By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
1984 380SL
heck, if the engine was original, I could at least understand dreaming of getting that much from some kook ... but nonmatching and rotted all around = not much.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
If the engine is reasonably correct, even if not original, and the chassis/suspension was done to a high standard, and assuming the engine/tran are OK to use, and the interior/trim is there, why not? All these cars need new sheetmetal anyway, right? I'm sure you can point/click/ship new quarters/pans in about 15 minutes.
Or, even better is if you have a sound body with no drivetrain (maybe a Lemans 6 cyl.) to marry up to the chassis?
Hey, we are talking project cars here, not pebble beach garage queens
besides, I am partial to that model GTO, and anything with a 4 speed must be saved at any cost. let the automatics rot in a field!
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
james
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
There is no upside to this wreck because it's not all that special a car---at least not special enough to undergo the massive amounts of work necessary to bring this one back.
I vote no, absolutely not. If it were a '66 convertible 4 speed, then yes, because you have double or more potential value.
Sell the chassis, bail out while you're ahead.
Also keep i mind that many of us get our perception of value from watching the B-J auction show, so I have no idea what a real nice basic GTo will go for.
Still, although that one did have some sheet metal issues, it did look reasonably straight, and you are cetainly ahead of the game over buying one like that on a rusty dirty chassis.
Also, i don't think he specified what motor it had, just that it was not original. Aren't you the one that makes fun of people for getting hung up on matching numbers on a mainstream domestic car? What if it has a period correct 400 motor in it?
But, I'm sure that buying a nice complete car is the best financial move, but sometimes the project is the important part. besides, using that logic, no one would ever restore a car, drying up the supply!
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Yeah, but on a relatively high dollar mainstream domestic car, matching numbers is going to be important. I think the main thing that Shifty makes fun of is not that people get hung up on that, but on certain cars the MARKET gets hung up on it!
I doubt if anyone would really care if my '67 Catalina convertible or '76 LeMans has a numbers matching engine, but on a GTO, Chevelle SS396, Corvette, etc they're going to get fussy.
As for matching #s, yeah personally I think it's silly but the market doesn't think so....so I'm trying to defeat my prejudices by making buyers aware that you are going to get penalized financially for a non matching #s car (in this case).
Basically all I'm saying is that a car like that '70 GTO, in the condition presented, is actually only worth the $$ you can get for the chassis + scrap metal...so maybe $2,000?
Further, it seems a senseless project for restoration given the current values. I doubt I would take it on if it were worth $75,000 retail all fixed up. Maybe if it were a '58 Fuel Injected corvette, you could take on a car this bad.
This might be do-able...it sounds like its about $500 worth of parts away from being anything legitimate, but when done, these things are pretty fun.
I'm thinking $350 for an SE-R trans to get rid of the "pop out" (been down this road before, they all do that), do a clutch while ur in there, and then some money for glass.
It gets some cool points for having a sunroof and it also gets some cool points for being the same stuff we were racing at Buttonwillow in CA.
I always thought an SE-R would make a great One Lap car.
I bet if you walked in with 400 cash and a trailer you could take that away no problem.
I always wondered if the '68-72 and the '73-77 A-bodies used the same frame underneath. They did use the same length wheelbase, 112" for 2-doors and 116" for 4-doors (and the Monte and Grand Prix).
I guess though, if anything serious enough happened to my '76 LeMans that it needed a new frame, chances are the rest of the car would be so smashed up it wouldn't be worth it! If I really got sentimental for the car I'd just go pay the $3000 or so for another one!
Just out of curiosity, would a numbers-matching engine be critical in something like my '57 DeSoto?
Estimated to take 70,000 dollars to restore
Center of the galaxy sized blackhole.
As to GTOs, I concede. Actually, I didn't think that '70 needed as much work as SHifty did, but I didn't really look at the pics too closely. I would still take a flyer though if the body was sound (it's a 4 speed thing).
the '67 Vert sounds like a bad idea. Having to replace the frame and all the sheet metal? Uh, no.
I just got the latest Automobile issue in the mail, and one of the auction cars (fro RM in Mich.) was a '66 GTO, 4 speed, seems nicely restored, with PS. That only sold for 33K, making a basket case project look even less desireable.
I need to find a 1970 Dart sport 340 4 speed with a rust free body (although it might be easier to find Hoffa...).
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
So its a rust bucket GTO without all the GTO parts and a non-matching motor that is toast? Is there any redeeming qualties of this thing at all?
Ferrari
There is no way you will ever not be upside down with that car, and whats worse, you will get spanked by a kid with a Honda Accord V6 at a light.
Almost all of them. Mine somehow still has a solid 5th gear closing in on 230k, but that is very much unusual. If I were going to swap the tranny and prep the car for autox, I'd think about hunting down a B15 box for the shorter gearing.
And yes, the stock VLSD was one of the things that made the first-gen SE-R so much fun.
-Jason
'67 GTO -- looks like previous owner made the right decision to bail out on this car. Probably the only way it could be restored logically is for someone to get it cheap and do all the labor hisself. Paying someone to do it, you'd be bottoms up for life on this baby. Seller estimates $70K to restore (sounds right) and really for that money you could buy the best '67 in the world and have money left over for a couple of African safaris.
I mean, there is no mystery here...you can buy nice 308s for $28,000 bucks...AND better years/models. An engine rebuild alone is $30,000 dollars! One (1) fan belt is $100. Front bumper? $4,000.
The whole auction is a travesty...very entertaining freak show here....
but this one apparently has a stick
diesel = +$2000
a Mopar for Andre
or a swamp buggy
I think every third vehicle Chevy built in 1972 was a C/10
or a C/20
the badge is a bit much
rare, but who cares?
buy someone else's project
#42, ready for the junkyard
The reason there are so many of them out there is because they were such an excellent, practical vehicle with a timeless design.
They'd fight for that diesel here...I've seen a couple of "Benz Diesel Wanted" ads on local CL in the past week.
Whoever the heck used the BIN button has GOT to be insane, a deadbeat, or the aforementioned shill.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Sometimes I can rationalize purchase of a high mileage car by using my favorite "bank account analogy".
It goes like this:
A car is like a bank account. Some people merely make withdrawals (driving the car) and very few, if any, deposits (maintenance)...some only put money back in when a check bounces (car breaks down).
So when you look at a high mileage car, you have to decide if the account is full, at the absolute minimum required, or is bankrupt.
If a 200K car is bankrupt because there have been few or no deposits, (you of course, ask for the deposit slips), then this requires YOU aka "the stuckee" to cover all the bounced checks.
So how do you all like this analogy?
Ad says that owning this car "will make you live longer" because it's a luxury car with sex appeal (maybe...).
I've lost the link. Oh well.
Looking at a car as a bank account is a good way to look at it. Especially if you realize that withdrawals can only be made by driving the car. That's the situation I'm in with my 1988 Olds 98. Having deposited so much over so many years I want to get some of it out by driving the darn thing. That all-new brake system from 2003, given how few miles we drive, will probably last quite a bit longer than we'll own the car--or perhaps even longer than the car itself will survive. But I wouldn't feel comfortable selling a car with bad brakes though, even if I disclosed it.
The analogy seems apt...a car like that is certainly one I would not want to own without a stack of those deposit slips.
Still if it were an old Toyota with 238,000 miles on it, he wouldn't dare ask $4000.
The priciest sale I personally know of was $7500 for an 85 300TD wagon, but it was really in beautiful condition in black on palomino, under 100K I think, and was 100% mechanically.
I'm sure it drives like a (bad) dream, but it could somehow be useful, for the money
how about this 1961 T-bird:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Best-Concourse-Restored-T-Bird-as-NOS-1961-1963-4- 0pics_W0QQitemZ150034430590QQihZ005QQcategoryZ6240QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
It's not really a project car, I realize, because someone else has done all the work.
If I wanted a 123 I too would hold out for the best imaginable