Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Steve, Host
Say "Hello!" to 2007's Coolest Ride (Karl on Cars)
Steve, Host
Working like a charm on and wayyyyy off road, and still attracting lots of ooohs and ahhhs, even with the scratches. Having the iPod connection is very handy in the bush because it doesn't skip.
Only complaint (such as it is) is that Toyota didn't anticipate the number of us who'd want trailer packages, and so we're still waiting for ours......
It will never have the collector appeal of an early rust free FJ40. To find a clean original 1964 small window FJ40 today you will pay over $20k. I paid new for mine $2400. That would mean in 40 years the FJ Cruiser would have to sell in the quarter million dollar price range. It is just another plastic car. They will be in the recycle heap in 10 years or less.
It should be obvious that I did have an interest in the FJ. If you are secure in your purchase, what others say about the vehicle should mean nothing. Even the leader of Edmund's loves the FJ. I am just disappointed in it. I wanted something more like the original which overall I liked. I did go to see the FJ and the only one they had was on a truck load of Toyotas coming in. It was probably sold. I wandered around the showroom for 20 minutes and no one asked if they could help. Maybe they saw me next door going over the new GL450 and figured it was a waste of time. I rarely see a 1990 Camry around here so I think 10 years is fair 15 at the outside. They are making cars so complex these days that it is not economical to repair them after the warranty is up. It is called planned obsolescence.
The future "collectability" of FJ will be determined by the number of production units they sell here as much as anything. If they mass produce and saturate the market, supply will exceed demand... no collectability factor in that. I suspect they will not over-produce to keep the price and margins up. I also think they'll have to toughen up the exterior at some point (less plastic) and that version will be the "collectable" version.
That is precisely my point. Look at the 10-15 yr old cars with plastic bumpers. They look like crap. Plastic deteriorates in the sun. If my wife's 1990 LS400 was left out in the sun it would look like bleep also. Cars over the last 15 years are better from a mileage aspect than older cars. Not from a longevity standpoint. For those of us that rarely put 100k miles on a car in 15 to 20 years, the longevity is more important.
Will the FJ be more than a niche vehicle? Only time will tell. I got money that says it will not have the lasting appeal of the original FJ.
By the way there are a lot of domestic PU trucks 20+ years old still on the road giving good service. I guess that is why I like trucks better than cars.
Some of y'all may be interested in the Classic? Collectible? Special Interest? Just Old? discussion.
Steve, Host
I am sure that it was. I cannot remember even checking back then. Even though gas was a bigger hit on my budget, it was not worried about like it is today. You still have not convinced me that plastic bumpers are good for anything except cutting cost to the manufacturer. I do hope all of you enjoy your Fj Cruisers. I will probably test drive one when they are less in demand.
Toyota FJ Cruiser vs. the Toyota Land Cruiser 78 (Straightline)
Steve, Host
No 78 in the US ... maybe a G-wagon would tide you over instead?
Steve, Host
The LC78 also has a 4.2L diesel engine which makes far more sense than the FJ's premium-only 4.0 gas engine
To say that the FJ isn't a capable off road SUV is simply wrong.
To say that Toyota put too much emphasis on styling, and could have improved visibility otherwise is accurate, but misses the point that the FJ is the most capable off roader that you can get at its price-point. It could be better (and probably will be in the future), but it is has been a long time since Toyota sold something this capable without it being in a very different price range.
The premium only comments are incorrect, ask you dealer, read the manual, premium gives optimal performance but it'll run on 87 just like the tacoma. Your dealer should have a memo from Toyota telling them this.
While I wouldn't mind a diesel, it is a safe bet that this would have increased the price outside their targets.
Every vehicle targets a market. FJ is targeting a market and I have no doubt it will be very successful. I like the FJ, don't love it as it is, but like it and believe it's a very capable off-roader, and definitely like Toyota as a whole. Someday I may buy an FJ if it transitions into "my" market segment (a bit less flash).
You don't want to totally eliminate those that have opposing views though (just the bashers that don't offer anything constructive)... Toy probably reads these boards, and maybe will make changes to help them target the market more effectively... that may mean moving closer to "my" market... may not.
As I've posted before, my FJ runs fine on regular getting about 17mpg. I suspect "Gagrice" is........in New York that's never seen a ........ that's why all he does is bad mouth without offering one bit of technical criticism. So please tell me why it is "foo foo"? Why are all the pro reviewers wrong?
Let's stick to debating the cars please.
Steve, Host
Surely a "debating the cars" would be more than saying the FJ is "foo foo". How silly is that? From my experience the only serious negative as far as drivability goes is the large turning radius. If someone thinks the body is too wide, too short, or the suspension needs massive work etc. I'd not only not complain I would appreciate the input. If Gagrice is in the Arctic you would think he would appreciate an FJ.
Now to the foo foo comment. I looked at the new Mercedes ML, GL & R class. I feel the same about all the plastic they use on them. To me a $60k vehicle should be steel. I don't like the plastic on my PU truck. At least the bumpers are steel.
If Gagrice is in the Arctic you would think he would appreciate an FJ.
I seriously doubt the FJ would last more than a year. Anything less than 3/4 ton HD PU trucks have very short life spans on the gravel roads and extreme cold. Chevy & Ford 1/2 ton IFS last about a year before the cold gets to the CV boots. Axles snap when the temperature stays 30-40 below for weeks at a time. I have never seen a Toyota in the oil field as a work vehicle.
my wife and I are interested in a silver or black cruiser with a manual tranny. just for kicks i did a search on auto trader (manual tranny only) and I am finding several black cherry with ridiculously low mileage. sounds like the dealers are beginning to see some price competition.
Going to sit tight and pick up a used 4Runner (2001 - manual tranny). I can have fun with some mods like a little lift and a katzkin interior for less.
Unless I can buy 2007 cruiser at or under MSRP i will wait for latter model year which i expect will have some practical improvement.
What are others thoughts re current price levels?
i
I'm finding that out. I guess buying a beater and fixing it up is the way to go. Probably less money that way.
I have owned three also. The only one I miss is the 1964 FJ40, in spite of a lousy engine. The last one a 1994 PU was a constant source of expensive repairs. You see why I don't believe the reliability stories one reads. Experience is what sticks in the mind.
Most guys I know that owned FJ40's took out the Chevy 250 copy and replaced it with a 327 or bigger.
That is what I should have done with mine. Several guys in the Tierra del Sol 4X4 club did that in the late 1960s. I sold mine after the 3rd valve job in 50k miles. Bought a VW Bug and took a job in Alaska. It was years before I would even look at another Toyota. We did have fun in the FJ40. Went all over the CA back roads and trails.
The color didn't appeal to me as much as the blue ones that keep showing up on Edmunds pics; looked a bit sedate for a cool car.
I suppose you could complain about the spare blocking the rear view except the windows are pretty small in the first place. But that's looking in, not looking out.
Steve, Host