By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
IMO having added it to my Silverado, then Denali is that the in cab resonance, dirty throttle body which requires cleaning vs. the overall performance increase and initial cost makes it a no brainer. I'll never do it again and have reinstalled the stock intakes on both vehicles.
Funny thing is that Granatelli Motorsports which sells aftermarket MAF sensors recommend that you do not install an air intake kit as the air turbulance will affect the MAF readings. They do go on to say that they have another MAF which will take this into account. Those with the initial MAF can upgrade to the one which handles the turbulace for $100 and returning their old Granatelli MAF. What a joke.
I guess these "ram-effect" systems are better but even with them the overall gain for the money and time spent is not great.
I guess you could do it with a G-Tech Pro or similar on board performance diagnosis system, but the variablility in those seems to be higher than any gain you would see from an intake system.
Of course, all that dyno stuff depends on the competence of the person setting up the dyno. You can set a dyno up to read whatever HP you want. I can give you 500 wheel HP dyno slips on a Toyota Echo if you want them.
Steve, Host
Actually I think you mean Mr. Shiftright - he's the mod pro. Shifty?
Steve, Host
Shifty
http://www.momentumtuning.com/site/services/#intakemanifolds
If you hydro lock, your engine is totally toast, since water will not compress in the cylinder and your connecting rods will bend.
So "don't go too low".
Would I personally have the air intake at the level of my license plates? Nooooooo......I like 'em just about at the height of the bottom of the air filter...or in a space that water can't easily intrude into.
There actually are kits designed to inject water into an engine in small amounts. These are primarilly intended to cool down air /fuel charges running through a blower system (air heats up when you compress it) to help make more power. They perform the same function as an intercooler.
The old Mercedes 280SLs were notorious for doing this, if the driver was careless, and certain Jeeps had this problem (people watched too many Jeep commercials of Wranglers fording streams and spraying up water).
I'd be real careful about CAI placement....the consequences of being wrong are disastrous
In the late '80's I had a '79 Firebird Formula with a Chevy 305 (Z28) motor and I installed aftermarket headers with SS dual exhaust and it made a huge difference in power and throttle response. My friend also had a 1980 Olds Cutlass with a Chevy 350 motor and did the same thing when he saw the difference it made on my car and when I started passing him at the light. After the exhaust upgrades, his car felt like it gained 40-50 HP. I can't remember what company made the headers though. My mechanic picked them out because he had installed several of those in other Camaros and Firebirds. SS exhausts were not expensive back then ('88-89) and of course we did not install any CATs, just straight pipes but the exhausts were muffled.
It would be much easier for a good mechanic or muffler shop to make slight modifications if you also installed an aftermarket exhaust (or dual) at the same time.
'06 Civic LX coupe
'11 BMW 335i coupe xDrive
'13 Honda Accord sedan (wife's car)
Sounded great. I seemed to notice more power too.
Three months later my head gasket blew. :sick:
But it was and old engine with allot of miles on it, the filter just was enough to push it over the edge.
That said, I should have just stayed at work and waited out the storm.
That said #2, my insurance covered it and I ended up with a rebuilt engine for $500 :surprise:
xnappo
www.ipdusa.com
www. volvospeed.com
Welcome to the Forums.
You seem to be on the wrong board so let me re-direct you to our "Technical Questions" discussion, in our Maintenance & Repair Board.
Here's the link for you. Just cut and paste your question and re-post it here:
Technical Questions Discussion
best
MrShiftright
Co-Host
had less power then the stock filter,and lost MPG from 19.3 to barely 18.I took it out put back stock filter, now the car is back to normal.I had other people tell me the same thing,so for me the K&N did not work.
checked out the stock filter and it says on it that its a high air flow,and looked like the same thickness as the K&N
so your right that the Manufactors are doing their homework on getting the most power.However I think it may help on certain applications.I also noticed that the air box on my Charger is about 1/2the size bigger then I had on my Intrepid.Both same engine and HP.
I've tried the K&N three times so far on three different cars, and came up with zilch on mpg. I never dynoe'd my own cars however.
get a dirty throttle body anyway.Thats why they make fuel injections cleaners.The heat new engines put out and the gas that being used you cant stop it from happening.Your
suppose to use injection cleaner with every oil change
after so many miles anyway.I was a mechanic for 25 years and i seen alot of dirty carbs and throttle bodies on car with stock filters.