Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
General Motors discussions
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
That's funny...my Dad recently said the same thing about his '03 Regal! There's no smell, but there are faint stains on the back seat, carpet, and floor mats. I was with him when he bought the car. In fact, it was such a good deal that I told him that if he didn't buy it, I would! It ended up being $10,995, with 19500 miles on it, in September of 03. We did notice the stains, but thought it was just a spilled drink or something. It had been a rental car. We didn't notice how widespread they were, though.
My old man swears that it's dried blood, and he's tried everything to get it out. But I think he's just letting his imagination get the best of him. If nothing else, it hasn't scared him enough to want to ditch the car!
One thing everyone who owns a Buick talks about is the 3.8. Great engine... 10 years ago. I swear they were afraid not to put the 3.8 in the Lucerne fearing returning LeSabre/Park Av owners would not buy it. However, in the process they ruled out several new buyers.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
I'm thinking that if I'm calling the shots for any manufacturer, I would not look to Chrysler/Dodge for ANY inspiration.
Lets just agree that incentives between GM and Toyota are pretty darn close now. Not "3 times".
My data is for the US from Automotive News which publishes weekly all incentive data.
Toyota's gpt a fair number of incentives. I was pretty surprised that Honda has so few right now. I mean they are a fine vehicle and I've had several but every one I bought new or CPO had a nice incentive rate on the loan.
Solara had some stuff.
You seem to question the rate of incentive overall, so here's my source. GM is coming down, but will go up again after Tundra's month of June. To counterbalance $5k on one vehicle, many vehicles have to have slim or no incentives.
http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2007/07/03/054000.html
DrFill
Toyota is very goal-oriented, and that's great, and they don't want to get ripped for not meeting their 200k goal, even thought the truck really didn't hit until April with any real supply.
They want the truck on the street so every one can see it, and tell their friends, and build the word of mouth. They also see the Silverado as strong competition.
I would have incentives closer to GM's, or maybe 4.9/$2k at the most.
I am more patient than Toyota is, when it comes to this vehicle. I think a 25% year-to-year increase is fine. 50-60% isn't essential in 9 months. Toyota has taken a lot of negative press for push so hard, so fast with incentives.
They may be doing the right thing. They are selling the truck very well. I would've been more conservative, and shown confidence that the market would appreciate the new truck. the quality of the truck is much more important than reaching sales goals, which will probably be reached regardless.
Knowing how good the truck is, and the ad campaign, I would go slow with incentives. But if Toyota wants to buy in, just this once, I don't see how anyone can say anything.
DrFill
What are you talking about??? They have two plants set up to build Tundras. Just like anyone else (yes, even toyota), they need to keep the plants busy to make a decent return. A plant running at half capacity is sucking up the profits and costing big money (hence GM's rebates until they got UAW agreement to shut plants). tundras are not selling as well as they needed w/o the incentives so they added them.
But you are right. Camry last month did not have the incentive but they do this month.
I showed the numbers for incentives today. they are what they are.
Tundra's goal was just over 16k a month. 21-25k a month is great for business, but Toyota may not be able to build 250k a year right away.
Late March and April is not enough time for anyone, even Toyota to see how a truck will do.
The incentives, I believe, were THE strategy all along, and not reactionary. April sales were very strong, relative to last April, at over 13k.
12-15k in sales a month will keep the plant moving fine. 17k and up will cause schedule and supply changes.
My guess is Tundra will do 22-23k this month. I don't think Toyota planned on that many, over an extended period. If that continues, incentives will drop noticably.
DrFill
Matrix $750
Yaris $0
Camry $500
Avalon $0
Prius $0
Rav4 $0
FJ $0
HL '07 $2k
HL '08 $0
4Runner $1500
Sienna $1500
Sequioa $3k
LC N/A
Tacoma $500
Tundra $3k
16 vehicles / 13,500 is less than a $1k, not including dealer cash or rates. I don't have LC information, there should be something on it.
If you adjust based on sales volume, the average would drop.
DrFill
DrFill
Loren
Detroit's Big Three on the Road to Oblivion (Auto Observer)
Wonder if Ford will ever bring the Euro version of the Focus here. Can't it be built here in the States or Mexico to reduce costs? Going by what they say, you know the famous "they" this Euro version is good, like the Mazda3 is suppose to be premium to say the USA Focus. The Next Mustang may help the image, with sportier looks, hopefully a new interior, and the 3.5 engine to replace the SUV engine in the current model. Also on my wish list would be a gas cap without an ad for BP gas
So next year we shall see the New Camaro and Next Stang side by side. I wish the American car dealers would once again come together and have a show night for the introduction of the latest line of cars. A long time ago, it was so much fun. See the cars, pick up the literature on the latest products, and get the scoop on the car from the salespeople. Unfortunately the current age salespeople likely worked for the dealership down the street a week ago, and the one around the corner a couple of months ago. Most know little about the cars, and do not seem to care all that much. It is not like the data is not on the Net and available to learn from the corportaion supplied data sheets.
Coming soon, NEW Mustangs, Camaros, and Challengers all driving American roads again together.
In a way, I am kinda a sucker for the old Mustang of '04 in that it was a simple car, a slightly smaller car, and wasn't trying to be a modern day '69 Mustang. No, it was just an evolution of design - simple little pony car. Yeah, I know it was due for change, being a chassis of the old '80 Fairmont, but it was an improved car over the years, and not a bad Pony. GM sort of got it right when they looked back to the first generation Camaro, yet made a modern looking car, inside and out. It will have more style and pizzaz. I personally prefer the old beltline and I know, it's just me, but overall, the concept of new age Camaro, is something that I like. The New Mustang to me was a bit like a strange mix of a '65 interior and a '69 exterior, with kinda a sad looking nose. No not sad as in poor, but sad as it looks like the car is sad and holding it mouth low. I bet the new nose will be much more like the concept and not as sad and sleepy looking.
Loren
I'm calling shenanigans on some of our west coast posters. I expected a heavy import presence out there, but it's nowhere near the 9:1 ratio of imports to domestics they claim. I'd say at least 50% of the vehicles out there were domestics and no, they were not all rental cars.
Spent the entire week in a rental Camry and I really can't see what all the hype is all about. The car is plug average! The fit and finish and materials used are really no different from an Impala I recently drove. I think my girlfriend's LaCrosse is much nicer than the Camry and I'd have rather driven it. Heck, I think I'd have rather spent the week in my old '88 Park Avenue.
All the time in a plane has given me a chance to read the motoring mags I usually don't purchase. From what I've read, the 2008 CTS is a car I most definately have to check out. Motor Trend is claiming it's the best Caddy in 50 years and the handling is on par with the best of Germany. I don't know if I can get used to the CTS' diminutive size, but I feel the DTS is old hat. The Impala steering wheel with Cadillac livery killed it for me. Maybe I'll compromise and get another STS. It's still too small, but has a much more up to date interior and drivetrain. The styling updates make the car slightly more attractive than the current car and they have upgrade the interior a bit - my biggest complaint.
You mentioned the Camry. See I told you, the Toyota Camry is basically taking the place of Oldsmobile Delta88, and the Avalon is say the 98. And if you go way back in time, one could say the slot it is in is comparable to the honored position of the Cutlass Supreme, which in its time was the reliable, middle class, and standard of which other cars were compared. I doubt the New Malibu will reclaim that position, but ya never know. Now if Pontiac got a RWD G6 sized car which sold for a low enough price, then yea, that's the ticket! And as stylish as it could be. The Camry has style, but it needs a little nose job ( i think it is suppose to do something though wind wise to have that bump on da nose ) and the Bangle butt is a good rendition. Of course it has the awful too tall door syndrome. More I think of it, please Pontiac make a smaller RWD soon! It could be the real hit. The New Malibu will be a little better looking than the Camry, IMHO.
Anyway, trust me, I am not saying good car, bad car, but most cars here in the real California, outside the Enclaves of LA are in fact foreign. Just the way it is.
Loren
It's not a sled (car sales lingo for a vehicle with no inherent value or demand).
Or a Rocket Sled (a very fast vehicle with no demand or value, like Impala SS, for example).
DrFill
Nope
Japanese cars and trucks outsold domestic models in CA in 2006 for the first time ever.
New car/light truck registrations for '07 are predicted (roughly) to be:
Big 3 - 728k
Japanese - 950k
European - 228k
Korean - 61k
Per driving a nice car - I've seen a lot of really nice cars in LA. Mercedes S-Classes and Rolls-Royces are as common as Chevrolets and Fords in Philly. I won't take my Seville or Brougham into certain parts of Philadelphia. When I do go to those areas, I tend to take the Park Ave which is less likely to be stolen. There are places in Philly the cops don't like to go and pizza deliverymen and taxicabs absolutely won't go.
Of course, based on the pictures provided on Edmunds alone, I have to agree with them about the really cheap low-grade chrome looking plastic accents they used. When will they ever learn? :mad:
But, showing off prototypes yesterday in Manhattan for New York-based auto writers, GM executives declined to say how much extra the hybrid versions of the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon will cost, except that they won't be the most expensive versions.
"It'll be priced competitively," said Mark Cieslak, chief engineer for full-size trucks.
Base prices for conventional gasoline Tahoes and Yukons range from about $35,000 to about $48,000.
For 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates fuel economy for conventional Tahoes and Yukons with 5.3-liter V-8's at 14 miles per gallon city and 20 highway. The claimed improvement from the hybrid technology will increase city economy to about 19 mpg, GM said, within the range of many midsize sedans.
With the CTS, however, the General’s luxury marque flanked the Germans with an all-American design, a line of attack that called for chiseled edges and sharp corners and lots and lots of ego. And with a goal of moving just 30,000 to 40,000 units a year, Cadillac wasn’t looking so much to win the war as to establish a toehold with the CTS and hang on.
The tactic more than worked. The CTS eclipsed its sales goal by the second year on the market and, at its peak in 2005, found its way into more than 60,000 garages, falling just a few hundred short of beating Cadillac’s perennially best-selling DeVille/DTS. More significantly, that same year, the CTS outsold every German midsize luxury sedan save the BMW 3 Series, including the BMW 5 Series, the Mercedes C-Class and E-Class and the Audi A4 and A6.
Even so, the CTS displays plenty of straight-line speed. Cadillac says the car should run from 0 to 60 mph in 5.9 seconds, which pushes the new CTS closer to the last CTS-V’s territory. The V car, which we last tested in 2004 (“Flying V,” AW, May 10, 2004), turned in a 5.35-second run to 60 mph.
Of course, Cadillac left plenty of room at the top for a new V-series model, expected to join the standard lineup this fall and rumored to include a supercharged small-block turning out upward of 500 hp.
Meanwhile, pricing on the standard 2008 CTS is what’s making the news. It will start at $32,990 for the PFI and manual-equipped car. That’s actually $540 less than the outgoing model, not even accounting for all the additional standard content such as the tire-pressure monitoring system. Moving up to the DI engine will cost less for the automatic ($35,290) than with the manual ($36,970), but only because of the additional content you must opt for to get the shift-it-yourself version.
In the mold of the SBC 350, it's STILL a great engine. It makes a GREAT BASE engine (great hwy mileage, a little thirsty in the city). Parts are cheap and plentiful, and VERY cheap to maintain.
Now I've got a Kia Optima. Have only driven it from Enterprise to the house. So far so good....
Loren
-Rocky
That's a significant bump from the 2007 model year, when the 9-3 started at $26,250.
The '08 9-3 features new sheet metal from the windshield forward, as well as new doors, bumpers and taillamps. Saab says the car's modest restyling draws more on the brand's heritage, include the return of the "clamshell" hood, with some other design cues borrowed from the Aero X concept.
Among the features for 2008, side sills are now standard and alloy wheels get a new design. Standard equipment includes OnStar, XM Satellite Radio, rain-sensing wipers and a tire-pressure monitor.
The 9-3 SportCombi 2.0T wagon starts at $29,630, and the 2.0T Convertible starts at $39,710.
The carryover 9-5 range is priced from $37,205 for the sedan and $38,455 for the wagon.
What this means to you: Modest changes, lots more money for the updated 9-3.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=121887
What this means to me: The edmunds editor is smoking something calling the 08' changes just modest. :confuse:
-Rocky
I suppose this is the attitude that the new CTS is going to try to disspel, that if I'm gonna spend $35k, it's goona be on an import.
Dispel? did I not just post that the old CTS outsells every german lux vehicle other than the 3 series?
I'll be interested in seeing how this one sells. I know that GM is trying to kill the idea of cheap cars with upscale marques. It's the right move and I think Cadillac is where you already have success at this. The question is can they, as Bob Lutz has said they will, eliminate the cheap Buick?
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
If I ever bought a BMW it would because they are a blast to drive. I'm really not concerned with what people think of what I am driving, though I will admit the fact that a lot of people are concerned with such things sells a lot of cars.
- Overall exterior style didn't change
- Overall interior style didn't change
A $2K bump should happen when a totally redesigned, all new model debuts, not during a mid-life upgrade. In my book GM hit the mark with the new CTS but definitely dropped the ball with the 9-3.
Loren
RIIIGHT! The price tag on these things is going to go straight into the elite column. $35-48K then tack on another 3-4K for the hybrid. That is IF GM decides to be NICE and eat 6-7K of the cost (which is reported to be 10K per vehicle for this system). Too many Ifs.
Also, this beast has a 6L engine, not the 5.3. This engine is rated 13/16 for the 2007 model year. My guess is the 5.3 wouldn't adequately power the vehicle in V4 mode so the 6L was necessary. Just a guess. Still, this drops the expected city mpg a tick to 18mpg city. (figuring a 40% improvement) That is IF it lives up to the expected performance.
In spite of all the questions - IF it performs as advertized, and IF the reliability is there past the base warranty, it might be worthy of a look from the hollywood elite, dot com millionaires, or recent loto winners. For most of us though the ticket to ride is just too much.
Yes, but it still puts it in perspective. many think of Cadillac as a non runner but yet it sells better than most all of it's competition.