Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)

12532542562582591306

Comments

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    It was a metallic dark brown, with a light tan interior.

    I know of that old color you mention, that was named 'tobacco brown', and in the old days 'Havana brown'. I have seen late fintails and even a 6.3 in that color. Not my first choice!
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    A view not seen every day (in for the yearly oil change today)
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    Are those white walls period correct? They look odd to me, somehow.

    james
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    They are odd brand cheapos from 1999 or 2000. MB didn't go to thin whitewalls until the 1965 model year, so they are not correct for my car - it should have a wider whitewall. But I do not want to change the tires until they are worn out, as a good set of wide whitewall radials is not cheap. It will be a few more years until the current tires are down to a level where I can feel good about replacements.

    This is how it looks in a normal setting - this pic is from the Sunday before last I like to think of my car as in a condition it might have been in ca. 1968, so I guess they can work with that.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    about a 1970-72 I think. The Torino nose, but don't think it had a safety bumper. I dwas driving past, but I think the badge was Ranchero 500 (something 500) on the front fender.

    Looked nice and clean, but the best part? It was barney purple, otherwise looked stock.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    outside a gas station I pass on my way to work: A Bricklin SV1. red. Looks to be in OK shape, but I guess fiberglass doesn't rust! It comes and goes, and moves around the parking spots, so it must run!

    Might have to stop and check it out one day.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • alltorquealltorque Member Posts: 535
    In our local supermarket car park yesterday there was a very tidy Triumph TR7, in pale blue metallic, parked next to a Smart Cabrio. Interesting combination. I've not seen a good TR7 for quite some time and there aren't too many Smart Cabrio's around either.
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    In belated reply to the discussion of old Volvo 1800ES sport-wagons, I had to offer up this optimistically priced example (incorrectly identified as a "P1800es")

    Volvo

    james
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    I saw a Geo Metro convertible in dark gray and very prime condition--NO RUST leaving-- the hospital parking. i don't know the year since I can't find a set of links showing the taillights of various years...

    1991 Geo Metro Convertible

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,670
    In belated reply to the discussion of old Volvo 1800ES sport-wagons, I had to offer up this optimistically priced example (incorrectly identified as a "P1800es")

    I don't think I'd buy a car from someone who didn't even know the correct name for it. :sick:

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    I need to talk to the guy at work that owns one about the names. he is also president of the volvo club.

    Even if it isn't technically correct, it is certainly the common name for it, so I don't really see the problem using the P.

    The price isn't really out of line if the thing is in great shape. Really depends on what, if anything, it needs. Maybe a little optomistic, but not crazy. I would easily go $7,500 on it.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    It could bring $7,500, definitely. Over $9000...well...it would have to be pretty spectacular for that kind of money. If it were a 4-speed overdrive with none of the usual 1800ES maladies (worn camshaft, all dash gauges inoperative, noisy timing gears, bad distributor bearings, leaking oil cooler, noisy reverse gear), it would be a tempting car to own.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    That E55 is not attractive and those wheels don't help a bit.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Yeah the wheels are atrocious. MBs usually look pretty bad with about 97% of aftermarket wheels. I will admit I wouldn't mind trying E63 wheels, but I would then want my brakes to look better.

    I don't really get those wood and leather colors either - very Lexus-like, not MB. Sometimes I think my dark grey-on-dark grey-with dark wood E55 is somewhat somber and cold...but at the same time, it isn't pretentious, and it suits the car.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I saw an old Mopar that I didn't even think existed. A 1960 Dodge Polara hardtop wagon! I know Chrysler offered a hardtop wagon from '60-64 (IIRC, they were all hardtops, and no pillared wagons), but I thought the Dodges and Plymouths were all pillared?

    It's a total basket case, but looks like it's being restored. Sitting outside the shop that my buddy with the two Mark V's uses. I dropped my Intrepid off there to have him check the suspension and a/c, and that's when I saw it. There was a whole slew of other old stuff out there, including a few other 1960 Dodges. One of my buddy's Mark V's was there, too, unfortunately looking a little worse for wear.

    When I go to pick the Trep up, I'm going to try and remember to take my camera with me.
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,107
    Did it look like this?
    image
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Yep, that's it! Maybe Polaras were hardtops, and Matadors were pillared? Or, since Dodge had that cheaper Dart lineup that year, I wonder if both Polaras and Matador wagons were hardtops?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I picked up my Intrepid from the mechanic last nite, and talked to him about that Polara wagon. Turns out it's actually him that owns it! When I asked him about whether Polara wagons were all hardtops and Matadors pillared, he said yep. And it turns out, he had a 1960 Matador wagon buried in the back of his shop, up on a lift, to illustrate it!

    He also had the shell of a 1960 Plymouth wagon, stripped down to literally nothing but the windshield. It's kinda funny, but once you strip everything off that car, especially the front end clip, the bare body shell actually has a sort of beauty to it.
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    You'd know this better than I do- was the Cordoba/Mirada platform of 1980-83 a variant of the chassis used to underpin the 5th Ave/Diplomat/Gran Fury or were they different? I tend to think that the last Cordobas were related to the 1971-78 intermediates. Either way, I haven't seen any on the road in a long time, not to mention Miradas.

    But I will mention this: While walking to work yesterday, I spotted a well-known member of Congress driving a rather ratty-looking 5th Avenue. It had to be an '84 or '85, I think. Maybe congressmen don't wish to be seen sometimes?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    You'd know this better than I do- was the Cordoba/Mirada platform of 1980-83 a variant of the chassis used to underpin the 5th Ave/Diplomat/Gran Fury or were they different? I tend to think that the last Cordobas were related to the 1971-78 intermediates. Either way, I haven't seen any on the road in a long time, not to mention Miradas.

    That style of Cordoba was known as the J-body. However, it was based on the M-body (5th Ave, Diplomat/Gran Fury), which itself was based on the F-body (Aspen/Volare). The 1981-83 Imperial was also based on the J-body, but I can't remember if it carried its own platform designation or not.

    The old 1971-78 intermediates (actually, the Cordoba/Magnum variants made it through 1979) were known as the B-body. The 1980-83 Cordoba/Mirada were big cars, though, around 210" long, riding a 112.7" wheelbase. While they were "downsized" from the old Cordoba/Magnum, and shed around 600 lb or more, they didn't lose much length. The older cars were around 215" long, on a 115" wheelbase, so the new models really didn't appear that much smaller. That could be one reason they sold poorly, in those fuel-starved recession years. That, plus the fact that Chrysler was on the ropes, and a lot of people probably didn't want to take the risk in ending up with an orphan.

    In contrast, when the Monte Carlo was downsized for 1978, it went from a 116" wheelbase to a 108.1", while overall length probably went from around 215" to 200-202. The T-bird, downsized for 1980, saw a similar shrinkage.

    Despite all that extra length though, the Cordoba/Mirada weren't all that big inside...not space-efficient at all. Basically, the length of a 1980 Caprice with the interior room of a 1980 Monte Carlo.

    In 1980, at least, you could order the Cordoba/Mirada with a 360-4bbl engine that put out 180-185 hp. Short of a Corvette, turbo Trans Am, or maybe a Camaro Z-28, that was about the most power you could get out of a domestic that year. 0-60 came up in a blistering 10 seconds. :sick: Most of them just had the strangled 120 hp 318-2bbl, but some of them had the sickly 85 hp slant six 1-bbl too.
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    To be honest I am wary of owning an older Mopar that has the Lean Burn emission system on it. I think it carried through the end of the carbureted 318 in '89 (last year for the M-bodies), am I right?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    To be honest I am wary of owning an older Mopar that has the Lean Burn emission system on it. I think it carried through the end of the carbureted 318 in '89 (last year for the M-bodies), am I right?

    Yeah, I think it did go up through 1989. I've always heard horror stories about it, but I've had three cars with it...a '79 Newport with a 318 and two NYers with 360's. My '89 Gran Fury was a police car, and while it had the little box for the Lean Burn, I don't think it actually had anything in it. So with police cars, they may have been a bit more lenient.

    Supposedly, it's not TOO major of an undertaking to switch a car from Lean Burn to a regular electronic ignition setup. I think you have to replace the carburetor, distributor, ECU box, and then either drill a hole in the intake manifold to run the vacuum advance hose for the distributor, or get an intake off of a pre-Lean Burn car.

    Now that I've found a mechanic who's not afraid to work on old cars, I might look into converting my two New Yorkers.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    of Lemko's old Cadillac. Kind of a light tan with a stupid landau roof, but at least it matched the body color.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    2006 Range Rover Sport and a 1997 Defender both covered in mud caravaning down the mountain on the way home tonight. Nice to see them getting used.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I really like that '76 Delta 88 hardtop. That "colonade" roofline was sort of odd, but it did give the cars a nice, open, airy feel to them. And I like the fact that they still had roll-down windows in back. IIRC, Chevy quit making 2-door hardtops after 1974, and I think that was when they quit making Bonneville 2-door hardtops, too. So for '75-76 that just left the Catalina, LeSabre, and Delta.

    Those cars aren't very space-efficient, but that trunk looks HUGE!! Almost makes that spare tire look like a space saver.

    I like the '83 Delta, as well. It is kind of spartan, but that was actually the base model by then. In 1976, the top model was called Royale, but by '83 the cheap model was Royale, the next step up was Royale Brougham, and then at the top of the heap they had the Royale Brougham LS. I never liked that center cap on those rally wheels, though. My '82 Cutlass Supreme had the Rallys, but it had a smaller center cap that left the lugs exposed. I wonder if you could fit that center cap on the Delta's Rally?
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,670
    I saw a nearly perfect Lincoln Versailles in a supermartket parking lot, it was as clean and straight as could be. At firs I thought it was a Merc Monarch or an upmarket version of the Ford Granada but the I spotted the Lincoln hood emblem.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    '63 Toyopet: Another clueless seller. You don't start the opening bid at 2X the retail value of the car. Let's get real---homely 4-door, stripped down Japanese compact in pieces no less for $6,000? Gee, should I buy that or a clean good running Alfa Romeo convertible? 0 Bids, 0 chances of one. Try $2,500.

    1987 Civic 4X4 -- one of those unheralded but really neat little cars. Worth every penny at $1,900 if it's clean and runs well.

    Cadillac Bustleback-- epitomizes everything wrong about Cadillac in the 1980s. Signaling the death of a great marque IMO. And to think, before WWII Cadillacs were made with silver inlay in the door panels! Asking price is optimistic but you never know. Some people love freaks.

    59 Imperial---that club might be to beat the bidders into submission. They seem to be laying down on the job. I rather like this car for the freak show effect. You sort of look at it and say "oh my god!" It's like a lab experiment gone horribly wrong.

    1937 Frankenbenz: Ay, carumba! One would be much better off finding a correct engine for this car. Putting in a 280SE engine is borderline nuts on a rare car of this type. Hopefully, some bidder will be more sober than the seller about this. Save me from the barbarians!

    83' Oldsmobile--doesn't the navy need something like this for gunnery practice?
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    What would a decent price be on that '59 Imperial? It actually looks a bit rough to me. I figure $14K should get you a really nice one, especially since it's just a 4-door hardtop.

    The Imperial from that era I really like is the 1960. The '57-58 were nice, although the '57 with single headlights looked really awkward. The '59 is kind of heavy-handed looking. The '60 just has a glittery, handsome look to the front that I find attractive. The fins are a bit over-the-top, though. Actually, the whole car is. But it just looks, well, "proud" of it, somehow!

    I thought 1980 Sevilles used a 145 hp Caddy 368? Upon looking in my old car book, it looks like the Diesel 350 was actually standard, with the Olds gasoline 350 or the Caddy 368 being optional. I wonder why they'd offer two engines so similar in displacement? Maybe the Olds was a California-only engine? I know that GM replaced Pontiac 350/400's with Olds 350/403's for California Pontiacs back in the late 70's, because the Olds was a cleaner running engine. Maybe it was cleaner than the Caddy engine, too?

    That Toyopet looks like something that I'd have to pay to have hauled away! :sick:
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    It was either a 1984 or earlier Coupe DeVille or Fleetwood coupe. The Fleetwood coupes were beautiful cars saddled with a really crummy 4.1 litre V-8. The Coupe DeVille went to a FWD platform in 1985.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Lemko, they actually did build a few of those coupes in 1985, as well. Something like 3,000 Broughams, so they weren't all that common. I think the style with no vinyl roof and the somewhat large-ish rear windows is really attractive. Even with the vinyl roof and the larger windows, I like it, but never really cared for the version with the tiny little opera windows. Wouldn't turn down a 1980 though, or maybe even an '81 with the V-8-6-4. I fear the 4.1, though.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I bet that W18 was rescued from some eastern bloc locale, where it lost its original engine 60 years ago after falling into the hands of those without the knowledge to maintain it, and was then replaced with a tractor engine or simply laid up. At least its a Mercedes unit! And the car isn't a roadster or anything either...I see it as kind of a Mercedes resto-rod.
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    I was trying to find examples of pickup trucks being used as God intended, to carry a load, when I came across this site, which is totally off-topic, but just too funny not to share. :P

    overloaded vehicles

    james
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    My ex-wife's father lives out in Rainier, Washington. We were out there in 1995. I dunno if he still does this or not, but he used to pick up extra cash doing logging work, hauling firewood, etc. At the time, he had three old Ford pickups. One of 'em was a late 60's, one was early 70's, and one was around a 1978-79. He'd beat the hell out of them, but they seemed to take it well. And because of the climate I guess, they were pretty much rust-free.

    I remember he said he's never buy a GMC, because that was the initials of his mother. Gladys Marie Christian, I think. Evidently, they didn't get along.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Yeah, 14K for an Imperial Sedan is about all the money for a really nice one, high #3.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Today I saw a ca. 1970 Roadrunner, a BMW 2002tii, and a very well preserved ca. 1975 Ford LTD wagon, very odd looking in modern traffic.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I've been noticing how odd some older cars look---part of the problem is that they are slab sided and don't bulge out at the wheels---also the tires are skinny and the cars seem to be on tippy-toe.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    55 I think (no cont. kit, so that's a 55 or 57, right?

    Parked on the shoulder of I295 in S. Jersey.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    an oddball yesterday in the lot at the soccer fields.

    a 1969 Corvette T-top. 4 speed (hurst T bar shifter).

    Had a hi rise (big block) hood, but had 327 painted on it.

    Looked OK condition, but the cowling had obviously been replaced (it was unpainted) and the molding/trim at the bottom of the windshield seemed to be missing.

    THe real kicker, it was shades of the 70's. Car was white, but had an assorment of blue stripes, and some kind of funky murals painted on it. Very busy paintjob, and didn't look close to new. Seemed to be a real period piece.

    Best thing? It had a for sale sign in it!

    DId sound OK when the owner fired it up and rumbled away. ANd it did get a lot of looks!

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    I was in Allentown today piloting a Freightliner 24' box Ryder through some decidedly narrow streets (that is a wide truck!) on the way to a band competition.

    ON the way in, in a not particularly nice looking neighborhood, was a small lot (can't remember the name, darn it) with some odd stuff.

    a chrome bumper MG-B, priced at IIRC $5,995
    a MG Midget for $4,995
    An early BMW 3 series, white with a black hood (?)
    ANd I think a 1972ish mustang.

    There was some other stuff that I would have liked to browse at, but I was too busy trying not to wipe out 2 rows of parked cars at the same time.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I've been noticing how odd some older cars look---part of the problem is that they are slab sided and don't bulge out at the wheels---also the tires are skinny and the cars seem to be on tippy-toe.

    Main thing I notice about older cars is how low-slung they are compared to modern ones. Even something relatively upright like a downsized late 70's GM midsize or full-size.

    And with the high beltlines and tapered front and rear-ends of newer cars, it actually makes the old ones look skinny to me...or I guess the flip side of that is that it makes the new ones look fat?

    As for wheels and tires, I know they're wider these, but with regards to overall diameter, has the shrinkage in sidewall kept up with the increase in wheel size? I swear a lot of cars these days look like they're under-tired, even though they might be riding on 16-18" rims.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I think what you're seeing is the tire filling up the wheel well more on older cars than newer ones. The oversize wheels people put on modern cars are trying to resolve that dead space in the wheel wells I think.

    But yes, old foreign cars like a BWM 2002 or the old British sports cars from the 60s and 70s look quite skinny and awkward from the rear to me at least.

    It reminds me that there was a time when foreign and domestic cars were entirely different universes. Stepping from a 60s American car into a 60s foreign sports car was a totally "foreign" experience, quite shocking to the senses.

    Now everything is kind of mushed together between foreign and domestics. You don't get that contrast at all.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Both of my '79 NYers have oversized tires on them. My 5th Ave has 235/70/R15's mounted on 15x7 copcar rims. They almost look TOO big for the car, partly because the copcar rims make the tires stick out a bit more than a regular 15x7 rim would, but I guess a 7" rim would just also allow the tire to "fill out" more than a 6" rim would.

    My other NYer has 225/75/R15's, just mounted on the standard 15x6" rim. When viewed from the front or back, they actually look kinda narrow IMO, but from the side, appear to fill out the wheel well pretty nicely. Stock on these cars was just a 195/75/R15. I imagine those looked awful on a car this size!

    My '67 Catalina just has 215/75/R14's, a size that's getting harder to find. I imagine it had bias ply tires when it was new. I think it's a 6" wheel with only 2" of offset and 4" of backspacing (I think that's how they say it). I recently picked up some 15x7 Rally II's for it, which I think have a 3" offset and 4" of backspacing. Can't wait to get them on the car, and see how they look.

    Often with older cars, when you got the optional wheels, they tended to stick out more, and had more "depth" to them. So maybe that helped give the wheel well a more filled out look, too.

    Most of my old cars have had oversized wheels/tires on them, so sometimes I guess it's easy to forget how they could look in their basic form.
  • magnettemagnette Member Posts: 4,229
    Ok - where do I start..
    It was the London _ Brighton car run on Sunday, so I was there on Westminster Bridge at 07:00 to watch about 450 veteran cars ( pre 1905 ) clatter rattle and grind over the bridge ( some of them were actually quite silent - but they were electric or steam powered usually..) Too many different weird cars to name but there were a number of unique ones, and a number that were the only one known to have survived etc...
    Most common individual model was as always the Oldsmobile Curved-Dash - there must have been at least 20. Also common - DeDion Bouton - they seem to have made so many cars that survived. This year there were loads of Panhard - Levassors, and ahighr than usual number of American cars - the theme was America on Wheels or something...

    Also saw a number of other great cars as people with something unusual tend to bring it along for the ride - highlights included

    Two Ford Cortina estates ( Mk III & Mk V ) - strange how an everyday car can become a rarity... Also a Mk I Cortina saloon.
    Vintage Rolls Phantom
    Morris Oxford "Bullnose" - mid 20's
    Ford Model T ( actually I cheated there, that one was on Saturday)
    Jensen Interceptor - about 1972
    Aston Martin seemed to be having a field day - saw several including a rare DB7 Zagato
    Several pre-war Austins
    Ronart kit-car - looks like a 50's racer, but is a two seater powered by Jag 6
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I'd love to do London-Brighton - in a Mercedes Simplex.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    something I would actually like to have (going back to my depraved childhood!)

    A 1970ish (pre-bash bumper days) Ford Maverick. 2 door, hood scope, V8, back end jacked up a bit with oversized tires. Stick shift 2 (From the sound). Looked pretty clean, but a driver.

    No idea what use I would have for it, but fun non the less!

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    A few minutes ago a ca. 1930 Bentley that obviously had some kind of supercharger on it just drove up the hill where I live - you could hear it whining up the street. It was likely one of the examples that lives in this area, as seen at the car show I posted pics of a while ago. At least it's being driven!
  • mazda6iguymazda6iguy Member Posts: 365
    Ok, while not classic or rare, nonetheless I spotted the brand new 2008 Ford Focus this past saturday (my first real world sighting) driving past me with temp tags on.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,531
    Jeep Grand Cherokee..

    The big one... from the mid-80s?

    and... a Subaru SVX

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

This discussion has been closed.