United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

1157158160162163406

Comments

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Thank you for your first hand perspective. I have no doubt what you are saying is true. What it adds up to is a 5 GM vehicle customer lost, probably for good. No matter who is to blame. It would give the UAW a little more credibility if they were to strike for quality control issues, rather than just trying to bring GM to their knees.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    It would give the UAW a little more credibility if they were to strike for quality control issues, rather than just trying to bring GM to their knees.

    That would take an group that is truly selfless....

    Regards,
    OW
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    >however I think the American dream is a total BS.

    Well, imHo, the American dream begins with the idea of everyone owning their very own independent house/apt. What irks me is the idea that kids should start living separately when they get out of high school. It is very lame brained. I like the idea of being independent, but parents can very well accommodate the needs of their young, who are on the doorsteps of becoming a responsible adult.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    >We proved discrepancy to the engineers and management. We were told to do the best we could, because they're not going to retool that quarter panel.

    I have been there and done that. That is one of the most frustrating times that the assembly workers has to go through i.e. Fix the mistakes of all the the processing that has happened up the line. But then, that is also another reason the assembly worker is considered "skilled" and paid highly. If he/she were to simply bolt the pieces on, then we don't need highly skilled workers on that line. The production cost is always there. You either pay it up front i.e. better design and better tooling (that has been tested) or you pay highly skilled assembly labors to fix the problems when they come across.

    Apparently GM was not paying attention up front, and expecting the assembly workers to perform to the skilled wages they were getting.

    a total crap hole, if I might use that word.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    >It would give the UAW a little more credibility if they were to strike for quality control issues, rather than just trying to bring GM to their knees.

    >That would take an group that is truly selfless...

    Remember that I spoke highly of a CNC machine operator who rose from the ranks of a sweeper to become my asst. supervisor? He was one of those. He would never tolerate quality problems. If the casting is not right, then it is not right and he will either find a way to fix it and if he cannot, he will simply take it off his machine and fight with me and my bosses to return that to the casting shop / vendor.
  • yankabillyyankabilly Member Posts: 43
    The half inch gap was caused do to a ROBOT when spot welding the part to fire wall was bending the tabe. The mirrors rattling is caused by two causes, one not using the right tool and torque our from wrong screws.Many of the qaulity problems are do to two problems ONE: Quality problem was brought to management attention and it must go up the chain before a desiction can be made. So who knows how many off them get through before if and when it is fixed. If it is a large number in arrow it is easy to track but if it a hit and miss unless some one is not writteng job number down you will have a hard time tracking. You are aloud to turn line off on the first time you see that problem and thats it. Work loads is between 93-95% so you do not have time to write it down it is managements resposability to put a person there to write numbers there.

    Two: When a problem is okayed to fix the vehicles might be on finish line or all the way in the yard to be shipped out. We have before taken trucks off rail cars our off car haulers Even some never get fixed because there are gone.
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,356
    a total crap hole, if I might use that word

    LOL ! Borat, is that you? :D

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Well, at least somebody knows what is right. Good for him and you.

    Regards,
    OW
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    It would give the UAW a little more credibility if they were to strike for quality control issues, rather than just trying to bring GM to their knees.

    Exactly! Perhaps us non-UAW normal Americans would see some value from all those salaries and benefits if we also saw those UAW people fighting for some quality. Until then, why should I believe the UAW is worth any more value than the non-unionized Honda and Toyota workers in the US? In fact, if I look at the crappiest vehicles I see mostly UAW. Where is the value?
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    I believe the essence of American dream isn't just a decent life for everyone, but to be so darn rish without having to work or it. So yes, I do think its total BS.

    However don;t you think the concept of American dream awfully resembles many UAW workers' lifetyles? Of course the huge difference is they choose to live a dream when they need fo face reality.
    And guess what, we're indirectly paying for their dreams by bailout means.

    I recall someone here saying that if we have to accept reality then Steve Jobs wouldn't be the way he is now and America wouldn't have revived from Pearl harbor incident. I can't remember who said this but let me tell you this: it's the total opposite. They both emerged as winners because they accepted reality and took the next steps based on it.

    When Apple tanked, it wouldn't have survived if Jobs ignore reality that his products were simply undesired. He accept reality and chose to improve his products, making products customer wanted to buy. Result? Welcome back Apple.

    Pearl harbor is the better example. Before Japan attacked it America simply ignored reality that Japan was capable of invading USA. Then reality hit them, hard, Pearl Harbor went bye-bye. Then they embraced reality and react accordingly, retaliate before they could get attacked once more.

    UAW definitely saw this day coming. And the reality is it's a huge factor that can make the change. Wage concession was the way, and they refused to take part. Remember that the bailout talks almost went bust for 1 reason: UAW refused to make wage concessions. It's my believe that the only reason the bailout proposal passed was because of luck, the situation worsened so much that emergency actions were necessary (hence the first wave bailout). I'm waiting for the day reality hits them, hopefully the hardest possible one, so they'll finally understand that living a dream is simply a no go.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Yes, I agree.
    IMO American adults live a too much convenient life in the sense that they have no need to take care for their kids once they're 18.
    On one side, you see early adults who imo aren't ready for the responsibility, on the other side, parents who conveniently wash their hands off responsibilities as parents so early.
    Some of them either failed or couldnt afford it, dropped out and took jobs such as the ones with UAW. Then they found out they can make easy money there and forget totally about college and further education. And the next time we all wonder why there are less and less quality workers coming from US?
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    What's the other extreme? Having a 30 year-old loser son living in your basement?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    dropped out and took jobs such as the ones with UAW

    You make a valid point. How many under 30 UAW workers will go sponge off mom and dad when the hammer falls and they are unemployed? For all those long time UAW workers that did not spend some of the big bucks sending your kids to college, you may be in for lots of unwanted company during this long recession. And they will probably not be that motivated to leave the TV long enough to find a job. Better stock up on beer and snacks. A second remote control would be handy. Not my idea of a pleasant retirement with screaming grandkids running through the house on a permanent basis. Those UAW retirees need to tell the Union leadership they can take care of their own healthcare.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Try the chinese way. Parents take care of their kids until they find a job. And they will, for being unemployed is a huge shame to them.
    Of course, we will have to take care of our kids until they graduate from college and fnd a job. It works both ways.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Might work for the Chinese, but it seems American kids don't have that same sense of shame of unemployment ala the slacker culture.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Again, sadly true, and truly sad. :P
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    the slacker culture.

    We are surrounded by it. The UAW entitlement mentality does not help at all. Laid off no problem I get as much to sit and watch cartoons as installing fenders. Now it is coming to a crisis. No more gravy train for the UAW jobs bank. My neighbor lady has her son that moved in with her. He is about 45 and quit his job as a Border Patrol agent up in Vermont. He is driving her crazy just sitting around all day watching TV. Has not looked for a job in 6 months. All you UAW retirees that pushed your kids into the UAW. Paybacks are a bummer.
  • srs_49srs_49 Member Posts: 1,394
    Try the chinese way. Parents take care of their kids until they find a job. And they will, for being unemployed is a huge shame to them.

    Let's carry that thought the next step. At the end of your working career then, your kids take care of until you croak.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    >What's the other extreme? Having a 30 year-old loser son living in your basement?

    Ha Ha...right. There is a sweet spot to let the hand go. I believe that is once the kid has graduated and found a good job, and more importantly saved up some money living with parents. That is roughly age 25-27. then he should use the money he saved to buy a decent home and one that he can afford payments on.
  • srs_49srs_49 Member Posts: 1,394
    you may be in for lots of unwanted company during this long recession. And they will probably not be that motivated to leave the TV long enough to find a job. Better stock up on beer and snacks. A second remote control would be handy...

    Maybe if you canceled the satellite/cable TV service and padlocked the refrigerator there would be some motivation.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    "Let's carry that thought the next step. At the end of your working career then, your kids take care of until you croak. "

    Hmm? That is also part of the chinese life. That's why I laugh at everyone who called me spoiled brat back in college (as my parents paid for tuition). They had no idea I'll have my parents, wife and kids to take care of either until they die or get a job.

    I wonder how UAW people will think of the chinese way. They might balk within seconds. :P Tradition, family ties, taking care of your whole family, the shame of unemployement, and the pride in working hard, all might sound alien to them (and so many other Americans).
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Try whipping them in the butt. :P

    Publicly humiliating them as jobless slacker living in mama's house is also a good method. :shades:
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    Laid-off UAW workers, who also are active in their union, might find jobs as orgainzers. It might require some travel at times however. These "organiizer" positions might blossom when Congress passes the card check law. Another enabler for the "organizer" position is a provision in the Congress' stimulus draft plan that would allot maybe $6 billion for community stabilization. This stabilization means groups such as acorn.

    Soooo, combine card check with billions to groups like acorn, and there are thousands of new job openings for community/union organizers to try and influence workers in non-union companines to sign up. This is not a farout speculation. Former staunch UAW workers with communicaton/organizer skills will be in demand.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,525
    I don't see the American dream as necessarily being "rich" for nothing - maybe "rich" compared to the third world, but the American dream had nothing to do with the entitlements of out of control unions.

    But it's all for moot, the American dream will be effectively dead in a world dominated by globalization and corporate control. No need to cry about the unions, their days are numbered - at least in the short term, perhaps for good. And if we are to whine about bailouts unions, it might also be good to target the endlessly more expensive and irresponsible bailout given to greedy financiers (economic terrorists) and the future needs of public sector unions. Don't think they aren't going to not end up even more addicted to taxpayer funds.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,525
    I'm pretty sure if your parents were able to fund your higher education and keep you on the dole into your 20s, they won't be broke upon retirement ;)
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    "A detailed study of productivity levels in the North American auto assembly industry has confirmed that Canadian auto factories are the most efficient in the continent. Moreover, the study shows that unionized auto plants demonstrate higher labour productivity than non-union auto plants.

    The study was released today by the Canadian Auto Workers union and was
    written by CAW Economist Jim Stanford."

    CAW Study Finds Canadian Auto Assembly Plants Most Productive in North America

    Whatever the equivalent of the Heritage Foundation is in Canada will need to provide the other hand. (It'll have to have a different name because the Heritage Foundation Canada is about promoting Canada's built heritage).
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    A study by the Canadian Auto Workers Union showing union factories more productive than non-union? Indeed!!
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I guess I should have left that sentence out and not spoiled people's fun in spotting it in the blurb. :D
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    I worked at Oshawa assembly for a couple years. I can believe it is the most productive. Those guys worked hard. Also Harbour has given the plant the most productive also a couple times.

    http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/31/news/companies/autoplant_productivity/index.htm

    The annual ranking of auto plant productivity by Harbour Consulting found GM's Oshawa No. 2 plant is the most productive in the North American auto industry.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    He quit his job as a Border Patrol Agent in Vermont? Now how hard could've that job been? It isn't as if there's thousands of Canadian illegal aliens trying to cross our northern border!
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Gee, a union-sponsored study finds union plants more productive -- who woudda thought? ;)
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Harbour though is not union sponsored. They go it right.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    >the study shows that unionized auto plants demonstrate higher labour productivity than non-union auto plants.

    Agreed. But what the UAW is not doing is not providing any intangible benefits to the production line. They want everything measured and then paid based upon that.
    How do you go about measuring intangibles such as honesty, eye for providing quality work, attention to minute details, etc?

    In a sense, unions will provide higher productivity simply because they will do their job as described in the job description, and not stopping for providing intangible benefits to their product.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    He quit his job as a Border Patrol Agent in Vermont?

    His mother says he did not get along with his supervisor in New Mexico and transferred to the other border. Then when the same boss showed up he just quit. I think he has some other issues, just from talking to him across the fence. No Union to protect him :sick:
  • grbeckgrbeck Member Posts: 2,358
    The result isn't quite as impressive when one realizes that those plants all build one type of vehicle (the old Taurus/Sable for Ford; the W-bodies for GM) based on ancient platforms.

    Any company that can't make those plants productive needs to get into another line of business.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    The result isn't quite as impressive when one realizes that those plants all build one type of vehicle (the old Taurus/Sable for Ford; the W-bodies for GM) based on ancient platforms.

    Any company that can't make those plants productive needs to get into another line of business.


    Actually just the opposite. Newer platforms are engineered to be more productive than the models they replaced.

    Believe me that Oshawa is very good at what they do. The plant manager and everyone below him worked very hard to earn the quality awards (pretty much every year they earned one) and productivity awards.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    No wonder the CAW split from the UAW. Those Canadians were making their counterparts in the UAW look bad. I can see why GM would shut them down. They were making it tough on US workers. Probably one of the work rules in those 2200 pages of UAW contracts. "Any plant that produces above average shall be shut down" so saith the team of Wagoner and Gettlefinger. .
  • yankabillyyankabilly Member Posts: 43
    Then go look it up and proves us wrong :)
  • yankabillyyankabilly Member Posts: 43
    It's called time study. It is called some thing else now but that is the old name. On a computer it tells you how long it should take to put a screw in EX: after you finish the truck how many steps it takes to get to the next truck how many seconds to grab the number of screws out of pouch how many seconds to put the screw on tool how many seconds it take to tighten the screws on every truck. You are given one extra second so after 5- 7 trucks you use that time to get more screws to put into pouch. ( They don't give you any time to get a drink of water on a hot day must have the wet bubble test to get a five minute break every hour).
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Actually Toyota has the most productive plant and Honda the most productive overall. There is a slight of words in the reports. Oshawa #2 is the most productive of the North American auto plants or what we call domestics. You have to read the whole article to get to the truth.

    Even with productivity improvements at the traditional Big Three automakers, Toyota Motor led Harbour's ranking of productivity for all auto facilities, while Honda Motor had the most productive assembly plants, with an average of 21.13 hours per vehicle.

    But the report showed that GM, Ford and Chrysler Group, which is being sold by DaimlerChrysler, made gains and narrowed the productivity gap with the Japanese automakers' U.S. plants.


    http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/31/news/companies/autoplant_productivity/index.htm
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Plant was shut down because it built both the old W car which was not being replaced and pick ups which capacity was not needed anymore. They did plan on building all the new Zetas there but unfortunately the new CAFE rules killed that platform. So now it will be a niche Camaro plant.

    But the Impala is still being built there and very doubtful it will be transferred to another plant since it is on the lame duck W platform.

    But at this time I believe all 3 plants are still running. But the truck plant will probably close in May.

    The Canada plants were making the wrong products at the wrong time.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    How will that impact the Canadian offers of help for GM? I don't imagine they want to give billions to a company that is bailing out of Canada.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    GM will have 2 assembly plants in Canada and a huge engineering complex and the powertrain plants.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Actually Toyota has the most productive plant and Honda the most productive overall. There is a slight of words in the reports. Oshawa #2 is the most productive of the North American auto plants or what we call domestics. You have to read the whole article to get to the truth.

    Please reread. If you average all their plants Toyota has the highest productive average of the marques. Oshawa is still the most productive plant in NA of ALL automotive assembly plants. And that is the truth.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    >It's called time study

    I guess I should know something about that ;) after all I am an Industrial Engineer :shades:
  • dallasdude1dallasdude1 Member Posts: 1,151
    Their hands were tied. GM, in exchange for tax breaks, signed an agreement in Canada years ago. That agreement said that the Camaro plant (don't confuse it with the new Camaro plant), in Canada, was to be the sole builder of Camaro/Firebird until 2009. In 2002 GM pulled out and razed the plant and had to wait. Now they decide to go back to Canada. Note that the national health is a major consideration and I'm sure that tax breaks are part of the equation. If that isn't a bone head mistake, I don't know what is.

    The Camaro and its sibling, the Pontiac Firebird, were being produced at another G.M. Canada plant north of Montreal when they were discontinued in 2002. That factory, Quebec’s last auto plant, was later demolished.

    The other main candidate to produce the Camaro was a factory in Wilmington, Del.

    But Chris Piper, a professor of operations management at the University of Western Ontario in London, said Oshawa’s consistently high productivity and quality ratings in independent surveys might have been decisive factors.

    He also said that government-financed health care gave all Canadian auto plants a substantial cost advantage compared to operations in the United States.


    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/22/automobiles/22auto.html
  • lokkilokki Member Posts: 1,200
    He also said that government-financed health care gave all Canadian auto plants a substantial cost advantage compared to operations in the United States.

    At the expense of every taxpayer in the country.....
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    At the expense of every taxpayer in the country...

    THANK YOU!

    I don't think most of the people that push for Canadian type social programs realize just how much the Canadian workers pay in taxes. I know my cousins that emigrated paid over 50%. She was a stewardess and he is a union musician. Neither made UAW levels of pay. Both have given up their Canadian citizenship and become US citizens.

    Someone has to pay the bills, Unless you have these BIG printing presses like the USA. All the Feds are doing is diluting the high pay made by Union workers with all this additional debt. The UAW worker will probably still get $30 per hour. It just will not be worth as much as it was before.
  • dallasdude1dallasdude1 Member Posts: 1,151
    One could argue that GM/UAW built cars have a hidden cost, health care. There is no free lunch, as economist say. You pay in some form or manner the cost of health care. Why do we have more uninsured people? Why do we pay more and are unhealthier than most other countries? Talking of a system which is UNSUSTAINABLE, this is certainly it. Its rising cost will be more and more of GNP over the next decade and beyond. In the end we will be forced into a much different system. Do we wait until all of the companies are gone before we act?

    GM spends an average $72 an hour on labor, including wages, health benefits and pensions. Non-union Toyota plants spend $42 an hour. Toyota hasn't been building cars here long enough to be stuck with the hospital bills of nonagenarian retirees. The company has plenty of elderly veterans back home -- the Japanese are the longest-lived people in the world -- but guess who pays for healthcare in Japan? The Japanese government. As a result of providing its workers with health benefits that everyone in this country should be getting, American automakers pay over $2,000 more in labor costs on every car they make. The best way to overcome a nut like that is to build big vehicles that you can sell for a big profit.

    At more than $2 trillion, health care spending now accounts for more than 16% of the U.S. gross domestic product. In 2006, health care costs in the United States, at more than $7,000 per capita, were the highest in the developed world. Yet despite that level of spending, more than 45 million people in this country are uninsured; more than one million in Michigan. That's 10% of our state's population and more than 15% of those aged 18-64.
  • dallasdude1dallasdude1 Member Posts: 1,151
    I have a co-work whose son married and moved to Canada. So what is your point? People do not grow roots. They are free to come and go. Lots of Americans trek to Canada to get cheaper prices on the drugs and people go to Mexico to get medical treatment citing better pricing. Globalization is supposedly going to create a parity for all good and services worldwide. So your arguing for allowing imports/free trade is a double edge sword and you will have to take your medicine sooner or later. Health care is but just a service everywhere, except here as we allow special interests lobby's favoritism.

    • First, the lack of health insurance reduces productivity, within the workforce and in the broader context of our national economy. Research tells us that people without health insurance have more health problems than do people with coverage. When people are not able to work to full capacity, business suffers -- and our tax burden increases as we care for those who cannot participate in the labor force.

    • Second, high numbers of uninsured cause financial instability in our health system. Those who are uninsured -- or underinsured -- tend to seek care only when their situations become dire, often ending up in hospital emergency rooms. In Michigan, as elsewhere, this is reflected in the increased rate of uncompensated care assumed by hospitals, physicians and other providers. The rapid growth of this cost destabilizes the entire health system and limits the availability of care for all, even those with insurance. It also threatens the solvency of health care providers, often major employers in their communities.

    • Third, health insurance is an issue of global competitiveness. As auto companies can attest, many of our competitors are headquartered in countries that provide universal coverage. In the United States, most health insurance for those under 65 is funded through employment. U.S. auto manufacturers estimate that $1,500 of the cost of every car is related to health care benefits. This cost significantly affects the ability of U.S. companies to compete in the global market.


    http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/ndvdls/fq/txrts-eng.html
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.