By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-mike
NO, THE SORENTO DOES N O T FLY!!!!
Aerodynamics class is dismissed. :-)
-mike
-mike
-mike
-mike
NOW it is about downforce? These vehicles don't weigh enough for you?
Or is it handling?
What is it exactly you are trying to say?
If the underside is the same (pipes, cables, mechanicals), but 4 inches higher up, how is that less aerodynamic? I'll buy that it has less downforce, but not less aerodynamic.
He does a good job and has provided me with lots of useful info. He is the one who pointed me out to the existence of the Sorento!
:-)
Hardee har harr!
:-O
;-)
I don't think it's much of a problem until you go transsonic! :-)
tidester, host
What is not to like about torque, reliability, and good mileage, plus cheaper fuel?
(no, they don't smell any more, nor are they loud any more!)
-mike
Are you also wrong about the higher SUV having worse mileage?
http://www.awtrucks.com/tailgateup.htm
http://cartalk.cars.com/Columns/Archive/1997/October/05.html
http://www.fordf150.net/howto/fueleconomy.htm
http://www.dakota-truck.net/ARCHIVES/9902/3106.html
What brands and models of tires?
Opinions?
17 postings in less than two days is excessive, especially when the tone is so adversarial, laced with sarcasm. Other forums are having similar problems with this same individual (e.g., #9035 in "Chevy Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Oldsmobile Bravada"). I hope Steve and tidester won't allow our Sorento forum to deteriorate into an AOL or IRC chat room.
What is the big problem? If you don't want to read it, hit the "next page" button, or whatever.
I promise I'll try not to intrude too much. Thanks.
I promise I'll try not to intrude too much in the future. The Sorento looks like a promising SUV, and I'm very interested in seeing how it progresses. Thanks.
We've had enough diversion for one day.
tidester, host
Happy trails...
Cheers!
http://www.kia.ca/english/showroom/accessories.asp?m=38&t=116
It looks interesting. I would like to get the bra/mask for the Sorento though.
Cheers!
-mike
Thanks to this board and all posters for very good information - it sure helped my decision.
SM
arkainzeye - I have the same question in my mind when looking at this Sorento, the past Kia/Hyundai history and reilablity. The people that I spoke with don't recommend Kia (a lot of break downs). I have never known anyone who owns a Kia. And I have never seen one real bad Kia on the road. The Sorento will be my first Kia. I am sorry to hear about your x-girl's Kia. I also saw one poster mentioned the cheap plastic screws in the Sportage bumper, bad engine & transmission. I mean the 100K warranty will not do much for them, and not to mention the trips and time off that they took for the unscheduled maintenance repair. But others said they enjoy their Kia very much. It makes me hold back a little even after a test drive and some good quote prices. I always wonder why they make this SUV (or any of their cars) with all the goodies and the price is so low. How can they do it when they are making a similar car with same or even better features than the Japanese and European? A plastic screw again? On the other hand, will people feel more confidence when Kia make a $30K, $40K car or it owns by Ford or GM? I am glad these folks enjoy their Sorento. And I believe it has a positive future.
paisan - Beside Isuzu, are other SUV has the Tourqe-On-Demand system like Sorento (with luxury package)? Is it some kind of trade patent in auto industry? Is the Subaru AWD system the same? Like one wheel slip and it will transfer power to others.
-mike
So it seems to me that Kia is far far better than those vehicles even in Kia's worst days. Now that Kia's instituted a company-wide incentive bonus pay system where work teams (and design engineers) are personally rewarded for high quality scores, we're seeing a radically new company. I'm sort of a Deming (the quality control founding father) follower and if you look at the leaps in technical learning on the part of Kia the statistical curve moves in leaps and bounds instead of in a linear trajectory. This means that quality/tech industrial "learning" goes in rapid movements up not so much in degree but almost in kind. Their increased use of supercomputers and dramatic growth in R&D in general is evidenced by the new Sedona and now this Sorento which are already garnering industry and consumer-wide accolades.
It's an open secret in this field that the Japanese companies are at the forefront of disseminating false and misleading information through their American lobbying intermediaries to sully the rep of Kia (and Hyundai) precisely bc they are shocked and fearful of the rapid pace of industrial learning on the part of these "upstart" Asian competitors. Kia's ambitions are so grand and their research/sales are so explosive that Toyota/Honda fears Kia rather than any US firm (unfortunately).
People in just their 40s now remember when Japanese cars were junk (but then back then they really were). Mark my words, Kia/Hyundai will reach their goal of top five global automaker in less than 10 years.
Aslo the front hood protector if you notice goes down on the sides of the grill the one sold here in the states doesn't cover that part just the upper hood. I know as I have one.
Anyway, still wondering why they can make cars with all the goodies for low price when others cost thousands more? In addition, the 10yr/100000 miles warranty doesn't seem to effect the vehicle cost where you can only find such warranty coverage on luxury cars or an option on some cars. Quality is my concern. Like the guy's ex-girl Kia, the engines & transmission replacement properly cost more than the car original cost. However, Sorento is still on the top of my list. Just hesitate.