Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"

1209210212214215853

Comments

  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    I think I told this story before not sure though.

    About a year ago we took an R-Class in for trade and one our directors was here with a Pacfica as his Demo. A couple of us drove the R-Class back to back with the pacifica and everyone agreed that the Pacifica was a better driving car then the R-Class. Sure the R was a little better looking inside with slightly more room but not much.
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    The 929 is nice... I had a Millenia last year for 7 months or so and really liked it... it was a 96 with 170k miles, some cosmetic issues but everything worked and it ran great... bought for $1800 sold for $1700 put some money into it... the 929s are the predecessor with many similarities.

    What I'd worry about is parts and getting someone to fix it. Great car if you also have an old Corolla for a parts chaser...

    -Mathias
  • jlflemmonsjlflemmons Member Posts: 2,242
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,734
    Actually, the 929 was a largish, rear wheel drive car (last of the breed for Mazda). The Millenia was pretty much an upsized 626 FWD.

    The original 626 was RWD though. I imagine the 929 might have been it's big brother?

    I think the 929 was fairly sophisticated for it's day.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    My college roommates grandmother had a 929.

    At some point in its life all the rear diff oil was drained out of it and never put back in.

    That car went several years and 50,000 miles with no diff oil.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,102
    that was actually one of the few modern cars I lusted for back in the early 90's. But alas, it was never meant to be, mainly for the sub-standard driving position. Maybe later models were different, but the one I drove did not have a tilt steering wheel. The salesman said it was because the car had a standard airbag. Anyway, the large driveshaft tunnel and center console made the driver's area really narrow, while the wheel was mounted way too low. It's like it forced me to bow my legs and force them together at the same time and, well, it just wasn't happening!

    I never fully bought the "it doesn't have tilt steering because of the airbag ploy", either. About 5 1/2 years after I drove that 929, I bought a used '89 Gran Fury. It had an airbag. Wanna know what else it had? Yup, you guessed it! A tilt steering wheel! I doubt if Chrysler built more than 40,000 M-bodies total for 1989, which was its last year, yet they went through the effort to figure out how to do a tilt wheel with an airbag. Way to go, Mazda. :confuse:
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    Well, that just goes to show what I know... I didn't know or forgot that it was RWD. I just looked at pics of a 929 last year and was struck how much the interior resembled the Millenia.

    And yeah, that had a few things in common with a 626, but I really liked it. Not much of a canoemobile, though...
    http://www.msu.edu/~steine13/ins11.jpg

    I scraped the undercarriage pretty good on that trip. Just was back there couple weeks ago, and it's funny how the Silverado had no such problem.

    "Beavis, you just need the right tool for the job!"

    -Mathias
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,792
    BR: interesting to know. For a while there, I kept telling the wife her next one would be a diesel R-class. I'm not sure about spending that kind of money, though.

    andre: yeah, I think the bench seat is on the lower-end models, though. We like the 2+2+2 for the most part. The only problem is with the carseat taking up one of the middle seats, it means anytime you take out another couple, someone HAS to sit in the back. But the 3rd row is quite inhabitable. Just not easy to get back there. My wife usually volunteers. The upside is that the 2nd row is much more comfortable with 2 seats that can be adjusted to the occupants liking AND has bun warmers. :)

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    What the heck are those four disks in on each side of the radiator on that Buick?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    TV dinner trays?
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,621
    I was wondering that too...the look like plastic buckets to me.

    Maybe filled with sand or something to add weight? (not that the car needs it)
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,621
  • martianmartian Member Posts: 220
    The old 1960s TV show featured a tricked-up Lincoln sedan-the "BATMOBILE"! Anybody know where it is these days? From what I remember, it broke down regularly-not that it got driven much!
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,150
    Took me a minute - they're the headlights! Instead of retractable covers, they're retractable bulbs. Hate to think what that did to their alignment.
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,150
    Dunno, but latest C&D has article on 5 tv show car reproductions, including that (it came in #1), so I guess you could get someone to build you one. Flame included!
  • jlflemmonsjlflemmons Member Posts: 2,242
    Headlights. They flipped up on that model.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    This Looks like a good deal No way you could build up one for this little money if you started from scratch.

    The fuel tank is strapped down behind the passenger seat instead of under it because of the Toybox, was going to put a fuel cell in just never got around to it.

    Just need to buy a fuel cell.

    Well I would not call it rare but at least it is unmolested.
  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,428
    ">link titleSorry about all that money that you spent He knows that it's an 12 year old Mecury Mistake, right?
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    Wow, poor guy.
    1. that blower thing was a recall/underground extended warranty ("they all do that")
    2. waterpump - yeah, the plastic ones fail, usually around the time a car with a belt needs the belt changed and it would get swapped anyway. Incidentally BMW has this issue with E36/E39+. ("they all do that")
    3. cup holder - what kind of wacky design is that? This flimsy little thing pops out of the center console and can barely hold a pop can.
    4. I have no idea how he broke the suspension unless the car was in a crash or something. In 150k of rolling off berms at Buttonwillow and Streets of Willow Springs, the entire suspension system was fine.
    5. I have no idea how the valvetrain broke either. See above.

    As far as what is wrong now, there are two vacuum lines that will trigger a CEL and those dry out and cook and fail. $30 in parts. You need to take the code scanner and start looking at the relationships in the codes its throwing.
    While overall the car may be a POS, it is a 175hp V6 manual transmission vehicle, which I always felt made it fun to drive. I would go for a 96-97 Contour SE because it had better seats and a firmer suspension.
    For all those ads that say the car needs TLC and there are big pieces missing and stuff rusting off of it, there is an ad like this where the car really needs a few hours of sorting out.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well at least now we know the projected life expectancy of a 1995 Mercury. Looks like 80K is a great time to pull the rip cord. (which is, ironically, what I always tell people who are driving mid 90s cars of...dubious...reputation).
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Geeze, if I put that much money into a Mercury Mistake, I'd just keep it until I scrapped it.
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    but but but... isn't that the same engine that was in the Mazda 626 and Millenia??? These will go 200k or so. Mine was at 170 in a '96 last year and was probably the best thing about the car... very smooth and sweet. Great tranny, too...

    Je ne comprends pas...

    -Mathias
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    but but but... isn't that the same engine that was in the Mazda 626 and Millenia??? These will go 200k or so. Mine was at 170 in a '96 last year and was probably the best thing about the car... very smooth and sweet. Great tranny, too...

    Je ne comprends pas...


    No, its a different motor, the 2.5 Duratec. Honestly, if my car went 2x that mileage and had that many HPDEs/autocrosses on it, I don't know how that one got so sorry, although it its 12 years old...

    They really aren't that hard to work on, mine was actually very reliable (it never had a no-start condition and it left me stranded once at 120k for the waterpump).

    The tranny is the MTX75 thats now in the Focus. I never had a problem with it, although shifting did improve when I went to Ford's synthetic trans fluid used in the current MTX75.

    I still miss that car...I should've dumped the Accord and kept the Contour.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Probably it was neglected, like most cars in that price range were. Maybe an old rental car, beat to death once, then passed to dealers, re-poed a couple of times, and finally, now sale-proof, to the "beater auction" rather than the wrecking yard.

    Obviously a hard life.
  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,428
    I hardly ever see these anymore Needing a tourque converter, the price is probably high

    Disclosed flood history is disclosed No way for 5 grand

    Since this is a stick, do we have any takers For the price, you could do worse

    That thing about 15 grand... nah This car must have been passed by by so many subsequent production GTs, that it's not worth much of a premium
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Oh man I always liked those SC coupes. I don't think I have ever seen one with a manual though. For the money that could be an ok car.

    Man I even like the color. Interior looks shabby but I guess that is par for the course for a 1990 Ford product.

    EDIT:

    Look I found another one
  • grahampaigegrahampaige Member Posts: 51
    WHY

    Very Rare (Yeah no one wants them)
    Fortune spent (Sucker)
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    I miss understood your meaning of rally, I was thinking of something like this:
    Rally Car in the making
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,792
    lessee... so i started the preventive maintenance project this weekend on the bimmer. some interesting stuff turned up.

    First, I found out that it has already been converted to R34. That's some good news.

    The fuel filter was quite clogged, so that could be good news in terms of the slow starting and underpowered feel.

    Found out the alternator belt was split. I'm just glad it didn't break while my wife was driving it back and forth to work thursday and friday.

    NOW... why its not yet complete: when putting the timing belt and tensioner back on, it dawned on me that something wasn't quite right with the setup. I look at some pictures on the net and realize the actualy tensioner spring is missing! It scares the hell out of me that we were driving the car like this. My father (the guy i seem to always have to call when i'm doing things like this) believes it is not an absolutely necessary part. As long as you put the proper tension on the pulley before tightening the bolts, you are good to go. But I am waiting for the special order spring to arrive regardless. There's no way I'm taking a chance on a vehicle with an interference engine that is worth more than the entire car. So that ended my BMW tinkering for the weekend.

    The parts were $275 (timing belt, tensioner pulley, camshaft seal, water pump, thermostat, fuel filter, plugs, cap, and rotor). Oddly enough, however, the most expensive part was the cap at $75. The old one still looks new, so I'm sending this one back to bring my total cost down to $200. How in the world a water pump is half the price of a distributor cap is beyond me.

    Anyway, I moved onto the alfa. I went to get it inspected saturday morning. I expected to fail because of the nonworking parking brake. apparently, that didn't bother the inspectors, but it did fail for emissions. That surprised the heck out of me. It has always been WAAAYYY below the allowed limits. So I'm not sure what I'll do. I don't even know where to begin. It COULD just need to be run on the highway a bit.

    I still didn't have the clutch where I wanted it ever since I replaced the slave cylinder. After bleeding it about a dozen times and getting nowhere, I realized this particular setup allows for adjustment of the pedal position. Well, I realize that the only way to do that is to remove the master cylinder. And the only way to remove the clutch master cylinder (at least with the tools I had on hand) is to remove the brake master cylinder. Well, while doing that, I realized the rubber grommets on the brake master cylinder are dry rotted and leaking. UGH. So now I need to get the kit and rebuild that while I'm at it.

    ya know, shifty, i think we actually need a forum to discuss our actual projects, and not just potential projects. ;)
    sorry for being off-topic. ;b

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,150
    Good idea to wait for the spring - the belt might have just had the perfect alignment before to keep things working, and now, who knows? And that the nice thing about the cap - about the only thing in the electrical system you can diagnose by sight!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Sure--why don't you start a "projects in progress" topic, as well as post your efforts on your own Carspace page. Then you can make "friends" with all of us and share photos, etc. and reference the photos here (link to your Carspace page, where the photos are 'stored').

    Good catch on the tensioner spring. I'm not sure if that engine requires a valve adjustment or not---can't recall, but that's worth checking.

    The Alfa might just need an "Italian Tune-Up", you're right. Take 'er out for a burn and bring 'er to the emissions testing red hot. Also throw in some injector cleaner.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,792
    oh, speaking of red hot, she was overheating at the station. i still don't understand the inspection rules here, but for some reason they feel the need to run the alfa on the dyno thingy while measuring emissions. They have never done this for any other car I've every owned EXCEPT the alfa. Anyway, by the time they gave the car back to me, it was around 225 degrees.

    So I gotta figure THAT out, too. I had the radiator repaired over the winter. Anyone know if I need to bleed the cooling system on this car? And, if so, where is the bleeder?

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well a dyno can heat up a car big time, depending on what they do. You have to remember that on the dyno the Alfa is going up an imaginary hill but without the cool air rushing by.
  • jlflemmonsjlflemmons Member Posts: 2,242
    One of the emissions "tricks" I have been hearing about here is to run the car down low on fuel, put in a couple of gallons of E85 ethanol and head for the emissions station. Supposedly that will drop the levels on some of the monitored exhaust and get you passed. Then fill back up with unleaded and you are good to go.
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,150
    How does one spend $18K on a car with a slant six, original interior, and old paint? :confuse: New tops must be very expensive!
  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,428
    So the interior is original and it needs to be painted and he still dumpted 18 grand into it??? Is he counting every tank of gas that went into it??? Did he rebuild the slant 6 after every thousand miles???
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well the battery isn't held down by bungee cords. That probably explains it.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,102
    I remember the valve cover on the slant six in those days being a light blue, but I don't think it was that shade of blue. Definitely doesn't look like it had $18K thrown at it!
  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,428
    How much for that AC service?

    Not enough done to this for 8500 Why would you give it such a plain jane white paint job? Just paint it any red, blue or black and it would like so much better but white covers waves I guess

    So futuristic when new, so dated now

    Another great Chrysler depreciation story

    Great grocery getter That trunk will hold a months worth of food and a case of beer

    Sharp car.. is this what it goes for? You very rarely see this listed used. They are a blast to drive

    That red velour interior is looking better with age

    Somebody wants this for a grand 213,000 miles... I didn't know that they went that long

    Is this legit?

    Such a peach but cheapo plastic hubcaps Anyone smell a flip?

    Not worth fixing

    If everything looks good, this is probably worth it
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,621
    "AC service" on a W126 could be a dozen things which would cost a couple grand to fix.

    Old Pontiac doesn't look horrible
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,621
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,102
    I like that '64 Bonneville. And I swear, those things must've had about the biggest trunk around that year! The Bonneville was on the B-body platform, so it wasn't any bigger in the passenger compartment than an Impala. But they stretched out its overall length to about what an Electra or Ninety-Eight would be. And just about all that stretching was in the trunk!

    That '79 Malibu was kinda cool too. But doesn't "roller" mean that you still need to drop an engine and transmission in it? Basically, it rolls. But don't expect it to move under its own power! I have a soft spot for those, as my first car was a 1980 Malibu coupe.

    I kinda like those Mark VIII's, too. But I tend to be afraid of late model used luxury cars. Unless it's something comparatively simple, like a RWD Caddy Fleetwood/Brougham.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    I don't think that Dealer plate thing is legit at all. Sounds to me like someone got their hands on some stolen dealer plates.
  • boomchekboomchek Member Posts: 5,516
    The Lincoln Mark VIII looks like it has a saggy rear air suspension. :sick:

    2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,621
    ha, they'd ask 10K for that 300SDL here. It actually looks pretty nice, but I will admit I am biased.

    Funny the speedo on that NX goes to 150.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.