Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)

11281291311331341306

Comments

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    in those pics I posted, one of them (#36) is of a 1973 Ford LTD 2-door hardtop. I took it mainly because I have a friend who, for some reason, is lusting after a car like this. That's also the reason that I took a pic of the for sale sign in the window, so I could give the seller's phone # to my buddy. Easier than writing it down, I guess :) Anyway, anybody have an idea of what a fair price would be for a car like this? It seemed to be pretty clean, in and out. IIRC the engine was a 400-2bbl. The owner wanted $4500 OBO. Most likely, he still had it at the end of the swap meet! Anyway, maybe $2000-2500?
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I just find it kind of funny that you can easily skirt the rules by putting a new body on an even older and likely dirtier chassis (probably a very easy job with something like a 2CV), not to mention that it is likely easy to 'fix' foreign paperwork...not that I don't have faith in the wise DOT/EPA workers to be able to know any difference. And then of course the rulemakers/power trippers hold similar vehicles to different standards, imported or not. Oh yeah, and foreign diplomats seem to be exempt too, as anyone in a major city can probably attest to.

    That's a good point Andre raises too, about the modified cars. Seems a lot of engines have came over from Japan, not to mention the odd engine mods. Probably legal so long as you don't get caught.

    I think you'r right about that LTD. Not a $4500 car...I think it would have to be really mint for that...but a $2000 car sure.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    one of the pics I posted was of an early-mid 80's G-body Cutlass Supreme. That sucker had an Olds 455 under the hood! How would you get something like that to pass inspection? I've also seen Chrysler PT Cruisers with 426 Hemis, and I hear the Ford 351W makes a dandy fit in the engine bay of a Ford Focus! Don't tell me these things are passing the emissions test?!

    Now in some areas, you can get historic tags for a car. In Maryland, it has to be 25 years old or older. It never has to be inspected, never has to be smogged, etc. So I could take my '79 NYer, trash all the emissions stuff, force a 426 Hemi or some other monster of a motor under the hood, etc, and it wouldn't be a problem. But bringing in a 1980 2CV would be?! That just don't make sense! :confuse:
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...you guys got to let me know when you're going to Carlisle again. I haven't been out there for years, but they've got a lot of nice cars there. Trouble is, many are asking for way too much. Remember that nice '74 Cadillac we saw at Macungie? I have a '75 that was similar. I'd like to come across something like that again - at a more reasonable price. Hearing about your '76 LeMans has given me the CCB bug.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,565
    What was the weather like there Saturday? We had SNOW on Saturday..

    We were going to go to a local car show yesterday, but at 38 degrees and wind/rain, we decided to pass.. I'm thinking they may have canceled it, anyway..

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    the next Carlisle event that I would probably go to is the Ford Nationals, which I think is the first weekend in June. However, I might not be able to make that one, but I have every intention of hitting the GM Nationals, which is June 24-26. Normally I just go up for the day on Saturday, but this time I'm thinking about registering the LeMans for the fun field and going up for Friday and Saturday. Usually Sunday is a pretty dead day for these things, as vendors tend to pull out early, and people selling cars either sell them or get fed up and go home. I guess since a lot of people have to be at work on Monday, and often have a great distance to travel, they get a head start on Sunday. This year's giveaway car at the GM Nationals is a 1987 Cutlass Supreme, which almost makes me want to stick around on Sunday.

    BTW, here's the giveway car for the Mopar Nationals, which is July 8-10. http://www.carsatcarlisle.com/schedule/chrysler/giveaway.asp

    I can absolutely GUARANTEE that I'm going to stick around for that one! :D
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    really? You guys had SNOW?! And to think I was running the a/c on the Intrepid coming out there last Sunday?! The weather actually held out pretty good that day. It was a bit drizzly in the morning, and the ride from my place up to Carlisle was densely foggy in places. It got cold later on in the day though, and then started raining. Grbeck and I got stuck under one of the pavillions and tried to hang out there for awhile until the rain stopped. It didn't, though! I had just bought a big 1976 Pontiac full-lineup brochure, and I really didn't want it to get wet. Finally the rain slowed a bit and we made a dash to another building, where a guy was selling a bunch of brochures real cheap. I snagged one for a '79 Malibu and a '79 Nova, and also got a '98 Tracker brochure for my buddy who has one. This guy gave us better bags too, so I put my Pontiac brochure in with it. We finally decided the rain wasn't going to let up, so we decided to just deal with it, walk back in the rain (it sounded ALOT worse in those steel-roofed buildings than it actually was). I just tucked the brochures under my shirt.

    Naturally, by the time we got back to Grbeck's car, the rain had just about stopped entirely.
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    On Saturday evening, my wife and I took her sister home up in Denver .. we decided to take the back roads home and avoid the highway. Spotted not one, but two Bentley Continental R's in Cherry Hills (an exclusive neighborhood in Denver; home to John Elway, among others). Both were black.

    On Sunday, we got about an inch or two of snow. Nothing like the 21" we got two weeks ago, just stuck to the grass this time.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Andre says:

    "After all, you can get a 1950 Plymouth to pass 1980 emissions standards. In fact, you can get plenty of older cars to do it."

    No way, Andre...I'm not buying that one unless you put a catalytic system on it. You'd have to reduce emissions enormously. One 1950 Plymouth probably pollutes about the same as 50-100 modern cars I would guess, roughly.

    RE: Modded cars----they are often illegal. There's a lot of corruption. I could get any car I wanted on the road, but I wouldn't support corruption.

    EPA/DOT/CUSTOMS: They can be monsters, and they sometimes manhandle cars coming into the country. I remember one case of them inspecting a 70s Ferrari being shipped in. The Ferrari had all proper papers, posted a bond, had appointment for modifications, etc. but they couldn't find the hood latch so they pried the engine compartment open with a crowbar.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    keep in mind that there were plenty of cars in 1980 that would have passed the emissions test standards by a wide margin. Whatever the standard was in 1980, you can't assume that all cars were running right at that standard. Some cars could have passed that standard by a wide margin. For example, if a good-running 1980 car could come in at 1/60th of the standard for 1980, and a 1950 Plymouth polluted 60 times what that 1980 model put out, then it would still pass. Heck, my '79 Newport ran clean enough that some of the readings would have looked good by 1997 standards! (this was back before Maryland switched to the treadmill test for '84+ cars, so you could directly compare a '79 to a '97).

    For example, in hydrocarbons, when my Newport was tested, the state standard was 470 ppm. My 230,000 mile+ Newport scored 162. So in this case, a car could have been about 3 times worse and still passed. IIRC, my '79 NYer, back in 2002, scored around 260 on this particular test.

    In CO, my Newport scored 0.03%. The state standard at the time was 5.00%. So here, a car could have scored a whopping 167 times worse in CO and still passed!

    Now, the treadmill test is more representative of "real world" driving, because it puts the car in gear, under load, and simulates driving. Just to show how cars have cleaned up in recent years, my grandma's '85 LeSabre scored 1.7541 gpm in CO on that test. My 2000 Intrepid scored something like 0.03 gpm. So in this case, the Buick polluted as much as 58.47 2000 Intrepids! But wait, the state standard for 1985 is 30.00 gpm! I forget what the state standard was for 2000 cars in 2002 when my Trep was treadmilled, but I think it was around 20 gpm.

    This is where statistics come into play, and shows you how they can be re-worded to serve various purposes. You could say that an '85 Buick pollutes as much as 58 or 59 2000 Intrepids, and get people in an uproar. Or, twisted the other way, you could say that the pollution levels of both cars are so tiny that the difference is negligible!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Exactly...there are too few 1950 Plymouths to worry about how dirty they are. But we don't need *more* of them. It took 40 years to clean up Los Angeles and I don't think anyone wants to go backwards. If your non-conforming European stink-pot can't be modified to burn clean enough, then my asthmatic self says fine, stay out of the country.

    Think of emissions regulations has having vastly improved the breed. A 2005 Corvette getting 26 mpg?!!!! That never would have happened with sloppy enforcement of EPA rules. You'd be driving a gas-sucking version of the '63 Vette.

    However, I would exempt all Alfa Romeos :P
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    Hear, hear! Mine passed emissions fine, which is a good thing since Utah hasn't implemented the rolling 30 year exemption. I got all the spares home Saturday - by the time I get the desirable stuff sold on eBay I'll be pretty close to a free car...

    My little beater truck, full of Alfa bits - including those boxes in the cab:
    image

    -Jason
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    sorry, no Fintails up there. I was keeping a lookout though, so if I had seen one, I would've snapped it for ya! I might go to a local cruise-in tonite, if the weather holds out (kinda windy right now, but I don't think it's going to rain), so hopefully I'll be able to take some more pics!
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    You have a '76 LeMans? I didn't know that! Tell me more about it...when and where you got it. (and how)
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,565
    andre1969 got a really good deal on his LeMans.. but, it cost him a milkshake... He has some deadbeat friends....

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    of a nearby cruise-in that I went to this evening...

    http://photobucket.com/albums/v247/jgandrew/Bowie%20Cruise%20In%20042405/
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I saw this '76 Grand LeMans on eBay one day, and fell in love with it. The bidding on it ended really late on a Monday nite, at like 2:00 in the morning. One of my roommates was staying up late watching a movie, and I asked him to wake me up around 1:45. Well, he forgot, and the next thing I remember it was 6:00 in the morning!

    Well, I checked it out, and it turns out it didn't make its reserve, so I emailed the owner and asked him about it. Then, before I knew it, I bought it! I drove out with a friend to Cincinnati on Sunday the 17th and picked it up, and we met Kyfdx out there, since he's close by. Hung out for a bit, got something to eat at a local Steak and Shake, and then came back home, with my friend driving my Intrepid back.

    Anyway, it's a '76 Grand LeMans coupe with about 76,000 miles on it. 350-2bbl, non-factory dual exhaust, Pontiac Rally 2 wheels, power bench seat, power windows, kind of a burgundy/purple repaint (I think the original color was called "Firethorn"), with a red interior (also called "Firethorn")

    Here's a couple pics of it that the seller had sent me...

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/jgandrew/HEADONVU.jpg
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/jgandrew/RTFRTVU.jpg
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/jgandrew/LTRRDETAIL.jpg
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/jgandrew/RTINTVU2.jpg
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/jgandrew/BACKSEATVU.jpg

    It has a few problems, but nothing too major. The a/c doesn't work, and it has tear in the driver's seat. The clock doesn't work either (how long do those old electric clocks usually last in these old cars anyway...15 minutes?! :lemon: ) It also has a little rust showing on the C-pillar at the base of the landau trim, and a few minor door dings and stone chips here and there. And, somewhere along the line, it ended up getting grille inserts from a '77 instead of a '76! But, overall I'm happy with it!

    So now all I need to do is buy a few more, and I can make my yard look like this!
    image
    :shades:
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Were there many foreign cars at all at that event, Andre? It seems like it would be very domestic-themed. Which isn't all bad, of course.

    Re: EPA silliness...maybe they should pay more attention to all the strange modded JDM and domestic engines out there. But far from it be expected of a taxpayer to have any say in how the money is spent. These people obviously have impeccable credentials and are very responsible and trustworthy. It's a worthy fight to keep what would likely be a few dozen old hobby cars out of the country. More space for trucks that are not held to the same standards as cars.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    EPA is responsible for Federal compliance only. If you see illegal cars on the street, then your state is lax in enforcement or maybe has no smog laws, which is even worse.

    The worst new truck is better than the best old car regarding pollution.

    The EPA leaves all the existing old cars alone anyway, so I don't see the complaint.

    Besides, the argument is irrelevant, since the weak dollar means that most old cars are now going the other way, back to Europe.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    Um, if your state or locality has no emissions laws, then the car is legal by definition. Not everyone lives in an overpopulated, underventilated atmospheric sinkhole.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    How much was that '66 GMC pickup at Carlisle?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    like the California coast, are just inherently "dirty" It has to do with the way the mountains and the currents coming off the Pacific interact, and help to keep pollutants stationary. so they build up. Another area is Texas, Houston area, and for some reason there's another natural area near where I live, in the northern area of Anne Arundel County, MD. It just has something to do with the Chesapeake Bay currents, and it traps the pollutants and supposedly makes for some of th nastiest air in the region.

    But hey, if we really want, I guess we could ban cars altogether, and go back to the horse and buggy. No emissions there! :P
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I think they wanted $3900 for that GMC pickup. It looked pretty good in the pic, but it did have some rust and the bed had a wooden floor, which was mostly rotted out. It had the 60-degree GMC-built V-6. I forget the displacement. I don't know much about the GMC V-6, but I've heard both good and bad.
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,670
    But hey, if we really want, I guess we could ban cars altogether, and go back to the horse and buggy. No emissions there!

    Oh yeah, I guess you've never mucked out a stable! ;)

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I was being sarcastic there! I guess a cow would have worse "emissions" than a horse though, since cows burp!
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    $3900's not too bad. It has most of the Custom trim and the correct center caps, power steering, and what looks like the manifolds for the optional large-port 351E (versus the standard small-port 305E). Chevy Small-Block Orange isn't a good color for it, but I'd offer $3300 if I didn't already have my '66.
  • grbeckgrbeck Member Posts: 2,358
    bumpy: Um, if your state or locality has no emissions laws, then the car is legal by definition. Not everyone lives in an overpopulated, underventilated atmospheric sinkhole.

    Every state and municipality in the United States is still covered by federal anti-pollution laws.
  • ghuletghulet Member Posts: 2,564
    ....and I don't think there are ANY states without emissions laws. Are there even any without emissions testing any more? Illinois still doesn't have any safety testing for passenger cars (though they have for trucks at least since I was a little kid in the mid-70s), which explains why you see so many scary hoopties driving around Chicago (admittedly, some of which have been mine).
  • seminole_kevseminole_kev Member Posts: 1,696
    Oklahoma got rid of their testing a few years back.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    emissions testing is done by county. The county I'm in (Prince George's), as well as where I had my condo (Anne Arundel) both do the emissions test. The county my Mom & stepdad live in (Saint Mary's) doesn't do it. For the most part, I think they only do it where the higher populations are, which, by default would mean more cars, more pollution, and less undeveloped land to help take some of the pollution out of the air.

    PG County has a population density of 1651 people per square mile. AA (I always loved that abbreviation...I thought it was funny to have "AA" printed on my driver's license :shades: ) is somewhat less, at 1177 per square mile. And St Mary's? A whopping 76 people per square mile! Putting up an emissions station down there would probably CAUSE more pollution than it would prevent, what with having to clear cut several acres, pave it, put up a building, provide utilities, not to mention long lines of cars sitting, idling, waiting for the test, and then gunning their engines while the readings are taken.

    So Ghulet, Illinois doesn't have ANY kind of safety inspection at all?! In Maryland, you only have to get a used car inspected when you first buy it, unless it's old enough and you get historic tags for it. We don't have a yearly inspection, though. From what I hear though, our 1-time inspection is much stricter than neighboring states such as PA, VA, or WVA. I bought my '79 NYer in WVA from a small car lot. The seller guaranteed to pass it in any of those states, but in Maryland, I was on my own! FWIW though, it didn't need much. Rear brakes (they were cracked, length-wise), turning the rotors, adjusting the steering box, and there was something wrong with one of the tires, but I forget what now. And the obligatory aiming of the headlights. It wouldn't pass now though, because it needs a new exhaust system, and the windshield wipers quit on me. And I don't think they'd consider Rain-X a viable substitute! :blush:
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I think the only area with emissions standards in WA state is the Seattle metro area. I've never had to do a test. Of course, the fintail would be exempt, and the 126 is in such good condition I have no doubt it would sail right through.

    Also, no inspections in WA state as far as I know unless it is a car coming in from elsewhere. This means you see some interesting vehicles on the road...cars lacking things like brakes, tire tread, chassis soundness, uncracked glass, insurance, etc.
  • jlawrence01jlawrence01 Member Posts: 1,757
    **So Ghulet, Illinois doesn't have ANY kind of safety inspection at all?**

    No safety inspections. Very limited emission inspections. The state will send you a notice if you need to have your car checked. My personal rides have never been tested. About 20% of my fleet has been over the past three years.

    I never liked the safety inspections as they were very inconsistent. In the St. Louis area (several years ago), the WalMart stores had the highest fail rates while some of the independent garages passed almost everything. I resented having to spend $250 to replace a small crack in my headlamp while I had friends who had the bumpers falling off after a wreck and they passed

    Virginia did a pretty good job.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I thought the experimental program to buy gross polluters from people and scrap them was a good idea. This way the owner gives the car up voluntarily, and he/she gets $500-$700 bucks for a bag of bolts, the car gets recycled, and we all breath easier. It's an "economic incentive" type of program rather than purely legislative or punitive, and I like those better than just more laws. You have to be registered owner and have had the car for a certain amount of time, so there's no abuse or "roundup" of cars by profiteers.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,565
    I agree wholeheartedly.. Of course, the key to the program is keeping it from being abused, as you say..

    If one old beater puts out the same amount of pollutants as 50 newer cars, then that is where the focus ought to be... Not on my '03, which I have to take in for tailpipe testing soon...

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    the problem with the typical $500-700 gross polluter is that the person driving it most likely can't afford anything better. So what did they do with that money? Go buy another gross polluter?

    Also, in the end these programs did nothing to reduce pollution. Factories that bought these cars were given "pollution credits", and buying these cars up gave factories the right to keep on polluting, instead of actually cleaning up their own act. Many of these cars that were scrapped were also cars that were on their last legs and just about dead anyway, or cars that were wrecked, not running, yard ornaments, etc.

    Plus, for awhile they were actually taking some antique cars that had plenty of good parts on them and could have been great donors to help fix up other cars, and they'd just crush everything, making it useless. I think later on they made it so that the engine had to be scrapped so it could never be run again, but the body/interior etc could be salvaged and used for parts.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well I don't think you quite understand how pollution credits work. They can be made to be degraded over a short period of time, and eventually made worthless.... so when you buy them they are worth less and less the more you "stall" fixing up your plant. So you don't get to pollute more and more, as you would be wasting your money doing that.

    ANYWAY---we are drifting off topic here and should probably start this discussion elsewhere....
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Well this is on topic...I wonder if any 'obscure' cars have been scrapped because of such ideas. I know some of the contributors to the letters section in the back of Hemmings are very vocal about their disapproval of such schemes.

    Personally, I think it isn't such an issue, and mainly plain old 80s junk would be scrapped. Were any bonafide collectible vehicles scrapped? A good scheme for the agencies handling all the old wrecks would be to weed out the special interest cars, sell them for parts only, and make additional money while getting the real bad ones off the road.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The program can be set up many different ways but the idea is still to get rid of the cars, whether in pieces or by crushing them is just a matter of details. I personally find it hard to believe that 15-20 year old cars being driven daily by poor drivers and willingly sold for $500 are somehow "collectible". One would think these precious vehicles sellling that cheap would be in such demand that $500 would be way too little market value. The reason the poor person has them is that nobody else wants them. When's the last time you just had to have the very car a homeless person is sleeping in?

    Some of these car guys are like attendees at a business conference. Nobody wants the greasy meatballs until they see them being taken away :cry:
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I have to agree with that, for the most part. I think any legit collectibles would have been saved before that point. Surely a few hard to find parts might have been sent to the crusher, but that seems to be natural selection for cars. Enthusiasts need to rescue them before they get scrapped.

    Perhaps if the car crushing entity would make a list of cars set to be scrapped, and would offer them up for sale at more than the government paid on the grounds that the cars are either parted or brought back to showroom condition, both sides would be happy.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The problem is, quite frankly, that the parts business for say most 1980s American cars really sucks, it's not worth the space and trouble. Most commercial yards won't even take these cars, much less keep 'em. So really they are doomed anyway--especially in urban areas, where the pollution is the problem. Sure, somebody in South Dakota can afford to keep 150 Cadillac Cimarrons in the back 40, but nobody in LA or San Francisco is going to do that.

    The few 80s cars that might be of interest, such as Buick GNs, Corvettes or maybe a few open cars, those are not going to show up in these buyback programs.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    If the cars can't be used for parts, yeah, that's a problem. I think the body in control of such a scheme should publish the cars to be crushed, and let them be scavenged (for some cost, of course) before the cars are destroyed. It would produce more revenue.
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    That reminds me. Last week I actually saw a middle aged lady driving a Cimmaron. I would guess there couldn't be too many of these left. I guess that makes it a sure-fire collector car.
  • wimsey1wimsey1 Member Posts: 201
    1st gen Ford Bronco, with the lift it had it was almost square from the side. looked good.
    Karmann Ghia convert. also in nice shape.

    Nice Nova SS. Sharp.

    1st gen RX-7. Good shape.

    The fun stuff is coming out of the garages in the "Land O' Oxidation". :)

    Should be at a vintage car race at Gingerman Raceway this weekend!
  • wimsey1wimsey1 Member Posts: 201
    LOL
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,342
    A 70s vintage I think (cold have been early 80s). I think they said on the TV, where I saw it.

    The kicker is where on TV. There is a local small auto auction place (outside Phila, in Pennsauken NJ): US auto auction. They run commercials on one of the odd ball cable stations (basically infomercials), and feature the great deals and the semi-literate people that buy cars there.

    Anyhow, they had one guy that had just gotten his fabulous deal on this RR (in the medium/light blue they had for a while). Probably in his 20s, didn't give the impression of being a lawyer or anything close to affording this car (down the road).

    Will probably look impressive parked outside his row house somewhere in Phila. though.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    What'll he gets the $8,000 bill for a routine brake job. Then he'll be yet another poor soul who finds out why 70s and 80s Rolls Royce are dirt cheap to buy and devil to keep running.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    from a little "break" outside when the fire alarm went off. Out in the parking lot, I saw an early 70's AMC Hornet sedan. Brown, homely, basic looking. Not a spec of rust on it though, and the paint was still pretty shiny. It had a dent on the rear bumper. Another thing I thought was curious was the stone shield up front, under the bumper. The years of taking it on the chin, literally, with rocks and other debris left it more bare, exposed metal than actual paint! But there was no rust.

    Amazing that an exposed piece of metal on a humble AMC could withstand the years like that without rusting, while much more expensive, prestigious cars crumble and return to the earth that they came from.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Probably the oil film spewing out of the engine preserved it.
  • seminole_kevseminole_kev Member Posts: 1,696
    That's what keeps the driveline and floor pans of old Jags from rusting out ;-)
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Hey don't laugh. Italians actually do (or did) paint oil and road dirt mixed up onto the chassis of their cars for rust prevention.

    Actually rusting is more about design than the metal itself. Some cars were constructed in such a way as to trap road salts, water etc. and some didn't have these "traps".
This discussion has been closed.