Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Engine Hesitation (All makes/models)

1303133353648

Comments

  • scoti1scoti1 Member Posts: 676
    Here is a link to another example of why the hesitation problem is a safety concern.

    "Transmission problems with Lexus ES-300 ?" #794, 24 Aug 2005 11:21 pm
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Actually after reading it carefully I have to at least suggest that the safety issue in that particular case wasn't about the transmission.
  • pilot130pilot130 Member Posts: 319
    That link describes one person's experience--albeit of significant concern to that person.
    I don't think you intended to use that story as a condemnation of all vehicles with a hesitation characteristic as "unsafe", or a "safety concern"--at least I hope you didn't.
    That story is in no way a criterion to establish that everyone who experiences hesitation of one form or another has a vehicle which is inherently unsafe.
    Nor does it arbitrarily suggest every vehicle with a 5 or 6 speed auto tranny(be it Toyota, Honda, etc., or any other make) which hesitates is inherently unsafe.
    As we have seen repeatedly (and I thought had achieved agreeement on), there are varying degrees of hesitation and shift patterns being reported in just about every make of 5 and 6 speed tranny, ranging from barely noticeable(most common reports), to much longer (occasional reports).
    Could you clarify your intention?
    Thanks.

    Edit to delete some of my post which echos Mr. Shiftright's comments--evidently he posted while I was in the process of doing mine.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I think the point is pretty clear---the driver of that car THINKS it is unsafe because of the transmission hesitation----- a reasonable statement, be it actually true or not is hard to say until the actual crash occurs. Probably "potentially dangerous" would be a better term than "unsafe" if one wanted to be communicating more accurately. This is what, for instance, they do with kid's toys. They justify recalls based on "potential" danger--they don't say every kid who plays with GI Barbie is going to die.
  • pilot130pilot130 Member Posts: 319
    Wwest--a technical question please.
    Transaxle wear as you have experienced it--you say the oil used had a burnt smell.
    What is your analysis re why that might be happening?
    Reason I ask is that there may be one or two plausible causes that you overlooked.
    BTW, I can speak to gearbox problems--not an expert, but lots of experience in design, assembly and operation--albeit in my younger days but the basics are still valid.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    It has become abundently clear that the hesitation is something of a random event. IMMHO the randomness of itself makes the vehicle unsafe for normal operation. Read the TSB itself wherein it states the circumstances where these "events" occur.
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    i'd have to completely absolutely fundamentally disagree with you shifty and pilot130.

    what you fail to realize is that even if a person accomodates the automation by adapting to it's behaviors, it is the low-level trained sensory/response cause and effect learning which has been re-inforced potentially over decades that is NOT SUPPORTED BY THE AUTOMATION.

    this is one aspect of the safety equation. you mustn't assume that people can adapt to a bad design and remain safe when they are doing that adaptation at a high-level which completely conflicts with their lower-level learning.

    the brain doesn't work that way.

    it is a safety problem plain and simple.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I wasn't on that team advocating an "adaptation" to a random event....I'm on your side there---I was talking about hyperbolic language usage, not whether the problem was "real" or not.
  • pilot130pilot130 Member Posts: 319
    It's a rare thing when people see given situations exactly the same way--it's all about the "eye of the beholder", right?.
    I respect your opinion, all I ask is that you respect mine.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    He's just disagreeing, he's not "dissing" you.

    I think his point (at least this is what I read into it) is that if you read the description of the "dangerous" incident, you *might* have to reluctantly agree that it would have been a dangerous situation without the transmission factor entering into it at all....turning left into a double lane of traffic.

    In other words, could an accident have occurred in this exact situation with any car?

    ANYWAY, try not to get at each other's throats about this---you aren't going to conclusively argue the safety issue, there are too many variables in terms of road conditions and driver judgment. You'll just go 'round and 'round on it.

    At least with the hesitation, you have copious anecdotal evidence...with "causing accidents", you have nothing but speculation.

    I'll butt out, please continue... :P
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    My theory is that my 2001 AWD RX300 is quickly downshifting whenever there is a need. The problem arises because the engine was just previously at a fairly low RPM and with the throttle closed the solenoid's duty cycle would have been minimum insofar as high hydraulic pressure is concerned.

    So, I apply significant pressure to the gas pedal and the engine/transaxle ECU quickly responds by commanding a downshift, just as it clearly should. The problem is that there is insufficient hydraulic pressure/flow available "instantly" and the newly engaged clutches slip slightly until the rising engine RPM results in higher fluid pump flow and pressure.

    The burned odor and appearance of the ATF results from the heating of the frictional surfaces, and thereby the ATF, as they slip and the graphite material in the bottom of the sump pan is simply the result of premature pad wear.

    Given that mine is a four speed and the new, hesitation ones are five speed I wonder if the need to engage additional clutches was overlooked and the pump wasn't upgraded for more flow.

    But then one must ask that if that were true why not just install a higher capacity pump in the later models? Result in too massive a recall to fix the earlier models?

    I have the definite sense there might be not just a few statisticians in the background assuring Toyota that accidents resulting in injuries or deaths arising from this particular flaw will be few and far between, and the ability to provide evidence of the contributory factors of "engine hesitation" to the accident will be a practical impossibility.
  • pilot130pilot130 Member Posts: 319
    You're absolutely right in saying: "The burned odor and appearance of the ATF results from the heating of the frictional surfaces, and thereby the ATF"
    Heat can result from a number of causes--friction being one of the more prominent ones.
    Overfilling--excessive ATF--is another prominent cause that is commonly overlooked, and results in heat build up as well as puts a strain on rotating elements within the gearbox--plus the engine (or source of power) driving them.
    Regardless, excessive and sustained heat is a killer.
    Perhaps these failures you're seeing is related to something as simple as an overfilled (or underfilled--same scenario) tranny?
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    That reminds me of the first few times I encountered inadvertent activation of the traction system in my new 92 LS400. Going to work in the morning I would exit my residential street onto a quite busy thoroughfare. Previous years of experience had taught me to reliability judge oncoming traffic speed, traffic openings, and the level of trust I could put in my car's ability to turn and accelerate quickly into the opening in the fast moving traffic.

    Then one morning my new 92 LS400 "balked". The rear wheels slipped momentarily as I accelerated across the wet plastic crosswalk stripping to enter the traffic opening, the Trac system instantly applied braking and just as instantly dethrottled the engine.

    So there I sat, out in a lane of oncoming traffic with the engine NOT responding to the gas pedal until the Trac ECU had the time to "unwind" the dethrottling servo stepmotor.

    You better believe that forever after that I always disengaged Trac as I started the car.

    I noticed that by 2000 the Trac system in the GS300 had evolved, been modified, such that the dethrottling of the engine was delayed a few hundred milliseconds to give the driver time to react and lift the gas pedal to a more appropriate position.

    Were the rear brake rotors also upgraded on GS300 so that could endure a longer period of Trac braking??
  • pilot130pilot130 Member Posts: 319
    Shifty, I'm not sure who your post was directed at, but I can assue you there's no need nor any intention to "argue" about differences in opinion, or get at anyone's throat over any disagreement, from my perspective.
    I've seen first hand, and wholeheartedly agree there probably won't ever be a common understanding of this issue, given the individuals involved--and we certainly don't represent any mainsteam "popular" opinion by any stretch.
    In the meantime, I'm going to simply give my opinions, thoughts, and observations on the issue, as politely and diplomatically as possible, and simply let the chips fall where they may.
    :)
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Nothing directed at you personally, no. My comments are meant to encourage the members of the forum to not "beat a dead horse" on any given point. If one or more people start dancing over the same issue day after day with no resolution, everyone else tends to leave the room or new visitors don't join---as one might if two people did this at a party, etc.

    Fresh content and many people participating is the key to an enjoyable forum.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    I'm a DIY shade tree mechanic (technician??). I always check the condition of the ATF when I change my engine oil.

    And there is an additional bit of information in that regard.

    When I purchased the ATF from Bellevue Lexus I was told that it only took 4 qts and so that was what I bought and used. Several days later I checked the ATF and it yet again looked quite dark.

    It turned out that there is an extra quart in the center diff'l (not the PTO) "section" of the transaxle that must be drained separately. So back to Lexus and this time purchase 5 qts.

    The second time I drained both sections and drop the sump pan and clean the 1/8" of the fine (non-magnetic) graphite looking material from the bottom.

    So, no, my transaxle was never over-filling and insofar as I know it must be overfilled to the level that the gears stir and "froth" the ATF before anything detrimenatl can occur.

    And I'm still not convinced that the factory over-filling wasn't the result of the need to somehow help alleviate the hesitation problem. Factory bean-counters do not take kindly to putting extra ATF in millions of vehicles by happenstance.
  • scoti1scoti1 Member Posts: 676
    Yes, we did discuss earlier the factory overfilling of the ATF. That had slipped my mind. I believe several participants reported that their's was overfilled.
  • billranbillran Member Posts: 113
    I have to wonder. For this issue, the implication is that it applies to all the Toyota V6 - 5 Speed transmissions. So we are looking at the Highlander, RX330, ES330 and V6 Camry and possibly the minivan (and perhaps others)? I may be mistaken but are those not Toyota's most popular cars? I would have to speculate that the production of those four cars combined for the last several years would have to be several hundred thousand? And in all my searches I can only definitively identify maybe 50 people who have posted about the hesitation. Assuming I have missed a few and that others have the problem but don't post (or are not bothered by it) and that say 300 cars out of 300,000 (one tenth of one percent) or even 3000 (one percent) have what the owners consider an issue, then this is really not the huge deal some would contend, statistically speaking. And also, statistically, is the actual percentage of people who don't like the way their transmission shifts really that much different than other makes.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    is REAL!

    Keep in mind that the TSB, or various versions therof, applies to this entire V6/5-speed FWD (transaxles only!) product line. So it appears that those that really count, Toyota and Lexus, believe that this is an across the board problem.

    Has anyone seen or noted a complaint of this nature, "engine hesitation" resulting from delayed (1 to 2 seconds) shifting on any RWD or rear biased AWD vehicles?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I've seen a few on Chevy Suburban on Chevy SUV forums (not Edmunds).
  • xpfshostxpfshost Member Posts: 35
    Let's not forget that there are a few reports (mine included) of the problem also occuring in the automatic V4 Camrys. I'm beginning to feel like I'm out here in right field all by myself ;) BTW, finally took my car to the dealer about the problem. Dealer says that all the Camrys drive that way and it's a characteristic of the new electronic transmission system. I wish the salespeople had to disclose this new "characteristic". At least he didn't charge me for the service visit. I've found myself slowly adapting to the hesitation...at the expensive of a newfound hesitation on my OWN part to apply the gas forcefully when warranted. I went to pass a slow-moving vehicle in front of me the other day (about 20mph in a 50 mph zone with people riding up my butt). It took about 3 seconds for the car to find the right gear (it tried about 3)...while I quickly tried to mentally decide as to when I should actually change lanes (might the tranny kick in and drive me into the car in front of me if I didn't get into the passing lane quickly, or should I move into the passing lane and hope that I have enough time after my car finds the right gear so as to miss any oncoming traffic?) I definitely don't have faith that the car will 'go' when I need it to 'go'. Then there's the intermittent 'jitter' I experience at highway speeds. It's a real annoyance on long trips, I can tell you. I was hoping to have a long/happy experience with a new Camry (my first), but I can't wait until my loan is payed off to dump the thing.

    xpfshost
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    What year is your Camry?

    Your experience makes me wonder if the V6/5-speed firmware was being retrofitted backwards to some of the later (e-throttle?) model year V6/4-speeds.

    Did the Camry use the e-throttle before the 5-speed became available?

    Maybe the combination that results in the hesitation symptom is really only FWD and e-throttle.....

    Assuming my theory is correct the premature transaxle failures in the RX300 series could be "fixed" with new firmware and conversion to the e-throttle.
  • jbolltjbollt Member Posts: 736
    Did the Camry use the e-throttle before the 5-speed became available?

    YES! Our (now my daughter's) 2003 Camry SE 4cyl automatic (4spd) has drive by wire..and very smooth, no hesitations.

    Jeff
  • xpfshostxpfshost Member Posts: 35
    My Camry is an '05 LE that was purchased in April of this year.

    xpfshost
  • bkinblkbkinblk Member Posts: 198
    My car is now at the dealership getting the June 21, 2005 TSB performed for the second time. Meanwhile, they put me in a 2005 4 cylinder base model Camry rental. The automatic transmission is very jerky, making smooth acceleration a near impossibility. It also hunts for the correct gear. It does not however, have the same lengthy hesitation my 6 cylinder has. As discussed previously in this forum, I am beginning to think that the DBW configuration carries with it very foul performance characteristics. I believe the car manufacturers have SACRIFICED pleasurable drivability for an incremental increase in gas milage and to satisfy CARB and EPA regulations. However, any benefit the manufacturers receive from changing what has been a very solid and reliable drivetrain will be lost when consumers do not return to the dealerships for their subsequent car purchase.
  • jbolltjbollt Member Posts: 736
    bkinblk...before I start, please don't take this the wrong way, as I truly hope you find the solution you seek...either a fixed car, or a buy back...I am on your side, and can only be glad that I am not "blessed " with this "behavior" in my cars. But I can't help but wonder if this is an already expected and "looked for" issue by you, or as stated many times already, in the driving style. In other word, you are very sensitive to it.

    I have driven a couple of 05 Camry rental base 4 cyl cars lately, and find the transmissions to be very smooth, and seem very "normal." Between myself, my wife and my daughter, we own: 03 Camry SE 4cyl, 4 spd automatic (DBW), 03 Highlander V6 4spd automatic (NON dbw), and an 05 Highlander V6 DBW 5 spd automatic. We have not experienced the hesitation or the jerky shifting in any of these. I would not hesitate to "return to the dealerships for their (my) subsequent car purchase(s)."

    I know how you feel, however, as I have owned other manufacturers products that I have sworn never to own again....yet they continue to be bought by many people each year. Even if their automatic transmissions will more than likely need to be rebuild or replaced by 60,000 or 70,000 miles.

    I believe that everyone has their own comfort level. I still wish some of us who can't seem to experience this behavior in their own cars, could drive your car, and you, drive ours... PERHAPS it DOES exist in all the dbw 5spd cars by Toyota, and many just don't drive in such a way that it manifests itself with hesitation and/or jerking, or we are adjusting our driving subconsciuosly to compinsate.

    However....Try as I may, I just can't get mine to hesitate..Because of this forum, I almost expected it yesterday....I was slowing (almost stopped) in a left turn lane crossing 2 opposing lanes of traffic turning into a small residential street from a 4 lane road, no traffic light....opposing traffic was very heavy, and I saw what I sensed as an opportunity to cross,...just as I made the decision, to "nail it" an opposing vehicle was approaching faster than I has estimated, and I thought "OOPS!" and thoughts of this hesitation came to mind, and I wondered...will this be IT??? NO! The car (05 Highlander) chirped the front tires, and moved briskly thru the intersection. (Traction control i assume activated,and kept the tires moving as needed.)

    Some here have stated all kinds of stats, trying to confirm or deny that this is a wide spread issue, even stating that Toyota agrees it is widespread because they have produced a TSB for it. To me, all that says is that they are trying to make owners experiences better. They didn't say that all car have it, or that none have it.
  • jim70jim70 Member Posts: 27
    What you say Jbollt makes a lot of sense to me. And the name on the TSB (Shift Feeling Enhancement) would make me think that Toyota is responding the the fact that some people don't like the feeling of the way the new transmissions shift, and is trying to satisfy all it's customers. As opposed to a safety recall in response to a widespread safety issue, which this obviously is not.
  • scoti1scoti1 Member Posts: 676
    It is my opinion that whatever design quirk causes the hesitation is present in all of the Toyota 5-speed auto. transmissions. It just may feel negligible to some, "a little different" to others, and totally unacceptable hesitation and erractic shifting in some. So what I am saying is the potential for problems exists in every one of the vehicles, however, a certain number of owners will never experience it to the point of complaining about it. I refuse to speculate on the numbers based on internet reports. It is simply impossible because of the too numerous to count variables. I don't think it is completely related to driving styles, however I agree that some driving styles may exacerbate the problem. I truly believe that if you were to drive bkinblk's car, you would feel the problems he describes.
  • pilot130pilot130 Member Posts: 319
    jbolt--some thoughts:
    A few negative experiences do not an epidemic make, nor do a few positive experiences signify that no owners experience difficulties.
    What we're reading about here and in other forums are experiences of a few--very few compared to all subject vehicles in use.
    Any suggestion that any others beyond these forums are experiencing anything, good, bad or indifferent, is speculation--as is any suggestion that what is being discussed is typical of everyone's experiences.
    We're also reading far more "discussion" re pros and cons than any reported experiences--either way, good or bad.
    Example--this forum has 1600+entries, and 1400+ of these are by less than 10 authors--exactly 6 to be precise. (I'm one of these BTW)
    Some of these discussion participants don't have the 5 and 6 speed dbw systems.
    The hesitation issue is very real to some, and non detectable to others, and still
    others report experiences somewhere in between.
    It's being reported on other makes incorporating the dbw technology, and symptoms reported range from very mild to quite severe also.
    My point?
    If you don't feel you have a problem, then enjoy your vehicle, whatever make it might be.
    If you feel you do have a problem, you might find the content of this and other forums helpful in your quest for satisfaction, whatever that might be--and good luck while doing so.
    I believe, and I've said so repeatedly, I suspect this issue relates to characteristic shift patterns for the 5 and 6 speed dbw designs.
    I think the variability being reported comes as a result of a number of things, not the least of which is driving style and getting used to the "different" feel of these tranny designs.
    As regards the extreme symptoms some are claiming, I have a hunch this may be related to component anomaly or outright component malfunction.
    This is not indicative, in my opinion, of an epidemic/across the board "design flaw".
    To suggest otherwise would be, IMO, equally speculative.
    In any event, thanks for your input.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    I think it has already been well clarified that "nailing it", being aggressive in the application of WOT, alleviates the instances of "engine hesitation" arising from delayed or slow downshifting.

    Read the TSB statements regarding the specific instances and circumstances wherein Toyota believes the hesitation symptom most often occurs.

    Additionally since the I4 cannot deliver the level of torque, and certainly not as quickly, that the V6 can and will, the same fix for premature transaxle failure would not likely be required. Also keep in mind that even if the same "core" firmware is used the firmware downshift "decision tree" for the 5 speed will be substantially more complex*** than the one for a four speed.

    ***
    -------------------------------------

    "hmmm, how serious is this driver, should I shift down to 4th or 3rd?"

    "Well, he seems to be a bit slow, hesitant with the gas pedal, maybe 4th will do..."

    "Oops, Oh damn, he just went WOT, shift into 3rd, quickly!"
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    "Polling" a small number of persons in any demographic market or circumstance and trying to apply the result to an entire group with common aspects is pure speculation.

    Look at when happened during the last Presidential election. The exit polls at several precincts in OH showed Kerry as the clear winner. But Bush won those precincts handily.

    Goes to show.
  • jmcdon7230jmcdon7230 Member Posts: 13
    I had the TSB TC005-05 performed on August 3rd and our 04 Camry has responded "normally" since then. If it would have responded like it does now I would never have been concerned. If there are any changes in it's performance, I'll post them.

    The dealer has apologized with a written letter and offered to refund a portion of the 30K factory service cost which they recommended rather than implementing the TSB. (I had to bring the car back and refer them to the TSB....the service manger said they didn't have time to check on all the TSB's Toyota issued and that they relied on the customer's to bring them to their attention)

    In regards to the "safety" issue...in my opinion, if you are apprehensive about giving the car to one of your children, or selling the car to a friend because of the hesitation problem, then it is a safety issue.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Stay on topic please. Political comments will have to be deleted on sight. They causes arguments and break continuity.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    That was not intended as a political comment. Simply the first example that came to mind to re-enforce pilot's statement that basing an opinion on such a small sample was really just speculation.
  • pilot130pilot130 Member Posts: 319
    Sorry Shifty--it was meant as a joke, not a political comment.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    no, it wasn't wwest's comment, but that solicited others, and I saw a dark cloud coming over the horizon, so... :P Call it a preventative surgical strike. Please continue and have a great day.

    Shifty
  • bkinblkbkinblk Member Posts: 198
    The service dept called to let me know that the TSB was performed successfully for the second time. They tell me after driving it 15 miles, the car performed "normally". The shift points they say, are all in the right place. The Toyota Regional Service and Parts rep was there to oversee the process. Of course, this report comes as no suprise to me and unfortunately, Toyota will use it in their argument at the Sept. 1 arbitration. So, I think I am dead in the water. Commenting on other posts regarding my car, I must say that they may have some validity. I am sensitive to the way the car shifts and notice most irregularities in performance. As an ex-car salesman, I have sold literally hundreds of Toyotas and have driven probably thousands. I hate this transmission, even if they say it's "normal". When my lease is up, I certainly won't get another Toyota.
  • jim70jim70 Member Posts: 27
    Have you driven it since the latest update? Maybe it's better? It is just so hard to understand how some people can have no complaints at all and others be so terribly unhappy if all the cars are behaving the same.
  • bkinblkbkinblk Member Posts: 198
    Havn't picked the car up yet, but I hope it's fixed. Anyway, if it drives the same, I'll just wait till the lease is up and get something else.
  • scoti1scoti1 Member Posts: 676
    Picked up your car yet??

    How is it?
  • spencer327spencer327 Member Posts: 106
    What is amazing to me is that Toyota, responds to a very few complaints, obstensibly on this forum, with a TSB for shifting issues. This costs them time and money for a supposedly insignificant sic: problem. The idea that this forum is the ultimate complaint platform and the number of people on this forum is anywhere the majority of people with problems is ludicrous.
    I for one searched out this forum because I was not happy with my HL shifting. I got some good info, but received much more negative mumbo-jumbo. I am trying to be proactive and research this issue , but find this forum to be more about legal issues, non issues, non believers, etc. I for one am tired of the constant repitition
    portraying the "problems" as either non existant or not representative of the vast majority of Toyota owners.
    This tranny shifts poorly, by design or accident is inconsequential. I / we, should expect / demand more of Toyota " quality " in this product .
  • bkinblkbkinblk Member Posts: 198
    I agree. If you want to research someone who has been proactive, look at my posts. I have called, E-mailed and written Toyota Corportate, I have called and spoken to several Lexus and Toyota shop foremen, I have researched every review of this drivetrain (some not favorable), and I have been diligent in reporting all relevant findings to this forum in hope that it might provide helpful information. I have had a valve replacement performed and the June 21, 2005 TSB performed twice! All this on a new 2005 V6 Camry XLE. I don't know if it was just a coincidence, but after about 1000 posts on this forum, Toyota came out with the "shift enhancement" TSB. Why? Not because of a few isolated complaints, but because I believe they are aware of the foul performance characteristics of the drivetrain. Of course, they would not admit to this because an official recall would cost tens of millions of dollars and conformity with CARB and EPA regulations would be in jeopardy. Remember, it's always about the money! Meanwhile, I have arbitrated my case where the arbitrator (paid by Toyota), confirmed after driving in the car, that my concerns were VALID. The second arbitration meeting is set for this Thursday, where it will be determined if the TSB had any effect on the drivability of the car.
  • bkinblkbkinblk Member Posts: 198
    As I reported, the first TSB had no effect. Picked up the car on Friday (after the second TSB), but havn't driven it enough to report.
  • mert2mert2 Member Posts: 74
    I for one am tired of the constant repitition
    portraying the "problems" as either non existant or not representative of the vast majority of Toyota owners.


    Me too.

    That's why I stopped visiting except for every couple of weeks to see if there's anything new regarding The Thing That Is Described In The TSB
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I've been monitoring the forum more closely and intervening on occasion and I hope you all have noticed an improvement. It might seem a little 'slower' in here but new info doesn't always come in quickly--I see this situation as still ongoing and developing.

    Shifty the Host
  • spencer327spencer327 Member Posts: 106
    I believe we all respect your efforts as host. The fact is the people on here with the shifting problems are looking for solutions, help or maybe just misery loves company. We dont need lectures or excuses. The people on these forums are in my estimation the few who recognize the problem, astute enough to research it and have the time and effort to pursue it.
    That said I will sit back and occasionally look at this forum to see if TSBs are reported to do any good. I for one am very skeptical. I hope the information presented here can remain pertinent. Thanks to the Internet, Edmunds and Shifty this forum exists. Without them there would be no information exchange and we would really be in the dark.
    Historically one can look at known problems wtih certain vehicles. These problems would take years to be known through the "mechanics underground" . vehicular reputations were made or broken by this method. This process has been accelerated due to forums like these, with instantaneous responses.
    Our problems pale in comparison to the suffering caused by Katrina
  • billranbillran Member Posts: 113
    The people on these forums are in my estimation the few who recognize the problem, astute enough to research it and have the time and effort to pursue it

    So those of us who are happy with our cars are either too stupid to know we have a problem, or too lazy to pursue it?

    Seriously though Spencer, that very thought had occurred to me as well. When I read all the comments about hesitation I thought that perhaps I may indeed have the problem and not be aware of it. I took my car out and tried to replicate the situations in which the "Foul Drive train Characteristics" might occur, with no success. I tried very hard to make my car exhibit the problem because if it had it, I wanted to jump on the bandwagon too. I may not be "astute" enough to recognize the problem, but if I had it I would darn sure pursue it. I did my best to find a problem with a car that up until now I had been very happy with. To this day I find myself acutely tuned into my drive trains performance, but I still have no complaints. Maybe I am just not very astute.
  • scoti1scoti1 Member Posts: 676
    When I read all the comments about hesitation I thought that perhaps I may indeed have the problem and not be aware of it. I took my car out and tried to replicate the situations in which the "Foul Drive train Characteristics" might occur, with no success.

    Yea! you don't have a noticeable hesitation problem. This forum helped you discover that. So luckily you can now move on to other important issues in your life. ;)
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Too stupid.....NOT!

    No one, I hope, who is experiencing this problem is disparaging those that have not in any way. Disparaging the naysayers, yes, but no disparagment simply because if lack of having experienced or encountered the problem.

    But I do wonder if forcing the "learned" driving style into the "highly agressive" bin might be the simplest resolution. Might that even be the TSB solution? Non-direct impact on CAFE & CARB issues.
  • spencer327spencer327 Member Posts: 106
    Obviously you are astute enough to know you dont have the problem.
    If you have the problem then I am sure you would be aware of it.
    Since you dont, I am not sure what value you get from this forum, supposedly of people that have it. Its nice to know that the problem is not universal. Maybe there is hope for all the 5 speed tranny owners that exhibit problems.
    My point is that Toyota has recognized the problem by issuing a "fix"
    Do we just ignore this or maybe there really is a problem.
This discussion has been closed.