Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options

Hybrid vs Diesel

1484950515254»

Comments

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Let us use "relativity" a bit more carefully next time around.

     

    How is this? Relatively speaking Honda has been all but shut out of the EU market. They had nothing the Europeans wanted including the underpowered HCH. They finally woke up and smelled the diesel. They had to buy engines from another company to get a car the EU would buy. I am glad they came around, it just took them a long time to get it right. How many hybrids do you think they will sell in Europe one maybe two. Remember they have the Accord with i-CDTI that will run all day at 100+ mph and still get better mileage than the HAH. People driving the HAH have to drive 55-60 to get close to EPA estimates. What kind of car is that? Even our old 1990 LS400 V8 gets 27 MPG driving 80+ out on the Interstate.
  • Options
    ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    To me this is truly where the comparisons break down. Using a diesel, I have traveled 606 miles in 7 hrs (including 2 15 min breaks) getting 48 mph, with most of the travel at altitude.

     

    I'd be more than willing to do the same trip with any maker's hybrid to see what the mpg would be! :) It would be interesting to see which garners the accolades for FUEL GUZZLER!
  • Options
    larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    that last post was almost totally incoherent....what EXACTLY were you attempting to say?

     

    I'm anti-American for what view?

     

    In the USA, when you compare SIMILAR CARS like the HCH and the Jetta TDI, neither car is a "gas guzzler."

     

    In Europe, when you can choose between an Accord diesel at 42 MPG and a gas Accord at 32 MPG, the best choice for high MPG is obvious.

     

    You cannot make that choice in the USA.

     

    You "can" make this choice in the USA:

     

    Accord Hybrid 29/37

    Accord V6 21/30

     

    Again, the choice is obvious if MPG is your goal.
  • Options
    larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    quote Gagrice-"They had to buy engines from another company to get a car the EU would buy."-end quote

     

    Actually, Honda designed on their own one of the cleanest, top 10 engines in the world, the i-CTDi they use in the Accord Diesel and now in the Euro CR-V diesel.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    To me this is truly where the comparisons break down. Using a diesel, I have traveled 606 miles in 7 hrs

     

    You have hit it right on the head. The Japanese build cars to go 55-60. The handling and braking are not equal to the European competition. That is not lost on the EU buyers. Toyota had to beef up the brakes on the Prius to get it into their market. I was just reading the specs on the new RX400h. It goes 0-60 real fast. It goes from 70-0 in an appalling 200 feet. That is substandard for what is touted a luxury performance car. Honda is notorious for poor braking. I would think they would want their cars to stop as well as they accelerate. I guess the market they appeal to, are not worried about braking only getting from 0-60 real fast.
  • Options
    larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    quote gagrice-" The Japanese build cars to go 55-60."-end quote

     

    Actually, I got 52.75 Miles Per Gallon averaging 74.5 MPH in my 2004 manual tranny HCH in December for a 6.5 hour drive from Phoenix to El Paso, with a loaded down car. In the whole 2,568 mile trip, I averaged 47.6 MPG with a lot of cold weather (15F-35F) driving and a lot of 75-80 MPH highway travel.
  • Options
    ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    that last post was almost totally incoherent....what EXACTLY were you attempting to say?

     

    And you are anti math also eh?
  • Options
    PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    OK... we're well into "personal" now. That always happens when folks are trying to prove something to each other and get the other guy to change his opinion. In case you hadn't noticed, that doesn't happen much on message boards no matter what the subject matter is. Rather than escalate things by starting to discuss who's making any sense, perhaps agreeing to disagree and getting back to discussing the topic of HYBRID VS DIESEL would work to keep this topic open.

     

    Just a thought!

     

    PF Flyer

    Host

    Pickups & News & Views Message Boards


     

    The MAZDA MANIA Chat is on tonight. Hope to see YOU there! Check out the schedule
  • Options
    ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    "In Europe, when you can choose between an Accord diesel at 42 MPG and a gas Accord at 32 MPG, the best choice for high MPG is obvious.

      

    You cannot make that choice in the USA.

      

    You "can" make this choice in the USA:

      

    Accord Hybrid 29/37

    Accord V6 21/30

      

    Again, the choice is obvious if MPG is your goal. "

     

    Perhaps you are having a thinking out of the box issue or what comes first: chicken or egg calculation. But I suspect these artificial parameters are there for a reason. So if you look at the GLOBAL choices...

     

    ..."Again (to use your words sic) the choice is obvious if MPG is your goal. "...

     

    DIESEL!
  • Options
    larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    My post was to point out to the user ruking1 that his last post was not understandable at all in regard to what exactly he might have been attempting to say. I just wanted him to explain what he was trying to say, not to personally attack him in any way. I never do that. I might point out some idiocy in a post, but I am attacking if anything THAT POST and not THAT PERSON.

     

    Someone else want to make an effort to explain this to me?:

     

    "Well perhaps you are an anti American proponent. Let's see, an Accord American, gets 32 and the VW Jetta TDI gets 49 mpg. Hmmm... I guess because it is in America it is totally not obvious which is the GASS GUZZLER? :) Ok lets do an unfair comparison Honda Civic gets 29/38, and the VW Jetta TDI gets 49 mpg! Ah! total cluelessness!!!??"

     

    I'm not sure what he was trying to say, at all.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Actually, Honda designed on their own one of the cleanest, top 10 engines in the world, the i-CTDi

     

    You are absolutely right and I applaud them. I understand they have built a 1.7 i-CDTI for the Civic, to replace the borrowed Izusu diesel.

     

    As for your mileage on your trip that was very good. Too bad the HAH did not carry on the tradition of great economy started with the HCH. That does not change the fact that it is not viable in the EU. The Prius will sell some in the EU just because it is different. If given a choice between a Civic diesel & hybrid I say 99 out of 100 will take the diesel. Remember the cross country review between the HCH and Civic gasser. The hybrid ran out of steam on the long uphill stretches. They did get basically the same mileage you got. So it is safe to say that is what a person should expect from the HCH. I would recommend the Hybrid Civic to anyone looking for a great economy car. I would also recommend the VW TDI's.
  • Options
    railroadjamesrailroadjames Member Posts: 560
    Gary, the loss of railroads in our country can be found in the great manipulaters of the "BIG 3". They lobbied congress just after WWII and now we have truck & car congested (not so) SUPER HIWAYS. They single handedly drove the railroads to their demize today.

    The thing about being on a winning team be it diesel or hybrid, is they're both winners. We're also winners IF, and I emphasize If, we accept the premise that we must be responsible with our AIR, OUR FOSSIL FUELS, and our EGOS. Yes, I said EGOS. In our society we flaunt our statis with glitz and glamour and SIZE. Huge seems to be much better than practicality. The main reason we're into the new hybrids and diesels is because we know that problems are lurking just around the corner if we continue our direction and don't heed the many warnings that environmentalists keep spouting our way.

    Last thing I'd like to point out is that railroad people like myself were blessed with the joy of, "playing with trains and getting paid for it". One more point. Steam was nostalgic and a much missed era but it was hard work and very dirty. That was the truth that got lost in the past.

    Culliganman (toot,toot-ding,ding)
  • Options
    robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Let's see, an Accord American, gets 32 and the VW Jetta TDI gets 49 mpg. Hmmm... I guess because it is in America it is totally not obvious which is the GASS GUZZLER?

     

    And Civic Hybrid gets 51 mpg. Insight gets 68 mpg. Hmmm...

     

    <Insert Oil burner here>
  • Options
    robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    In Europe, when you can choose between an Accord diesel at 42 MPG and a gas Accord at 32 MPG, the best choice for high MPG is obvious.

     

    True. While we can&#146;t get Accord diesel here, we could use Jeep Liberty for comparison, a vehicle available with diesel (2.8/I-4) and gasoline (3.7/V6).

     

    Price premium on diesel is $1400 (&#147;4X4 Limited&#148; models with the two engine options). Ignoring the 290 lb. or so the diesel four banger version weighs over the V6 version, the diesel claim better EPA rating compared to the gasoline version.

     

    3.7/V6: 17/22 mpg (gasoline)

    2.8/I-4: 21/27 mpg (diesel)

     

    Now, where I live, the current price of fuel (price true as of this morning):

    Gasoline: $1.80/gallon

    Diesel: $2.00/gallon

     

    Fuel economy advantage to the diesel is better in city. Assume 100% city driving and 100% compliance with EPA estimate, over 12K miles in a year. Cost of fuel,

     

    Gasoline Version: $1270

    Diesel Version: $1143

     

    That&#146;s a &#147;whopping&#148; $127 in savings for a premium of $1400. Same savings over time would require 11 years of driving to recuperate the premium in the USA. Well, this is the math I have learnt from participating in anti-hybrid debates. But too bad we don&#146;t have hybrid version to throw into the mix.
  • Options
    PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    I might point out some idiocy in a post, but I am attacking if anything THAT POST and not THAT PERSON.

     

    While you know what you mean, and *I* may understand what you're trying to say, I can guarantee that pointing out idiocy in a post will NEVER be interpretted by the poster as anything other than a personal attack.

    Even a simple response like, "What are you trying to say? I didn't quite understand." might get a shot back at you wondering whether YOUR comprehension skills are up to snuff.

     

    The single hardest thing to do in a posting is to say exactly what you mean and have it interpretted in the way you intended by those reading it. That's how most explosions happen around here. The first misinterpretation leads to a small shot back, followed by an escalation in rhetoric, and suddenly you have people pulling quotes from each other's posts to respond point by point and prove that they are right and you're not.

     

    Since I have the flu and my head is swimming right now, I'll say what I came to say...

     

    Let's stick to discussing the topic and not each other please!

     

    PF Flyer

    Host

    Pickups & News & Views Message Boards


     

    The MAZDA MANIA Chat is on tonight. Hope to see YOU there! Check out the schedule
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The thing about being on a winning team be it diesel or hybrid, is they're both winners. We're also winners.

     

    I have looked for economy every time I bought a new vehicle. I usually end up with a full size truck, as it is the most practical for me and they hold their value. I always weigh the issues of size vs economy when buying. To me a full size Chevy that gets 14/18 is more practical than a small truck that gets 18/22. Especially when I buy the small truck and it gets closer to 15/19 mpg. As little as I drive the cost of gas is inconsequential. So I opt for the size, comfort and safety. If I ever sell my Suburban it will be to buy a small diesel PU truck. As you know they do not exist in America so my Suburban has to do the hauling duties until that time comes along. I think the EPA & CARB have brought a lot of this Large PU & SUV purchasing on the American public. If the mileage of the smaller rig is insignificant, less than 6 mpg difference, why not buy the bigger more comfortable vehicle. You can see that trend in all areas of vehicles. My 1978 Accord would fit in the trunk of a 2005 Accord, almost. I always got 28/32 on that old POC car. Too bad it was so prone to overheating. You cannot blame the American public for buying all the big SUV's. They are programmed that way by the automakers and oil companies. As long as oil stays under $50 per barrel the trend will continue.

     

    PS

    I'll bet you have some great railroad stories.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    That&#146;s a &#147;whopping&#148; $127 in savings for a premium of $1400. Same savings over time would require 11 years of driving to recuperate the premium in the USA.

     

    You are correct. If you remember several people have done that exact same analysis between the HAH and Accord V6. It would take 29 years to break even. That is if you are getting EPA on the HAH. Even worse is the Dodge Ram PU with Cummins Deisel. The difference over a V8 Hemi is $7000. You could never recoup that difference. You can haul a lot more. And from the reviews I have read the Liberty CRD is a much better offroad option than the gas version. Diesel has more than just economy as an advantage.
  • Options
    railroadjamesrailroadjames Member Posts: 560
    If the HOST "BOB" will allow me a little leeway, I'll just point out .....in 30 yrs on the railroad.. I collided with 5 pick-ups

                               2 Corvettes

                               2 trains

                               2 people

                               1 Diesel fuel truck

                               1 Refrigerater (yea!)

                               2 Payloaders

                               and a partridge in a pear tree. Most of the vehicles were diesel powered...maybe thats why I'm PRO-HYBRID (ha-ha)

    So the host can tollerate this thread I'll say seriously that the real reason I'm leaning toward HYBRIDS more is, as they say, "the proofs in the pudding" My Prius gets great milage. I've had her well over 100 MPH and she's rock solid(must be those great airodynamics) and the low,low pollutents make sense. Test drive one for more than a day and you might come away with a better understanding why we Prius-People are so content and a bit giddy while passing Hummers loading up in gas-stations.

    Culliganman(HIGHBALL!!)

    P.S. By the way, why , after all these yrs, do diesel vehicles have to be so darn noisey? Can't someone remedy this quirk? It's like Harley-riders and their loud pipes announcing their coming and going.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    No Moose, Deer or cattle?

     

    I think the hybrid concept is good. I am a simple thinking person. I don't believe the Prius reaches the level of simplicity that I could entertain. I know that all cars have gotten more complex to satisfy every need under the sun. I don't like being a prisoner of the very automakers that ran the railroads out of business. With the hybrids you are a prisoner of the manufacturer. At least for a few years. We did not have an independent Lexus repair in San Diego until 18 months ago. We were prisoners to the whims and exorbitant prices that the dealers charge. When the warranty runs out, and you don't have an out, you are in deep trouble.
  • Options
    yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    Wallstreet Journal carries an article on a massive project in Qatar to convert Natural Gas to Diesel and this is supposed to cleaner than Oil-based Diesel.

     

    www.greencarcongress.com has article on Finland establishing a Bio-Diesel production plant. Looks like Diesel (Cetane) is asking for 50 : 50 share in the Transport market with Gasolene / Petrol (Octane). Meanwhile there is a new player. LPG (Propane) powered vehicles are 9 million Worldwide at the end of 2002.

     

    US should also have more Diesel powered vehicles like EU.
  • Options
    brightness04brightness04 Member Posts: 3,148
    I grew up in a country that had railroad as its primary means of transportation. Let me just say that riding railroad is no fun compared to driving your own car. People want to believe in conspiracy theories; too bad, they are usually false.
  • Options
    mistermemisterme Member Posts: 407
    Last spring my family of 5 took a similar trip across the Blue Ridge mountains of Tennessee, passed next to Greenville SC and spent a few days in Charleston. Even with our ~300lb of luggage all in the trunk we still got 53MPG average for the trip. Not my usual 58-60 but still outstanding.

     

    If your diesel only got 48, which one is the fuel guzzler...in your own words.

     

    Both 48 and 53 are GREAT numbers, in my opinion.

    But I'd rather have the 53.
  • Options
    yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    Hello misterme

     

    Certainly Hybrid is the best in current technology. But as a fuel, Diesel has more energy / volume and is better than Gasolene.

     

    In the near future, the order will be

    Diesel-Hybrid

    Gasolene-Hybrid

    LPG-Hybrid.

     

    Keep it up.
  • Options
    ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    "If the HOST "BOB" will allow me a little leeway, I'll just point out .....in 30 yrs on the railroad.. I collided with 5 pick-ups

                               2 Corvettes

                               2 trains

                               2 people

                               1 Diesel fuel truck

                               1 Refrigerater (yea!)

                               2 Payloaders

                               and a partridge in a pear tree. Most of the vehicles were diesel powered...maybe thats why I'm PRO-HYBRID (ha-ha) "

     

    Yes makes sense: gunning for a couple of hybrids to round out your portfolio!? :(:)
  • Options
    ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Let's see, an Accord American, gets 32 and the VW Jetta TDI gets 49 mpg. Hmmm... I guess because it is in America it is totally not obvious which is the GASS GUZZLER?

      

    And Civic Hybrid gets 51 mpg. Insight gets 68 mpg. Hmmm...

      

    <Insert Oil burner here> <unquote>

     

    Like I have said; more than once in a few posts, you have a deep affinity to turn everything adversarial!

     

    What I did in the real world (irregardless of your attempt at causing artificial conflict and trying your darn est to be a burl in the saddle) was to get a Honda Civic GASSER at 29/38 mpg.

     

    What is at issue here? COST!!! Specifically cost per mile driven. The HCH was 20,000, the Honda Civic was 12,000. for a difference of 8,000 dollars. You'd absolutely laugh at the BE points; if you were not so wedded to the adversarial fight and the higher cost concept of the hybrid! You may see this as the quest for the "holy grail" but...

     

    So at 2 dollars currently a gal 8000 dollars will buy 144,000 miles of commuting fuel, 36 mpg which equates to 11 years of commuting at 50 miles per day R/T.

     

    In response to ...

    ..."Not enough info. We don't know how fast you were driving over the Blue Ridge Mountains. You might drive like me (crawling along at 55), and the diesel owner might go 80."...

      

    If you care to do the math, it is easy to find the average speed.

     

    The point here was: I could have easily gotten 55- 60 mpg going at hybrid speeds.

     

    I can even map quest the route. But as the host said folks are pretty dug in, so if you want me to confuse you with the facts, I can.
  • Options
    electrictroyelectrictroy Member Posts: 564
    Last spring my family of 5 took a similar trip across the Blue Ridge mountains of Tennessee... we still got 53MPG average for the trip. If your diesel only got 48, which one is the fuel guzzler...

    =============================================

     

    Not enough info. We don't know how fast you were driving over the Blue Ridge Mountains. You might drive like me (crawling along at 55), and the diesel owner might go 80.

     

    troy
  • Options
    Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,148
    OK, despite repeated attempts by the hosts to quell the personal attacks, some members are unable to steer clear of them. This forum is closed pending Sylvia's decision on the future of this topic.

     

    kirstie_h

    Roving Host

    Host, Future Vehicles & Smart Shopper discussions

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    Share your vehicle reviews

  • Options
    ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I think the fact that on the one hand we are talking about increased mph performance and on the other hand, base it on automatics is disingenuous at best. Sticks as you know can get from 16% to 21% better mileage, all things being the same. Not to mention that the automatic option costs more in most if not all cases where a stick is offered. The European fleet, if my indications are correct have 95% stick and 5% automatic. The USA fleet is almost completely the opposite at 95% automatic and less than 5% stick. So structurally we are behind the "fuel" savings curve 16-21%.
This discussion has been closed.