Volvo XC90 Maintenance and Repair

1131416181930

Comments

  • tjazztjazz Member Posts: 10
    Thanks for the info, guyf! I do have an appt. for my 15,000 service and will definitely bring it up.

    BTW, I've learned some stuff from the tire store and even a whole lot more from this forum. I've just come across this forum yesterday and have found it to be very useful so far. It's not for people to whine, according to a certain someone, but for people w/ something in common to share their experiences and information so that we're all made aware of what's going on. Sure, people have different opinions, but it's a free country as long as you don't force your own opinion on others, right? You read what people write and make decisions for yourself. And, it made me feel better being able to vent my problem. So, thanks everyone for keeping it going.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Ideally the vision for the Edmunds Forums is to share info and help each other out. Complaining is fine, even necessary, but hopefully it shouldn't turn into a non-productive and repetitive rant. The idea is to get to a solution by sharing information.

    So you got the idea, definitely!
  • lev_berkovichlev_berkovich Member Posts: 858
    Finding out that Volvo knowingly put these crappy tires on their cars makes me wonder what other inferior products came with my XC90. I don't think that I'm alone here.

    Yes, you are not alone here, and that is what drives me crazy sometime, as I disagree with both points- Pirelli's are not crappy, and Volvo did not put inferior products on their cars, not intentionally anyway.

    The problem, as I see it, is in Volvo's attempt to push the "performance and sportivness" envelope to the extend, to compete as much as they could with BMW in those areas.
    So, they have chosen tires from "high performance" categories (if you browsed the tirerack already). And those tires by definition have low thread wear indexes, being made off the soft compound.

    So, just accept this, and on a new round adjust the choice of tires to your driving style.
  • tjazztjazz Member Posts: 10
    You are correct. I guess in mine and others' frustrations, we're generally trashing Volvo and Pirelli instead of verbalizing our observations. I see Volvo's and Pirelli's reputations being compromised due to lack of thorough testing to make sure the tires live up to the Volvo name on the specific model. Surely the tires would have shown poor wear - they're not a good match for the XC90. That makes the tires an inferior product for the XC90 because there are other tires that do better. I see that they no longer come OEM on the 2006 XC90 models! Guess Volvo got tired of having to replace the Pirellis for free to keep customers happy.

    Just hope my dealership won't be too resistant about replacing mine.
  • scooterzscooterz Member Posts: 20
    Do not wait until your 15,000 mile service to discuss the tires. Your dealer needs to inspect the tires before 15,000 miles in order for you to be eligible to get new Pirelli tires. They replace them with Scorpion STR which are much better and so far I have had no problems with them. Volvo sponsors this through Pirelli. Once Volvo confirms the tire problems, they order them from Pirelli and unfortunately, you have to go back 3-5 days later for the dealer to put them on. At least it's better than buying a new set of tires like the first batch of XC90 owners did before Pirelli/Volvo started to replace them for free.
  • tjazztjazz Member Posts: 10
    My XC90 won't have 15,000 miles on it when I bring it in because I've just barely passed 14,000 miles. Do you still think I should bring it in now and not wait til my service appt.?
    Do you have a link for me to pull up the tire replacement program so that I'll have something in writing for the dealer?
    Your help is appreciated, scooterz.
  • scooterzscooterz Member Posts: 20
    I believe there is a specific bulletin about this, but I have not been able to find it. I will have a look at the work order when this was done on mine to see if it provides any additional info. You may want to call your dealer up to discuss first. Regarding when to bring it in, I think it just has to be diagnosed at the dealer before 15,000 miles, so od it whenever it is convenient for you, just make sure you will not go past it, like if you take an unexpected long trip.
  • skimbearskimbear Member Posts: 20
    I think problems similar to mine may have been discussed before, but I was wondering if anyone can shed new light. I have a 2005 XC90 2.5T AWD. At the 15K mile service, the brake sensors were replaced. I don't know if this was just coincidental, but eversince then, the wheel-base has been making a spinning noise at higher speeds (say over 30 MPH). Also, when I turn left without braking, the front right wheel makes a grinding noise. One more question. The radio preset does not work most of the time. When I select a preset station, the radio just searches for about a minute or so. Is this a problem that can be fixed? Thanks for any suggestions.
  • audifan3audifan3 Member Posts: 25
    I had that same problem from new on an 2005 XC90 2.5T AWD. On a left hand turn, the front right tire would produce a grinding noise, and a tight turn-arounds in a cul-de-sac, it would also happen, again only turning left. Volvo replaced my front pads at 7800 miles, at my cost. As someone has mentioned before in this forum, Problem: XC90. Solution: Sell it. I liked my XC90 when I first got it and researched and drove everything else before buying it. Volvo's drive very well, but they have problems with reliability in the accessory front. My driver's side window needed the rails and motor replaced after 1 month, and after the snow needed a new sunroof motor, which took almost 2 weeks and 3 trips back to the dealer. In the meantime, my driver's window would auto-up, hit the top and auto-down, with the only way to keep it up was to hold the button up and switch off the car. After two attempts at reprogramming the window, the 'solution' was to have the window stop 1/4" from the top resulting in horrendous wind noise >30 mph. After the last visit, the dealer (Big Dee Volvo of White Plains, NY) rufused to honor the Volvo warranty and suggested I take it to another dealer 50 miles away. That combined with what I read here and the three safety recalls in 15 months gave me my answer. I sold the car that day, took a 6k hit on the residual value and bought the new Audi Q7.

    XC90 Problem solved.
  • audifan3audifan3 Member Posts: 25
    By pure incident, I have just came back from a good friend of mine. His wife has a new BMW 530i for about one year. And while it "drives great" by their account it has been in the shop due to the numerous electronic "gremlins" for 32 days.

    You should (have your friend) check the lemon laws in your state. For NY/CT, if a vehicle has been off the road for 30 calendar days, or has been back to the shop for the same problem 4 times, then the lemon laws apply and they would be entitled to a new or replacement vehicle from the dealership. It is
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    One clarification on lemon law.
    Lemon Laws don't involve the dealership.
    They only involve the motor co.
  • lev_berkovichlev_berkovich Member Posts: 858
    Thank you for the lemon law reminder, but I think my friends are, generally, happy with the car.

    I will let you know, when and if their tolerance will wear out :-).

    In my experience, good service department makes little electrical (or other) gremlins very tolerable. You just drop your car in the morning and pick it up after work.
  • audifan3audifan3 Member Posts: 25
    Thanks! I read them quickly and mentally glossed over the 'manufacturer' mentioned in all the phrases to include 'seller'. Thanks for the tip!

    Strange when I think back on it now, right when I got my XC90 two other people with 1-2 year old volvo sedan's said that they were having lots of electrical and nuisance problems with their cars. Oh well. I did actually own a 440 GLT in 1990, and that car had similar problems with the windows, sunroof, and radio, but it drove just fine and much better than any similar smaller hatchback at the time. I should have learned my lesson then, but I will definitely never buy another Volvo. :(
  • phl1phl1 Member Posts: 8
    My 2005 XC90 2.5T has an ongoing issue with the Pirelli tires (235/65-17). The dealer changed all four tires at 16K due to noise and vibration. The dealer said the tires were worn unevenly, (cupped). I paid $40 per tire, prorated wear, and paid for an alignment, approximately $300.

    The service manager actually said that if I had given them a 10 out of 10 rating in the Volvo telephone survey, he would not have charged me for the alignment. I gave them an above average rating because, at that time, I believed they fixed the problem. Unfortunately, the service advisor initially tried telling me to go to a Pirelli dealer. I had to argue hard and involve the service manager. So, a 10 rating was out of the question.

    Now, at 30K, the second set of tires are cupped again, exactly the same as the first set. The tires are extremely noisy, howling like off-road tires. The car is going to the dealer for the 30K service soon. We'll see what happens.

    I've been meticulous about the tire pressure since the car was new and the car is driven gently, mostly highway. There is plenty of tread left. In fact, except for the cupping problem, there is little tire wear. The brakes are still original, additional evidence that the car is not driven hard.

    It is not acceptable to have an expensive car that eats a set of tires every 9 months. My high-mileage 11 year old second car is quieter and smoother and its not a model known as quiet, even when new.

    Does anyone have any insight into whether the problem is the vehicle or the tires? Based on what I've read, it seems to be these particular tires on this vehicle. If the tires alone are the problem, they are essentially a defective part and should be replaced with something better. If the vehicle is the problem, the car needs to be fixed and the tires should be replaced. Any suggestion for better replacement tires?

    How can I get the dealer to address this? I've already paid $300 and the problem is not resolved. I've been patient up to this point, but now I'm open any approach, even litigation.

    This vehicle has had numerous other issues, beginning the day I took delivery. At this point, my patience is exhausted. Why is it so difficult to get a warrantied car fixed? I like the car, but I bought a new car specifically to avoid problems. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
  • lev_berkovichlev_berkovich Member Posts: 858
    I would more than glad to share some suggestions with you, if you will tell us what are those other problems.
    What is that 11 year old car? Did you drive SUVs before?

    One thing I can tell you now - $300 for an alignment is a total rip-off? Where did you get your alignments before? Why didn't you use the facilities you already trust?
  • phl1phl1 Member Posts: 8
    Thanks. I'm mainly looking to get the dealer/volvo to fulfill their warranty obligations and fix the problem with the tires. My secondary interest is tire recommendations since it is pretty clear that the Pirellis should go. (The vehicle never goes off road and rarely sees snow, so I'll want something with an on-road bias.)

    My second car is a '95 Accord 4-cyl. I've owned many types and brands of vehicles over the years, from Toyotas to Porsches. This is not a first-time SUV owner being unaware that it drives differently than a car.

    The dealer did the alignment in conjunction with the tire replacement. I wouldn't pay $300 for an alignment. I paid $140 for the pro-rated tire replacement, $90 (which is high) for the alignment. I just looked at the work order and it was $245, not $300.

    Other issues:
    Three attempts to fix Pirelli tire issue.
    Check engine light.
    Climate control only blows hot air.
    Climate control - one vent blows hot, one cold.
    Driver's side window/lock/mirror controls inoperable
    Driver's side power lock motor broken
    Parking brake not stopping vehicle from rolling.

    I'm pretty sure the vehicle was out of service for enough days to have qualified for the NJ lemon law, had I chosen to go that route.
  • templeton3templeton3 Member Posts: 69
    Consider yourself lucky. I had similar problems plus my transmission going out at 52,700 miles.
  • lev_berkovichlev_berkovich Member Posts: 858
    Although, I can not help with the climate and door control issues, I do have suggestions for the different tires.
    I was more fortunate, when I have read and believed the postings here and on other forums about poor performance of Pirellies. So I have chosen optional 18" Michelins and have gotten about 32K miles out of them.

    However, I have eventually had to replace them and I have looked then for the tires with the hardiest compound and most warranted thread life (highest thread wear index).

    While Michelin and Pirelli have this index in 300 low 400 range, there are tires from Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza and Continental CrossContact LX. They both have wear index in high 600 - low 700 (more than twice of your Pirelli), and warranted for 65K miles. I have selected Conties based on price ($100 for 17" and $127 for 18" at tirerack.com) and very happy with them - all season highway, decent dry, wet and snow handling, rather quiet and have been barely "broken-in" after 12K. I can see them lasted for 50-60K miles or more.

    Another point I would like to make that the proper and frequent alignment is very important. My wife (and maybe I as well) has hit curbs not making wide enough turns several times and that moves the wheel out of alignment, so one of the Michelins had very uneven wear (rear right one), and was prematurely replaced at 25K.
    At 32K I have decided to replace all 4, and still have 2 18" Michelins in my garage - one almost new, and another one - from the original batch with about half of thread still there.
  • eliaselias Member Posts: 2,209
    Lev, I have read that treadwear ratings are not standardized so that comparing between brands is apples/oranges comparison.
    In any case, we have did not have excessive tire-wear problems with the 17" michelin "syclone 4x4" tires that volvo factory put on our 2004 xc90 . we replaced them at about 25k miles i think, with some Japanese brand tires and they are doing fine at about 42k now. Toyo i think. Or is it Yokohama. Well, one of those.
    On the other hand, if you are getting twice the miles out of Conti tires with double the treadwear rating, maybe there does happen to be some consistency between treadwear ratings for different brands.
  • lev_berkovichlev_berkovich Member Posts: 858
    You are right in the sense that there is some subjectivity in the ratings, but they all still apples just of different colors, so speaking.

    (See bellow)

    So, even if I would not be absolutely certain that the tire with the rating 600 should last twice as long as the tire with the 300 rating, it will last much longer under the same driving conditions.

    And 65K warranty for both Bridge and Conti speak for itself.

    As I said, I consider that I've got a decent life from the stock Michelins, and I personally, did not experience any excessive or uneven wear (but on the wheel that was obviously knocked out of alignment), but I will welcome any extra mileage.

    I stay with Conties on my S80 for many years and miles, and usually get about 50K out of low-end ContiContact. I hope that more durable CrossContact will last as much or longer on heavier and more demanding (AWD) XC90.

    "Treadwear Grades

    UTQG Treadwear Grades are based on actual road use in which the test tire is run in a vehicle convoy along with standardized Course Monitoring Tires. The vehicle repeatedly runs a prescribed 400-mile test loop in West Texas for a total of 7,200 miles. The vehicle can have its alignment set, air pressure checked and tires rotated every 800 miles. The test tire's and the Monitoring Tire's wear are measured during and at the conclusion of the test. The tire manufacturers then assign a Treadwear Grade based on the observed wear rates. The Course Monitoring Tire is assigned a grade and the test tire receives a grade indicating its relative treadwear. A grade of 100 would indicate that the tire tread would last as long as the test tire, 200 would indicate the tread would last twice as long, 300 would indicate three times as long, etc.

    The problem with UTQG Treadwear Grades is that they are open to some interpretation on the part of the tire manufacturer because they are assigned after the tire has only experienced a little treadwear as it runs the 7,200 miles. This means that the tire manufacturers need to extrapolate their raw wear data when they are assigning Treadwear Grades, and that their grades can to some extent reflect how conservative or optimistic their marketing department is. Typically, comparing the Treadwear Grades of tire lines within a single brand is somewhat helpful, while attempting to compare the grades between different brands is not as helpful."
  • phl1phl1 Member Posts: 8
    Thanks for the info. Good decision selecting the optional wheels/tires. I'll definitely be choosing a tire with a higher wear index. The trick is finding the right balance of wear, grip, noise, comfort, handling, etc. A treadlife warranty is reassuring on a heavy car known for short tire life. My car would actually get acceptable life out of the Pirelli's, except for the uneven wear. I'd really like some reassurance that the problem is the Pirellis and not something with the vehicle. Has anyone had the Pirellis wear unevenly and then driven enough miles on a different set of tires to confirm that the Pirellis are indeed the problem?
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    The problem is the Pirelli's, which is why Volvo has a replacement program.
    Pirelli has come out w/ a new tire, the Scorpion STR which seems to be working out a whole lot better from a treadwear standpoint.
  • jtlajtla Member Posts: 388
    The problem is the Pirelli's, which is why Volvo has a replacement program.

    That was what I heard. However, when I asked my dealer in Southern California, the service department manager told me there was none. I guessed that one might have to make a scene out of the tire problem in order to get free (or pro-rated)replacement.

    Phl1, about the hot air in climate control, my 2005 2.5T once blew hot air from driver's side and cold air from passenger side, which of course rendered the a/c unusable. It was hot summer and the hot air still came out from one side even when I set the temperature all the way down to lowest. I was about to go to dealer, but I thought I gave it another try by setting the temp. setting to the highest, which sent hot air out from both sides. I then adjusted temp setting down. The problem was mysteriously fixed. I may just be lucky, but it did save me a trip to dealership.
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    05 XC 90 V8, loaded same problem and many more since the day I drove home, still dealing w/ probelms. Exhausted going to the dealership. Only consolation my advisor and Svc. mgr. are nice. But it does not make problems go away: annoying, mechanical . I should saty w/ my Japanese car bought Volvo for the dependability it's marketed but none of it. Are true. Had the car for 14 mos. Been to the dealer more than 20x. Exhausted! Help!
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    Yes, people w/o complain u'r lucky Im exhausted going to the dealer as well, most of my days off are spend going there. This would be my 1st and last Volvo, I wish I kept my Toyota not one problem just schedule maintenance, A Tundra V8. Any suggestion to get my money back I have the Xc90 V8 loade for 14 mos now w/ 12,000 miles. Help anyone
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    Is your request at the moment successful I have the same problem XC90 V8, loaded, pur. May 05 paid cash, problem fr. day one. I become friends w/ my advisor coz I'v been there many times, People are nice in the dealeship where I go but I need all this problem to go away, May u' share ur progress. Pls........................
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    Welcome aboard, benilda!

    The post you "replied" to is three years old. Unfortunately, the link I gave there is archived (i.e. temporarily unavailable). The musty odor you detect is caused by accumulation of moisture near your air conditioners condensor (meaning it's a good environment for bacteria/fungus or whatever).

    I suggest turning off your air conditioning for 2 or 3 minutes before turning your engine off. That gives the condensor some time to dry up a little bit and often provides relief from the problem. If that doesn't help, your dealer/mechanic can spray peroxide or some other suitable chemical/disinfectant near the condensor and conduits.

    Good luck!

    tidester, host
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    I second the motion, service is good though as the audifan mention :lemon:
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    Thanks for the tip, happy w/ ur XC90, mine is a V8 loaded exhausted w/ all the problems love the aesthethic of it a lot of annoying nad mechanical prob, they fix one another comes rt. a/ you drive off fr. the dealership. :lemon:
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    happy w/ ur XC90

    I don't have one but what I read here is mostly positive!

    tidester, host
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    Spinning noise on LT, w/ my XC 90 V8 it's on the Rt. turn Clik, thug, clug. Like u' 15 mos. of having the car. All the problem is nothing compared to what I have and still having. Best solution I've heard and would like to do but it's sad we pd. 50 grand for the car, aesthethically cool, mechanically cold. I lkie Q7 as well. :lemon:
  • phl1phl1 Member Posts: 8
    Just got the car back from the dealer. A rear wheel bearing was bad causing most of the noise. The dealer has no solution for the tire problem so far. The service manager keeps saying they don't replace tires. Then he says they already replaced one set. Of course, since I paid for that set (pro-rated) and an alignment, and the dealer presented this as a solution to the problem, the tire life and wear should be normal. I feel like the dealer should return that money, since I paid with the expectation that the problem would be solved and it clearly is not.

    :lemon: So, the question is: Does Volvo stand behind their vehicles or not? The answer seems to be -- Buy Lexus
  • eliaselias Member Posts: 2,209
    eh. buy what you like. is maximum family-vehicle-safety worth your possible extra dealer/tire-replacement annoyance? you decide. in your case volvo/dealer seem to have been reasonable. i was fortunate that my xc90 came with michelins so have avoided the xc90 pirelli problem. but i had identical-to-yours situation with pontiac, and they inisted on reimbursing me for the $250 alignment - but not for the wrecked tires - i've got to replace those now or the car won't pass inspection. on the other hand, i did get 20k out of the tires. that's good for a performance car.
    but indeed, 10k miles on the factory SUV tires is not reasonable unless maybe it's an SRT8 or Cayenne Turbo!
  • phl1phl1 Member Posts: 8
    :mad: How can you say the dealer is being reasonable? I agreed to pay $250 to fix a known problem on a $40K+ warrantied vehicle. The only reason I paid was that the service manager said the problem would be fixed. Well, its not fixed. If the dealer would return the money I paid, that would be reasonable. If the dealer would fix the problem, that would be reasonable. The way they have failed to handle this, they lose my business forever. I didn't spend $40K+ to put up with this amateur-hour b.s. Either they take care of their customers and stand behind their product or they don't. That's the bottom line. They can probably weasel out of fixing this, but it is penny-wise and pound foolish. How many billion dollars will Ford lose this year? Nickel and diming your best customers is always a losing proposition. I didn't grind the salesperson on the price. I left the dealer enough profit to buy many sets of tires at retail. I'll pay for quality and service, but the dealer has to hold up his end of the bargain or I'm gone.

    :( Additional annoyance: The service manager was unhappy that I kept his loaner car for two days instead of one. My answer to this loser: Your service advisor called me to tell me my car is ready, but failed to address the tire problem. I didn't hear from the Service Manager, despite calling to alert him before bringing in the car. Ignoring problems does not make them go away. So, I don't feel bad about keeping the loaner until I can get the manager on the phone and get some information. Fixing problems the first time is the best way to minimize loaner car demand.
  • eliaselias Member Posts: 2,209
    i can easily say the dealer has been reasonable, as long as they were knowledgeable about the tire problem and handled it as per the volvo factory TSB/etc. so far it sounds like they may well have done that.
    if the tsb only allows for pro-rated new tires in some cases, then maybe that fits your case. i understand the tsb does allow for free replacement tires in some cases so maybe you have a good case to have the factory reimburse you the $250 - maybe contact the volvo corporate reps?
    if the vehicle or dealer annoys you, maybe trade it and surely avoid that dealer in the future.
    the pirelli tire xc90 problem been known for at least two years. the dealer certainly should have handled it however the factory/HQ authorized. you might want to get a copy of the tsb and read it yourself: google alldata ?
  • jtlajtla Member Posts: 388
    the pirelli tire xc90 problem been known for at least two years. the dealer certainly should have handled it however the factory/HQ authorized.

    If the Pirelli tire problem has been known for at least two years, why did Volvo continue to use them?
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    Have not read this forum until 3 wks. ago. A lot of stories were shared and I found mine in each one. I thought to myself Im being unreasdonable w/ things going on w/ my XC 90 V8 bu there are some unfortunate ones as well. I 'v shared the good and the bad of it. Joehand did they give u' another Volvo or the value of it since the problem start. No problem like yours but a ot odf trips to dealer door rattle 2x, weatherstipping coming off 3 weeks a/ pur. came of again a/ 3 mos. cup holder 4x. wind leak fr. sun roof one time. cliking sound when you steer to LF, RT, reverse 3x the first one misdiagnose and the problem is still here I have to go back for the same concern when it's not intermittent so they could do something about it. Honda and Toyota in my experience did not give me any experience. Hope things w/ ur SUV wnet well.
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    Add me to your count, I have a lot of problems for a 15 mo. old 12 miles. Been to dealer around 20x not including the recalls or oil change. for a a 50 grand this is sad. :sick: I agree w/ u about the cars u' mention
  • eliaselias Member Posts: 2,209
    jtla, here are some possible answers:
    - maybe they had a big inventory of these tires.
    - maybe they did the math and determined it was cheaper to keep shipping the pirellis and then pay out to the small percentage of owners who complain loudly.
    - maybe they had a contract with Pirelli which required them to ship a certain number/% of XC90s with poor-treadwear Pirelli tires.
  • soxfansoxfan Member Posts: 25
    dealer tells me a stone punctured the radiator, which is not covered under warranty - anyone have this problem before? would seem like an suv would be designed to make this a rare occurance. any color would be appreciated.
  • volvomaxvolvomax Member Posts: 5,238
    It is a very rare occurance, but it does happen.
  • templeton3templeton3 Member Posts: 69
    Sorry to hear that you have so much problems. Its sad to spend 50 grand for a piece of JUNK!!! I wouldn't recommend this car to anyone.

    I've had several strangers approach me, asking how do I like my XC90. I just show them the photocopies of my service reports that I keep in the car. There jaws drops and they are astonished with problems that I've had. After looking at the paperwork and hearing what I had to say, I'm sure they were no longer interested in a Volvo XC90.
  • benildabenilda Member Posts: 21
    Im now come to a conclusion time to sell this SUV.
    :lemon:
  • guineabratguineabrat Member Posts: 2
    I have a leased Volvo Xc90 and I have never had any serious issues with this vehicle till now, 3 years into a 4 year lease. It seems every time there is a heavy rainstorm and I drive my volvo you can hear water movement in the side doors or frame of the vehicle. Especially when braking and the water comes rushing towards the front of the vehicle like waves hitting a boat. It seem to evaporate or eventually stop after about a few days. I didnt think much about it till recently again a bad rainstorm and this time while driving the vehicle water started rushing towards the front when braking and came pouring in from under my dash and filling the floor board from underneath the floor mats. The entire car smells moldy. Not only that but I noticed my steering wheel went from a power steering to something that felt like non power steering. The power fluid level is ok and upon looking under the dash on the drivers side I notice there is rust deposits on the metal shaft leading to the undercarriage. I have read about 4 messages concerning something similar to my problem with the leaks but they seem to all be from the year 2004.. Am I missing something here, is this a mfr defect and does anyone know if the mfr covers this if the 4yr/50k mile warranty has passed?
  • guineabratguineabrat Member Posts: 2
    I noticed you posted this Rain leak message on the board but back last June in 2004. Needless to say I have had the same incident happen with my 2004 XC90. I had the car parked outside and we had about a week of terrible rainstorms and when I went to use the car there were sounds of water rushing underneath the carriage of the vehicle. Water started pouring out, the floor mats were wet and when we lifted the mats it was not only soaked underneath but you could actually push on the floor board and feel the water sitting underneath. When we pulled the interior rug back it was standing with water. We used a wet vac to take up the water which we emptied 6 different times. Can you advised me as to what happened when you took it to the dealer and if this is a mfr defect? My vehicle is a 4 year lease and I have 1 yr left on it but the warranty expired at 50k miles, unfortunately I have 59k miles and Im afraid I will get stuck with paying to fix this. Please advise.
  • templeton3templeton3 Member Posts: 69
    We are the point of buying another new car. The Dealer is willing to buy the XC90 at a really low price. We're willing to take it, just to get rid of it. We've had so much problems with this piece of JUNK!!! We told the saleman that we have been really unhappy with it and its had alot of problems. He said that he didn't care because its going straight to auction. They are aware of its reputation and don't want it on its lot.

    I assume that from there another Dealer will buy this car and sell it to consumer. The consumer will think that they are getting a $50K car, 3 yr old, for a great deal. Unfortunately they don't know what they are getting themselves into.
  • lyng1lyng1 Member Posts: 1
    This is a warning to all 2005 V6 XC90 owners who have had their cars recalled for the possible electrical system problems. I had mine recalled months ago and everything was fine til a week and a half ago when I was driving, heard a click (that was it, a click) no message warning, nothing. The car stopped, period. Just stopped. Lost all electrical power, no warning lights, nothing, luckily I was a 1/4 of a mi. from home and not on the highway as you lose any chance of any warning without hazards, etc. Unfortunately, my sunroof was open as were the windows, so car was unsecured. To make long story short, car had to be towed to my house, and rolled into gar. in neutral as dealer was closed. Towed to dealer on Monday wide open, fixed, my mechanic tried to drive it home to me a week later and engine light came on again, back to dealer. The engine harness, etc. has been replaced, and they have done everything they can to make sure it does not happen again, but needlesstosay I am not comfortable driving this car any longer, esp.on the highway.
    A warning to all owners, if you hear any suspicious clicks, anything, get off the road. Don't know why Volvo is not making more of this safety issue than they are, are they waiting for someone to get killed or cause a major accident. Typical Ford attitude. This is my 32nd Volvo, we are a 2 per family for years. This is my first Volvo SUV and loved it until now even with all its problems, new tires at 20,000 mi, tie rod assembly replacement, sway bars, etc., etc. Only keep a Volvo under warranty, we trade every three years. Wouldn't want the repair cost on this one.
    LG
  • slvrvolvoslvrvolvo Member Posts: 1
    Has anyone experienced trouble starting their XC90 in the mornings during hot weather? My'04 recently began began stumbling and stalling during ignition, however it will start perfectly the second time I turn the key. The dealer has updated all engine software and is stumped. :confuse:
  • sadownersadowner Member Posts: 4
    I have a 2005 lemon, it has leaked but from another part of the vehicle. Our sunroof...Actually it has happened twice that the drain holes for the roof have clogged up and caused water to come in and leak from the center lights that are in front of the sunroof. This puzzled the service crew in Germany and they claimed I was was joking about it.
    The problem continued till one morning we were packed up and on the way to Paris when the sunroof opened up by itself and would not shut. By the way, it was raining. They had to replace the control module for the sunroof.
    Thought the problem was resolved...not a chance for my lemon. I just got it to America and the same thing happened!! Just love how the quality of Volvo is so piss poor!
  • 7milehi7milehi Member Posts: 28
    I hit 50k miles yesterday in my XC90 and I traded it for a new Honda Pilot today. If post warranty was going to be anything like in-warranty I wanted no part of it.

    Believe it or not the Honda Pilot had less wind noise at 70mph than the XC90 along with 5 star crash test scores all the way around. And the Pilot is noted to be a very reliable vehicle.

    Now I'm not worrying whats going to happen next and how much is it going to cost. Good bye XC90..........good riddance !
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.