Luxury Lounge

1133134136138139428

Comments

  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    I am no SUV fan since a downtown urbanite like myself needs an SUV like a hole in his head.

    But a small Sport ute like a diesel Honda CRV would IMO be one compelling package.

    The gas CRV is nothing special IMO since based on a recent review I read the CRV got equal mileage to a V6 Toyota RAV 4. In that case I'd rather buy a V6 RAV4 than a CRV.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    The gas CRV is nothing special IMO since based on a recent review I read the CRV got equal mileage to a V6 Toyota RAV 4. In that case I'd rather buy a V6 RAV4 than a CRV.

    Spoken like a Toyota salesman. Now you're cookin' with gas! ;)

    CR-V seems to have the female market all but sown up. Can't win them all.

    DrFill
  • blckislandguyblckislandguy Member Posts: 1,150
    A Silverado is too blue collar but a Sierra is not? Gee, they could have fooled me. They are built on the same lines,have the same bodies, drive trains, and pricing. One has a Bowtie and one doesn't. The Bowtie makes it blue collar?

    What IS blue collar among pickups are the class 8 wannabes from Dodge and all the 3/4 variants such as the Chev 2500 and the Ford F250 with SuperDuty stamped into both the hood as well as the tail gate just so your friends won't forget. These, like Budweiser, are for the blue collar elite.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    is marketed as some upscale Chevy, just so you don't get the same vehicle confused.

    I vote for the Sierra's styling too. The only truck who's styling doesn't work for me is the Silverado. Looks like a wide-mouth bass! :(

    DrFill
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    A fuel efficient three row V6 RAV4 IMO is the most sensible vehicle in its segment.

    So Doc what is the point of spending the extra bucks on a Highlander especially a hybrid Highlander when you can get better mileage with a 3 row V6 RAV4 ?
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    A fuel efficient three row V6 RAV4 IMO is the most sensible vehicle in its segment.

    An associate of mine owns a new RAV4. It's a good vehicle for the money, and it delivers a very good performance/fuel-economy ratio, IMO.

    From a styling standpoint, it's basically non-offensive generic... easy enough on the eye to accept it's significant value.

    The adrenaline comes from under it's hood, provided it's the V6 model.

    TagMan
  • laurasdadalaurasdada Member Posts: 5,217
    I just reports 'em as I sees 'em!

    Nissan will always have a special place in my heart: Can you say 240Z? I knew you could...

    Actually, '74 260Z 2+2. And, get ready for it, automatic! Hey, my Dad bought it, I had no say and wasn't old enough to drive anyway. I did learn to drive in a '71 Saab 99 four speed standard and drove an assortment of sticks 'till the fancy Camry Wagon replaced the '95 Saab 900 stick in '02...

    Interestingly, the 260Z replaced an enormous (IIRC) 1956 Mercedes 300C four door convertible. It wasm I believe, a European model as the speedo was only in KPH. And it had a Dictophone! A pilot (military?) bought it in Germany and shipped it to Los Estados Unidos. Convertible stack was so tall, the rear view mirror flipped up above the windshield like a periscope!

    '21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)

  • donthegreekdonthegreek Member Posts: 127
    First off, I hate the looks of the Tundra.So its not on my list, regardless of how good it might be (looks is a personal taste kind a thing and i want a good looking truck)..not interested in a ford either.The dodges look good, but i'll stick with GM...i've have several Chevys and GMC's...like em both, no problems ever with either.The older version of the GMC's were the nicer looking ones, now with the new redo, the chevy looks better.I won't be towing anything,basically a daily driver.
    Reg cab short box 4x4 loaded up...they are a sharp looking truck.
    Would love to find a SUV...nothing out there i like.I had the new Tiguan on my list (hopefully with a diesel)..but like you already mentioned, the current crop of pics being published, it looks to bland and generic...but will check one out next year...maybe too late by then.The only other consideration is the Volvo XC60.
    Everyone is playing it safe SUV wise...boring,bland,generic.
    I'm in here reading the posts all the time.I get tired of the vehicle "A" is better than vehicle "B" debates..its all personal tastes....which i guess is a good thing. ;)
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    TOYOTA TUNDRA:

    image

    GMC SIERRA WITH TOP-OF-THE-LINE DENALI TRIM:

    image

    CHEVROLET SILVERADO WITH GENUINE GM CHEVY TRIM

    image

    The GMC is certainly very nice with its stately grill, but I still prefer the appearance of the Silverado more. The Toyota is just horrible, IMO. Sorry, Doc.

    I agree with donthegreek here!!... I also hate the Tundra's looks.

    Take a good look at that Silverado... it's just right!! ;)

    TagMan
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    Tagman we think alike :)

    Seems we do. The vehicle A is better than vehicle B thing... it's more about preferences, Don, not which is better... and that makes it more realistic, IMO.

    TagMan
  • esfesf Member Posts: 1,020
    It is... and in my A3. Nice ride. I had no idea.

    '06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG • '05 Audi S4 Cabriolet • '04 Lexus RX330
  • esfesf Member Posts: 1,020
    Assuming I do like it, I will likely trade-in the GTI for the GLK diesel when it becomes available.

    Make sure you check out the Audi Q5 TDI if it's available here, too... it may have DSG.

    On a completely irrelevant note. I am still having a hard time with my wife's car. She changes her mind every other day, and I'm getting more and more sick of the RX330. We're going to test drive the (deep breath) 535xi, E350 4Matic, possible E320 Bluetec, X5 4.8i, Cayenne S, possible S550 4Matic and even the Audi A8. I'm thinking the S550 (too big), Cayenne (guzzles gas, not as fun as X5) and E320 Bluetec (RWD) will be cut from that list by the end of the week.

    '06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG • '05 Audi S4 Cabriolet • '04 Lexus RX330
  • esfesf Member Posts: 1,020
    Sierra all the way, sorry. It looks like a luxury sedan turned truck. I guess I'm just too refined.

    '06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG • '05 Audi S4 Cabriolet • '04 Lexus RX330
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    No problem... and you've got some company in the forum in prefering the Sierra... I don't dislike it, it's just not my first choice, that's all. Now the Tundra... that's a different story. I don't like it.

    TagMan
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    You'll have that long list narrowed down soon. It's inevitable. I had thought that the new Cayenne was supposed to be better on the fuel economy. I guess I'll have to check the EPA rating. Sounds like you might be headed towards a BMW this time.

    TagMan
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    It is... and in my A3. Nice ride. I had no idea.

    It IS lethal!! I got caught up in a powerful sprint earlier this evening with a 5-series BMW, and he could not catch me!!! (he must have had the smaller engine!...LOL) Anyway, it was fun... Later, he met up with me where I was stopped at a red light, and he just waved... at least he was a good sport. And thank goodness, no ticket!

    That 2.0L FSI Turbo is a great little engine... especially with that DSG!

    TagMan
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    A press photo of the Tundra might make this a fair fight, no?

    All I know is I'd rather be better, than look better. :shades:

    Tundra. Sierra. Silvy, for me

    DrFill
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    The Rav4 is great, greater than the CR-V, in that it offers more, and does more. The two are barely comparable.

    The problem with the Rav4 is it's drivability is relatively low. The Highlander just drives better. It's more polished and finished.

    And the 3rd row seat in the Rav4 is a joke. But a nice marketing tool.

    DrFill
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    Lexus Problem

    the age of the average Lexus buyer is sneaking up. Currently it's at 51 years old, while kids who spent the 1980s learning hair metal riffs on their B.C. Rich are choosing Infiniti, Audi, BMW, or even the somewhat fusty Mercedes. If you were at Yasgur's farm with your Microbus, chances are that you've got a lust to wheel around in an ES350 for your retirement years. The average age of that car's buyers is 61, and only Cadillac, Lincoln, and Jaguar have more buyers north of 60 in this segment. This data has Toyota's fancy division rethinking their future plans, lest they be left in the dust

    Lexus Solution

    While Lexus may not release a direct competitor, they're keeping a close watch on how BMW launches its 1-series. The way BMW woos buyers is what Lexus has to do, according to Jim Farley, who recently left for Ford. Younger buyers are looking for edgier cars with a higher degree of technology integration, so Lexus must make a serious run at building a real performer with the IS-F, as well as push design and image.

    link title
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    First Ting: Lexus has had that age demographic since forever. The buyer is very similar to the Toyota buyer in general. It's not like Lexus has lost anything over the past 15 years because they have an older demo. They are in fact getting more successful!

    But they do see the downsides, and maybe working on addressing that, and that non-complacent attitude is good, and healthy.

    #2: When you go for a true luxury demographic, you won't find many younger buyers.

    BMW and Lexus couldn't be more different. BMW buyers are younger and more driver-oriented. Lexus buyers are older, and more comfort-conscious.

    Neither approach is better or worse, just different. They both have succeeded. :blush:

    I think they both would like a page out of the other's book, doh. ;)

    Building the IS and GS into true sport-sedans would help. But I'm not holding my breath. :(

    DrFill
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    To break down the brand into 3 divisions, in regards to marketing and design philosophy.

    Have the IS, GS, and any coupes follow a more sporting philosophy.

    Have the ES, LS, and any sedan above cater to the true luxury buyers. I would move the LS up to the $80k+ class, and fit in a sedan above the GS.

    And have the SUV division work together to have vehicles that compliment each other, and the market.

    Just my thought. Won't happen, but with 100k+ between the three segments, they may want to approach the markets with more focus, and unique marketing initiatives.

    DrFill
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    Doc,

    cant argue with what you are saying.

    But Lexus does have an ace up their sleeves for younger buyers. The younger people are the more swayed they are about environmental issues. Lexus is the only luxury marque with the experience of marketing enviro-green friendly luxury autos. At least they have their foot in the door while BMW, MB and all the others are racing just to reach the entrance.

    Have the IS, ES, and any coupes follow a more sporting philosophy.

    I think you meant GS not ES. A sporting philosophy for a ES is like a sporting philosophy for a Cadillac DeVille (DTS). :lemon:
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    Lexus is the only luxury marque with the experience of marketing enviro-green friendly luxury autos. At least they have their foot in the door while BMW, MB and all the others are racing just to reach the entrance.

    While true, Mercedes and particularly BMW are not far off from entering the arena, and if my hunch is correct, Mercedes will do it conservatively and technically well, but BMW will shock the marketplace with something outstanding.

    While no one manufacturer bats 1,000, I never sell BMW short... and have very high confidence in them over the long haul.

    And there is NO doubt that you also have high confidence in them as well!

    TagMan
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    I hope Nissan shows half-a-brain, and releases this as an Infiniti

    Doc, the GT-R as pictured is outstanding and awesome!!!

    Why, do you believe it should be an Infiniti? Just curious about your thinking on this.

    TagMan
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    Of course the average buyer age for the ES is high, it was supposed to be high. I'll bet that there are more woman driving the ES than man comparing to the others so is that a problem also? The ES is doing well to appeal to its intended demography and it is being knocked on because of that? :confuse: Cadillac can only wish that they have a hot seller like the ES.

    Here is the shocker:

    According to JD Power, in fact, the IS has the youngest profile in its segment and the same looks to be true for the GS.

    From JD Power, % buyers 16-35/36-55/56+ years old:

    Lexus IS - 44/42/14
    BMW 3 - 35/46/20
    Acura TL - 36/44/20
    Infiniti G - 35/50/15

    Lexus GS - 22/50/28
    BMW 5 - 8/66/26
    Acura RL - 8/43/49
    Infiniti M - 13/53/34

    (Data for 2007 models, except 2008 for BMW 5 Series)
  • bristol2bristol2 Member Posts: 736
    This was posted in a Honda forum:
    link title

    Essentially CR has knocked Toyota from #1 to #5 in reliability.

    I know some folks do not have a high opinion of CR's research (I would describe their methodology as shaky in getting a representative sample) but it should still be news that Toyota would have quality issues showing up.

    This is not a 'knock on Toyota' post, but I think this is worth discussion....
  • bristol2bristol2 Member Posts: 736
    You should be excited about the MB Bluetec for sale in CA. I believe that Brightness was going to buy you one if they weren't 'vapourware'.
  • sysweisyswei Member Posts: 1,804
    If there's an old geezer's brand among mainstream-luxury imports, it is MB, not Lexus.

    article

    Car buyers' median age by brand:
    Division Median age
    Rolls-Royce 62.9
    Lincoln 62.8
    Buick 60.8
    Mercedes 58.7
    Chrysler 56.4
    Mercury 55.1
    Cadillac 53.4
    Jaguar 49.8
    Lexus 49.4
    BMW 46.1
    Ferrari 45.6
    Hummer 45.6
    Acura 45.3
    GMC 44.4
    Saab 44.4
    Pontiac 43.4
    Porsche 43.4
    Dodge 42.9
    Chevrolet 42.7
    Honda 41.9
    Toyota 41.9
    Infiniti 41.6
    Mitsubishi 41.3
    Volvo 40.3
    Ford 39.7
    Land Rover 38.9
    VW 38.7
    Jeep 37.6
    Nissan 35.1
    Mazda 34.6
    Suzuki 33.2
    Isuzu 32.7
    Subaru 31.7
    Saturn 30.9
    Hyundai 29.8
    Kia 28.1
  • bristol2bristol2 Member Posts: 736
    I'm amazed at Land Rover and Porsche having relatively young buying demographics. I would have expected the cost to move them up the list.
  • sysweisyswei Member Posts: 1,804
    Both of those companies have some products at moderate prices, too, and those tend to sell in bigger volumes. Plus, SUVs and sports cars generally are going to have a younger demographic.
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    LOL. I won't hold my breath. :)

    TagMan
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    Be CAREFUL how you interpret that data! It does NOT mean that the Lexus IS attracts the largest number of youngest buyers from the entire segment. :surprise:

    What it DOES mean is that, on a per model basis, the Lexus IS sales break down to a larger percentage of younger buyers than the BMW 3 series sales when broken down into groups.

    In terms of total units sold, however, there are certainly more total 3-series cars than IS cars being sold to that youngest group! :)

    TagMan
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    So, what does this mean in the final analysis?... Well, there tends to be a greater affordability factor within that 50's group than in the younger groups... so it means that there is a higher degree of affordability of a Mercedes Benz than there is a Lexus. The Mercedes Benz appeals to the wealthier crowd.

    While exceptions will always exist, on a statistical average basis, there would be a percentage of Lexus buyers that didn't really make a choice, but simply couldn't afford the Mercedes.

    In addition, this is still a result of the "value" mindset of the Lexus and it's lower price tag in general within the similar category of vehicle.

    TagMan
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    I don't think I "interpreted" the data at all, all I did was lifted directly out of JD Power's website without surgar coating it.

    From The Passionate Pursuit:

    The median age of people who bought a Mercedes C-Class in the first quarter this year was 47, according to data gleaned from J.D. Power & Associates Power Information Network, which parses dealership sales from around the country. By contrast, the average age of a buyer of BMW’s 3-Series cars was 42, while Lexus’ buyers for the IS averaged 41 years of age. The compact premium category average age is 45, per the consultancy.

    Source: Debunking the Lexus Age Myth

    Again, no spinning here.
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    The two autos below are Toyota's Bread and Butter autos:

    Consumer Reports said it no longer recommends V6 versions of Toyota's Camry or V8 versions of its Tundra pick-up because of poor reliability.

    Whoever said excitement has to be unreliable

    European manufacturers showed some of the biggest improvements in overall brand rankings. Porsche rose 20 places since last year's survey to finish ninth, for example. Meanwhile, Mini rose 16 places and Jaguar rose 17.

    CONCLUSION: ALL THE ABOVE IS BUNK.
    I dont believe reliability fluctuates at such whiplash levels. Porsche rose 20 levels? I dont believe it. I believe Porsches(except the Cayenne) were always reliable and it just turns out that these year's statistics are finally accurate.
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    So, okay, following your train of thought, since Lincoln and Buick's average buyer ages are also higher than MB's I am sure "on a statistical average basis" there would be a percentage of Buick/Lincoln buyers that didn't really make a choice, but simply couldn't afford the MB.

    What the...

    :P
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    Louiswei,

    I have news for you:

    Gray hair and wallet sizes tend to be highly correlated. MB's are still renowned as being a top end Luxury Marque and many of the more expensive models tend to be bought by elder gentlemen and ladies.
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    Sorry, if you thought I was accusing you of spinning the data. I don't believe you would do something like that. ;)

    I was just realizing that when reading your post and the information you provided, there was the definate possibility for misinterpretation, so I simply nipped it in advance, and provided some extra clarity.

    Nothing wrong with that clarity and accuracy... from what I can see, we've ALL been on that same page here lately... keeping our opinions and preferences seperated from raw data. :)

    OK NOW?

    TagMan
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    MB's are still renowned as being a top end Luxury Marque and many of the more expensive models tend to be bought by elder gentlemen and ladies.

    You wouldn't get an argument from me with that.

    So it's settled, Lexus doesn't have an aging customers problem, neither does MB since gray hair and wealth tend to be highly correlated.

    That we can agree on? No?
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    I can't believe you would put a "spin" out there like that!! :) :P (just kidding)

    Seriously, As I posted , and Dewey has also posted, there is a definate correlation between the demographics and the affordability factor. We've had this discussion last year, and it went all wrong, because there is a statistical extrapolation that can be made to suggest that Lexus buyers can't afford a Mercedes, and that's not true. The actual truth is that there is, in fact, only a percentage of Lexus buyers that cannot afford a Mercedes.

    As the age demographics go lower and lower, the overall average affordability factor, with variations within each demographic of course, reduces with the age.

    Overall, on average, the kids can buy the cheaper cars, and the elders can get the nicest marques.

    Eventually, the "super-seniors" can't do anything. :) ... :(

    TagMan
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    Of course.

    But the real reason why a percentage of Lexus buyers that cannot afford a MB is because MBs still cost more than their Lexus counterparts. It has nothing to do with with MB's average buyer age.

    Same thing goes for Ferrari vs MB. I am pretty sure there is a percentage of MB buyers who can't afford a Ferrari since a Ferrari cost way more. However, I'll bet that the average buyer age of Ferrari is younger than MB.

    It's really not about the age but the wealthiness. Of course, like Dewey and you have pointed out, there is certain a strong correlation between wealthiness and age.

    There was no spin on my previous post, it was supposed to be a joke.
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    Absolutely disagree.

    Elder folks buy lower priced Lexus ES models. These folks are not necesserarily the same kind of elderly affluent folks who buy the top of the line MBs.
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    Elder folks buy lower priced Lexus ES models.

    Really? Because according to JD Powers:

    Ages 16-35 / 36-55 / 56+
    S-Class 16% / 52% / 32%
    LS460 5% / 35% / 60%

    Since LS460 also outsold S-class in units I'll bet my car key that there are more old people who drives a LS460 than a S-class. Again, this proves that it's not about buyer' average age but their wealthiness. However, I agree to a point that there is a correlation between age and wealthiness.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Just regarding the price and the prestige of the model would help give a pop to Infiniti, maybe bringing in the high-end clientele the brand wants/needs.

    Who wants to get their $80k supercar serviced in the waiting room of a Nissan dealer?

    The car will be a hit in either showroom, but it's inapproapriate for Nissan to sell such a car, when they built a whole brand to sell high-end Nissans. Kinda defeats the purpose.

    I'm sure Nissan knows what they're doing. :blush:

    DrFill
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    WOW! :surprise:

    That's a great link! I would never have guessed, in like a billion years, Toyota buyers and Honda buyers are the same age, and Lexus buyers are only 3 years older than BMW buyers.

    Fascinating!

    I guess some good news came out of today. :shades:

    DrFill
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    There is affluence and there are degrees of affluence.

    The degree of affluence is higher for Benz owners than other luxury marques like Lexus or BMW. The "Old Rich" have a bias towards Benzes. I also think there is a higher degree of affluent owners of Jags than Lexuses and BMWs.
    Traditions do not die fast especially among the elder conservative wealthy types.
  • deweydewey Member Posts: 5,251
    The very same day these CR results were announced Toyota's shares listed on the NYSE are at a 52 Week Low.

    Reliability and Toyota are two words that basically meant the same thing unitl today ofcourse. :P
  • tagmantagman Member Posts: 8,441
    On yeah, you're making good sense there, Doc. GT-R owners would deserve more than being in the same service facility with Sentra owners.

    TagMan
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,621
    Now that's an interesting list.

    Thank you.

    If I had any self-respect left, I'd be worried.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.