United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

1214215217219220406

Comments

  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzMcAsGuJpU

    Featuring the future president of the U.S. -Virgil Bernero :shades:

    -Rocky
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    GM would be in better shape if they had built this Malibu during the last model generation and if they would have played hard ball with the UAW back in '92.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    GM, would be in excellent shape if George H.W. Bush, didn't fast tract NAFTA and Clinton, wouldn't of signed it and the UAW workers and GM, would still be #1 and millions of good paying jobs would of been saved. :sick: We also wouldn't be borrowing so much money from China, and we would be a safer nation because the 3rd world that wants to see us killed wouldn't have the financial means to carry out any attacks. 9/11 probably would of never happened if we would of invested in alternative fuels like bio-diesel decades ago and the Middle East, would be a poor cess pool instead of a rich one!!! :mad:

    -Rocky
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,691
    I thought Obama already fixed the Caterpillar problem He visited the plant and the CEO said he'd rehire people if the stimulus $800 billion bill passed.

    Obama Caterpillar visit

    (Caterpillar union is UAW...?)

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    Yeah....this is an upgrade for you Rocky

    image

    Cardboard box living in Detroit
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    Wow? Your reaching. UAW is getting a haircut.
  • jimbresjimbres Member Posts: 2,025
    No one looking for a Hyundai gives a damn at all! That's the problem with today's Americans!

    So why have you been hanging around the Genesis discussion?
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    "Have you run the numbers? The U.S. taxpayer will put up $10 billion. The secured creditors will forgive about $7 billion. And so at $17 billion, it’s costing $340,000 to keep each Chrysler employee working for Fiat’s North American subsidiary. And Fiat isn’t even putting up any money. That isn’t a deal your voters are going to like."
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Honda offers buyouts, slashes pay in North America
    Published: 3/31/09, 7:05 PM EDT
    By MEGHAN BARR

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) - Honda Motor Co. is offering voluntary buyouts, cutting workers' pay and imposing 13 non-production days at its North American plants to reduce its production this summer by 62,000 vehicles.

    Honda spokesman Ron Lietzke said Tuesday that the buyouts will be offered to most of the Japanese automaker's 35,600 employees in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Enhanced retirement packages are also being offered, he said.

    Overall compensation will be reduced for its North American employees, with top executives experiencing the biggest cuts, Lietzke said. He would not say how much salaries would be reduced.

    Bonuses will be greatly reduced or eliminated, but pay rates for production and hourly workers will not be affected, Lietzke said.

    "There is a continuing need to reduce our inventory," Lietzke said. "Regardless of job title or level within our organization, each Honda associate will share the responsibility of doing what we must do to remain competitive."

    Honda builds Accords and Acuras in Marysville, Ohio, near Columbus, and makes Civics and Elements at a factory in East Liberty, Ohio. The company also has an auto plant in Alabama and it makes parts in Georgia.

    The 13 non-production days will fall from May through July, and employees will have the option of using vacation days or taking no pay on most of those days, Lietzke said. The company is limiting non-work days to two a month to limit the effect on employees, he said.

    The company said in December it would cut vehicle production at its Ohio plants by 58,000.

    Honda followed that with an announcement in January that it would reduce production in North America by 29,000 vehicles, a move that would affect plants in Ohio, as well as Ontario, Canada, and Lincoln, Ala.
  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    Blah, blah, blah. You forgot to add the locust in Southern Hemisphere, Sun Spots, Aliens (both those from South and from Mars and Vulcan), and of course (like with all the rest if the evil in this world) Jews and cyclists. :sick: :sick:

    Never us, always "them". Never I, always somebody else. Car was invented here (it really wasn't, but the President said so, so it must be true), so an American com pany and its labor can do no wrong. :blush:

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    The difference? Thanks to no militant unions they can actually do it without going on strike or having President mediating. It's necessary so it's done. Buyout some, cut the management pay, leave worker's pay intact for now.

    Of course I can hear you talking about those capitalist pigs slashing those devine-given jobs. Simply reduce the output - simple as that. People don't want/need as much product so you make less. Since you make less you need less labor. Try that with Detroit :sick: .

    Now - when (yes - when, not if), the demand picks up, the same people laid off get back to work, perhaps even with overtime.For now, they simply run less - because they can. Detroit? Until December '08 their business model was "we lose money on every car we make, but we compensate that by volume".

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    headline from Reuters that Obama is OK with GM filing a "controlled" bankruptcy (whatever that is)...finally, they will make headway by (hopefully) killing the UAW and hiring folks who WANT to work...nothing wrong with being 3rd or 4th largest auto company...being the largest literally means nothing, when you think about it...neither is market share, because a business comes down to PROFITABILITY...no profit, nothing else matters...

    I could never understand why a carmaker wanted to increase market share by a few points, solely for the market share...often they would sell the cars cheaper (less profit) just to say they have 20% market share instead of 18%...so what???...

    Ads that say "the largest selling model in the country" does not make me want to buy it...design and quality make me want to buy it...

    I think GM would THRIVE if they had a 20% share but made top notch vehicles, only fewer of them...hence, dump Saturn, Pontiac, Hummer, Saab and GMC or Chevy truck (keep one brand, drop the other); make top notch trucks, Chevys, Caddys, and either dump Buick or merge it into Caddy as an entry level luxury car...

    I am available to lead GM for a few years as CEO, and I ONLY want 5 million a year...pennies compared to the rest of them...when the position opens, please call me at 800 555 1212 and ask for Bob... :P ;) :shades:
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Honda offers buyouts, slashes pay in North America

    Gee, it looks like Honda knows how to be proactive in a tough market. Before they have a gun to their heads. ;)
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    GM, would be in excellent shape if George H.W. Bush, didn't fast tract NAFTA and Clinton, wouldn't of signed it and the UAW workers and GM, would still be #1 and millions of good paying jobs would of been saved.

    I think you forgot currency manipulation. ;) :P
    That must be why GM is in such trouble.
  • srs_49srs_49 Member Posts: 1,394
    I could never understand why a carmaker wanted to increase market share by a few points, solely for the market share...often they would sell the cars cheaper (less profit) just to say they have 20% market share instead of 18%...so what???...

    Maybe that sort of perverse incentive was written into their contract? You know, for every percentage point increase in market share I get a $10 million bonus that year.

    ads that say "the largest selling model in the country" does not make me want to buy it...design and quality make me want to buy it...

    Same here. I was never enamored with the first generation Ford Taurus, even though Ford sold a ton of 'em.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Exactly...GM is toast in this market when the Asians suffer. Bye, Bye, Miss American GM Pie!

    The administration appears to be drawing in part from a playbook used with troubled banks, with the goal of creating a new, healthier G.M., but leaving behind its liabilities and less valuable assets, perhaps for liquidation. More often referred as the “good bank-bad bank” model, the approach can infuriate those with claims against the bad bank.

    Under a plan being worked out by the administration, G.M. would file for prearranged bankruptcy, according to these people. It would then use a sale authorized under Section 363 of the bankruptcy code to quickly sell off the desirable assets to a new company financed by the government. These good pieces might include Cadillac and Chevrolet, as well as assets the company needs to run the business.

    Less desirable assets, brands like Hummer and underperforming factories, would be left in the old company. Proceeds from the sales, including stock in the new company, would be given to the old G.M., helping to settle claims.

    The plans are still being discussed, and the details are subject to change, people familiar with the talks said.

    G.M. joins a long list of companies in industries like airlines, railroads and steelmakers that have faced the prospect of being remade in bankruptcy. Typically, a troubled company usually seeks to line up creditors, employees and other stakeholders for a plan of reorganization before a bankruptcy filing. Failure to achieve this agreement can create a prolonged and messy court process as the company battles its creditors while its business and financing rapidly deteriorate.

    Elements of the government’s plans for G.M. are in some ways similar to the demise of Lehman Brothers last fall. A day after filing for Chapter 11 protection, the securities firm agreed to sell the bulk of its North American business to Barclays Capital, the British bank. The sale was completed in a little more than three days.


    Regards,
    OW
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    People will buy new cars, any brand, if they can get financing.

    Those days are OVER, carlady. Give us a break!

    Watch and see what happens to GM and C....the cars that didn't sell are toast...and those models were out for sale when financing was like taking candy from a baby. Now that credit is tight, you buy only the best for as great a value as possible, not the same old GM fix-it-ups and pick-em-ups.

    Regards,
    OW
  • ingvaringvar Member Posts: 205
    People will buy new cars, any brand, if they can get financing.
    You are right at some point. Some people, like me, don't care about brand. If I like the car, I buy it. If Indian or Malaysian offers me car of my dream, I'll buy it. Could I get RWD or AWD with RWD bias coupe with V6 300hp from GM? I also need free loaner car for my oil change & etc...
  • mikefm58mikefm58 Member Posts: 2,882
    I was never enamored with the first generation Ford Taurus, even though Ford sold a ton of 'em.

    Actually Ford only sold half a ton of the Taurus. The other half ton was given to the rental car companies.
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    The car market will pick up again, but the market is extremely saturated due to years of shady financing, crazy incentives, and some really nice cars.
    Owner ship in the US is at 101% for everyone with a license while it is at 75% in Canada. Credit and the economy don't help either. People are steering clear of medium to large investment and a decent percentage can't get credit.

    That being said, I can definitely imagine the market going on an upturn in two years and being at full speed in five. Have we ever had such a great selection of SUVs, cars, and trucks? :)
  • grbeckgrbeck Member Posts: 2,358
    The first-generation Taurus was a big success. It was the facelifted, second-generated models that were rental queens. By then the Camry and Accord were larger, and word of the transmission and head-gasket problems with the Taurus had gotten around.

    If Ford had debuted a new overhead-cam engine for the Taurus by 1988 and fixed the transmission problems immediately - in other words, adopted a policy of continuous improvement, as Toyota and Honda have done - the car would probably still be a best-seller.
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    I guess the popularity of Obama's decision made him decide to up the anti. No more Pontiac, Hummer, Saturn.
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090401/ts_nm/us_autos_report_sb
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    who understands what needs to be done...the new CEO, Fritz Whatever, knows that Ch 11 is what GM needs...

    if GM never made a dime under Wagoner, why would rocky follow the man's career like some rockstar???...he was, obviously, out of his league as CEO...

    A question that I asked for years that no one in the auto industry ever seemed to confront: with all those record- breaking years of sales in the last decade, and with cars lasting longer than ever before (even UAW cars are better than the 70s and 80s), didn't ANYONE think that at some point the auto market would literally be SATURATED with cars to the point that people might go for years without a new one???...following that thought, didn't ANYONE see the overcapacity problem that would eventually hit ALL carmakers, esp the ones with excess capacity in the GOOD years (think GM), know they would REALLY have excess capacity at some point in the near future???...leading us to the natural consequence of...CLOSING PLANTS AND DUMPING EMPLOYEES WHO WERE HARDLY NEEDED IN THE GREAT YEARS AND ARE CERTAINLY EXCESS BAGGAGE IN THE DOWNTURN YEARS...am I the only one that saw this, even without the AIG and other financial problems???

    With everybody leaving Detroit, maybe real estate is the best field to be in, but only in Detroit...as houses will be selling like hotcakes...
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Great points. Take a look at US miles driven and it is on the wane. Gas prices reflect the fact that people are driving less....and cars will last that much longer.

    The technical gurus in ALL of the auto manufacturers have been caught with their pants down....but they are in line behind our illustrious banking geniuses!! :mad:

    Regards,
    OW
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    True, but people still need and love cars. Who can't wait to buy their next car? If I had money I would be the next Jay Leno.
    Maybe in five to ten years the market will stabilize at 90-95% ownership. Hopefully with new management at the Big 3 and realistic credit restrictions the market wont get flooded again. :lemon:
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    Detroit, 1980-1990, Chrysler and Ford almost went bankrupt...Chrysler got the Iaccoca loan, Ford just worked thru it...they closed plants, dumped workers, etc....back then, Ford "restructured" themselves, with the thought that they would limit their manufacturing capacity, so that, whiel they might miss sales in the good times, they would be better prepared for the bad times by not having the overcapacity of the other makers...seemed like a good idea at the time...either Donald Peterson or Phillip Caldwell was CEO I believe...

    Obviously, whoever took over later completely forgot the lessons of the 1980s...

    The one thing we learn from history is that we obviously learn nothing from history...
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    Great info. Although people are freaking out about this recession, the recession of 81-82 is probably closest both in time and comparison. Unemployment was over 10%, inflation was sky high, housing prices were depressed, and the stock market took a hit and we had Eddy Murphy.
    But we didn't have internet.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    iPods to the Queen is a bit off the topic. And it's not the iPod that's the deal - it's what's on the playlist. Labor songs in this case?

    There are plenty of sites around the net to talk politics. But we're talking about the UAW in here.
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    Do any GM cars have iPod docks? Or was that too taxing on the UAW?
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    ".....GM would have a tough time selling diesel cars. They are the major reason diesel cars are such a hard sell in the USA. They built one of the worst diesel engines ever and put them in their cars in the 1980s to try and ward off the imports."

    I believe this is a major reason (as well as what I stated above) as to why they don't bring their diesels from Europe here. I also believe many would hesitate to buy a diesel from any car company decause of that debacle.

    BTW, the old V-8 diesel block is highly sought after for racing, as it is quite sturdy for gas applications.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    If GM goes Bankrupt which is likely it appears I just don't want to hear you and others cry and whine about how much it costs later. I know you and others will be salivating like a pack of wolves as the UAW worker loses everything he or she worked for. This will have a huge affect on my family personally but screw em' right is the attitude in this country!!!! :sick:

    My interview with the dealership went good but what they have to offer in commission structure, no demo, and having 6 brands and only 30 something new cars out wasn't very encouraging news. I guess they have to interview a few more candidates before they will make a decision and they are going to let me know one way or another by the end of this week or beginning of next. I did check out a 3.8 Genesis and a brand new right off the shipping truck black Nissan 370Z. :shades: I really like the 370Z and I think it's one of the best looking cars ever made.

    -Rocky
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    "If GM goes Bankrupt which is likely it appears I just don't want to hear you and others cry and whine about how much it costs later. I know you and others will be salivating like a pack of wolves as the UAW worker loses everything he or she worked for. This will have a huge affect on my family personally but screw em' right is the attitude in this country!!!!"

    rcoky, I think you have missed the point by so much that it is hard to believe you have reached adulthood...

    when a client comes to me, they are usually quite upset, often emotional (both men and women)...whether they lost a job, or lost a spouse thru death or divorce, or just had their work hours cut in half (and also their paycheck), they are not happy...almost always, they were living easily within their means (which I will define as making all of their payments...you may argue they had too much debt to begin with, but that is irrelevant...if they are making their payments they are within their means) and then something happened and they are falling behind in their payments...

    when we discuss bankruptcy, it is because they are completely unable to kepp up with expenses and payments, now that their income has dropped, for WHATEVER reason...now, they are aware that they signed contracts with Visa, Mastercard or Amex and they are legally responsible to pay their debts...BUT THEY CAN'T...and no amount of crying or moaning will change that...so, bankruptcy is for those who are UNABLE, not unwilling, to pay their debts...

    rocky, GM is simply identical to my last client, except that the debt is in the billions, and that is billions of $$$ that GM does not have...you can squeal, cry, moan and holler, but when will you face up the the fact that the contracts they signed, agreeing to pay out certain monies in the future, that money simply is not there...stop bitching...it simply is NOT THERE...GM is just much larger in size than my last bankruptcy client, but it is the same...

    how do you expect GM to pay out when it is broke???...I take no glee in seeing this, but, after all this, what did you expect???...be mature and honest about this...what happens to ANY company when its debt is 100 times what it earns...they are insolvent and have been insolvent for more years than you seem to understand...Wagoner, for better or worse, seems to have lost about 80 billion $$$ during his tenure, and you worship the ground he walks on...he did NOTHING for GM except take up space on the 14th Floor and lose money...it seems that anytime a CEO comes from finance, they know nothing about cars, and finance men have run GM since Roger Smith...

    I absolutely will complain simply because I do not believe that taxpayer money should bail out the retired UAW workers anymore than AIG, Big Banks, and they sure as hell won't bail ME out if I don't make my bills...

    what makes you and the UAW so special???...NOTHING...a bunch of folks occasionally showed up sober, made some cars over the years, much of it was boat anchor material, and they retired...they have no more right to my tax money than anybody else, but you still live in the dreamworld that elevates them over every other illiterate in this country...

    They had it good while the Wizard's Curtain hid the Wizard...now the curtain is pulled back and the crap is exposed...their retirement is no more sacred than mine, but you act like it is Divine Right...

    GM must breach its contracts for the same reason that everyone else does...because the money to pay simply isn't there, their product quality is, simply, too little too late, and, like the boy who cried wolf, no one believes in GM anymore...they had it coming because they took advantage of American buyers for years, and the "quality chickens" are coming home to roost...selling a few top-notch Malibus, CTSs and Buicks does not bring in enough money...dumping all the excess baggage (Hummer, Saab, Chevy Truck, Pontiac to name a few) will bring forth a new company from the ashes...they have been too big for too long, and the ONLY thing keeping them alive was a credit line and sheer momentum of their size...the company was shot to hell years ago, and anyone with half a brain (UAW excluded) could see it coming...the last book I read (The End of Detroit) was written in 2002, and they saw it back then, exactly as it is happening now...

    GM, like the Alfred Sloan hierarchy, is dead, and has been dead for years...it was good in its time, but its time has long passed, and only the auto workers can't see the Reality...

    We WILL have an auto industry, and a strong one at that, but the model of business must change...GM will simply be another large auto company (I think it has been written that years ago Chevrolet, by itself, was larger than most other auto companies) but not the goliath behemoth that it has been for the last 75 years...Kmart ran the roost but was dethroned by WalMart...local drug stores ran the towns until CVS and Walgreen came in...

    The only thing constant is change, and the automakers are finally adapting to the world in which they sell...the world controls them, but they always thought (and acted) like they controlled the world...

    The dynasty called General Motors is over...may it rest in peace...
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    I will only cry and scream that GM wasn't allowed to go into bankruptcy several months ago. I foresaw GM's bankruptcy 5= years ago. It doesn't take a genius to see where GM's been heading for a long time. I will put 90% of the blame on management including the board if that makes you feel any better.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I know you and others will be salivating like a pack of wolves as the UAW worker loses everything he or she worked for.

    I don't wish anyone ill in the UAW. I just feel they have brought this on themselves. That includes the retirees and older workers in the UAW. Plus the UAW leaders. They saw the jobs going away in the 1970s. Instead of sitting down with GM and saying what kind of cuts can we make to insure jobs. They would go on strike like there was no end to the money. GM was losing $billions in 2005 when they set up the two tier system. Why didn't they say what is good for the new hires is good for the old timers. NO the older guys were greedy and showed the attitude screw the new workers. We are keeping what we have. Well those greedy oldtimers are about to lose also. They could have dumped the gold plated health care for retirees years ago. Saving GM $7B per year over the last 20 years. No they had earned it and that was that. Well they are about to find out how most of the countries retirees handle health care. We pay our own at least till forced onto Medicare at 65. Then we have to have a supplemental to actually get any kind of health care.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Bob - that was an awesome post.... thanks for taking the time to write it.
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    marsha7 and gagrice and most of us on here all the time with common sense have understood that GM is not fit to pay their bills under their current drainage plan of having their employees unionized by the UAW's. Simple and plain as that.

    Bankruptcy looks like the way they will head, with Cadidillac and Chevrolet emerging as the New World Order GM.

    Wow...kind of makes one's head spin, huh? Not completely around, I didnt' say that! :shades:

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    My Cadillac DTS has an iPod dock. So does my sister's Ford Focus and F-150.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Make it Chevrolet-Buick-Cadillac and I can live with that.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...there would be no need for unions!

    NJ CEO gives employees $1,000 from his pay

    The Associated Press

    SHORT HILLS, N.J. - A New Jersey CEO dipped into his own paycheck in a bid to stimulate the economy.

    Jack Windolf gave $1,000 to all 434 workers at Bollinger Insurance Solutions and told them "let's jumpstart this economy."

    Windolf says the idea came to him a year ago when he received $500,000 in deferred compensation after he orchestrated the sale of 51 percent of the Short Hills-based company. Windolf included a provision that said he could direct the money to other employees.

    The CEO calls it the "Bollinger Mini Stimulus package."

    Employees were surprised when they found the envelopes in their mailboxes on St. Patrick's Day.

    Human resources vice president Maria Force says she'll use the money to help her two kids in college.
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    The US tax payer has already spent $16,000,000,000 to keep GM afloat for three months. Lets say the tax payers pick up the legacy pensions and pay the union at the current rate, one can assume that the bill would be well over $100 Billion. :mad: If the UAW really didn't want to go into bankruptcy, they could make concessions.
    Didn't the financial analyst that went in front of congress quote $300 Billion.
    Bankruptcy is a much cheaper option.

    Also thanks for the info, I knew Ford had iPod connectivity (Sync is awesome) but was not sure GM had it.
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    Buick should be absorbed into Cadillac, it is probably not large enough to stand on its own...sort of an entry-level Caddy...either all the GM brands under one dealer roof, or simply 2 types of GM dealers, all the others will be gone...

    1. Chevrolet/Corvette/GMC Truck
    2. Buick/Cadillac

    All made by non-UAW workers, and the quality will skyrocket...

    Remember, the UAW folks have a silver-spoon-in-the-mouth mentality, kinda like a welfare mentality on a lower level (... ;);) ...)...the remaining UAW workers, with that low-level mentality, will probably SABOTAGE the remaining GM products, trying to "get back" at the Man for dumping all his buddies and retirees...so, those lower-level brains of theirs will think they are "showing the Man who's boss" and will probably drive GM deepr into negative territory, as they are simply too stupid to see they are (again) destroying their own livlihood and their own industry, pushing even more buyers into Honda and Toyota...

    GM needs to simply hire all new workers to replace the UAW...don't worry, they can train them in about a day, and, without all the fiefdoms to worry about, the new workers may actually CARE about product quality and even having a job...finding people without the welfare mentality will be GM's salvation...they need to move South...
  • dbostondriverdbostondriver Member Posts: 559
    Buick makes so much money in China, GM should still keep them in order to maintain value of the Brand. Buick should not be merged with Cadillac as it would eat into Cadillac's revenue.

    There should be four types of dealerships:
    Chevy/Buick
    Chevy/Buick/GMC
    Cadillac
    And a few specialty GMC dealers.
    GMC still brings in more revenue than any other nameplate besides Chevy.
    As for the UAW, they should disband, regroup under another name, and give in to any concessions GM and C want.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    I see a three tier approach:

    Chevrolet: everyday cars, trucks

    Buick: near-luxury - Acura-Lexus-Infiniti-Toyota Avalon level

    Cadillac: No holds barred, no compromise luxury vehicles - BMW-Mercedes level and beyond.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    GM needs to simply hire all new workers to replace the UAW...don't worry, they can train them in about a day, and, without all the fiefdoms to worry about, the new workers may actually CARE about product quality and even having a job

    After Obama/govt induced structured(?) C11 gets done for GM, UAW contracts will be voided. GM can merely invite all former UAW employees to submit resumes for jobs. Managers and supervisors, rehired under a "new" GM, know the union hotheads and malcontents and will simply not rehire them.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    As long as those new hires are at least as well-paid as the transplants. If you hire people at a Wal~Mart wage, you're going to get a lot of undesirable riff-raff.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    Three tiers too many.

    Split up C11 reorganized GM into two different companies:

    One is the "Cadillac Company" which maybe can strive to compete with Mercedes someday. It has to be exclusive and stand by itself without encumberances of remainder of GM.

    The other is the "Chevrolet Company" which builds cars, trucks, suvs. The Lucerne is merely like a Toyota Avalon, though not quite as good, and can be rebadged Chevrolet Lucerne which would be Chevrolet top end car as was Caprice Classic years ago. The Enclave could be rebadged to Chevrolet Enclave and get rid of Traverse. No need for Lacrosse.

    Important to entirely lose the "GM" name in that it has such a bad reputation and it would be a stigma and albatross on the newly formed companies. Also important, after UAW contracts are voided in C11, for new companies to NOT HAVE any association with UAW. Hopefully, newly hired assembly and other workers would not be motivated to start/restart a union.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I cannot imagine GM escaping the UAW stigma in the Midwest. Sadly they are so set in their entitlement mentality that they cannot see what they have done to their once dear goose. It laid golden eggs for generations of highly paid unskilled labor to live high on the hog. When GM started losing market share and not making profits like in the 1950s and 60s the workers could not comprehend that they were part of the problem. They just continued to add to the debt with gold plated health care and work rules.

    I believe the Obama people realize that GM cannot sustain their current model using UAW labor. They just are in a dilemma as they would like to keep the Union voters happy. To survive the UAW workers will have to be cut to $20 per hour max with modest health care partially paid by the workers. And a matching 401k for retirement. The paid health care for retirees has to be eliminated. That is the biggest drain on D3 finances. GM cannot continue to pay $7B per year for retiree health care. VEBA may work if the UAW goes to a much less expensive plan. It needs to be phased out and retirees need to look for less strenuous jobs after they retire at such an early age. The days of retiring at 55 need to be addressed. That leaves a decade of expensive health care for someone to pay. At current Cobra rates I would be paying over $132,000 for 10 years coverage. If a person has stashed that kind of money to cover his medical. Then early retirement is a viable option. The Boomers are retiring and they will be expensive to maintain.

    I think Mexico is the logical place for GM manufacturing to expand. Easy transport of finished product and a very capable, willing workforce.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    If you hire people at a Wal~Mart wage, you're going to get a lot of undesirable riff-raff.

    Wait a minute. That is insulting. :);) I encounter mostly pleasant, helpful and "working" employees when I shop at Wal-Mart. That includes the greeter. Don't you?
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    that there a shiploads of people from just south of me here in SE Arizona that would be able to forego a trip up north, if GM built or refurbished a car factory in Mexico to build Chev's and Caddy's at. No shortage of applicants and I really believe they'll work hard and build good American cars, too.

    The argument to save Buick, is it more sentimental than reality-based. Chevy and Cadidillacs make more New World Order sense to me.

    I have to see the 2010 Chevy Volt in production form, getting it's 400-mile range and looking all dressed to kill on American highways and biways. Yikes, about a year and a quarter ago, Dec.of '07, something clicked inside of me. I was willing to let decades of ICE cars and trucks wilter in the SW desert for a shot at an all-electric rig. Bring 'em on, I know this is going to piss a lot of you off, but if Wal*Mart can sell shiploads of Chinese-made products, BYD can certainly import the e6 all-electric in late 2010 or early 2011, sell it for about $27,995, Obama will offer the $7,500 "green" rebate and I'm fully completely in the New World Order. It's the product I shop for, if Congress OK's a product for sale in the U.S., I view it as fair game. Besides, isn't a Company that Warren Buffett decides to invest $220M of Berkshire-Hathaway funds in at least of some interest to y'all?

    Marty, where's my flux capacitor? :D

    I've already given my spiel for UAW's to retrain in the Medical fields. It still is one of the best retraining options for you all. It's not like I have never had a job helping to build widebody jets up north and been given two pink slips. All of one's background comes in to play when they look for work and make shopping decisions, huh?

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.