By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Both Honda and Toyota have had significant quality gaffes in the past. Acura had the very embarrasing CL\TL transmission recall a few years ago. The new RL has been a quality disaster, with SH-AWD lockups, and massive electrical problems.
Toyota had the sludge issue with their old 3.0L V6, and some pretty massive recalls recently.
The days of huge quality leads by the Japanese are over. They have basically plateaued, while the Americans, Europeans (other than the French) and Koreans are all improving.
I have the choice of a 07' Lexus GS 350 AWD fully loaded and a 07' Mercedes E350 4 matic with a nice package (not premium package 1 and sports package that is free). The prices are pretty much the same. All things considered, which vehicle would you suggest to purchase. Thank you.
As Hemi pointed out, the older Mercedes S-Class got grilled for quality issues, and if the LS460 is showing quality issues, it is significant and deserves any discussion anyone, including myself, wants to make of it.
Haven't you noticed that Toyota has not been at the top, or as high up on the list as it used to be, of some of the important quality surveys recently?
Everyone here is smart enough to know what that means.
Gee... "shame" on me for mentioning it? Guilty as charged! LOL.
TagMan
As for Prius, the production volume has quadrupled over the last few years, so the per unit production cost has become much much less than when it was a low-volume production run. It only makes sense to lower price a little to increase sales . . . the per unit profit is still far higher today than when it was introduced. It's called economy of scale, so that Toyota will have the funds to properly design, engineer the bugs out and have the right kind of production line in place to make Prius III . . . something that MB could do well learn from, so that they can stop fumbling from one project to another, churning out shoddy cars one after another that are under-engineered and destined to have their customers to work as beta-testers.
Ford isn't thinking credibility right now. They are thinking survival! :surprise:
All I can say about Ford is they will do, or say, anything to sell a vehicle at this point, and the F-150 is one of it's weakest links right now.
Payload I'll give them. Towing......ask a Ford owner what the truck can tow. Better than asking Ford. I think you know what the deal is. :lemon:
They should take their lumps, and make sure the '09 kicks a whole bunch of tail.
DrFill
The Luxury Performance Sedans thread is devoted to this class of car. Personally, I'm not a huge fan of either one. The '06 GS has seriously bad quality for a Lexus. Granted it was the first MY, but Lexus usually doesn't need such excuses on initial year cars. Aside from that, the interior isn't as roomy as it should be, the driving experience is fairly bland for a "sports" sedan, and the trunk is Corolla sized.
The E is now the grandpa of the class, it just can't match the newer cars for latest tech. The COMAND system is last gen, and I just find the car to be boring overall.
I would highly recommend taking a look at the Volvo S80 and Audi A6.
There is one poster there who has put up a $10,000. challenge to Mercedes that says once an S class has electrical problems they can NEVER be fixed. He has had over 100,000 hits but no takers.
Like you, I only mention this as a public service, as I feel it is my "duty" to share this info with you. :lemon:
2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460
When it is falling off a cliff!
As for Tagman and his shameful exhibition of the truth by posting what is going on in that "other" thread:
R E P E N T ! ! !
Absolutely priceless!!! LMAO!!!
Now let me get back to my summer vacation where the sun is strong, and the :lemon:-ade is weak. :shades:
When it is falling off a cliff!
The Prius is more than capable of 100mph, under its own power. Just ask Al Gore's son.
DrFill
And the Lexus LS board's posters have certainly been reporting gripes not usually typical for that board.
What a horrible (and, oh yes, shameful) thing for me to post.
TagMan
Here's the original concept:
Here's the likely real interior:
Here's the link:
link title
TagMan
The production at least looks like somethin'.
Take a look at the EvoX concept vs the production. Now that's a letdown! :mad:
DrFill
When it is falling off a cliff!
When can a Prius achieve 60mpg EPA figures?
When it is falling off a cliff while the driver's not pressing the gas pedal
It is also my understanding that the upcoming GM Chevrolet Camaro will be very close to concept and be a gorgeous coupe.
Unfortunately, too many times the concept is great, only to be replaced by a run-of-the-mill boring vehicle.
In this case, too bad for Jaguar... as their death gets even closer.
TagMan
Let's just hope it gets GM's 'new' approach to interiors, not some recycled, mis-matched, grey and black plastic interior (should that read inferior?) that GM used to love so much.
Yes I noticed that myself. Also what I notice is that the most avid fans of Toyota/Lexus reliability are usually the owners of dated models from the 80s and 90s.
The relentless increase in electronics and complexity within all new luxury cars will make high standards of reliability and durability as nothing more than remnants of a foregone era.
Is it mere coincidence that the most reliable cars today are cars with minimal complexity and electronics ( Honda Civics and Toyota Corollas)? In contrast during the 80s the most reliable cars were luxury Benzes. My 83 MB300D was a benchmark for reliability and durability.
By trying to impress us with its newest technologies Lexus is sacrificing its reputation for reliability. IMO that is like a hangman trying to tighten his own noose. Reliability is the oxygen for the existence of Lexus. Without it there's really no compelling reason to buy one.
The problem as I see it is wouldn't one sorta run out of time before actually figuring out the EPA figures? That would have to be one swift calculator! Heh! Heh!
As far as jokes go, Dewey, the Pry-us cannot deny-us!
Good to see there is a healthy dose of reliability woes throughout the boards. One can get 3 Lexi in a row that are total lemons or be "lucky" like me and have 3 consecutive BMW's that have been perfect.
Perhaps the lesson here is: be a bit more humble before bashing fine German reliability or as we say, who the heck are you to cast the first stone? :P
You "lucky" dog.
TagMan
So true.
TagMan
All kidding aside, I just know the day I switch from BMW to a Japanese brand will be the day I have my first problem.
Some kind of poetic justice just waiting to happen! :surprise:
TagMan
That's okay. I'm sure BMW and MB will somehow manage to provide those disappointed folks with something good to buy.
The shock for the ones changing to BMW will be how to handle getting a great comprehensive warranty for the very first time!
Won't the handling itself be enough of a shocking new experience?
TagMan
PS: Perhaps Hallelujah from "Handle's"(heh! heh!) Messiah!
TagMan
link title
Seems to me diesels will fair very well, with a simpler powertrain, and with a lower cost of fuel as well.
TagMan
TagMan
What I do have to credit Toyota for is for the first time I believe (someone correct me if I am wrong) they have produced a backup camera independent of a Nav system. It will be available in all but the very cheapest Highlanders.
My suggestion: If you're going to change then get a Japanese car with a at least a wood interior. Otherwise everyday while you're driving that phony wood will become an eyesore.
Simulated wood belongs in economy cars for people who like to pretend they're not driving an economy car. A luxury car with simulated wood is incomprehensible IMO.
E320 Bluetec takes a similarly "big hit", percentage-wise, as its most similar competitor in hybrids, the GS450h.
I am seeing many more Hyundais on the road over the last half a year. Their SUVs are quite good-looking, IMO. They are working quite aggressively at changing that "cheap" perception many folks still have of them. They have my respect as well as my attention.
Expected to debut at October Tokyo Auto Show.
Very likely: a 550+hp v10, a sequential F1 type gearbox, under 2,800lbs.
Price tag: $175,000~$200,000
Lexus has promised "the ultimate weight balance", "extravagant comfort" and "precision operation."
There also might be a convertible and a hybrid versions.
I don't expect a sub-3k car from them on this. Maybe impossible, even for Lexus. :surprise:
DrFill
Thing One: Taking a page of any discussion and dragging it here for the purpose of "proving" something - positive or negative - is just silly, distracting and unnecessary. If you have some comments of your own to make about the subject then do so, but please do not drag other discussions into this one.
Thing Two: The sarcastic meanness of a number of recent posts is completely uncalled for. There are some of you who have been warned about this behavior in the past. If it continues, you will be discontinuing your membership in this discussion.
Thing Three: Pretty much anything goes as far as subject in this discussion, but disrespect for your fellow members is unacceptable anywhere. Which pretty much sums up Thing One and Thing Two.
Questions, comments? Email me. But this recent ugly line of posts needs to end.
Thank you.
Just imagine still getting paid to do THAT. :surprise:
TagMan
definately the human being that wrote the article Dewey posted. :P
BTW, what kind of dog? :shades:
TagMan
So... are you therefore implying that an unreliable Lexus is the unlucky non-typical event, and that the reliable German car is the lucky non-typical event?
TagMan