By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
As far as "amount of time" is concerned, if I got rear-ended while leaving our parking lot (@ 1.5 minutes in the car) it could be enough force to cause a whiplash injury to a headrest-less passenger.
I'm not going to comment on whether on not there should be a headrest in the middle position of the 3rd row. Fact is, there isn't. And I knew that when I bought the car.
I just wanted to dispel the "frequency" and "duration" arguments.
I have an '06 Azera that has a headrest in the middle position of the back seat. Guess how many times over the course of the last year there was someone sitting there that would take advantage of that. I can count on one hand and still have fingers left over. If you want, you can have mine.
So...the chances of you getting rear ended with an adult in the 3rd row seat are much smaller than you possibly backing up into something or over something because your visibility was hampered by a headrest in the center position of the 3rd row seat. I'm sorry, but give me a clearer view as I didn't buy my Outlook to bus the lunch crowd around on a daily basis.
However, you have only dispelled the 'frequency' and 'duration' arguments for yourself and for one instance. You could go the rest of your life without ever being rear ended again. Then again, you may be targeted by mystic forces that seem to have everyone rear-ending you every time you turn around. I would hope not on the latter.
I also noticed you said, "...it could be enough force..." I would assume that none of your passengers suffered from whiplash, which in the end makes this argument a moot issue. The headrest didn't matter one way or the other. If someone sits there knowing it doesn't have a headrest, then they take that issue into their own hands, it's not like you're forcing the person to sit there. If you tell the two in the captains chairs to slide up a bit, then the 3rd rown could be afforded a little more space and sit in one of the side positions and have the headrest protection, depending on how tall that passenger is. Personally, at 6'2", that headrest in the 3rd rown will do nothing for me in the event of getting rear ended.
My experience is that a) adults ride back there, specifically in the middle seat, and b) any amount of time in the seat is long enough for the headrest to be useful.
When you pull the lever on the back of the 3rd row seats to fold them forward, the first thing that happens is the headrests fold forward. When you pull the seat back up, you have to manually pull the headrests back up into their useful position. I frequently leave the headrests flopped forward when I'm driving around with no one back there. It increases my visibility.
I don't see why the middle position headrest couldn't operate the same way. If there's someone sitting back there, they push the headrest into the appropriate position.
I did say that an adult that would ride back there, wouldn't be back there long. If the lack of headrest is an issue, then the person can sit on either side where a headrest is.
You are right, a headrest COULD exist, but...they chose not to provide one. Personally, I would agree with those of you that feel one should be there. I mean...GM is touting the 3rd row to be highly usable by adults and not just kids. That being the case, set the 3rd row up to be used by adults by adding the headrest in the center seat position.
What I posted earlier was MY opinion on why GM left out the headrest. They were playing the odds that even though they say the 3rd row can accomodate 3 adults, the chance one would be filled by 3 adults would be low. I mean...not too many adults I know of really want to be crammed into a 3rd row seat...that's for kids.
Maybe we'll see an addition of the extra headrest in later models. Don't hold your breath though.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Anyway, while driving away from that dealer, I decided to stop into the nearby Mercedes Benz dealer, and look at an R-class 350 SUV. It has 3 rows, with 2nd row captains chairs, and 2 seats in the third row (so 6 total). I talked with two sales people (very knowledgable), and took one for a test drive. It had a few nice features, but I still think the Buick Enclave wins. A few reasons, in no particular order
- R350 did not have heated mirrors (not a huge deal, but wanted to mention it)
- R350 did not have articulating headlights
- R350 only had single disc CD
- R350 has bluetooth option, but it is not supported for my Treo 700 smartphone
- R350 does not have an option for a trailer hitch. I do not do any towing, but we like to go family bbike riding on local trailers int he summer, and I have a bike rack that uses the trailer hitch. I would never buy a new vehicle that would not allow me to carry my bikes on a rear bike rack.
- R350 has 2nd row captions chairs, but there is only a few inches between them and it is almost impossible to squeeze between them to get to the third row. You still have to fold and slide the 2nd row seats to sneak past them to get to the third row.
- R350 was around $60,000.
R350 did have a few nice features that Enclave does not have, here are a few:
- direct iPod intergation
- oil & filter only need changed every 12,000 milees
- gear shifter is on the column, so there is more room in the console between the driver and passenger seats.
If the R350 had been a super great vehicle, I would have possibly considered paying the extra money. But with the above shortcomings, all comined together as a whole, I think the Buick Enclave is likely still the vehicle for me.
Just thought I would mention my experience, as I haven;'t seen any comments on the Mercedes R350 in this forum.
The other thing everyone missed is I said 'ditto for second row' bench seating. Everyone wants to dismiss 3 adults sitting in 3rd row; fine. But what about 2nd row? It doesn't have one in the middle either. If you're gonna have a 7 or 8 passenger vehicle ( a la Sienna/Odyssey), then every one should have similar equipment, at least as far as whiplash protection goes (no, I'm not a socialist), I just don't get the logic, or lack thereof. :confuse:
I saw a Cadillac SRX and I see they have the headrest in the middle position of the 3rd row, I can also see how it obscures a clear view out of the lower part of the rear window as well.
It's not a lack of logic, it's just about odds. If one is going to tote adults around in one of these CUV's, the odds are most adults will be sitting in 1 of 4 positions with the middle of the 2nd row and the entire 3rd row really being for children. NO, that's not to say adults would never sit in those positions, but just not often enough that they figured head rests were needed.
Look at how many cars that seat 5 adults don't have a head rest in the middle position.
It's impossible to please everyone all the time.
I own an SRX and it does not have a middle headrest. And the two headrest that are there are a pain because I have to take the darn things out to fold it down. Since only kids are back there they are usually in the garage anyway.
I love everything about our Outlook (red w/ black interior). We got the 2nd row captains chairs, upgraded sound system (which sounds decent), convenience package, power rear liftgate, dual sun roof and back up assist. There are things I'm finding to be a complete surprise such as the screens for the sun roofs that are there and the ability to set all the door lock, back up mirror, entry lights and such from the driver's seat!!!
With the Enclave being an 08 and not much more expensive, if at all, compared to the 07 Acadia/Outlook, I think we can assume that the 08 is not going up much in price.
There is a 2 week plant shutdown around the 4th of July holiday. If your car wasn't built before then, you might be looking at late July for delivery.
The Enclave is certainly selling well, but the numbers don't back up your theory - at least not yet. Here are the number of units delivered in June:
Acadia - 7,006
Outlook - 3,869
Enclave - 3,659
GM reports 326,300 June Deliveries
Can anyone explain what he meant by allocation notice?
- heated mirrors
- articulating headlights
- single CD play AND a 6 CD changer (and can play both, one in the back with headphones, one in the front)
- kids go through the center all the time
- paid much less the $60M
It also has separate climate control for the back seats
Most comfortable 2nd row and 3rd available (13 year old sits in 3rd row)
It does cost extra, but it is a mercedes and drives like a mercedes
- Ipod integration kit is available
- panoramic roof is a great option (not sure if buick offers it)
- powered tail gate is great for winter, closes with a touch of the button
- comes in diesel and gets 25 mpg
I looked at alot of vehicles that seat 6 passengers, this was by far the best in functionality and style.
GM Reports 326,300 June Deliveries
I'm not sure if all three shifts are running now at Lansing Delta Township; that would affect capacity too.
I don't know where you live but I live in North East Ohio. We have three Buick Dealers within fifteen miles of each other and all three of them have the new Enclave on there Lot's. They may not have the options or colors one may be looking for. But they are available to test drive.
I agree with you about the appearance. I test drove one last Friday 6/28 and was really disappointed. The outside seemed bigger than my Rendezvous but the interior didn't. However I didn't have the third row seats in my Rendezvous, and I did have the Captain chairs in the rear so maybe that was the difference. The Enclave had a lot of blind spots that I didn't care for. Changing lanes and backing up is going to be a challenge to say the least. It was very similar to driving the Dodge Magnum with the narrowed windows on the tailgate and back sides. Sharp looking in appearance but too many blind spots.for an old person like me. :shades: