By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I remember my dad's '92 Crown Vic would just blow it away. Pretty sad considering that was a 9 second 0-60 car.
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Chevrolet/1977_Chevrolet/1977%20Chevrol- - et.html
Pontiac offered buckets and console in the Bonneville up through '81, but I've only ever seen '79's with it, and probably only one or two of those. It reminds me of the Grand Prix models of the sixties, and I consider it a nicer car than what a '79-81 Grand Prix actually was.
http://www.mclellansautomotive.com/photos/B28107-2.jpg
I like the rear window of those coupes, but I remember joking that if you were inside the car and looking at somebody who walked behind the car, the person looked like a Picasso painting right around the wire bends!
A lot of degradation, I think, is due to a change in application/installation methodology rather than a change in the actual materials themselves. Example: ceramic tile is the same, but I can't remember when I have seen it installed over a Masonry/expanded metal lath substrate... Tiles are nowadays just glued directly to, if you're fortunate, water resistant Sheetrock and then grouted. Different expansion and contraction characteristics guarantee cracked grout joints in that application.
Carpet, which used to be all wool, is now synthetic, and much easier to keep clean and last much longer. Countertop materials are far better than the old laminated plastics, too.
Plumbing has generally moved to Plastics from galvanized iron and copper, but that's pretty much a wash, since each has it's advantages and disadvantages. PVC drainpipe is probably better that the old cast-iron, oakum and lead-joint drainpipe, and certainly easier to repair.
Appliances certainly offer more options and functionality, but along with that comes the increased opportunity to malfunction. I remember my mom getting her first washing machine... It had no spin cycle, but a set of motor-driven rollers you manually shoved the wet clothes into to wring out the water. That machine would probably still be useable today if I had kept it throughout the years, but who would want to use it today?
Boy, thinking about that old washer brought back memories...
I'm surprised it's that old of an age...
That's Buick country...
For years I've been getting behind blue hairs in their Camry (Avalon) trying to see how to drive and goin' slow. Pull out in front of you.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Well based upon the understanding of other posts on this forum, it seems that numerical sales of units are recorded at the retail buyer level, but sales at the accounting level are recorded as revenue upon shipment and payment by dealers. If you're an accountant then you'll understand that much better than me.
So for data like market share, etc. - uses retail sales. For revenue reports which are measured by value of shipments to dealers, if you overproduced for a couple of months and stuffed the channels without a corresponding increase in retail sales, it appears that the numbers would reflect the bloating of inventory and might be inflated -- but you couldn't keep that up, and there would be a compensatory decrease in sales when production ramped down to compensate for the excess inventory.
I don't believe I ever said anything about Chinese made products from GM sold in North America. Although I do believe that GM is the only company that's ever sold vehicles in North America with Chinese-made engines in them.
My post also mentioned (at least for me) not wanting to support US owned companies just because of their ownership, if the executive management has shown themselves to be inept and incompetent while sucking millions of dollars off a company. I'd rather support companies (even foreign-owned) which employ US citizens and make excellent products. What is your thought on that?
Too bad - a unique vehicle. Isn't the Avalanche one of the GMs that is recommended by CU?
To me this can be an artificial number. It would be inflated by bloated inefficient companies, even if the large numbers are unsustainable. So I would rephrase it as:
"Which of these companies has the largest US employment, in a profitable and sustainable configuration?"
And other product reviews from WSJ, CU, etc. - so many biased reviewers out there!
Realistically, a review is only an opinion. For each of us, we should get what makes us happy. Diversity is a good thing.
That kind of stuff has been hashed over and over here in this discussion:
Buying American Cars: What Does It Mean?
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Usually when there are big inventories of cars on a company's dealers' lots, it's because certain models aren't selling all that well, as opposed to dumping for the sake of some phantom revenue number people are talking about.
I don't like wall to wall carpet so I pulled the stuff up here. It was in good shape so I laid it out in the basement. It's 100% wool, came from Sears and the owner marked the installation year on the label on the back. 1952. :shades:
Went to a play last summer - solo performer and her main prop was an old wringer washer. One of those came with my old house too, but the wringers are all warped. Elsewhere I've mentioned the '52 Philco freezer left behind that does work. Even have the owner's manual.
I count myself lucky that the sellers didn't leave a '59 Impala in the garage though. Been there, done that.
http://autos.aol.com/photos/best-cars-for-the-money-2/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing9- %7Cdl8%7Csec3_lnk1%26pLid%3D151871
Other posters have said that the sales (in $$) count on the manufacturer's books when the vehicles are shipped to the dealers.
I guess the real question is whether the cars shipped to dealers are on consignment for the manufacturer, or whether the dealers actually "purchase" the vehicles in order to get them on their lots.
Surely somebody must know the answer to this?
"On the website of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a group that touts environmental solutions, one Volt owner, Jeff, noted that he has used just 23 gallons of gas in 13 months since purchasing his Volt. In that time, he's driven 13,500 miles – about 566 miles per gallon."
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Back in 1999, there was a local guy that had a white '79 Bonneville sedan with a blue vinyl roof and blue vinyl interior. One night, while delivering pizzas, I saw the guy outside, and stopped off to ask about it. He said that he was actually getting rid of it, donating it to charity. I asked if I could come back on one of my days off and check it out, and he said sure, but not to expect too much!
Turns out this one had a 350, but it was a Buick 350. I've heard rumors that you could still get a 400 or 403 that year, but according to the EPA's website and other sources, the Buick 350 was the best you could do. In California, it was replaced with an Olds 350.
Anyway, just going from a seat-of-my pants feel, I'd say that '79 Bonneville 350 was about as fas as my grandmother's '85 LeSabre, which had an Olds 307. The Bonneville would've had a bit more hp (155 or 170, according to my old car book versus 140 for the LeSabre) and I'm sure a bit more torque, but was also a bit heavier, and most likely had the THM350 transmission instead of the THM200-R4 that my grandmother's had. I think first gear in the THM200 series was quicker than in the THM350, and the axle ratio was definitely quicker. The '85 had a 2.73:1 while the '79 probably had a loafy 2.41:1.
I didn't have my Intrepid yet, and at the time my daily driver was an '89 Gran Fury ex copcar. That '79 was definitely a dog compared to it! This '79 was also in need of some work. The headliner had been taken down and glued back up in sections, and the tires were bald. The interior was a bit trashy in general, as this guy said he tended to use it to haul bags of topsoil and such! It was also a base level car, with no power accessories, and had the same cheap wheelcovers with the little holes in them that Sherriff Justice had on his '77 LeMans. So, I passed on it, and thanked the guy for letting me check it out.
FWIW, I hadn't realized this, but Pontiac actually dropped their own 350 after 1977! So in '78 if you bought a full-size Pontiac with the 350, it used a Buick unit in the big cars (Olds in Ca), or a Chevy in the Firebird. The LeMans/Grand Prix only offered a 301 or 305 by that time, but you could still get a Chevy 350 in a Phoenix...but only in California! I'm pulling this stuff from the EPA's website, so hopefully it's accurate...
I do like the bucket seat/center console that the Bonneville coupe offered, but I think I'd rather have a '77-78, when you could still get a 400 (403 in CA)
1980 was a bit of an odd year for the Catalina/Bonneville, when it came to engines. Normally, CA engines were considered a step down, because of the smog regulations. However, that year if you bought a Catalina/Bonneville in CA, the V-8 options were a Chevy 305-4bbl or Olds 350-4bbl. The rest of the country was stuck with the sucky Pontiac 265-2bbl or the 301-4bbl. Supposedly, the 265 wasn't too bad from a durability standpoint, as it simply wasn't strong enough to hurt itself! But the 301's tended to be troulblesome. I've heard from Pontiac guys at car shows that a 301 can be okay, if you don't stomp on it too much and if you keep up on oil changes (don't let it run low, go too long between changes, etc). And, I'm presuming, don't let it overheat!
It has to do with "dealer floor plan" financing. Ally/GMAC finances the dealer inventory at delivery (to the dealer).
I found this to shed some light and I'm sure all auto companies are guilty of "channel stuffing", although this might touch the "GM Faithful" nerve.
Anyhow, it underscores the "sale to customers", or unit sales, is secondary to GM's actual sales to dealers which are reported in all auto manufacturers financial statements.
The story gets more muddled. The Chevy Volt has now halted production due to channel stuffing, in which dealers are forced to take on more inventory than they can sell. This allows the parent company, GM, to claim credit for the sale. The sale to the eventual end consumer is secondary. GM has been running supply on certain vehicles like their light truck line at over 120 days. The norm is considered 60 days. GM is under pressure to show the sales growth so they can get the stock price up to allow the final sale of the government’s share of the IPO stock. The Volt has been a classic bait and switch in that consumers are drawn in under the pretense of buying the heavily subsidized Volt and then redirected into a model like the Cruze which dealers have on hand and are much more profitable.
Channel stuffing is not new, nor unique to GM. What is new and you’re not hearing about in the press is what is called dealer floor plan (DFP) financing under TARP. DFP is financing extended to auto dealers under the manufacturers credit arm in order to allow the dealer have a large inventory on-hand. The dealers could never afford the overhead cost of having to pay for the cars on their lots before they sell them to the consumer. What happens is the car is built and delivered allowing the manufacturer to claim the sale. The credit arm of the manufacturer pays for the car and then issues a loan to the dealer to allow them to keep the car on their lot until sold with a monthly interest charge per vehicle. The average dealer loan is $5 million dollars and the DFP industry is valued at $100 billion.
Why is the DFP plan under TARP different? Because what is normally an expense to dealers via the interest charged per car on their lot has now become a money maker. The end result is taxpayer financed channel stuffing. You are picking up the tab for dealers to have more inventory than they can sell.
But under this scenario, the sales to the dealers ARE UNIT SALES and GM reported sales!!! I stand corrected!!
Don't shoot the messenger!
Regards,
OW
Sense there's no "source" listed or linked for the above statement, it can't have much, if any, credibility.
Then how did Volt sell 2286 in March? The factory has been closed and the channels were _supposedly_ already "stuffed" with fake sales.
I don't see folks debating over in toyota on the mend about how their sales are determined?
Why does it continue to be a distraction in this forum. We've been over it many times. It's repetitive and boring. A new viewer coming in seeing this useless debate would switch channels to another forum very fast.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
No comments here on AOL this week calling the '12 Malibu the best buy of all cars out there now. In fact, the top three or four on their list were all GM products. "Best buy" = value and is not a bad thing, but I'm sure someone here will make it out to be. I'd expect no less. Just like buying from the plant down the road isn't a positive thing
I was waiting for that! I posted way back the Malibu was a great car and agree its tops on value.
But, after all it is America On Line, isn't it.
Regards,
OW
Until March, sales of the Chevrolet Volt were disappointing. The company sold 7,671 Volts last year, below its goal of 10,000. GM had 6,319 Volts in its inventory at the end of February, enough to supply dealers for 154 days, according to Ward’s AutoInfoBank. A 60-day supply is considered optimal to keep a good selection of cars on dealer lots.
GM Adding Week to Volt Plant’s Normal Summer Break
That's how.
Regards,
OW
Because its a non-issue. Point data seldom means much in business. Time and trend is more important. As I tried to say earlier, whether one company recognized sale at time to dealer and another at time of consumer sale, it isn't going to make sa lot of difference over time. Kind of like LIFO and FIFO. Might matter during a shorter period, but not long term.
I saw a Five-Hundred on the Chevy dealer's used car lot this a.m. I think those cars were underrated. The looks were somewhat a blend of American and Euro, I think, I like the instrument panel, and they had a ton of room inside.
So, what kind of power plants served Jeff? Any with coal? What amount of coal was mined, transported and burned in power plant to serve his Volt's electricity hunger?
My brother has a working model old-style Kelvinator fridge with the compressed mounted on top of the unit.
Still, you don't see many of them around.
Wool carpet was known for long life as long as it was properly cared for, just like old suits made of mohair. Pet stains (urine) were all but impossible to remove from wool carpets.
A childhood friend's dad has tons of old working appliance type items, from wax-cone style phonographs to slot machines, and everything in between. As a child, I marveled at all the old pinball machines he had that still worked perfectly. He even had music juke-box "things" ... I don't know what they were called, that played music by playing the actual instruments, something like a player piano. Pop in a quarter and hear some classical music. IIRC, they ran off a vacuum system, which he replaced with a more modern style canister vacuum.
Ungainly, awkward, but still way, way better then GM styling experiment, Aztek.
I see it a bit differently, though.
The electricity could also come from hydro or solar/wind sources.
The most important thing to me is that the Volt allows mobility in relative comfort on a greatly reduced consumption of a fuel that, while is easily transportable (gasoline), is also becoming increasingly more diffuse to produce.
No energy is free... Even solar requires the mining of certain materials, which adds cost.
Even hydrogen, the most abundant element, doesn't come without a cost.
I do think electrics make sense as long as they don't add load to the power grid at peak times. If we all go electric and insist on charging our Volts/Leafs from 9-5 then they don't make much sense at all.
#1 - News that Chevy Volt drivers could use California’s HOV lanes, an attractive leasing option in California.
#2 - Gas prices keep rising.
#3 - Chevy Sales grew 16.3% (while Cadillac sales were down 13.4% and Buick was down 16.3% , which was the worst among major brands operating normally in the US). Chevy has the highest number of efficient vehicles in GM. More volume in Chevy translates to higher Volt sales and the rebates help quite a bit.
Regards,
OW
Regards,
OW
I'm into textiles so I felt (ahem) that I had to stick up for the wool stuff.
I had a pinball machine back in the 70s and would enjoy another one. Got a kick out of playing a pinball game on my wife's iPad (can bump and tilt it), but I had to quit after my thumb started acting up after about 40 hours.
Like a lot of old cars, lots of that old stuff still works, but most is better left to the museum corner. Tail lights and starters were once innovations, but what's GM got coming around the corner?
Ungainly, awkward, but still way, way better then GM styling experiment, Aztek.
That was then. This is now. Go Mexico!
Lots of value at Wal-Mart, too. Yet people complain about them.
So is GM the Wal-Mart of auto manufacturers?
That Acura is hideous. I'm reminded of "The Joker" on Batman every time I see one. Seriously.
If large amount of Volts being bought for use in CA, what happens to demand on electric power systems there? Had heard in recent years that CA was, maybe still is, derelict in adding more plants and capacity. Maybe lots of Volts there will bring brownouts.
Wonder if any progress in capturing energy in tides.
But, new Impala handles the front grill better, seems like it belongs with the rest of the car, integrates it into the whole car. Does a better job than the Fusion.
But, Impala has that funny looking curve line from middle of rear door to taillight. Not sure about that.