By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Sounds like Saab all over again. Buy Peugeot, rebadge a Cruze and then say it was "born on the streets of Paris..." :P
-Rocky
February’s winners are seen as Chrysler, Volkswagen, and Hyundai-Kia, in that order. GM is looking with worried eyes at the report. It predicts a 5.8 percent decrease in sales for GM. In a rising market, this would translate to a hefty 2.4 percent decrease in market share if Kelley is right.
Guess they didn't see the gas price forecast again, right? Or, perhaps they put a huge clamp down on fleets?
If you are looking for deals, look for them amongst the domestics. Dealers of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have more than 80 days’ supply of vehicles available on average. Toyota, Honda and Nissan are slightly up to more than 50 days’ supply. Hyundai and Kia are short of cars with only a 30 days’ supply of vehicles on average. Domestics spent more than $1,000 per unit more on incentives in January compared to their Japanese and Korean counterparts, a trend that will continue in February.
Looks like they've got inventory under control!
Regards,
OW
Well you know what they say about "insanity" (doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result).
I'd say SAAB is currently dead, but it's possible it can be brought back. I read on autoblog (IIRC) that 6 or 7 companies have bids on whats left of SAAB. Rumor is BMW is one of the bidders. Mini was dead for years for example. I'd love to see a BMW owned SAAB. They might actually build a SAAB worth buying.
GM had it's chance with SAAB. Why shut it down only to try to pick up the pieces again? Plus GM already has a mess going on with the European brands it currently has. I don't think the market (or GM) needs another brand built off a European GM platform. Why do you think GM closed SAAB in the first place. Building SAABs from Opel platforms wasn't working. Then building SAABs rebadged from Subarus and Trailblazers was a travesty.
IMO, GM still needs to on its remaining brands. There has been improvement, but still a lot of work remains.
link title
I for one would like to see Saab survive, but if they remain under GM's thumb in doing so then let them die.
I doubt it'll go that high, but this price creep will surely help the Volt, not to mention other EVs and hybrids too.
Even if GM had to pay tax, they'd have a dozen ways by now to avoid paying it at all. And that's what's really bankrupting our nation. The companies that make billions in profits don't pay anything back in the end regardless of what the actual tax code says. The sad fact is that U.S. corporations by and large don't even end up paying money on their profits.
One last fact - we have the lowest actual corporate taxes in the entire world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_rates_around_the_world
Yes, it says we're at 38%. On paper. But that link to debtclock.org that I posted shows that the actual amount collected is 8%.
Giving our corporations a free ride on top of that is just insanity. GM made a profit and should start to give us taxpayers back some of the money that we gave them.
True, same can be said of personal tax rates. On paper they are as high as 35% but the average effective rate is under 10%. I've finished my taxes and we're at 13%. According to the tax policy center the average effective individual federal tax rate (2007 is the most current year I could find quickly) was 9.3%. I bet is lower than that currently.
As for GE, yes they use every tool at their disposal and they were able to get a ton of green energy tax credits too.
I have no doubt that in my experience (with Chrysler in my case from the 90's), that at LEAST 75% of the problems and failures I had were intentional, purposeful, planned, and engineered that way. They were known issues that would occur as expected and designed by the "planned obsolescence" geniuses at the Big 3. The plan was to have the car completely fall apart between miles 36,000 aand 65,000. Between years 3 and 6. No part would be purchased that could last a long durable time.
Corporations pay 8% and I think my effective rate was something like 15%. Those are some lucky "people"...
Let's not go overboard in painting a picture that we are tax-free in this society. The last I knew our "tax-freedom" day was still sometime in May; we work to that point to pay all our taxes. I know most of us have social security and medicare taxes, state, maybe county, and even city income taxes, property taxes, gas taxes, electricity and cable taxes, plus sales taxes. And most of those taxes are levied on our after-federal-tax income.
Today I just had the pleasure of paying my annual tax to the city, a property tax on my 2005 and 2007 vehicles - to the tune of $195. That then allows me to go to the DMV to pay them $43.50 per vehicle to register the vehicles, which then allows me to get my vehicle inspections (about $60 total) there. Whether you call them "taxes or fees" they're all required and hurt, so it doesn't matter how they're defined.
To whomever mentioned that $5/gal gas is going to help the Volt ... well that is true. But what does that do to PU and SUV sales? How many Volts are made compared to Silverados? If gas were to some reason stay above $5/gal on average around the nation, we'll be looking at another round of auto bailouts.
I wonder if the gov't might actually collect more in revenues if they did go ahead and eliminate corporate taxes altogether, but have some kind of stipulation that the money be paid out in dividends? Any dividends I get are taxed at 15% if they're qualified, and 25% if they're not.
Well, 25% or even 15% is a lot more than 8%. Might be more profitable for the gov't to not take the taxes at the corporate level, but instead, get it from the investors who get the dividends? I'm sure I'm over-simplifying it a bit and missing something, though.
$5 as a nationwide average for regular will result in pains far greater than the end of 2008. It would unravel consumer spending, which is the backbone of the economy.
I have no problem with the idea of cutting corporate taxes, so long as it involves an ideal of shared sacrifice in personal tax policy, and is also coupled to an end of our policeman ideal which sucks down so much tax money to begin with.
But I'm still glad that the news shifted the conversation to how gas has doubled in price since Obama took office. I'll be watching to see if this run-up is planned by Obama. If he can bring us to $4.50 gas and then back to $3.25, he will be a hero, even though gas will still be up 85% from Jan 2009. Kinda like the 75% off sales when they mark the list price up 65% the night before.
Oh, and if you're only using 4 gallons per week, you might as well just drive that Malibu until it wears out. At that rate, to get better efficiency you'd be spending dollars to chase mere pennies!
However, I don't think you should use January 2009 as a baseline for fuel prices. I remember filling up for as low as $1.49 per gallon in December, but that was an artificial low. I paid $4+ per gallon back over the summer of 2008. Prior to that, I think the last time I saw gas for around $1.49 per gallon might have been early 2002. Maybe for a brief moment in late '02/early '03.
That tax rate, though, at debtclock.org takes into all of the secondary taxes and fees, plus payroll and social security taxes. The problem is that the vast minority of the money in the U.S. is held by those that are paying 92% of the actual bill. We're being squeezed like peasants while the rich make off with money.
Oh, and I want one question to be asked to our leaders in the upcoming debates:
"It is a fact at this point that large multinational corporations and small business are diametrically opposed to each other. Given that you can only chose one of the two, which side do you support in your policies?"
Nobody asks the hard questions. It's such a disappointment to hear about blather about who hates Obama the most, when that's not even a factor.
One thing to consider is corporations pay half of the payroll tax since they are responsible for making social security and medicare taxes equal to employees. Currently corporations contribute more to payroll taxes as they pay 6.2% into Social Security vs 4.2% for individuals.
So 7.65% needs to be added.
Yes. The problem with talking taxes is some are talking federal income tax only and even then only about the total effective rate rather than the marginal rate. And there's the problem of all those other taxes we all pay, from property to sales tax, auto taxes, gas tax, tax for no gas, utility taxes, etc.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Well SOMEBODY has to cover all of those union pensions and bailouts.
I'll let you know next week! I'll wager the PU sales tanks in the next 3 months driving up inventory for a nice incentive war.
Regards,
OW
At $5/gal., let's see who's REALLY number one. I think Volt-svagen sales could grow even stronger!
While most automobile assembly plants are idled in mid-December to allow workers an extended holiday break, production typically resumes in late December or early January. The Hamtramck, Michigan-built Chevrolet Volt took off the entire month of January as well as the first week of February, according to the Detroit News.
Just why production of the Volt was paused for such a long period is unknown. A federal investigation into the extended-range EV’s batteries resulted in a few structural changes to the vehicle which would have forced some minor retooling at the assembly plant. In addition, a new Low Emissions Packaged aimed at qualifying so-equipped Volts for California’s high occupancy vehicle lanes was confirmed yesterday, and it is possible that its implementation could have also been responsible for a few delays.
Chevrolet is also likely realigning Volt production with demand. Last year, the automaker missed its national sales target of 10,000 Volts sold by more than 2,000 units, and it has swept its 45,000-unit 2012 target under the table.
Regards,
OW
Bills that are up under Obama:
gas doubled since inaug day
electricity 11% per year
cable tv, phone, internet 8.5% per year
property taxes 20-30%
college 8% per year
medical expenses and premiums 8% per year
food 5.3% in last year
The warm winter should have really drove down prices.
Gas topped $4 per gallon for such a short time in the summer of 2008 that I never actually paid over $3.88 that year. I could go a couple weeks between purchases because I had 5 vehicles. By Nov, 2008, I was paying $2.10 to come home from Fla.
There are people out there that actually think that higher fuel efficiency will lower the cost of gas at the pump.
Sounds like VW makes way more profit per vehicle than GM. Where does that profit go? shareholders. Where did GM's profit go? The unrealized profit that is.....to customers and employees. What a terrible idea.
Just saw the new Beetle featured today on tv show. $24000 list price for the one they were testing on the show. Cruze is much less.
Looks profits will "Run Deep" into trouble in February!
Edmunds agrees with Kelley that GM will get it on the chin, and predicts even more hurt: Unadjusted for sales days, Edmunds foresees a 5 percent decrease in GM sales. Ford (+18%) and Chrysler (+32.5%) are doing much better on the Edmunds spreadsheet than predicted by Kelley.
If Edmunds’ predictions pan out, then GM will suffer a huge hit to their year-over-year market share, dropping almost three percentage points from February of last year. According to Edmunds, “GM’s year-over-year decline is a direct result of its aggressive incentives push that pumped up sales in early 2011.”
Pretty much all of that lost market share will be snapped-up by the cross-town rivals. Edmunds has Ford gaining 1.1 percent in share, and Chrysler a very respectable 1.9 percent.
You see, at the end of the day, "At GM, the results don't change, only the excuses."
Old GM is alive and well...minus the debt, of course, thanks to the bailout!
Regards,
OW
This runs counter to how many of those cars I still see being driven daily here in salty northeast OH.
I was told to design my part to last 150,000 miles under the most severe use. That was 1995 and GM was setting a new profit record that year.
They were already down to under 30% market share. Gas was about to drop from $1.25 to 89 cents over the next 3 years. They were planning for an army of commuters that wanted 21 mpg FWD pickup trucks.
Now we have 21and 22 mpg RWD pickup trucks and we have discovered 100 years worth of oil and gas in the US.
Remember when cars were worth nothing after just a couple of years?
Now we're driving cars that are over a decade old (on average).
RL Polk usually tells us the makes with the highest % of cars still on the road, wouldn't it be interesting to see the ones with the lowest? Wonder if they publish that...
http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/27/general-motors-last-tango-in-pa- ris/?source=cnn_bin
"GM said it has "talks continuously with all sorts of parties," while declining to acknowledge that specific alliance talks with Peugeot are taking place. In its last conference call for reporters and financial analysts, GM executives said the automaker remains committed to returning Europe to profitability and that the subsidiary isn't for sale. Meanwhile, Peugeot chairman Phillippe Varin estimates Europe's overcapacity at about 3 million vehicles. Peugeot and Opel together sell about that number, meaning that the industry might be better off if the two companies simply shut their doors, or if they found Chinese partners eager to try their hand abroad. Since those two options are unlikely, the two auto makers will first try to contradict a time-worn adage of Wall Street: two rocks tied together are unlikely to float."
Maybe starting Saab up again isn't such a bad idea! LOL.
So, essentially, they got rid of one Saab, still have another and are now going about acquiring another? Your tax dollars at work... :sick:
Can hardly wait for French flavored Sonics...
Jury is still out. Imagine if Akerson (and Jeremy Anwyl) got his wish to add $1.00/gallon gas tax? :sick:
Where do these guys live? In electric La-La Land?? :lemon:
Now that they got rid of Slob, they want to merge with Pew-jot? Ridiculous!
Regards,
OW
-Rocky
I have heard European guys pronounce it as Pooh-jho. Same guys say Rhen-Oh for Renault.
Nissan got Carlos "le cost cutter" Ghosn's leadership out of the Renault deal. First thing he did was pull them out of California and relocate them to an area with a much lower cost of living (TN).
GM won't get anything.
Didn't they get enough already? JK!
Regards,
OW
GM is still offering an average of $3,000 in incentives per vehicle sold.
These include cash back rebates as high as $4,500 on several models including the Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra, Cadillac Escalade, Chevrolet Impala, and Buick Lucerne.
GM's full-size pickup trucks have been slow-sellers recently, so they're offering cash back rebates as high as $6,000 on the leftover Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra.
On the financing side, GM is offering 0% to 3.9% financing on nearly every model.
There are also some incredible hidden dealer incentives on some leftover GM vehicles, such as $10,000 for the leftover 2011 Cadillac DTS and STS models, and up to $8,000 on the 2010 Cadillac Escalade.
Analysts are expecting an incentives war to heat up during the first quarter of 2012 and we're expecting GM to be a part of that.
GM has been selling cars at a brisk pace recently, with the Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain being the hottest sellers.
Deals on those particular vehicles will be hard to come by this January since demand is still high.
However, GM has cut back production on the Chevrolet Cruze after inventory started piling up at dealerships - be on the lookout for good deals on this compact vehicle.
Regards,
OW
GM is by far the most generous American maker when it comes to incentives. In January 2012, GM’s Total Cost of Incentives (as calculated by Edmunds) was $3,171 per unit. Ford spent $2,788, Chrysler $2,447. The industry average stood at $2,141. In January 2012, only BMW put ($28) more on the hood of its much pricier cars than GM. GM out-spent Mercedes Benz which had been in a bitter fight with BMW for the luxury sales crown last year, and spent $3,107 in January.
Regards,
OW
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/ed-welburn-finds-a-fan-in-president-obama/
He went to the show and the White House even told car makers he was coming, but he totally dissed the imports. Apparently Mercedes-Benz went through quite an effort to get a hydrogen car here and Obama didn't even visit the lower level where they were located.
Ouch.
The two companies would share engineering and development costs and GM, which filed for bankruptcy during the economic downturn, would provide cash to help Peugeot slash its debt by selling assets, Dow Jones reported.
Regards,
OW