried they would total it and leave me on foot. With those old cars you can never replace them for what they're worth.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • kiawahkiawah Member Posts: 3,666
    Unfortunately, wrong place at the wrong time.

    You can work yourself into a long term frenzie over this (trying to sue for whatever), or you can just take what is reasonable for a car this age and condition and move on.

    You got dealt a bad hand (not as bad as if there were personal injuries so be thankful), handle it quickly and move on. Life is way too short to dwell on the negatives. Think of the devastation some folks have had with recent disasters/fires/floods. In the grand scheme of things, this is a minor life inconvenience of some material hunk of metal.

    Look at the positive side, that GA was just about ready to have a major engine/transmission problem which it would then be worthless....so count your blessings! Go upgrade your driver with something that has all of the latest safety features.
  • wlbrown9wlbrown9 Member Posts: 867
    Not sure where you are, but there is on higher (insurance) authority in most states, the state insurance commission. They could overturn the 'absolutely final' decision if they deemed you to be in the right. I would at least explore this option before giving up.
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    if you are gonna sue a third party, there has to be damage / loss which can be proven. without selling the car, how is the actual loss determined?

    i think this is really slippery.
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    you're replying in the wrong forum. ;)
  • levan53levan53 Member Posts: 2
    Thanks for all your replies. I knew what you all were going to tell me, but I HAD to ask. Talked to a lawyer today and he told me the very same.
    So in future, I'd better check the depreciation of any car I'm thinking of buying!
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    One of the few cars that doesn't depreciate is the 65/66 Mustang V8. Either convertible, fastback, or hardtop. All will appreciate in years to come if you take care of them. ;)
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    If your car is totalled, and there are no injuries, then the car is worth maybe the $3K you said it was...end of story...

    You might get 1-3-5 days rental to hunt for a new car, but whoever said you could get a month (unless it is your own rental insurance), no way...liability will NOt pay for a month's rental while you car shop...
  • oh2beinscoh2beinsc Member Posts: 4
    I have just recently found out that my 2004 accord ex had previously been wrecked. when I purchased the car I had never thought about pulling a carfax report on it because it was the dealership my husband worked for.

    my question is how do I determine what my car is worth now? you can't tell by looking at the car that it had been wrecked before. it is in great shape. runs like it is new. according to edmunds in good shape is should get me about $12800 but not sure since it had been wrecked.
  • blueiedgodblueiedgod Member Posts: 2,798
    Have you ever, or do you know someone that has had to pay expenses out of pocket from a lawsuit where they were at fault?

    Um...I have a friend that made a turn into a litigious person. The person was fine at the accident, the damage to the cars was minor, but has since claimed to have severe back injuries requiring multiple surgeries. My friend is being sued for an amount that far exceeds the limits of coverage. They also received a letter stating from the insurance company (a large company with a good reputation) that they may want to seek their own legal counsel, although the company is providing them with a lawyer. My friend has met with a lawyer who didn't seem too concerned, like the lawsuit was rather routine. Still, it is very frightening. My friend doesn't really have assets to go after, but worries about a judgment hanging over their head.

    So, my question is, how concerned should they be? I've heard that it is very unlikely that they would be impacted, but is this so? Do you or have you been in this situation? And, how did it turn out? Thank you.


    According to NY state, if the damages exceed the insurance coverage, and the judgement is entered against the defendant. Plaintif CAN NOT collect any more than the insurance coverage. So, if one has state minimum coverage ($50,000), but the damages exceed that and a judgement is entered in that amount, let's say $2,000,000, plaintiff can only colelct $50,000 and not a cent more.

    This is in NY, other states may have different laws.
  • cccompsoncccompson Member Posts: 2,382
    What's your authority (case law or statute) for that claim?
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,202
    What's you authority (case law or statute) for that claim?

    Yea, I'd like to know that also. I seem to recall that lawyers here in NY will usually only sue for the policy limits but I didn't know there were any legal limits. I just thought that the lawyers would not sue for money that was too difficult to collect.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • brownie523brownie523 Member Posts: 22
    Thanks to all for the advice. I do have an attorney working on my case, I was just curious as to if there was some sort of formula used when coming up with a settlement amount. I haven't discussed the settlement with my attorney yet, since we have just received all of my FINAL medical bills last week($9,000). Though I would like to receive something for my pain and suffering, my main concern is having my medical bills paid and lost wages reimbursed. Being that this was a 4 car accident, my concern is whether or not the at fault party has enough insurance to cover all claims (i.e. 2 of the cars were totalled and mine had over $16K worth of damage, not to mention the personal injury claims...). I live in Virginia and I'm praying that the person did not only have the minimum insurance amounts of 25/50/20, but I'm sure I'll find out soon enough!
  • kiawahkiawah Member Posts: 3,666
    If this was the case, why would anybody ever buy more coverage than the minimum? They'd just be throwing their money away. Are you sure that is the way it is?
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    I have just recently found out that my 2004 accord ex had previously been wrecked. when I purchased the car I had never thought about pulling a carfax report on it because it was the dealership my husband worked for.

    Carfax is not 100% accurate. How did you discover the damage and can they determine the extent?
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    brownie: that is why I always recommend having U/M, which also covers you in the event the at-fault party is UNDERinsured, not just uninsured...

    blueiedgod: I would be interested in that cite myself...for a state to pass a law like that is beyond foolish, plus contrary to public policy, otherwise everyone would only buy minimum limits, as they would never be responsible for anything beyond that...while I only know GA, I find it incredible to believe that NY would do soemthing like that...whether or not the excess is collectible is always another story, of course...
  • brownie523brownie523 Member Posts: 22
    Thanks...I DO have U/M with 100/300/100 limits, so I guess I should be OK. I was under the assumption that the U/M only kicked in when the person is UNinsured. So I'm assumimg the U/M would pay only the balance of what is left over from the property damage and medical bills if the person does not have enough coverage? Do you know if it would pay lost wages and diminished value too?
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    often misunderstood...in my experience, it always stands for uninsured/underinsured motorists insurance...

    If the liability coverage is exhausted, then U/M will usually kick in, BUT YOU MUST OPEN A CLAIM TO NOTIFY THEM OF THE POSSIBILITY OF A U/M CLAIM, as it is not automatic...

    They will cover injuries, pain and suffering, and lost earnings, similar to the liability coverage (altho they are known for NOT being generous)...

    Diminished Value: unknown...
  • brownie523brownie523 Member Posts: 22
    Thanks for the info...That sounds like something that would make my premium go up if I have to use it...
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    on whether you are at fault for the wreck or the other party...it could cause a minor rise even if you are not at fault, but that depends on the payoff...if they pay $50K, I might expect a rise...if they pay $3K, prob not...
  • albertjohnnalbertjohnn Member Posts: 19
    Hi Experts,
    I recently got rear ended on my car and the other guy tried to make a deal with me to fix the car by himself so that he can be saved off the insurance hike. I initially said OK but when I had shown up neck and head injuries that evening, I went ahead and filed aclaim with my insurance and went for medical treatment.

    Here is the situation.
    I am with an insurance company A, got 500/1000/500 coverage with a $5K medpay and also Un/Under Insurued coverage as well(I am a strict student of Marsha's school here, I took the U/M, medpay and what not all of the suggestions from Marsha, thanks Teacher :) )
    The other guy is with insruance company B.

    Now my company is taking care of my claim and I am going through the medical treatment etc.
    My ins company is saying that they will start paying my medical payments but I am right now using my employement based medical insurance to start with.

    My question: What is MedPay,Why not I can use my employment based insruace for all of my treatment and my Company A will pay all my medical bills at the end directly to me?(this is where my MedPay comes into picture?)

    What about company B's responsibility on my medical bills? As the company B is at fault, they must be paying all my medical bills?
    I am clearly confused here, can some one guide me the right direction?

    Also, What are the responsibilites of My Ins Company A and the other Insurance company B(which is at fault)?

    I know that I am a student here, I want to learn from you guys..

    Thanks in advance.
    :confuse:
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    Ah, yes, one of my better students, you always participated in class discussions, and you were one of the few who always handed in your term paper one week early...:):):)

    The reason for using medpay is this: USUALLY, when you use group insurance, they want to be paid back (i.e. subrogate) out of your eventual settlement from Insurance B...so, if your group ins paid out $4K, and you recovered $10K, you must pay out $4K back to group for what they paid out...

    If you use medpay, they usually do NOT need to be reimbursed out of your settlement, whcih, in my example above, would put $4K more in your pocket, simply for the mere cost of paying for the medpay, usually between $50-200 per year...nice payback, when you see the numbers...

    Plus, medpay usually pays first dollar, no deductible, and no copays (at least, that is how we do it in GA)...so, if you had a $250 deductible, a $20 copay, if you saw a provider for 20 visits, you would pay out $650...medpay should be zero from your pocket...that $650 for deductible and copays could almost pay for 5-10 years worth of medpay premiums...that is why when someone tells me that medpay (assuming it is available) isn't worth it because they have group insurance, they often have no idea what they are talking about, as the copays alone will often exceed the medpay premium many times over...

    Assuming a fault state, Insurance B should NEVER be told you have any ins paying your med bills, negotiate for pain and suffering as tho those bills are not paid, as your damages are your damages, and the at-fault sompany should never have the opportunity to reduce your settlement simply because you were smart enough to have alternative ins to pay your doc bills...

    Just to make it better, if your meds were $15K, and group paid $12K, you would have to reimburse them the $12K...but medpay would allow you to put that $12K in your pocket...so, you pay a premium of, say, $50-200 per year, and put $12K tax free into your pocket...hard to make me believe that medpay is not a wise purchase...naturally, this only works if you are injured in a wreck, but the cost is nominal if you never have a wreck...it just seems to be the smartest gamble in the insurance world, with a decent liklihood that you could use it anytime, and more than once if you have multiple wrecks...

    Plus, your group covers you and your family only, whereas medpay covers anybody in the car, so if my family is in your back two rows of your SUV, we, too, are covered by your medpay and so we never have doctors hounding us for payment while waiting for the case to settle 6-9-12 months down the road...

    Medpay is a no brainer...in fact, it is so simple (yes, here we go again), that even a caveman knows enough to have medpay thru his GEICO.....:):):):):)
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,737
    Just to make it better, if your meds were $15K, and group paid $12K, you would have to reimburse them the $12K...but medpay would allow you to put that $12K in your pocket

    wow! that sounds like something that SHOULD be illegal. You sue for your "medical expenses" but the money never actually goes to medical expenses. hmmm...

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    wow! that sounds like something that SHOULD be illegal.I presume an insurance company would not pay out amounts beyond what the actual costs were unless ordered to do so by a court decision.
  • albertjohnnalbertjohnn Member Posts: 19
    Thanks Bob(Marsha), you are always great in educating them with your exceptional knowledge.

    I always remember that you will stress on the importance of MedPay and UI coverages in each and every message from you. I am glad that I am able to pick those points and follow them.

    Now coming to my case, as per your responce, I think that I did a mistake.
    I told the other party's insurance company (B) that I will go through my insurance company(A) and they (A) will follow the other party insurance(B).
    In this case, My insurance company (B) is spending on my PD and Medical bills(from my medpay) and then they will collect the same amount from the other party's insurance (B)
    If this is the case, How come my MedPay and my insurance with my company(A) is useful for me?

    I am planning to do this
    Talk to my Insurance company (A) and tell them that I will pay all my bills at this moment, and submit the bills once the treatment is done..
    Talk to the other party Insurance company(B) and telling the same.
    Once done, submit the bills to both of them, inform my group insurnace ang get the total bills
    Once A and B paid(I am thinking crazy here, I am confused, why do they both will pay me??) and pay back my group insurance company.

    Now I am sure that I am either confused or talking crazy here, I need help in understanding this.
    Thanks again ,
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    No, quite wrong...in tort law, your damages are your damages, regardless of whether or not YOU were lucky enough (group ins) or smart enough (medpay) to buy something that paid your bills...

    Why should the person/ins co who must compensate you for the damage they caused you get a break...what if a rich uncle paid your $12K in med bills...should liability get a $12K discount because you had a rich uncle???...why shouldn't your damages be calculated as your damages, regardless of whether or not something or someone paid a part of them???

    If your rich uncle gave you $10K, as a legal gift, to offset your $10K in lost wages, shouldn't your claim still document the $10K you lost as earnings???...should the at fault party, or their ins co, get a $10K discount because your lost earnings were not lost???

    Tort law goes back quite far, and damages are calculated as the damages, and that is why the liab carrier should NEVER know if any part of your loss was compensated by something that YOU may have had but the next guy does not...

    That is why medpay, to me, is beyond a no brainer, because it is so cheap to buy and can make your life easier, but only if you are involved in a wreck with injuries and med bills...
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,718
    I agree about what you can collect from the party that caused the injury... but..

    If you use your own medical insurance from work to pay your medical bills, almost every paper you sign will ask if someone else is responsible for the bills, if you have other insurance, if someone caused the injury that resulted in these bills, etc, etc, etc...

    If you collect on those medical bills from someone else, or through some other insurance policy, you can bet that your employer-based medical insurance will want reimbursement.

    (not an attorney, nor do I play one on TV)

    regards,
    kyfdx

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • gmccardlegmccardle Member Posts: 35
    My G35 was in a very reputable repair shop recently having over $16K in damage repaired. This place was recommended by Infiniti and is one of the only Mercedes approved body repair facilities in a large urban area in Florida. I took a tour of the shop and the office area looked like the lobby of a five star hotel. In the shop itself were a variety of Ferrari's, Maserati's, high end Mercedes, etc. all in various stages of repair. You get my point, this was a high end shop recommended by the local dealer of the brand of my car. I expected the repairs to be first rate. Not to drift from the subject too much, but my car has been in the repair facility since the date of my accident which was May 3rd. I'm writing this on July 14th and still don't have my car back. Maybe someone has a comment on whether this is a reasonable repair time or not.

    Yesterday I paid a surprise visit to the body shop. My car was sitting out front and no one was around so I thought I'd check it out. The first thing I noticed is that the vehicle was unlocked! In a city with one of the ten highest crime rates in the country I thought this need would go without saying. As I carefully looked over my car I noticed a number of disturbing imperfections. There were deep scratches below the headlights on the left side that were not there before the accident. There was a clearly visible paint drip on the right front fender (the car was T boned on the right side). The leading edge of the passenger side door (a replacement) was not painted. The body molding was not mounted flush on the door and there was a visible gap between the molding and the door. There was a visible dip in the door that was a sign of poor bodywork. I'm no expert, but I did work in my Dad's body shop at his car dealership during high school and I can tell shoddy work when I see it. The chrome moldings around the doors didn't fit tightly against the body, the trunk lid didn't fit right, the spoiler wasn't drawn up tight against the body and had nicks out of it, their were fish eyes the paint....I could go on, but my fingers are getting tired. The manager of the shop made notes of all these imperfections and tried to dismiss most of them. When I pointed out the dip and ripples in my repainted door he said "that's the way the come from the junkyard". Arghh!!

    He said all these issues would be fixed before I was to pick up the car. Obviously, the insurance company has not paid them yet. I'm sure I missed some issues because it was the end of the day on Friday and the shop was shutting down.

    My question is: Do I have to accept the car if I feel the repairs have not been adequately completed? When new this was nearly a $40K car built to exacting tolerances. Now anyone who knows cars can plainly see this was a car that was hit and haphazardly repaired. If I don't take the car, what repercussions can their be against me? My rental car bill is huge and continues to skyrocket. My supposition is when I go to pick up the car it will not have been restored to precrash condition. What are my options? Thanks. :confuse:
  • gmccardlegmccardle Member Posts: 35
    What are the obligations of an auto insurance adjuster when they do an initial estimate of the damage to a wrecked auto? Are they supposed to do a full and thorough inspection of the vehicle and generate their estimate from that?

    The reason I ask is that my G35 Infiniti was T boned a couple months ago and the initial estimate was for $8K. The final cost after repairs was over $16K. In short, I think the first estimate was grossly underestimated and was done so to prevent totaling the vehicle. Even the manager of the repair shop told me recently that if they knew the full extend of the damage the car would most likely have been totalled. He agreed with me that insurance companies don't like to total too many vehicles and lose money.

    Now that the car is repaired and has lost most of it's value, what can I do? I really feel I have been ripped off.

    Thanks.
  • dtownfbdtownfb Member Posts: 2,918
    I think it's time you had a talk with your insurance agent about your concerns with the repairs. Since the repairs are done (or close to being done), I doubt they can total the vehicle now. I know there has been a lot of talk on this forum regarding diminished value. It seems to me that you have a reasonable claim for diminished value. Maybe the experts can chime in and suggest something.
  • gmccardlegmccardle Member Posts: 35
    I'd have about as much luck getting the Pope on the phone as the insurance adjustor on my case. That said, I did talk with the local ins co rep who did the initial estimate on my car. He said at this point the car can't be totaled out even if repairs were to exceed 100% of the car's actual cash value.

    I'm not big on conspiracy theories, but this appears to me to be a case where the damage to my car was grossly underestimated knowing full well it would most likely require more repairs and at that point it is too late to total the car. The ins co saved $$$ my not having to pay out actual cash value to me and the repair shop makes $$$ by getting a big job. The only one who loses $$$ is me by getting back a car whose post accident cash value is several thousands less than it was pre accident.

    It is quite difficult to get any automobile professional to give an opinion on DV. The big dealers say they would never take my car as a trade in because of the history of damage. They would never sell a car like that to one of their customers. I read somewhere on this forum about getting an opinion from a lender, but now I can't find the posting.

    My Dad has always told me, "a car is worth exactly whatever someone is willing to pay for it". True, but doesn't help me much when submitting figures to the ins co.
  • cccompsoncccompson Member Posts: 2,382
    I don't understand how you reach the conclusion that the insurance company made out on this. If they had declared it a total from the get-go, they would have sold it. It's a popular model and should have brought fairly good money. It sounds to me as though they lost money here.

    That said, I can understand your frustration at so-called professionals underestimating the damage by half.

    As far as the DV figure is concerned, that's easy. IIRC, you said that you had been contemplating a trade prior to the crash. Ok, when you get it back, trade it immediately. Whatever you get for it is a hard number (not some damned estimate of its value) and the value of the DV claim is readily established.
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    The body shop made a professional error. As such, they should be held financially responsible for their error and sued to cash you out so you are not to be visited by the sins of the repairer. Such apparent prestige shops hold themselves up and beyond the average and as such deserve to be held to a higher standard of repair via legal means.

    The prestige is maintained by their awarding you what your car was worth prior to the crash and they get to keep the remains.
  • gmccardlegmccardle Member Posts: 35
    I figured that paying me over $20K to total the car would have cost less than to have it repaired, even if the cost of those repairs exceeded $16K. The repair shop was offered $4K for the car before it was repaired.

    The local dealer offered me $18K as a trade in and after talking to them now they say they would, in theory, offer me 8K for the car. In actuality, they would never take the car and sell a vehicle with that kind of damage to their customers.
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    That is exactly why I reco medpay, because group based ins will usually want reimbursement, aka subrogation...but there is STILL a silver lining to that in many cases...

    Let's say your hospital bill is $10K, but your ins is a PPO or HMO, and only is contractually obligated to pay $7K...when reimbursement time comes, you get to take advantage of the ins forced discount ($3K) so when you pay back, you only pay back $7K, as the hospital accepts the $7K as payment in full...whereas it would almost be impossible for me to negotiate the $10K down, simply because they are under the (mistaken) impression that we get 4-5X meds when we settle, when it is more like 1.5-2.5X meds, and the money from PI simply ain't like it used to be...
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,718
    I agree....

    Just didn't want anyone to get the impression that they could have their employer-based insurance pay for their medical bills, and not have to pay them back if they collected elsewhere..

    However... you can buy all the life insurance you want.. and when you die, they will all pay off.. ;)

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    you buy term, and never get totally ripped off by whole life/variable life/universal life, as all it does is thicken the agent's pocket at the expense of yours...

    "If I sell term I can't eat, if I sell whole life I can't sleep"...insurance company proverb...
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    What are the obligations of an auto insurance adjuster when they do an initial estimate of the damage to a wrecked auto?

    The adjustors job is to get an initial feel for the cost of the repair and to make an educated decision as to whether it's worth it or not. Many things aren't discovered until after the shop starts getting into the job - that's why they do supplemental appraisals.

    About 4 years ago I was involved in an accident where the rear tire came off the car in the next lane and hit the nose of my car. The initial estimate was for around $5K. By the time the repairs were completed, my insurer was into it for almost $14K - for a 6 YO Accord!! Drivetrain damage wasn't discovered until structure and cooling system damage was fixed (couldn't start the car). At that point, they fix it because they don't want to eat what they've already spent.

    Two years later, I was t-boned in the same car. Same bodyshop did everything they could to get it up to the total amount. They had it up to almost $7K in damages. The insurance company insisted on repairing it. The feeling I got was that they refused to total it because they had too much invested in it.

    Instead, I got trade in values for it repaired and they were in the $4K range. I sold if for scrap and pocketed the check and moved on. If I were you, I'd investigage DV and then trade it in and move on as well.

    As for dimished value, it varies from state to state. MA does not allow for diminished value claims.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    That is exactly why I reco medpay, because group based ins will usually want reimbursement, aka subrogation

    Are you saying that if you collect under medpay, that any overpayments belong to you??
Sign In or Register to comment.