By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
So what kind of progress have you had since your post in June?
In your opinion can this be resolved or is it built into the car?
The solution is extremely simple - when you start up icy hill just disable the Traction control by depressing DSTC button on a center console. Then XC90 will behave in more "familiar" manner, grabbing with all 4 wheels as much as it can, regardless the wheel spinning.
Please remember, that Stability control portion will keep working, as well as the AWD, so the power will be appropriately shifted from side to side and back and forth to the wheel with the best friction.
So, my recommendation is - take it back from the dealer and try disabling the Traction control. I can not guarantee, but 99.9% sure, that the Traction control is the problem.
Same technique needs to be used to pull the XC90 out of a deep snow, using the "rocking".
I have learned it from my personal experience back in 2001 with my S80, trying to pull out from a parking, after the huge overnight snow storm, and finding to my surprise, that when I "rock", the more I press on a gas - the less motion I get. A quick research through the owner manual has resolved the problem, and I went out of a snow pile, just like in my old days, "rocking" back and forth.
BTW.
Th DSTC button is there for those specific reasons.
Thank you for your feedback.
Thanks
Em
There are several dedicated Volvo chat sites. You will find some info there. I don't think edmunds.com allows users to post other chat sites, so I won't list the web addresses.
Q1: Why did the oil go low before 7,500 miles. My coolant ran low at 7,000 miles the last time around.
Q2: Is an oil change covered in every 7,500 mile service for 3 years as the free maintainance says? Why does a dealer ask you to service every 3,500 miles when Volvo says every 7,500 miles. Our driving conditions in the NorthWest are not harsh. Another friend on mine faces the same dealer issue.
Q3: My wife and I use our own keys with its seat settings. She drives it on a daily basis for short trips to office. I noticed that the we loose the settings very often sometimes when i don't drive for a long time (like 3-4 weeks) I loose my settings or when she drives, i drive and she goes back and its gone for her in the lat 24 hours. I make sure we lock when we leave to hold the settings.
Thanks
q2 - dealer just wants more $ out of you. ignore their service intervals and use what volvo recommends.
q3 - heh heh. the power seat memories on the xc90 are very weird. they correspond to the key-fob usage as you mention. apparently i do not have enough advanced degrees to figure out the proper operation. from my perspective, seat memory #3 doesn't work properly. so i use #2.
Since getting this car less than a year ago, had the battery dies 3 times, told bad battery cell and battery replaced. Then last week car would not start, bad relay module to fuel pump, just the relay was replaced. I am doubting this car's reliability. I give it one more chance and then I am getting rid of it if it strands me again. New policy at our dealer, I had to pay for a loaner vehicle, although a nominal fee. Am I alone?
We still have an original set of 18" Michelins on our XC90 at 32K. And I predict that they will survive through summer up to probably 40-42K. However, one tire (right rear) - had to be replaced as it worn out down to the steel belt. The reason was - my wife hit a curb and off-set the alignment (there was visible deep scratch on the rim).
My opinion (just an opinion) is that a lot of XC90 drivers moved up from smaller cars and do hit curbs due to the turning habits that are not quite suitable for the large vehicle, therefore, off-setting the alignment and reducing thread life.
I an speaking from my own experience. In 1996 I have moved from driving Altima to driving 20 ft. long bed/extended cab F150. I was hitting curbs with my rear wheels left and right for a quite some time. Luckily for me it was a truck with a solid rear axle that was not effected much.
So,
I suggest inspect tires frequently and check the alignment at the first indication of uneven wear. It not necessarily a poor factory alignment, but the off-set due to the overlooked impact.
My XC70 has 36,000 miles, gets 26mpg highway and has been trouble free except for rear seat sensor. A great car except for front cabin size.
thanks all, WOEOB
17.5 - 18 MPG - city drive (Los Angeles - heavy traffic+surface streets)
22-25MPG - highway (depends heavily on a speed, best @65 MPH)
No problem at all.
1 tire was replaced @ 27,000 due to the damaged
1 tire need to be replaced soon, most likely the same cause as the first one - my wife keeps hitting curbs at sharp turns, getting into driveways, alleys, etc.
2 tires have maybe 20-25 % of usable life yet.
Original brake pads.
However, I don't know if the XC90 really offers that much more room than your XC70. The 2nd row isn't any bigger than that in an average mid-size sedan. The 3rd row is only good for kids on short trips. The cargo area is probably bigger, but you'll also have to deal with a much higher loading height.
I have a 2005 XC90 2.5T AWD with 3rd row. Thus far at 15K miles, been averaging 15~16 mpg overall. But I live in LA, so a lot of stop and go even on the highways, and the A/C is on most of time except in the winter. On rare normal highway drives without the stop and go, been averaging about 20 mpg. By the way, I hardly ever use the 3rd row. Unlike XC70, there is no weight limit for the 3rd row and the seats are forward facing. When the 3rd row is used, the 2nd row seats have to move forward, which means giving up leg room in the 2nd row. I believe XC70's 3rd row is limited to 140 lbs and rear facing.
The only problem I've had so far is with the seat and mirror memory settings (knock on wood). Oh, and the cupholder lid seems to be a common problem many people complain about.
Also, keep in mind that XC90 with 3rd row has a different rear suspension to compensate for the extra weight when occupied. This suspension is stiffer, so the ride isn't as good as the model without the 3rd row. But still, the ride is very good for an SUV. Good luck.
My husband and I are considering buying a new 2005 or 2006 Volvo XC90 and have heard lots of negatives regarding the reliabilty and problems with it, can anyone give their insight or experiences (positive or negative appreciate). We really must have a dependable vehicle it is the whole reason we are shopping for a new vehicle. Please help, we're making a decision within teh next 2 weeks.
We're between an XC90 and the Lexus GX. But really like the third row in the XC90.
Thanks!!
Since reliability is THE key priority, then safety, I was shocked to learn of the poor quality of the CX90. From dozens of sources, I have learned the same thing - big problems. Both Consumers Report and JD Powers state the CX90 has below average reliability. It does not get worse than this.
I feel very upset for you fine folks having these problems. It is unethical and immoral for a company to charge the big price and deliver a poor product.
Are you folks making this stuff up? Are you kidding me about the tires/brakes wearing out after 15,000, the poor gas milage, the slow response from the engine and the wide variety of other basic ailments?
I simply will not consider the Volvo CX90 any further - guess I am off to the Toyotas, Hondas. Also considering the fine Cadillac SRX.
I appreciate having access to the intenet and Edmonds and to the fine folks who post on these sites.
Take Care and God Bless
NascarQueen24
If I can get the "dog" to stop barking I'd be thrilled.
I've only had my XC90 for 4 weeks and it has already broken down (dead) twice. :lemon:
The XC90 simply is NOT a reliable car.
My advise, stick with Japanese made cars.
Hope that helps!
Problems concerning rear suspension and tire wear. At 7500 dealership replaced rear tires due to cupping; at 15000 miles rear tire wear was again very poor; at 18000 had to replace 2 rear tires (had to fight to have dearlership replace on their dime); and at 30000 and 37000 each time had both rear tires replaced.
I have the third row seat -- never used. Only children who aren't required to be in a car sear and who are less than 4' tall would be comfortable in it.
Currently looking to trade in this vehicle and not sure if it will be a Volvo. You may want to choose the Lexus.
Mine has a noise coming from the dash board “ a windy electric motor / pump type of noise “ on a off every 5 sec . If the fan dial is turned down to minimum the noise intermittently go off. It is a very irritating and annoying noise for the driver and the passengers respectively . Is this the same noise you experienced . :mad: Is this the Volvo for life experience and driving experience they mean! :confuse:
About a week after buying our XC90, one of the door handles broke. Apparently, it was something that wasn't installed correctly at the factory, which made me question Volvo's quality control. It was very disappointing since I would expect a lot better from a $40K+ vehicle, but it happens. My brother has always driven BMWs and he has dealt with annoying problems, too.
Despite these two minor problems, I love driving my XC90. :shades: The engine is broken in now and it's a nice ride.
pbparfait
I think I'd be more leery of a handbuilt car! That sounds like high maintenance to me.
JD Power said in 2003 the risk of buying a newly launched vehicle is much less than in previous years, and some new models held up better than the ones they replaced.
Avoiding bugs in new models and redesigns (Bankrate)
I think the consensus is that it's better to wait a while for any bugs to show up if you can. Sometimes it's more fun to be first on the block though.
Steve, Host
You really wouldn't want a hand-built car unless you just wanted a piece of art that you didn't drive everyday.
The reliability of a modern car is statistically driven, so with the some occasional exceptions, the larger your sampling, the sooner the defect will be manifested, and the sooner it will be corrected. That is one of the reasons, why Japanese luxury cars that share a whole bunch of components with their mass-production counterparts, are more reliable than German or Sweden cars.
Most vital electrical parts of any Lexus are the same as many other Toyotas, and produced in millions. S80, for instance , on other hand, has quite a few electrical components designed specifically for this car (and S60/V70/XC90 maybe) and produced in thousands. So, with the equal reliability of an individual component, Toyota will recognize the design defect and correct it sometime hundreds times faster than Volvo, where there would not be enough statistically significant failure data for years.
But of course, the QA plays its role too, and Japanese workers are considered as the most quality oriented in the world.
I'm on my second XC90 T-6, a 2004 model, and the car mysteriously keeps draining the battery. Six times I have had to call Volvo On Call to come and recharge the completely drained battery. Half the time it has been towed to the dealer to try to pinpoint the problem to no avail.
Anyone out there having experienced the same problem? I'm at a loss, so is the dealer, they tell me. About 18 months ago the front electrical distributor panel had to be replaced. Any connection maybe?
From what I hear in a lot of complains, there is some disconnect between the complexity of the modern Volvo and the skill set of the Volvo dealers in some parts of the country. Luckily, I leave in LA, where even my Indy mechanic can spot a problem over the phone.
I might sound fastidious, but I am dead serious - 95% of the problems that I have read on this board should be resolved at the first attempt, and should not cause such a grieve.
FIND A KNOWLEDGEABLE PERSON to take cars of your investment. Modern Volvos are very complex.
In the typical car locking mechanism, by manually locking the door, you prevented the door from flying open in a violent crash, throwing you out of the vehicle or allowing external factors into the vehicles.
Anyhow, Volvo cars do not need to be locked for safety- actually in a crash, you'd want the doors to be unlocked so that someone can pull you out. Most Volvo's had the "pull" style door handles, and those were for the time you needed to actually pull/wrestle the door open after a crash- surprised why the S80 reverted to the standard style?
I've heard the argument that people want the doors to lock automatically so that others can not have unauthorized entry- ie car jacking- and thats valid for .01% of the population that drive Volvos- for others thinking about that, you neighborhood isn't that dangerous!