Have you thought about a full sized, crew cab pick up? Seating for 5, towing capaility, and hauling ability. I would think you could buy a used 1 year old domestic (thinking F-150), put 60K on it, and only lose $8,000 - $10,000 when it comes time to sell. I have heard that after the first year or 2, full sized pick ups depreciate at a lesser rate than do SUVs. I have nothing to back this up, but I have been told this by a couple of folks that claim to know.
We ran into a very clean 2001 Honda Civic Ex, for 11 K, with 31K miles, and very clean.
The alternative is a 2005 Ford Focus ZX4 4 door, with 32K miles and about 12K.
I am stuck as to which one to choose:
The Ford is newer, the dealer is local, the car has more head room. CR has it as an average car reliability wise
The Honda has really low miles, sunroof, to me a better interior and the usual CR high quality rating.
Cons: Honda dealer is a long way from us for repairs, and I am unfamiliar with the maintenance requirements, i.e. who can work on them. It is 4 years older. I didn't test it on the highway, where some people complain the engine has little pick up and the wind noise is bad. Ford had a noise that was in the back enbd to get fixed, and 15K miles a year on the car tell me it's a rental and I'm not happy about that.
The Civic's maintenance should be something like: every 10k - oil change, tire rotation. 20k - oil and filter change, tire rotation, inspect brakes and other items. 40k - all of the above plus air filter. Replace brake fluid every three years. Probably no tune-up or ATF change until 100k.
The Civic sounds like a low-mileage, one owner car. You could get a newer one with more miles for the same price, but there wouldn't be that much advantage to doing so. What is the condition of the body and interior of both the cars? Rental cars (like the Focus) tend to be a little beaten up; I'm guessing that a private owner vehicle would be in better shape.
The Civic's warranty is out anyway--if you have a local mechanic who is familiar with imports, you could go to them for repairs.
The bodies of both look to be okay, just a couple of scratches on the rear bumper of the Civic.
I am surprised about Honda maintenance,you mean no oil change every 3K miles? Do they recomend full synthetic? It seems so different than other cars.
Do Civics have a lot of noise at highway speeds? That to me is the big issue, though some also say they are unclomforetable for long drives. If I knew the Civic was not a wind tunnel, I'd be heading to the dealer now to pick it up. I usually drive Fords, I like the cars a lot, our family has used nothing but Sables/Taurus models for years. But the Honda seems like a nice low cost car to have.
The Civic's maintenance should be something like: every 10k - oil change, tire rotation.
My Accord calls for 7500 miles oil changes under normal schedule only. I consider mine severe and change oil every 3.5-4k. Also, change the filter every time oil is changed, not every other time.
Other than that, pretty accurate description of Honda maintenance, I think. What about radiator flushes, though?
Drive the Civic to see if it meets your preferences. If so, you can't hardly go wrong with one. It is always worthwhile to pay a little extra for a premium used car.
The Ford will likely not be as reliable and its resale will be worse.
The Ford will likely not be as reliable and its resale will be worse.
Two comments:
1) On a used vehicle, the greater reliability of the Honda is reflected in the price. If you can buy similar models of the same model year for significantly less, the Ford could easily be a better deal. Personally, I would see if I could negotiate the price on the Focus down at least $1000 as the price seems a bit high to me.
2) In this case you are comparing a 2001 model with a 2005. Parts fail due to mileage and age. The OP needs to be somewhat careful will low mileage vehicles to ensure that proper maintenance has occurred.
I have seen a lot of cases where there is a car that is 6 years old with 30k miles that still has ALL the original equipment. That means the buyer will be replacing the tires, belts, hoses and other stuff during the first months of ownership. Trust me, those cars are NO bargain.
Buyers always need to be careful that proper maintenance has occured regardless of age or mileage.
Although I wasn't specifically equating low mileage with premium condition, low mileage usually offers a wealth of advantages for the additional cost just because the car has been used less and will show less wear.
I haven't checked numbers on either of the cars under consideration but the price on the Honda does seems steep for a 6 years old car. It probably sold for less than $17,000 new.
My inclination here would be to search a bit more - there are a great many vehicles available in the $11,000 to $12,000 price range.
First, about the Honda. I took it for a test drive and a detailed inspection today. The road noise was not bad at all, the handling was good, and the dealer had done some work on it, oil change, and some other stuff. There were new after-market tires on it, in good shape. Mechanically the car is sound, and the sticker price price for the car new was in the 18's, and while I can see it costing in the 17's, I'd like to see if anyone ever bought one for under 17K new. It is a clean car.
The problem is that each rear fender has scratches along the back end of each wheel well, like the former owner scraped the car on a post or garage door or something. There is no signs of body repair, or any signs of damage other than scraped paint, but I am not paying anywhere near 11K for it, if I get it.
As to the age of the car, if the thing has only 5K miles a year, and it has been well-taken care of mechanically, how can it be a problem? I would worry more about a 2 yr. old car with too many miles than an older one with less. If the man who posted about the cars age would say more abou this, I would appreciate it.
Thanks for the Ford advice, I am sure that the car will not be purchased for 12K or anything close to it with its milage if I buy it.
As to the age of the car, if the thing has only 5K miles a year, and it has been well-taken care of mechanically, how can it be a problem?
A lot of times, when you have a low mileage vehicles, they are garage queens. That is, the proverbial little old lady buys a car that she drives to the market and to church once a week. Heck, i have bought a couple over the years when someone's aunt can no longer drive.
The problem with these vehicles is twofold. First, the engine never really gets much of a workout. It gets started, driven four miles and put away for a few days. Second, people who drive little, generally don't service the vehicle all that much. Some parts, especially the rubber parts deteriorate as much from sitting around as by running.
If the car turns out OK, that is great. Just make sure that the necessary maintenance has been done as opposed to just a little armor-all to make everything look good.
Unless the car was kept in a climate controlled garage, time will cause rubber, metal, plastic, electronics, etc. to deteriorate. It can be minimized through proper storage, but time stops for no man (or machine).
It is all a judgement call on used cars - each one is different, but age is just one factor to consider.
My son bought one of those "garage queens" -- two years later he has a 1998 LeSabre with only 60,000 miles on it and it is in perfect condition. Never a problem. I would feel even better about a Honda. They hold up very well even when you drive them a lot. I would feel more confident about the Honda than the Ford.
We got the Honda, and the thing is a dream. Not a bit of trouble, and it is running great. they had it sitting in the right place for us.
My recommendation: Find the lowest milage car you can in the model you want, and find it as old as you can resonably find it. And before you buy it spoend a lot of time on the internet learing about the general history of the model you want. And if you are lucky, once you find a car or two you like, see if you can in touch with the former owner if you are buying through a dealer.
Probably a better deal new than used; with the Vibe, a used one may pop up for the right price.
I used to own one and probably will again. It's got the same space as many SUV's -- Gd Cherokee is no bigger inside -- it has decent ground clearance, and it gets great gas mileage.
Super reliability is also a factor.
I installed a $120 hitch on mine in a couple of hours. Easy. Max towing is 1,500, I think.
A large local newspaper is looking to interview consumers who are considering purchasing a Ford vehicle. If you are interested in speaking to the reporter, please reply to jfallon@edmunds.com no later than Friday, April 20, 2007 with your daytime contact info.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name. 2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h) Review your vehicle
We are looking to replace the family minivan and have begun the process of determining what would best fit out needs. We have 3 kids with 1 in a booster & 1 in a car seat so that means 3 rows since the occasional grandparent will be along. Also, we would like to have AWD capabilites as we do travel in to snowy regions quite frequently. Since the wee one (2-1/2) is getting bigger, we no longer have the need to tote along as much stuff as we used to (amazing how #3 will be fine in a shopping cart, but #1 "Needed" the full travel system). So we can get by with a smaller cargo area, but would still need space for groceries, etc.
I've been doing some research and my wife has looked at a few options, but then, I had a different thought. One of the cars we tested was the Ford Freestyle. My wife liked it, and it seems to fit our requirements. I currently also have the ability to buy with the X-Plan so that makes it appealing as well. But... (there's always a but) The Volvo XC90 also is X-plan eligible and, to my wife's delight, is a Volvo! ( We currently have an S70 that was bought used and is still going strong). However, a new XC90 is a bit out of our budget.
Now, after all that, here comes the part where I could used some opinions. While a 'new' XC90 is out of the question, an off-lease one that is certified can be got for about the same price as a 'new' Freestyle similarly equipped. So, the question is do I go for a 'new'car in it's last model year or a 'used' car that may last longer. As a note, when we bought our S70, it had 36k miles on it and they replaced all 4 tires, brakes and rotors as well as doing the 40k service. At 103k, it's still going strong and still looks good too.
The Freestyle, while technically is in it's last year, it really isn't. It mainly is changing it's name to the Taurus X, plus some cosmetic changes. If you want to go with the X plan, go with the Freestyle. Have you looked at the Pacifica? Or will the x plan work with Mazda? If so, what about the CX-9. Those are suppose to be real nice. Good luck!
Let me know your ZIP Code and I will pull programs for your area and let you know if there are any extra rebates for plan customers. In are region there is $2500 rebate or 1.9% on 60 months. There is also an extra $300 for X-Plan Marketing Associates.
I have a 04 Nissan Quest SE. I see that Nissan is offering a 3K rebate on the 07 Quest SE. For 2004 owners, there is an additional 2K rebate totalling 5K in rebates.
Is it a good idea to trade in my SE and get a 07?
My 04 is in excellent condition (new brakes), 33K miles
its never a good idea to trade in for a new car when your current vehicle is in good working order with low miles and will serve you just fine for years to come.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Has your 04' been problem free? A lot of 04's have had quality/reliability issues. If your's has been relatively trouble free... from a financial standpoint I'd hang onto it.
Also the 2004 have the 5 yr/60k mile bumper to bumper warranty that Nissan gave to all 2004 Quest owners for the 1st year problems. I would drive it (I Have a 2004 Quest) until the warranty runs out.
I had the rotors cut recently. The dealer covered it in warranty but did warn it will not be covered in the future. Had to replace both my front and rear brakes. These are the major ones. The rest were minor and covered under warranty.
After reading the forums, I am afraid that I may face more problems and end up spending a lot out of pocket.
Brakes are a maintenance item. Yes you will have to replace the rotors and pads at some point in the future. And yes it will cost some money, about $300 per axle. Nothing you can do about it.
You have another 2 years and 27k miles left on your BUMPER to BUMPER warranty from Nissan. This warranty is equivalent to most manufacturer's 3 yr/36k mile warranty. Nissan issued the 5 yr/60k mile warranty to ALL 2004 QUEST OWNERS so everything other then maintenance items are covered.
I was including the rotors at dealership rates. But you are correct, if you are handy, you can do the work in a short afternoon.
I just don't see the sense in getting rid of a car while you ahve so much left on the warranty just to get a newer version of the same vehicle. But to each his/her own.
Hi, I am in the hunt for either a new or used car this winter and I am very undecided what to buy. My limit is around 35K. I was hoping to get a used Audi S4 (2004-2005) but I hear of reliability problems, plus the usual cost of maintaining a German car. I am hoping to get my hands on a reliable, fun driving, quick (fast), women approve kind of car. I am just not sure if American cars are reliable anymore. Are there any cars our there comparable to an S4 that are reliable?
Infiniti G35 Coupe... assuming that you're looking for a grown-up "chick magnet"
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name. 2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h) Review your vehicle
the G37 looks pretty nice. Kind of what I'm looking for. not sure of the MSRP on it though. The G35 coupe is another option that kirstie suggested. I very well could be leaning this way. Thanks for the suggestions
well, a used G35 coupe with low miles will run you around $25k. The new G37 will start around $33k and top out around $40k (at least, this is what i've read).
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Comments
I am looking to replace a car for my wife.
We ran into a very clean 2001 Honda Civic Ex, for 11 K, with 31K miles, and very clean.
The alternative is a 2005 Ford Focus ZX4 4 door, with 32K miles and about 12K.
I am stuck as to which one to choose:
The Ford is newer, the dealer is local, the car has more head room. CR has it as an average car reliability wise
The Honda has really low miles, sunroof, to me a better interior and the usual CR high quality rating.
Cons: Honda dealer is a long way from us for repairs, and I am unfamiliar with the maintenance requirements, i.e. who can work on them. It is 4 years older. I didn't test it on the highway, where some people complain the engine has little pick up and the wind noise is bad.
Ford had a noise that was in the back enbd to get fixed, and 15K miles a year on the car tell me it's a rental and I'm not happy about that.
What say ye? What would you buy?
The Civic's maintenance should be something like:
every 10k - oil change, tire rotation.
20k - oil and filter change, tire rotation, inspect brakes and other items.
40k - all of the above plus air filter.
Replace brake fluid every three years.
Probably no tune-up or ATF change until 100k.
The Civic sounds like a low-mileage, one owner car. You could get a newer one with more miles for the same price, but there wouldn't be that much advantage to doing so. What is the condition of the body and interior of both the cars? Rental cars (like the Focus) tend to be a little beaten up; I'm guessing that a private owner vehicle would be in better shape.
The Civic's warranty is out anyway--if you have a local mechanic who is familiar with imports, you could go to them for repairs.
I am surprised about Honda maintenance,you mean no oil change every 3K miles? Do they recomend full synthetic? It seems so different than other cars.
Do Civics have a lot of noise at highway speeds? That to me is the big issue, though some also say they are unclomforetable for long drives. If I knew the Civic was not a wind tunnel, I'd be heading to the dealer now to pick it up. I usually drive Fords, I like the cars a lot, our family has used nothing but Sables/Taurus models for years. But the Honda seems like a nice low cost car to have.
every 10k - oil change, tire rotation.
My Accord calls for 7500 miles oil changes under normal schedule only. I consider mine severe and change oil every 3.5-4k. Also, change the filter every time oil is changed, not every other time.
Other than that, pretty accurate description of Honda maintenance, I think. What about radiator flushes, though?
I would cut that in about half to say 3 year 50,000 miles though.
The Ford will likely not be as reliable and its resale will be worse.
Two comments:
1) On a used vehicle, the greater reliability of the Honda is reflected in the price. If you can buy similar models of the same model year for significantly less, the Ford could easily be a better deal. Personally, I would see if I could negotiate the price on the Focus down at least $1000 as the price seems a bit high to me.
2) In this case you are comparing a 2001 model with a 2005. Parts fail due to mileage and age. The OP needs to be somewhat careful will low mileage vehicles to ensure that proper maintenance has occurred.
I have seen a lot of cases where there is a car that is 6 years old with 30k miles that still has ALL the original equipment. That means the buyer will be replacing the tires, belts, hoses and other stuff during the first months of ownership. Trust me, those cars are NO bargain.
Although I wasn't specifically equating low mileage with premium condition, low mileage usually offers a wealth of advantages for the additional cost just because the car has been used less and will show less wear.
I haven't checked numbers on either of the cars under consideration but the price on the Honda does seems steep for a 6 years old car. It probably sold for less than $17,000 new.
My inclination here would be to search a bit more - there are a great many vehicles available in the $11,000 to $12,000 price range.
Thanks for the information.
First, about the Honda. I took it for a test drive and a detailed inspection today. The road noise was not bad at all, the handling was good, and the dealer had done some work on it, oil change, and some other stuff. There were new after-market tires on it, in good shape. Mechanically the car is sound, and the sticker price price for the car new was in the 18's, and while I can see it costing in the 17's, I'd like to see if anyone ever bought one for under 17K new.
It is a clean car.
The problem is that each rear fender has scratches along the back end of each wheel well, like the former owner scraped the car on a post or garage door or something. There is no signs of body repair, or any signs of damage other than scraped paint, but I am not paying anywhere near 11K for it, if I get it.
As to the age of the car, if the thing has only 5K miles a year, and it has been well-taken care of mechanically, how can it be a problem? I would worry more about a 2 yr. old car with too many miles than an older one with less. If the man who posted about the cars age would say more abou this, I would appreciate it.
Thanks for the Ford advice, I am sure that the car will not be purchased for 12K or anything close to it with its milage if I buy it.
A lot of times, when you have a low mileage vehicles, they are garage queens. That is, the proverbial little old lady buys a car that she drives to the market and to church once a week. Heck, i have bought a couple over the years when someone's aunt can no longer drive.
The problem with these vehicles is twofold. First, the engine never really gets much of a workout. It gets started, driven four miles and put away for a few days. Second, people who drive little, generally don't service the vehicle all that much. Some parts, especially the rubber parts deteriorate as much from sitting around as by running.
If the car turns out OK, that is great. Just make sure that the necessary maintenance has been done as opposed to just a little armor-all to make everything look good.
It is all a judgement call on used cars - each one is different, but age is just one factor to consider.
'24 Chevy Blazer EV 2LT
I'm in the market for a new vehicle (will be retiring my 96 p/u w/245,000 miles this summer).
I need a vehicle that gets very good gas mileage (due to a 100 mile per day round trip work commute).
On the weekends I'd like to be able to tow my boat to the lake (the boat/motor/trailer combo weighs 1,200 lbs).
Price should be reasonable ($18,000 or less preferred).
I'm not partial to any specific brand or style.
Can you help with suggestions and/or recommendations.
Nick
Any other considerations? number of passengers, etc?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
We got the Honda, and the thing is a dream. Not a bit of trouble, and it is running great. they had it sitting in the right place for us.
My recommendation: Find the lowest milage car you can in the model you want, and find it as old as you can resonably find it. And before you buy it spoend a lot of time on the internet learing about the general history of the model you want. And if you are lucky, once you find a car or two you like, see if you can in touch with the former owner if you are buying through a dealer.
Probably a better deal new than used; with the Vibe, a used one may pop up for the right price.
I used to own one and probably will again. It's got the same space as many SUV's -- Gd Cherokee is no bigger inside -- it has decent ground clearance, and it gets great gas mileage.
Super reliability is also a factor.
I installed a $120 hitch on mine in a couple of hours. Easy. Max towing is 1,500, I think.
-Mathias
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
I've been doing some research and my wife has looked at a few options, but then, I had a different thought. One of the cars we tested was the Ford Freestyle. My wife liked it, and it seems to fit our requirements. I currently also have the ability to buy with the X-Plan so that makes it appealing as well. But... (there's always a but) The Volvo XC90 also is X-plan eligible and, to my wife's delight, is a Volvo! ( We currently have an S70 that was bought used and is still going strong). However, a new XC90 is a bit out of our budget.
Now, after all that, here comes the part where I could used some opinions. While a 'new' XC90 is out of the question, an off-lease one that is certified can be got for about the same price as a 'new' Freestyle similarly equipped. So, the question is do I go for a 'new'car in it's last model year or a 'used' car that may last longer. As a note, when we bought our S70, it had 36k miles on it and they replaced all 4 tires, brakes and rotors as well as doing the 40k service. At 103k, it's still going strong and still looks good too.
Thanks!
Peeter
If so, between the two, I suppose it would be the better choice since the Ford's resale will be so bad.
However, if I was in your shoes, there'd be only one choice: an AWD Toyota Sienna.
I think I would focus more on moving or finding a new job.
I think I would focus more on moving or finding a new job.
Thats just the way of the world in allot of places back east. Its cheaper to commute then live in the city.
Granted most of them take the train but still.
Is it a good idea to trade in my SE and get a 07?
My 04 is in excellent condition (new brakes), 33K miles
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
After reading the forums, I am afraid that I may face more problems and end up spending a lot out of pocket.
You have another 2 years and 27k miles left on your BUMPER to BUMPER warranty from Nissan. This warranty is equivalent to most manufacturer's 3 yr/36k mile warranty. Nissan issued the 5 yr/60k mile warranty to ALL 2004 QUEST OWNERS so everything other then maintenance items are covered.
That'll last about 25k miles, at which point I'll spend $110 or so to replace rotors and pads. Then I'm good for 50-70k.
Drum brakes are a pain, and I always have those done. But discs are as easy as falling off a log.
A good independent should keep the cost reasonable, I would think.
-Mathias
I just don't see the sense in getting rid of a car while you ahve so much left on the warranty just to get a newer version of the same vehicle. But to each his/her own.
Any suggestions?
Thanks for any direction you can get me in.
Do you mean approval from a women you already have or approval from women you are looking for? Big difference
maybe a mustang, toyota solara, volvo c70, a4 cabrio...pontiac G6 hardtop convertible...
just some options...
good luck!
-thene
assuming that you're looking for a grown-up "chick magnet"
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
hey, im a chick, and i LOOOOVE that car (but i also love the new Nissan GTR - but its not out yet, and not for $35k)
-thene
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Or.. to be more accurate... An open wallet.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I love cars and I have my own wallet, thankewverrymuch!
So, with the parameters set, I just think there is a more cost-effective way to achieve his goal.
However disgusting that I personally think that goal might be!!
(Is that better?)
regards,
kyfdx
(not the host here, obviously)
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S