Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
That one shows lots of honest age, would probably take a detail well.
This is a pretty nice example, but it is a pretty low-option car - power locks seem about it. No power seat, no custom interior, no power windows. The vinyl seats look surprisingly low-end for a Caprice. The seller must have used a gallon of Armorall under the hood.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/California-Original-1982-Chevy-Citation-X-11-100-- Rust-Free-All-Original-A-/171026407107?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item27d1f7dec3
I came very close to considering one of these new instead of the '85 Celebrity Eurosport I bought...less money and identical underneath, even wheelbase. I thought I'd take a bath on resale value though, back when I cared about that.
The only options that are visibly lacking to my eyes, are the 350 engine, power windows, and the third seat. Those wheelcovers were the premium wheelcovers for a wagon that year. The wire covers were only available on the Landau coupe.
Beautiful car, and with bucket seats and no Landau top, not often seen.
These cars remind me of the Grand Prix and Bonneville models with buckets and console of a decade earlier...a good thing when the current year Grand Prix didn't do anything for me.
Sweet car IMHO.
Is that a 301, does anybody know?
I think the driver was one I later saw parked. Both were a light blue later (bumper model) so I figure it was the same one.
then right down the street at a gas station, 2 parked side by side. Both chrome bumper models. A white and an orange. I have seen the white one there in the past.
3 that close together outside of a convention must be rare.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
and right after that got stuck behind an old-school Jeep Grand Wagoneer. My wife commented that it was ugly. And it smelled a bit. Quite the throwback.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
My wife has always liked those, although it's been awhile since we've seen one here in rusty NE Ohio. I remember telling her there was a guy who'd advertise in Hemmings that he'd buy, fix up and resell them. I'm thinking his name was 'the Jeepsterman' but that might be another Jeep vendor, I don't know.
Vin shows an X code for engine so for 1979 that's going to be a 350/4bbl. Buick engine maybe?
The price is crazy though. I'll tell you, I'd buy it at half the price. So would a lot of other people I think though.
It's relisted with a BIN of $3,500, which doesn't seem insane to me.
I'd feel better if it had the 350 which got you out of the THM 200 trans. I'm not certain if wagons had that trans, but the 305 coupes and sedans did.
Of course ours was base with no options, and you could get those nicely equipped. I'm sure consumer models were nicer.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Drove down to Manhattan today to have brunch with some family, about a dozen of us.
Parked 20 yards from the restaurant was a shiny gold Tempo. Even the wheel covers looked new.
Funny thing is on the way home on I-87, while driving at about 65 mph, I got passed by a ratty blue one going about 80. It looked like it was about to crash any second by the way it was weaving around trying to stay in it's lane.
Parked on the top deck of Home Depot parking garage, near Stew Leonard's, a black Checker.
But, Cutlass Ciera just seemed to have some sort of honesty about it. It didn't try to be anything but an honest, wholesome, middle-of-the-road type of car. Not too old, not too young, not too sporty, not too fogey, not to cheap, not too flash-in-the-pan, not too dull, et al.
Back in the late 1990's, I looked at a base level (vinyl interior, crank windows, etc) 1979 Bonneville that a local guy was interested in getting rid of. It had a Buick 350. I drove it, and was unimpressed. At least, it wasn't enough to convince me that it was a better car than the '89 Gran Fury ex copcar I was driving at the time. Main reason that I was concerned about it, was that at the time I was worried that the Buick 350 was every bit the turd that the 231 had been in the '82 Cutlass I once owned. But, in later years, I learned that, while you can trace the Buick 231 and 350 back to the same source, at one point their histories forked and went on wildly different paths. The Buick 350 was always a good engine (although not too powerful in its later years), while the 231 pretty much shook off its turdiness in 1985, when the lesser engines were beefed up in the same fashion as the turbo block.
Had I known that at the time, I might have been a bit more forgiving of that '79 Bonneville.
BTW, if you're curious, the VIN code for the 301 was a "Y". I remember it by thinking "Y did they do that?" :P At least, "Y" was used in 1977-79. Not sure about 1980. That was the year the Olds 307 came out. It was used in Bonnevilles and Catalinas in 1981, which was their last year. At some point, the 307 started using the "Y" VIN code, but by then I think the 301 was history.
My wife wanted a Cutlass Ciera when her kids were younger. She ended up with an '86 Tempo instead, which she kept for 10 years.
Oh, for one brief moment in 1988, they actually had the Cutlass name spread across FOUR different lines! They built about three months worth of the RWD Cutlass coupe, which they called Cutlass Supreme Classic. They also had the new GM10 FWD Cutlass Supreme coupe. Then, there was the Cutlass Ciera. And, 1988 was the first year they tacked "Cutlass" onto the Calais.
My wife had one of these for a mercifully short time. I told her not to judge Oldsmobile by this car which was an Olds in name only. It definitely wasn'y my father's Oldsmobile which was a glamourous 1955 Ninety-Eight Starfire convertible nor even my 1979 Ninety-Eight Regency.
Unfortunately could not stop to check it out. Looked clean from a distance.
Speaking of cars from that era, saw an immaculate looking Buick Somerset sedan this morning.
My friend, who's a M-B guy now, bought a slightly used '87 Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupe way back then. He said he looked at one recently and didn't like the way the doors sounded when closed, etc., but I reminded him he had to look at other things at that same time, similarly priced, and I think the Monte would look better.
Right now, I could very much like an '87 or '88 Monte Carlo LS, two-tone dark over light maroon, V8, and those checkerboard wheels. There's a gray one down at the end of our street, checkerboard wheels and all, but the lower body (doors, etc.) is so rusty it's depressing.
BTW, I'm with lemko on those '97 Malibus and Cutlasses. I did not see one redeeming thing about them, then or now.
They are sort of in the realm of the just phased out Impala. Nothing really wrong with the car, but nothing really great either. My cousin had one of those Malibus and he drove it pretty hard up and down through Philly for a few years and it was very reliable.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I can think of a few redeeming qualities. The 1997 Malibu was a MUCH better car, IMO at least, than the Corsica it replaced. I thought it was better than the Lumina in some respects, as well. It had better legroom, both front and rear, than the larger Lumina, and a similar sized trunk. However, it was narrower, so shoulder room was more compact-like. I also thought the interior was nicer than a Lumina or Corsica. Not necessarily more upscale or plush, but better fit and finish, higher quality, etc.
But, for one brief moment, that Malibu actually seemed competitive. However, the competition moved quickly, and GM didn't, so the Malibu just sort of got left behind.
As for the Cutlass, I thought it was a sham to put that name on that car. But, I think GM simply figured that the type of people who would buy it were those who bought Cutlass Cieras. I thought it was a step down from the Ciera, though.
I looked at Malibus on the same day I bought my Intrepid, but the Malibu just seemed like a major step down. Of course, it was a smaller, and cheaper car, so that wasn't a fair comparison. My Intrepid would have been more comparable to an Impala. The few Impalas the dealer had on the lot, however, were pretty well-loaded, and around $25-26K...about $4-5K more than my base-level Intrepid.
I remember they also had one Dodge Stratus on the lot, for about the same price as my Intrepid. But, it had leather and a sunroof. It was a nice car, but I went with the Intrepid because it was bigger.
Back to the Malibu...I also thought the 2004 was a huge improvement over the 1997-03 style. But, it just wasn't enough, as everybody else was improving as well. And there was just something a little extra awkward about the 2004-07 Malibu's style, I thought. It really seemed too tall and slab-sided, and ill-proportioned. The '03 and earlier seemed downright tasteful in comparison!
http://harrystoys.com/2008-Cadillac-XLR/Used-Convertible/Milwaukee-WI/5152/26187- 90/Details.aspx
AAAGHHH!!! Change it, Butthead! Change it!
I liked the Intrigue and Aurora as well. Unfortunately, I've heard that the 3.5 V-6 and 4.0 V-8 could be troubleprone, and expensive to fix. But, there's an Edmund's member (unfortunately, his handle eludes me at the moment) who had a 2001 or so Olds Intrigue, and I think he got good service out of it.
I had a 2001 Malibu rental. I think by that time they got a bit more power out of the 3.1, maybe 170 hp versus 155 or something like that? And, essentially, that's about what it was...a classic rental car. Nothing horrible about it, but nothing really redeeming, either.
Oh, back in 1999 I had an Olds Alero coupe for a rental. That sucker was a nice car, I thought. Had the DOHC 4-cyl, which was a descendant of the old Quad 4. I thought it had a lot of pep to it. It definitely seemed to perform better than that Malibu did, even though the Malibu had a larger, more powerful engine.
I was very close to buying an Intrigue in January 1999. It was a very nice car, especially for the times. I wanted the 3.5 (which had more power) but I was told by quite a few people to get the 3800.
As I was shopping I saw a loaded up leftover 1998 88 sedan, burgundy/beige that I was offered an outstanding deal on. I decided to buy it. That was a nice car, not quite as sedate looking as the LeSabre, or as gaudy as the Bonneville. Well, it turned out to be a mistake as that car leaked water inside and they could never fix it. Always wondered how the Intrigue would have treated me.
Andre, I used to get Aleros as rentals and they were always pretty nice. In that time period the Oldsmobile models seemed so much more upscale than the other GM brands.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
Did they ever offer the supercharged V-6 on the 88? Or am I just imagining things?
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic