Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"

1450451453455456853

Comments

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well I try to respectfully explore the owner's comfort zone. If he wont' let me drive it a decent distance, I just either a) walk away or b) offer him what a non-running car is worth. Fair is fair. If he won't demonstrate that the car can go 25 trouble-free miles, but insists that it will, then I'm outta there. I'm going to spend thousands of dollars only to learn that I have a slipping transmission in 4 th gear or a bad differential or a severe overheat situation? I don't think so :mad:

    I also never pester owners when I'm not entirely serious about purchasing the car. If I'm only curious or mildly interested, a 5 mile drive will either determine my desire to press the owner for a 25-50 mile trip or to abandon the hunt. I might even offer him a deposit, (write him a check) contingent upon the car passing my inspection.

    You have to let the owner know you are serious and not some time-wasting tire-kickin' fool. "do onto others as...blah blah"

    I bring cash when I really want a car (unless I don't like the neighborhood).
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    So, I guess you wouldn't carry a bundle of cash into Hunter's Point?
  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    I just have a serious case of nostalgia with it because my older brother had a 73 Javelin stick which I liked to drive every chance I got.

    I've always liked the Javelin/AMX cars but not much else in the AMC line if it wasn't a Jeep. In '73 my sister's boyfriend bought a new Hornet X with the 360/automatic. It was a fast, strong running car for the time and was finished in a medium blue like the Javelin pic below. Anyway, even though it was a good performer I didn't really like it much. A Hornet just doesn't have that Mark Donohue AMX cachet. A year later James Bond was driving a Hornet but that didn't seem to boost the image of either franchise.
    Photobucket
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,366
    "...medium blue like the Javelin pic below..."

    LOL That looks exactly like my brother's Javelin--same color.

    Unfortunately, my brother liked to hang out in rough neighborhoods and one night someone stole it, trashed it and drove it into the Hudson river.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,792
    this is right around the corner from me.

    Wasn't this series XJR the one British Rover endorses? Awfully tempting. I think I'll have to start beggin the wife.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    The seller's ad calls it a turbo engine but I think the XJR-6 was supercharged and the VIN decodes as 4.0L 6 Cyl Supercharged. Anyway the paint looks shiny and it still has the leaper!

    I found another link to the car with more pics showing some interior wear, mostly driver seat and steering wheel. No engine pics at all though.

    With the lowered price it's probably due for 100k maintenance. Here's a link to a photo album showing how to do it yourself and it begins with replacing the lower radiator hose:

    "This is the lower radiator hose on the X300 XJR-6, the 'Octopus Hose.' It has many connections, be sure you get the right one for your car. As you'll see, replacement is a $1000 job at the dealer!"
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,792
    yes, that's the supercharged one.

    In any case, wife let me go check it out this evening. I believe this is the 3rd time now that I've been enticed to visit that dealer and every time I was disappointed. His photographer is a real artist, IMHO. This thing was in HORRIBLE shape. What looks to be shiny paint is nothing but makeup. I can't even begin to describe what lie underneath it. The bumps, cracks, and thin spots were easily visible within 5 feet of the car. And the interior is WAY worse than appears in those pics. A real fright pig. I hope I've learned my lesson now about that particular dealer.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    edited April 2011
    A supercharged Jaguar! You have no idea what that car will do to you!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    When I check out cars for people who are out of state, I don't even take full-car pictures. Rather, I take very high res photos of small details and sort of string them together into logical groups (interior shots, exterior trim, engine bay). This allows the buyer to blow up the photos on their computer and really zero into the details. In this way they get to judge, and rate in their own minds, the condition level of each "group" and by the time they're done, they've added up all the various "groups" to form a full impression of the entire car.

    You can do all sorts of tricks with a camera to deceive the buyer---one, of course, is distance (at a certain distance for instance, all scratches and dings to exterior trim pieces just drop out), or the angle (you can cut off cracks in the dash, or missing seat trim parts), or avoidance, such as no pictures of the chassis underneath, in order to hide a tarted-up old car quickly re-sprayed in "re-sale red".
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    1980 Corvette? Who wants an 1980 Corvette at any price? 190HP and an 85 MPH speedometer. Wow. Asking price is not sober. Figure he'd be lucky to get $19K out of it, maybe $20K to someone who has a '79 and and '81 and wants to fill in.

    Porsche 914---actually a LOT of those died, and continue to die.

    Bricklin? clean driver, maybe $7500. Drop-dead show car, maybe $15K
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,611
    That's one of the higher mileage W210s I've ever seen. Being a NE car, I would look for chassis rust.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The price is totally goo-goo, and quite frankly, it's not very attractive either. Some cars really shouldn't be bastardized, and the 6.3 is one of them.
  • garv214garv214 Member Posts: 162
    edited April 2011
    Too bad gas is $4.50/gallon, seems like a nice car for the price of a 10 year old civic...

    Your Fathers Oldsmobile
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Yeah but it needs an engine rebuild and that's not going to be cheap. I'm thinking that "as is", it is already more than fully priced at the bid existing. I'd offer $3000 for it. This is not the same as dumping a crate engine into a Chevelle.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited April 2011
    MMMMMMM........

    Man like.

    Man want this car.

    MMMMMMM.......
    TIN WAGON

    However, Man primitive but not stupid! Seats bad. Price bad.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,765
    Interesting find. What's with the discolored spot on the lower front corner of the passenger door? Seems like an odd blemish for a "rust-free" vehicle. The lack of photos on the driver side exterior is odd as well.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,426
  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,148
    "Similar car was just sold at RM's Hershey auction for $45,100

    PRICED TO SELL AT ONLY $41,500 (Or Best Offer)

    GREAT INVESTMENT "

    "ONLY"?
    "GREAT INVESTMENT"??
    Stop it, you're killin' me!!!
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    I guess what I find interesting is that the owner is advertising on CL!

    I would think that if you want to get 40 large for a classic, you'd advertise somewhere where the right crowd might respond.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Seller did fail to mention that the Hershey car's restoration receipts were over $50,000. So let's see----Spend $52K + cost of the project, sell for $41.5K --- hey, that's pretty good for a classic car!! :P
  • jlflemmonsjlflemmons Member Posts: 2,242
    That has to be the lowest optioned Toronado I have ever seen. No power windows, seats, or A/C?
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,366
    Recently I asked for an opinion on a 1973 Javelin aquired by my son's friend. He now has it posted on Craigslist as-is for $3000. I also noticed another Javelin for sale locally for $2000.

    Which would you guys buy if you had to buy one?

    http://albany.craigslist.org/search/cta?query=javelin&srchType=T&minAsk=&maxAsk=-

    The friend's car turns over but doesn't run.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,366
    edited April 2011

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,426
    "Doesn't run, but probably wouldn't take too much to get it running. "

    That always makes me think 'then get it running doofus' They're both Javelins but they're really apples and oranges with the other being an AMX. I'd think that the ceiling on a 304 Javelin would be low teens and the ceiling on an AMX would be low 20s
  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    So we have to pick one, either the 304 Javelin at $3k or the 360 AMX for $2k? Neither car is running or drivable as is/where is. From the pics and description the 304 Javelin looks restorable maybe #5 condition and the 360 AMX looks like a #6 parts car. If forced to buy one, I guess I'll take the cheaper one and try to part out, sell bits and pieces, donate and then scrap what's left to offset the $2000 expense. But if I wanted a Javelin to drive, I think I'd skip both of these CL cars and buy a driver to begin with...

    There's a local car dealer from Powell who recently sold this '73 Javelin AMX for a bit over $4k. It's a rough #4 driver from the pics/description. But it was running+driving. Dealer was originally asking $7500, then put it up for bids on ebay no reserve, and got out of it at $4,300 -- a lot less! In other words, the market spoke. So what is a non-running faded '73 Javelin really worth on the market? Tidy things up, advertise on ebay with beaucoup pics and VIN number, then see what the market offers. It's probably not going to be $3,000.
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,366
    edited May 2011
    "...then get it running doofus..."

    Yeah, that's what I thought. The friend says it will start with a shot of fluid but I guess he doesn't want to take the trouble to drain the fuel tank and everything else to make it run. A mistake in my opinion.

    There's nothing that would make me want to dive into a project car more than hearing it run.

    As to values, Shifty mentioned that a 304/auto was not as sexy as a 360 AMX but that AMX had rust to the extent that the seller was providing sheet metal panels. That kind of rust would scare me. The green 304 is in very good shape rust-wise. Just a tiny bit on the edges of the wheel wells.

    When I think how early 70s cars rusted on me after 10 years or so, to have a 38 yo car in that shape is amazing.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The 360, no contest, if you are asking "which car should be restored"? The other car is simply not worth restoring, and probably the 360 is not really worth restoring either---however, the 360 is actually rare with the Cardin, the Go-Package and the 4 speed, so it has desirable attributes.

    The 360 when fixed up would easily be worth *double* the other car.

    The smartest move would be to buy both of them, and cut up the 304 to fix up the 360.

    on the other hand, if the price were low enough, it might be a nice project for a kid to buy the 304 for $1500 bucks and get it running--but not restore it.

    Both these cars are the way they are because of what they are.
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    edited May 2011
    Is it just me or is the first generation Javelin/AMX more desirable than the later ones? (Based solely on the on the impressions of a young kid when they were new.) :blush:
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    No, it's not just you---the entire world seems to know that 1971 was the last serious year for American muscle and it's all downhill from there.

    After 1971, we enter the Dark Time, and receive only a scant and partial consolation from the mid 70s "luxo-personal-coupes" such as Monte Carlo, Cordoba and Elite, which substituted lots of up-scale gadgets and Corinthian leather for power, and some further partial consolation from the 80s GN and GNX and the Corvette C4.

    You do not see a lot of late 60s muscle or pony cars going begging for $2,000 or $3,000. There is a reason for this.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,611
    Beautiful day here, I had the beast out. Visited a local park, parked by a late SL55 AMG, rare color, full option load...and I am pretty sure my car got more attention:

    image

    My ego was boosted by the car turning heads and even getting a compliment, and then the car reminded me of its age and unrestored status. I was setting the parking brake as I needed it to idle in gear to work on the idle irregularity it has developed. The second time I set the brake - BANG - something in the brake assembly broke, and the handle went limp. The car has an old fashioned umbrella style handle under the dash. Luckily the brake didn't engage, so the car can be driven fine, but there's now a cable dangling under the car. One more thing for the list...

    But I got it to idle nicely...I think I set it just a notch too high, but it's now very smooth at in-gear idle.
  • oldfarmer50oldfarmer50 Member Posts: 24,366
    "...I had the beast out..."

    So THAT'S the fintail! All these years of reading your posts and I thought the fintail was something like a Caddy or a Plymouth. Nice car.

    2019 Kia Soul+, 2015 Mustang GT, 2013 Ford F-150, 2000 Chrysler Sebring convertible

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,611
    Thanks

    Yep, it's a nickname for the only MB with tailfins. My car is very photogenic and looks and performs decently enough for an unrestored car. It just has a hiccup now and then.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well I'd do it if I still worked for Mercedes and still had my office, which was 50 yards from the Benz Technical Training School. I could just push it over there. :)
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Attempted suicide? It's clearly a "successful" suicide to whatever bidder is reckless and self-destructive enough to take on a project like this! There are far less painful ways of killing oneself - like running in front of a speeding freight train!
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,611
    You might only have a couple bankruptcies if you do it Shifty's way. Amusing to see how much harder they fall when they are so big.

    The transmission notes gave me a laugh too.
  • au1994au1994 Member Posts: 3,731
    RE: Nova...it is clearly that "holly" carb that makes it so 'spensive!

    2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee L Limited Velvet Red over Wicker Beige
    2024 Audi Q5 Premium Plus Daytona Gray over Beige
    2017 BMW X1 Jet Black over Mocha

  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,164
    The Crown "Victory" if in decent shape would be a good buy at 925.00. The Mustang is a crazy price. What is that really worth? $7000 max?

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Icon I6L Golf Cart

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well perhaps the seller of the Nova means he has $20,000 "in" the car---hidden somewhere for us to find. :P
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,792
    ah yes. I'm sure the 5-digit odometer in that Crown Vic"tory" has only clicked 79k times.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,426
    If it's orignally owned by an old timer, maybe 79k is possible. It doesn't look like a 179k car
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    re: low mileage claims---if there's no proof, don't pay for it.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,100
    Yeah, the pictures aren't really detailed enough to see any wear and tear on that Crown Vic. The only thing that really jumps out at me is the peeling paint. But, any car painted in the United States in that era was prone to doing the same thing. In fact, that's one way you can always spot the Japanese Acords from the US-built ones...the peeling paint!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well no matter--low miles don't make a car like that worth anything more---it might even be considered a detriment if it were true.
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,164
    My 89 Town Car that I had about 7/8 years ago only had a documented 66K on it. I still had to fix quite a few things just because of age not miles.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Icon I6L Golf Cart

  • gsemikegsemike Member Posts: 2,426
    That Crown Vic doesn't have much of a low mileage premium built in at $925, maybe a couple of hundred bucks. At least around here, the floor for a presentable and inspection worthy car is a grand.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Exactly---you reach a point where the local marketplace tells you to not even bother with the price guides---a decent-looking, good- running "turn key" car is worth X dollars, bottom line. Where I live, that would be about $1500--$2000, no matter what it is. Of course, you may deduct for bashed in doors, bad paint, missing parts, broken glass, torn up interior, etc.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.