By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Thanks
Ken
Second,, haven't had the chance to drive the XOnes in the rain yet (Imagine, mid December, no snow OR rain in South Central Ontario, WOW! People are still golfing), but had the same tires on my previous Voyager for 4 winters and was quite pleased with the grip in snow and wet. The Sienna has VSC and traction control, so the poor weather performance of the van should be even better.
I have found the XOnes superior in dry, everyday use. Upon leaving the tire store, I noticed immediately there were positive differences. The Aquatreads provided excellent wet traction. However, I noticed the feeling of excessive lean in corners which I'd put off on the Siennas softer suspension. That issue is gone with the XOnes. The van actually corners much better and leans less. This must be a case of softer sidewalls on the Aquatreads. I do notice a bit more transmission of road irregulaities into the van with the XOnes. I prefer the feedback and the cornering abillity with my style of driving. Steering effort seems to be less as well. Also, none of the balance vibration or pulling issues I had with the Aquatreads are evident with the XOnes.
How about smoothness and quietness on highway cruising?
Thanks
Ken
Wet handling of the Aquatreads is excellent and IMO their best feature. The XOnes are very good as well. It rained a bit last night and this morning. Although I didn't drive much, did try to toss the van into corners at higher than normal speeds and did accelerate faster than normal. Both produced good results; no tire spin and no sliding in the corners. Felt much more comfortable hard cornering than the Aquatreads.
Ken
Ken
And... if your vehicle is vibrating because the tires out of round and your vehicle is pulling to the side because of shifted belts, you are never going to get to care about how smooth the tires are suppose to be.
My conclusion: Aquatreads are junk
Yesterday we went around to do some shopping and went to a friends house so I got a chance to try them too. The slush had frozen into ice sheets in many parking lots but I didn't know until I got out and tried to walk that there was ice so they even seem OK there. We visited a friend's place where the street hadn't been plowed so it was also an ice sheet; the stop sign at the end of that downhill road was slippery and I took longer to stop than I would have liked (should have slowed down sooner, will next time) but I still stopped in time. After this first weekend of winter driving, I'm thinking that I won't need snows.
My other car with Rainforce MX4s only saw a little bit of driving so they haven't been tested enough for a report.
Now you may wonder just how forthright a dealer would be but he's treating me well in regards to the vibrations and niose I thought was coming from the Goodrich Long Trails I just put on the Suburban. Turned out there that the U joint was the culprit and now that vehicle is as quiet and smooth as ever. The tire dealer was ready to pull the Long Trails and get me something else if needed so I don't think he's pulling one on me here on the Aquatreads. We'll see how it goes; I plan to have them put on later this week. If they're a problem I'll be reporting it here for sure!
Best wishes to all for a wonderful Christmas.
Ken
I currently have bridgestone Poortenza RE92 and they make a lot of noise and hydroplane a lot
I have Potenza RE92's (OEM) on my 2000 Subaru Legacy GT Limited sedan, and most people have the same complaint you do with that tire. I'm shopping around for different tires that do better in the rain and snow, but it's been tough. Anything in a 205 55 R16 is designed for performance only, and handle miserably on wet or slippery roads. My only other alternative is a winter-specific tire, but I don't want to go with that either because of the major tradeoffs in dry road handling.
I'm still searching, and one I'm looking at right now is the Continental ContiTouring Contact CH95. Continental claims great handling on wet or dry pavement, but I want to hear from real owners to get to the truth.
Ty
1. Michelin Cross Terrain - from research and the forum
2. BF Goodrich TA KO - from a tire shop recommendation
3. Cooper Discoverer AT - from my mechanic
4. Michelin LTX AT - an alternative
Grand High Poobah
The Fraternal Order of Procrastinators
Consider approaching a Continental dealer about the premature wear on your H95s. Those tires have a 60,000-mile warranty, which should be applicable to you if you are the original owner of the car. You may be able to get a set of new tires for half price.
Ty
There's no question that the LTX A/T and the All-Terrain T/A will work great off-road. Both are excellent for the person who needs off-road performance but still wants some civility on-road. Quiet on the highway? Mmm, not really, especially as they wear both will become "howley". Decent treadlife? Well, yeah, decent.
The Cross-Terrain will do what you want on-road, no problem, but will not help you off-road. Since it's a new tire there is no real-world consumer usage of it during winter. So that critical snow traction is an unknown right now. Probably this one should be scratched off the list until more votes have been cast.
Which leaves the Cooper. They do have a reputation for making a very good 4 season tire so it may be your best overall choice, especially when price comes into play. Give this one some serious consideration.
While you are looking consider putting the Pirelli Scorpion A/T on your list. It's also good for what you are needing.
I hope this helps.
Merry Christmas to all and Jesus IS the reason for the season!
In case you live in Twin cities, MN, could you recommend your mechanic?
Thanks.
AJ
We are using the car for daily driving to work, shopping, etc., and for shorter trips around our home state (CT) and to close places (RI, MA, NY City). Mostly suburban and city driving, with some rural roads and a bit of highways.
Except on highways, the speed is low, mostly around 40 mph in suburbs, even less in city. However, our CT roads are rather hilly and winding, with a lot of turns, often sharp. I like to turn fast, without reducing speed, and the previous tires used to sing songs on the turns.
The SH-30 tires are excellent for this driving style. Especially on wet roads: practically no difference with the dry ones. They also stops fast when braking.
There was a lot of snow in our places the last winter. The tires are generally good at snow, but nothing outstanding.
The tires are not noisy. A bit stiff, but my wife and I like it. I am overinflating them 3 psi above the manufacturer recommendations. However, we have mostly asphalt roads in CT. On bad concrete NY highways it was unpleasant to feel all the slabs borders.
A pecurarity: when the car was not used for several days, the tires behave as if out of round at low speed for first 1/2 miles or so.
I will spend my New Year's Eve reading all of the previous posts, so hopefully I will get additional info.
Thanks again!
K
P.S. I have also been told that I need tires with mud and snow rating. Will that be obvious or do I need to find out that specifically?
K
The articles that I've been reading about the SH30 sound really impressive. I'm hoping for the wet surface and corner performance increases that everyone who seems to report are a reality for me once I mount these to my 2000 Impala LS.
Also remember that the wear bars are for DRY pavement only. At a minimum, you need double that tread depth for wet and triple the depth for mud and snow. In rain, as soon as the puddles are deeper than your tread depth, you can hydroplane if you are going fast enough (depends on your tire pressure with higher being better).
A decent tire link was posted on another discussion recently: http://www.autospeed.com/A_0996/P_2/article.html
Mud and snow tires say M + S on the sidewall. Snow tires have a snowflake on them.
Ken
The GY Aquatread 3 and the Michelin X-One are direct competitors. So compare feature for feature, dollar to dollar.
The Regatta 2 uses a lot of the design elements of the Aquatread but as the dealer said, the Aquatread is a little more focused on wet weather performance. So it really depends on what kind of driving you do and what your priorities are. I think either would work well.
So, where to buy them.... The $700 price for the X-One is a rip off IMHO. I wonder how many additional charges are tacked on to that quote. Probably a big x-mas tip for himself ;-) That's a tire that shouldn't cost more than $110 each. Add in $20/tire for mounting and balancing, new valve stems, tax, and you should be out of the door for $525-550.
Do you have a Sam's Club or Costco membership? Have a friend or family member that does? Reason I ask is that both offer a Michelin that is the same as the X-One but sold under a different model name (X Radial Plus). You can save some $$ by just going for that model. In the Goodyear line Sam's sells the Allegra which is very similar to the Regatta 2 but, again, under a different name. If you are leaning towards the Regatta 2, look at K-Mart as I know they sell that model at great prices.
Finally, if you are still considering Toyo (I think that's what you were referring to as "Spectrum tires") look at the Toyo 800 Ultra as a low-priced competitor to the X-One and the Aquatread 3. I'd say skip the Toyo Spectrum unless you've got a case of sticker shock. Even Toyo uses words like "economical" and "value conscious" in their literature to describe the Spectrum.
I am looking to replace my bridgestone poortenzas RE-92 195/55/vr15 with BFGoodrich touring T/A VR4 205/55/15.
What I am looking for?
Quiter and more comfortable ride with good wet and dry traction.
If you try them, let me know what your experience is. I think you'll love 'em like everyone else does.
Noelle
A little more than I wanted to know about the placement of their ethics. :-0
j/funnin' u :-)
Thanks
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
With their moral judgement residing so strategically on their person, no one can ever say of these guys: "They left their ethics at home."
Hey, I couldn't let that one pass! :>
Noelle
I changed over to 205/55/VR15 tires, "BFGoodrich Touring T/A VR4 M+S", to be precise.
Quiet when compared to the RE-92 on rough concrete roads. A Tad more comfortable than the RE-92, especially by not letting me feel the tiny irregularities on the road. It soaks them pretty good.
But surprisingly they still retain the driving & Handling characteristics of the car.
All these for just $83.94 per tire installed with lifetime flat repairs, rotation and balancing.
Why did not go with yokohama avid? well they are not good in snow - they are not M+S rated.
And all the reviews lead me to believe that that they are as quiet&comfortable as the yokohama Avid V4.
check this out
http://www.1010tires.com/ubb/Forum3/HTML/000038.html
or read this:
Hi,
I am looking for a replacement tire that is not as hard riding and noisy(plus the excellent ability to hydroplane!!)
as the Bridgestone RE92 195/55/VR15. My choices are:
1. BF goodrich Touring T/A VR4 (205/55/VR15)
2. Yokohama Avid T4(195/55/TR15)
3. Yokohama Avid V4(205/55/VR15).
Which of the three provides:
1. A comforatable ride (quiet&soft)
2. good Hydroplaning resistance
Thanks for your time,
Nick
Reply:TechGuy Administrator Posts: 354
Registered: Nov 2000 posted 01-03-2002 11:07 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't want to drop to a T-rated tire from a V-rated tire, so skip the AVID T4.
The other two are pretty similar with the B.F.G being a bit more quiet and comfortable. Either of them will be a significant upgrade from your RE92.
thanks techguy.
But again, which is a better choice in wet handling and road noise between the yokohama avid V4 and BFG touring T/A VR4?
Want to make the right decision this time since once I get them, I have to stay with them for the next couple of years come snowy winter or dry summer or rainy fall here in philly.
thanks again.
REPLY:TechGuy Administrator Posts: 354 Registered: Nov 2000 posted 01-04-2002 05:15 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The B.F.G. will be slightly more quiet and comfortable, as well as giving a slight advantage in wet and snow traction. There isn't a big difference, but it is the better tire in these conditions.
http://www.htmlclinic.com/
Thanks,
Ken
I purchased a set of Yoko YK420s and wanted more info
so I emailed the company:
The Yokohama YK420 is a high-performance all-season tire
that is offered exclusively through Discount Tire nation
wide. Because this tire is only offered to one specific
chain of dealers, we do not include it on our website.
However, the YK420 is designed to deliver very good performance
in dry, wet and light snow and ice conditions. In terms of
performance, the YK420 most closely compares to the Avid H4/V4
that appears on our website. I hope this information has been
helpful. Thank you for contacting Yokohama Tire Corporation.
Hope this is helpful for others out there - Mike
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards