Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Great show, loads of unusual cars - everything from veterans to Veyrons, and from Isettas to a Duesenburg.
Some of the rarities were incredible - whenI get the chance I'll post a couple of the pictures in the mystery car forum...
There are a lot of Benzes, but even more Porsches and Jaguars / Aston Martins etc - as well as Mustangs and other pony cars - very popular in Germany.
What I like the best is the rare and unheard of makes - weird Fiat specials, Talbot Lagos, Adlers, Tatras - there were several of the latter from the period before they discovered streamlining....
A great show - although Essen itself isn't really a holiday destination and a but soulless.
Early Tatras were pretty boring IIRC...Tatra 77 with a rear fin is the one I'd want. That part of Germany isn't scenic, the great NRW industrial zone, factory after factory, and traffic.
So did the driver have a pack of cigarettes rolled into his t-shirt sleeve!
I think I was ruined by being around in the day. I just can't appreciate the low trim line of these cars. They scream 'poverty' to me (except when that trim was chosen for lightness). Anyway, I like the Two-Ten just fine.
2009 BMW 335i, 2003 Corvette cnv. (RIP 2001 Jaguar XK8 cnv and 1985 MB 380SE [the best of the lot])
On the obscure car topic, saw a nice looking 450 SEL today in the typical boring creamy beige, a ~65 Mustang convertible that looked like a 6, 190E 2.3-16, Volvo Amazon/122 4 door.
65 Fury on a car carrier. 58 Fairlane Corral/Cream. 71 or so butter colored Galaxie. Late 60's Mercedes sedan on a car carrier. 60's gray Mercedes coupe as I drove over an underpass.
It was about 70 and people are getting their specialty cars back on the road in the Northeast.
Hate the fender skirts though...IMO, they just make these cars look fat! Oh, and I think that color is "Firethorne", which is the color that mine would be, had it been properly repainted. I'm impressed at how little rust is on that junkyard car. I wonder what it was that ultimately sent it to its grave? The Pontiac 350 was pretty reliable, and THM350 transmissions were pretty durable. Of course, that car is now 37 years old, and nothing lasts forever.
Speaking of junkyards, "Cereal Marshmallows" has started getting into junkyard videos, and at 1:30 happens upon a rare very early fintail - hopefully to be parted rather than scrapped.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Also a fities preserved London Bus - a single decker we knew as an RF - there were hundreds of them once and quite a few are preserved - theres a big old bus scene in Britain.
Of all things. It was a 1980 Citation. I tell ya...kids these days!
But, time marches on. My '57 DeSoto was 34 model years when I bought it (September 1990), and it seemed like an old car, even back then. I guess to me, something from 1957 has ALWAYS seemed old, because it was before my time.
but it's weird to think that my two 1979 New Yorkers are now 34 model years old (soon to be 35!). Somehow, they just don't seem all that "old" to me. Not like that DeSoto did when I bought it.
I think part of it though, might be simply that I can remember a 1979 New Yorker when it was new And, in that timeframe, whenever a new car came out, it had a habit of making the preceding model seem ancient. Now that everything's aerodynamic, and the retro trend has been bouncing around here and there honestly, since the 1994 Ram was introduced, new cars just don't have the ability to make the preceding model seem "old" anymore.
But, I guess to younger kids (my roommate isn't *that* much younger than me...born in '75, while I was born in '70), something that pre-dates their birth, or was new when they were just a little kid, might seem every bit as ancient to them, as my DeSoto or an older car would seem to me.
My dad had several 60s Fords back in the 90s - cars that were usually 30-35 years old. To my teenaged eyes, they were real vintage cars. I bought my fintail around the same time - it was an ancient car then. But a 30 year old car now? Not extremely impressive. I'm older.
There's less differentiation because there's much less design freedom nowadays.
Also, I think cars age better cosmetically than they did. Other than a few late 80s-90s paint issues, paint holds up better today, interiors age better, cars rust less, etc, so they don't look as "old".
80s cars were square, then came the Audi 5000/Tempo/Taurus and everything became jelly bean round. That got old so we got New Edge and Art & Science creases everywhere, so back to square. Then came fluidic sculpture and peeled back headlights and we seem to be moving to rounded again.
I guess once those headlights hit the A-pillar it'll change back to square again.
Nice to have the emotorcons back! :surprise:
I really cringe at marketing speak like "art & science" or "fluidic sculpture"...sorry suits, it's not art nor science nor sculpture :shades:
URL is the embedded image doesn't show:
http://www.turquoisebranding.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/water-sculptures.jpg-
Speaking of odd cars, a white Reatta convertible just drove by.
But that trend couldn't go on forever, as the cars could only get so long, low, or wide. And windows can only get so huge. The first domestic cars to really buck that trend in a major way were GM's downsized 1977 B/C full-sized cars. The 1976 Aspen/Volare did it to a small degree, in being taller than a Dart/Valiant, slightly shorter (but a longer wheelbase), and more glass area. However, they were also a bit heavier than a Dart/Valiant. So while they might have stalled the longer/lower/wider and heavier trend, it was GM that truly reversed it.
But then, you can only make cars so short, narrow, and tall. You can only round them off so much. So, it was probably around 1985-90 that the downsizing trend began to stall, and then reverse. One one hand, you had GM shrinking a bunch of cars in 1985-86, and a few more in 1988. But then you had Honda coming out with a larger Accord and Civic every time they redesigned them. And GM started lengthening some of its cars for 1989.
So, what goes around, comes around I guess. To me though, some features will always be considered "Modern". Such as low belt lines, large glass area, thin pillars, etc.
Today I think it is more the technology that changes, and sometimes quickly... but I still want my CD's in WAV format rather than degraded mp3. :shades:
I think sometimes features are classic rather than just modern. Some examples; an XKE, 66 Toronado, 57 Chrysler 300, or a 65 or 69 Mustang will always look good no matter what is around it . The again, a 58 Edsel or 59 Chevy will always draw attention because it's a freak show (but I still like 'em)!
With intense safety standards, lots of glass and low beltlines are probably something that won't come back.
Just saw an International Scout drive by.
I do have a soft spot for vinyl, however!
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
I do believe that the terms "classic" and "timeless" are intertwined.
A car's status as a classic will be tested by time passing, just like Presidents and baseball players. The hype is not carved in stone by any means.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
My kids played Bon Jovi in my car, and the sound was awful. Massive distortion, my ears almost bled.
Then I upgraded to premium sound. We played it again.
The sound was awful. Massive distortion, my ears almost bled.
Just a little less static.
Well, you're probably not a fan of the majority of my fleet either, so I'll second ab348! :P