Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
The Future of Hybrid Technology
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
___I really do like my 5-speed Insight for the highway mileage I have received over the last 6 months or so but watching your posts over the same period makes me believe the Insight might not be the car for you? It isn’t as fast or luxurious as your tastes require more them likely. I don’t really know your tastes directly of course but I have a feeling that your performance and accommodation needs are a bit higher then what the Insight has to offer is all
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
thanks!
The new Prius is scoring a home-run now with the greenies, technophiles, and first-on-the-blockers because of the styling, technology, and better utility/performance (than the old Prius, anyway). It's a neat little car. But I think until the price premium on hybrids goes down from several thousand to several hundred or so, hybrid adoption is going to be slow. Most people don't want to pay more for fuel economy, period. And unless gas gets up to $3 or more per gallon, I think that will remain true.
I expect we'll slowly see more and more hybrids over the next decade or so, as the manufacturers wrestle with the technology and find ways to make the cars profitably. Once the economies of scale kick in, hybrids will become common but that's going to take a while. Figure hybrids will be a significant portion of vehicles by 2015 or so. I'm not even going to make a prediction about hydrogen because I'm not sure they're going to be able to get it to work efficiently, like the EV debacle.
Why would a clearly benefit improvement not carry a price of more than just several hundred?
Still to this day, automatic transmissions cost around $1,000 more than a manual. And they reduce MPG, so there's an obvious penalty. Yet people pay that difference anyway.
JOHN
I don't believe that for a second, since there is absolutely no way to prove that they wouldn't actually do it.
Lots of people don't "want" to pay $2 per gallon, but millions do daily anyway.
*NEVER* have people had the option between choosing tradition & hybrid for the very *SAME* vehicle.
It was always a compromise in the past. In order to gain MPG, you were almost always forced to choose an entirely different vehicle. (In some rare cases, a manual was actually available. But that clearly required a sacrifice of having to do all the shifting yourself.)
Finally getting the choice changes the purchase decision process entirely. Will I buy a Ford Escape with a traditional or a hybrid system?
JOHN
As far as the benefit of the lowered fuel economy and reduced emissions, not everyone is as worried about emissions as you. Certainly not when it means a hit to the old pocketbook. ;-)
___I too believe in much what you have posted
___When Hybrid tech comes in at ~ a $2,000 premium or less instead of a $4,000 - $7,000 premium as it appears today, then it will make much more sense. Even today, PZEV rated emissions can be achieved with most any 4 and it appears to be slowly making its way toward std. 6’s if the automaker(s) decide to offer this level of emission control HW in the automobiles we desire. If the automakers go with similar ICE’s (1.8 L Corolla, 2.4/3.0/3.3 L Camry, 2.4/3.0 L Accord), then you will receive a small increase in fuel economy and even better performance then what is offered today. If they go with the undersized and under performing ICE’s (Insight, Civic, Prius I and II), then you can choose for mileage vs. performance but with just a $2,000 premium, the Hybrid will pay itself off for those that choose the latter.
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
And the good ole USA has plenty of oil; its just not profitable to extract it until gas goes over three bucks per gallon, or so.
Turboshadow
Amen. My reasons exactly. It's hard for a single person to affect foreign policy, but we can individually drive a hybrid and demonstrate to our friends and neighbors that they work and they can be a completely mainstream form of transportation.
Mike
It most certainly is helpful. And I am aware of the downsides to alternate fuels such a bio-diesel and CNG. I wish that a larger percentage of the American population were as informed as those that read the Forum. It gets back to my frustration with the automakers. I wish I believed they were truly interested in saving fuel. I believed in Honda in the 1980s when the CRX and HF Civic got great mileage. They went down hill from there. The 1986-87 Civic HF had highway mileage higher than the Prius and better than anyone is reporting for the Prius on this forum of combined 54MPG. Plus they were very simple for me to work on.
___If most would give a damn about national security; they wouldn’t drive 75 + out on the highways receiving just 75% or so of EPA estimates rather then 50% above driving much more sensibly. Fat chance of that unfortunately.
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
kirstie_h
Roving Host & Future Vehicles Host
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
The projected increase in mileage is not enough to pay the premium & take the risk on the technology. We do not know what will happen when the mandatory battery warranty expires.
___Driving an SUV across the country vs. any sedan no matter how appointed is something you need to experience for yourself. The overall comfort of all passengers is far greater in an SUV when properly equipped. A minivan is even better!
___As for the fuel economy and such, the last time I drove the MDX for any lengthy distance, this is what I received:
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
I agree, I would rather drive my Suburban on long trips than anything else I have driven. Although the wife's LS400 is pretty nice on trips to Vegas and Palm Springs.
Which year MDX and engine did you get the 33mpg with? I past them by as the EPA listed them at 17/23mpg, which was not enough to sell my Suburban and buy new.
Mini-vans are still kind of scary to me, sitting right over the front wheels..
___Our X is an 03 Touring w/ RES. It only comes with a 3.5 in 4WD trim which is mighty powerful in its own right (sub 8 seconds to 60 in some reviews). The fuel economy capabilities of the beast are what surprised me as I can routinely achieve > 30 mpg out on the highway. As for RES, there is nothing better then on a long trip to take a break and watch a movie, sitcom, or just plain listen in for a change. I highly recommend this option in all future vehicles with the Minivans being top of the list for size, utility, and even higher fuel economy That is if you can stand the look of the things ;-)
___And back to the topic I am sure I could achieve even higher fuel economy w/ a Hybrid MDX/Ody or Accord but the base non-Hybrid power trains can do some serious damage to the EPA’s underrated estimates if you drive them for what they’re worth. Not many know this yet but someday, all will Wait until VCM hits the entire Honda lineup w/ the iCDTi’s following! Hybrid’s will more then likely fade away when and if that happens. Unless the Ni-MH, Li-Ion, Li-Sulfur, Zinc-Air, straight AGM’s, whatever pack prices come down significantly to be added to an iCDTi anyway ;-)
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
___As mentioned above, unless the pack prices come down a tremendous amount they will.
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
your hybrids will more than likely fade away statement doesn't hold water
___Are you not predicting the future?
___For a heads up, why not consider Europe’s total sales of HCH's, Insight's, Prius I’s and II’s vs. everything else given they already have great overall fleet fuel economy without hybrids. They are voting with their pocket books and do have to pay $5.00 to $6.00 for a gallon of petrol.
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
___I am not so hot at predicting the future either ;-)
___Remember that Toyota, Ford, Mercedes, and Honda all have a huge and profitable investments in diesel technology as well. A look at the manufacturer’s euro based web sites will show you all you need to know in this regard. We just haven’t seen it here yet.
___The reason I mentioned Europe is they do have a ton of high mileage diesel options and with that; Hybrid’s aren’t selling worth a damn over there. We will soon have the same or at least similar diesel options here in the states and once we do, the $3,000 - $7,000 premium for a hybrid makes them (hybrid’s) as good as dead. That is where the lower priced pack statement comes about. If that hybrid premium isn’t reduced significantly, the diesels will arrive and they will destroy the Hybrid market imho. Europeans appear to be a bit more practical then us American’s and I do not see how an American could pass up the opportunity to purchase an Accord EX-L iCDTi for maybe $22,000 (30/45) vs. an Accord EX-L I4 (24/34) for $21,000 vs. an Accord Hybrid (30/38) for $25,000 +. The 255 HP Accord Hybrid w/ no sunroof will be much faster then either the iCDTi or I4 by a good deal (7 seconds vs. 9 seconds to 60 mph) but neither the I4 or the Hybrid will receive anywhere near the highway fuel economy of the iCDTi if 34/38 is all the I4 and HAH are good for in the EPA highway cycle In regards to the city estimate, the iCDTi vs. HAH (30 vs. 30 possibly?) might be about equal.
___With the above, if the pack prices do come down significantly so a Hybrid premium is only let’s say $1,500 in total, then an even smaller 1.5 to 2.0 L iCDTi w/ a 25 - 30 HP IMA addition might make sense for 50 - 60 + out on the highway and 0 - 60 in 9 + seconds or thereabouts Diesel Hybrid. Then you are speaking of a VCM’ed iCDTi EX-L w/ IMA for ~ $23,500. Just as fast as today’s I4, equal or higher highway rated fuel economy then the HCH, and city fuel economy that should easily be in the mid 30’s for a 3,300 # semi-Lux automobile. It is the pack and total hybridization price that will make or break this scenario imho.
___The prices I used above are both estimates in terms of what a HAH and iCDTi might go for here in the states and some of the best pricing received on a PZEV based EX-L w/ Auto in the last few days per Edmunds own Honda Accord - Prices Paid and Buying Experience forum.
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
___I don’t know why you need a 300 HP sedan to cruise the Interstates nor do I see why anyone needs this for back and forth to work either. This is America thank goodness so we have a nice choice if speed and handling are your forte’. With that, an SUV or Minivan are much more comfortable for everyone overall. There is simply too much room sacrificed in a sedan/hatch vs. a larger SUV/Minivan. I remember our 5 person trip to Florida in the 87 Mercury Sable LS. It wasn’t nearly as fun or comfortable as the trip to South Dakota, Utah, Arizona, California, and back in the MDX w/ its RES.
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
___And how!!!
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
___I prefer the comfort for 5 or more including myself, a wonderful ride of a semi-lux Acura SUV (a Beemer’s ride isn’t what I would call soft by any means), and receive great fuel economy as posted previously. Given your driving style, I highly doubt you will achieve even the 545i’s EPA highway estimates :-( Can you even purchase a $55,000 545i with a RES?
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
That is a good question. I just take the Suburban into Firestone every 5k miles and they rotate and check the pressure for free, part of the OEM agreement. The pressures must be good they lasted 6 years & 45k miles, with tread to spare. I hope the Michelins I bought at Costco are as good as that set of Firestones. So far the mileage is about 1/2mpg less, so I should add a bit of pressure.
If allowed to be sold in all 50 states, diesel cars would wipe out the market for hybrids. They are not in the same league as dozens of current diesel offerings in the rest of the world. We tout the Europeans on the environment most of the time why do we resist them on this issue? I believe the US environmental organizations are in the oil companies pocket. I know for a fact that the bulk of the environmental studies in the Arctic are financed by BP. From the grass, bird & whale watchers to fish squeezers, they are financed by the oil companies.