It was for emphasis that the OP was getting old. When you start to wax nostalgic for the good old days - you're old.
My FIL is 84 this year and likes to harken back to those days. But then he realizes that he made so little money compared to today that he snaps out of it. It usually happens when he is at the lumber yard with me as he was a contractor.
I am sure the lumber market is real sticker shock. Heck, I am in my mid 30s, I remember buying a candy bar for 30/35 cents. Now they are about a dollar in most stores.
Cars vs incomes are pretty high nowadays too, but you do get a lot more for that money, even with GM cars :shades:
My FIL is 84 this year and likes to harken back to those days. But then he realizes that he made so little money compared to today that he snaps out of it. It usually happens when he is at the lumber yard with me as he was a contractor.
I wonder if, on average, people's take-home pay was higher, as a percentage of their gross income, in the old days? Maybe that made them feel "richer", if they kept a higher percentage of their earnings.
Heck, even in my time, I've seen what's happened with health insurance. When I first got hired full-time in 1994, my policy was $10 per week. Today, it's $30.28 per week. It would have been about $40-45, but last open season, I opted for a slightly cheaper policy.
And, if I want to retire anytime soon, I have no choice but to contribute to my 401k. In contrast, my grandparents probably couldn't spell 401k! :P They all got pensions. Same with my Mom, Dad, and stepdad. So, that's money coming out of my paycheck that they never had to deal with, although I know Mom did contribute to her gov't thrift savings plan. And, while she had to contribute to her gov't pension, something like 7% I think, she didn't have to contribute to social security.
As for Social security, back in the old days, wasn't the amount you had to contribute a bit smaller? I know we're only contributing 4.2% for 2011-2012, temporarily, and I'm sure it'll go back to 6.2% soon. But, in the past, I think the amount was lower than 6.2%.
I know my grandparents, as well as my parents, carry on about how expensive things are compared to the "good old days". Some of it might just be the old "rose tinted glasses" thing. Heck, I find myself doing it sometimes! For instance, in videogames, I've been hearing for years now, people complaining about these $60-70-80 video games and how that's just too much. And then, I remember for my birthday in 1982, Mom bought me an Intellivision, which she got for around $229 on sale. Games for it were around $30-35, and by that time, prices were coming down! I remember reading that one of the games, Chess, originally cost about 50 bucks! The reason was that the standard ROM chip they used for the cartridges wasn't big enough, so they had to add another 256 bytes to it for the chess game!
I also remember as a kid, saving up and buying a VCR in 1984, which cost around $379+ tax. And my 19" Toshiba color tv, from earlier that year, which was also around $400.
And, to keep it somewhat automotive-related, there was my grandparents' 1982 Malibu Classic Estate wagon, which was $11,000 out the door brand-new. With a vinyl interior, weak 110 hp 229 V-6, an ECU that fried itself twice in 2 1/2 years, and oh, let's not forget the non roll-down windows in the back doors! But, it was a beautiful shade of midnight blue, with fake woodgrain on the sides, and a stand-up hood ornament...so at least we looked classy as that car bucked and sputtered and couldn't get out of its own way, and fried in the back seat because we didn't have a roll-down window on those hot days where Granddad was too cheap to turn on the a/c! :P
I wonder if, on average, people's take-home pay was higher, as a percentage of their gross income, in the old days? Maybe that made them feel "richer", if they kept a higher percentage of their earnings.
IMHO, they felt richer than today because they had simpler lives. They were happy with a 3 BR ranch or cape without granite counters and a spa bath. They went on simple vacations to the shore or mountains. They didn't commute 60 miles a day.
Well, I'm not THAT old... Only 57. In the 70's, before the Iranian revolution, I remember buying gas in the 25-30 cent range, and is wasn't unusual to see gas wars. And, as I said, that was about the same price as a loaf of bread.
Granted, wages weren't anything like today, either. I remember a college instructor saying to gauge the price of gas by what a gallon of milk and a gallon of laundry bleach costs. By his gauge, gas isn't overpriced...
I think the big difference back then, as compared to today, was that, then, there were limited consumer items available for people to but if they wanted to "keep up with the Jonses"... House, boat, and a car.
Since then, there's been an explosion of consumer items, tons of electronics, etc. and, they all cost $$$.
Also, mass marketing has changed our expectations on what we "should" have .vs. what we thought back then, which was based far more on understanding what we really needed. I would say in the 60-mid-70's, at least in the South, most folks thought a single TV in a house was practical. Finding a house with a single TV nowadays is difficult, I would imagine.
Like air conditioning, no one ever missed it until they had had it for a while...
Technology tends to get cheaper over time, the initial development costs are recovered, and larger scale production brings down average prices. Even 10 years ago, you'd only find nav in cars costing 40K+++, 25 years ago ABS and airbags were exotic. Now the latter are expected in everything, and the former can be had in cheaper cars too.
Healthcare, food, and education have exploded in price compared to wage gains, that gets people pining for the good old days. I suspect overall taxes aren't any better either, unless you are a "high earner" who must be coddled.
We were just discussing the TV issue last night - we both grew up in households (born in the 60's) with one TV and didn't think anything about it. That's what everyone in the neighborhood had.
An additional factor that contributes to complaints about gas prices is probably the distance that many people travel for fun, and travel for work. I remember my dad travelling 7 miles one-way to work, and we thought he worked way out in the sticks. When I lived in St. Louis a few years ago, my one-way commute was 22 miles (from a suburb to the main city). The suburb I lived in didn't even exist 20 years ago, and neither did many other 'burbs that were that far out, so I suspect the average commute distance & time, especially around larger cities, has increased.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name. 2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h) Review your vehicle
Technology tends to get cheaper over time, the initial development costs are recovered, and larger scale production brings down average prices
Look at original IBM PC in 1982. It was priced at $3,000 and relatively crude by today's computer standards. What would $3K 1982 dollars be in 2012 dollars?
No question that today's cars in terms of economy, safety, power, features, handling, etc are a better bargain than cars of 30, 40 years ago. Look at the offerings of GM, such as Vega or Citation of years ago compared to the Cruze or Malibu of today.
The suburb I lived in didn't even exist 20 years ago, and neither did many other 'burbs that were that far out, so I suspect the average commute distance & time, especially around larger cities, has increased.
A couple different jobs I had a while back were 50-55 miles one way. Pay was good and distance was mostly on Interstate roads, so no concern. Flex time let me avoid most rush hour traffic.
Heck, I CLEARLY remember buying a candy bar for 15 cents in the mid-1970s. Some off-brand bar might even be 10 cents. A twelve-ounce soda was 20 cents. A box of Cracker Jack was 15 cents and you'd get a decent prize, not the bogus stuff that passes for a prize nowadays. A Tastykake pie was 25 cents. Heck, if a kid had a dollar, he could go on an all-day candy binge!
A pack of cigarettes was 45 cents and they'd sell 'em to an eight year-old kid! I remember my Mom or Dad sending me to the store with a 50-cent piece to buy a pack of Tareytons or Vantage and coming home with a nickle change. Yesterday, I saw a guy who was clearly over 21 get carded by the clerk for cigarettes at a convenience store.
Heck, I live in a modest Airlite home like most people in NE Philly, can walk to work if I wish, and have never been any place more exotic than Canada. Still, I feel poor.
The factory where my Dad worked was half a block down the street. My brother and I would often wait for him near the factory steps when work let out. You'd see about two hundred guys walking up the street to their homes when work let out and similar amount going toward the factory for the second shift. Alas, this plant is now closed after having been there for over 50 years. Thanks, NAFTA!!! :mad:
I would've never looked at a Citation or Vega back in the day and I seriously doubt I'd buy a Cruze or Malibu today. Where is the Caprice Classic I would most definitely buy and did buy back in the day? Oh, the smaller cars are infinitely better than they were back then, but where is the nice full-size car I would've bought then and most definitely would now if one existed?
Look at original IBM PC in 1982. It was priced at $3,000 and relatively crude by today's computer standards. What would $3K 1982 dollars be in 2012 dollars?
According to my handy dandy inflation calculator, $3K in 1982 is equivalent to about $7200 today.
When I was a kid, my Dad used to commute 27 miles each way and I thought it was so far away. He would leave at 6 AM and pick up two other guys in the city we lived in for the ride out to the burbs.
I remember running into my high school girlfriend's father recently who worked about 1.5 miles from his house his entire working life. He couldn't believe that I commuted 40 miles a day round trip and thought nothing of it.
General Motors Co. (NYSE: GM) today reported May sales of 245,256 vehicles in the United States, up 11 percent year over year and the highest monthly total since August 2009 when dealers delivered 246,479 units
I live in a little apartment in an expensive neighborhood, close to work, I am frugal (and single) so I can travel now and then and indulge a hobby or two, and I feel fortunate.
Just keeping things factual, but the heading says "Reliability", but the text of the article says, "Customer Satisfaction". Also, the article mentions "British motorists" (which to me doesn't mean the same thing as 'owners of a Jaguar', for example), which makes me believe this is a survey of British car owners.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
I might add, what model of Chevrolet is shown in the photo? Not one that is sold in the U.S. That, plus the mention of "old Daewoo-based models", none of which 2012 Chevrolets sold in the U.S. are, again makes me think this has nothing to do with 2012 Chevrolets sold in the U.S., although that is most-certainly the gist of your post.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
My Dad had a Stationary-Luncheonette in the '60's. When he opened in '62, butts were 22cents/pack, a 12-oz. fountain soda was 5 cents and a candy bar the size of a brick was 6 cents.
The GM cars were the best and no hint of a ToyHonHyunKia! The rest is history! :sick:
I got a lot of nickel Baby Ruths and six cent Cokes with the money I made from collecting glass Coke bottles at the city park across the street. Would get two cents each for them. When I'd get a crate or more full, my dad would load them up in his '53 General Motors' made Buick and we'd head to the store to cash them in.
Now I get a dime each for Coke cans and bottles. :shades:
Were you led to believe from the OP's post that this had to do with Chevrolets sold in North America? I sure was. Wrong. But then, this was the same guy who posted about a 'new' Corvette recall that was in actuality, from three years prior.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
The factory where my Dad worked was half a block down the street. My brother and I would often wait for him near the factory steps when work let out. You'd see about two hundred guys walking up the street to their homes when work let out and similar amount going toward the factory for the second shift. Alas, this plant is now closed after having been there for over 50 years. Thanks, NAFTA!!!
My wonderful little hometown was negatively affected by NAFTA, too...Greenville Steel Car Co. built railcars there for 80 years, until one year after NAFTA when the parent company moved them to Mexico...where their first orders were so screwed up they had to be rebuilt for the customers.
There is a resurgence in the townsfolk to do something new there, but it's hard without the kind of employers that used to be there...the ones that paid a decent wage.
I don't deny someone their success at all..but at some point reward for success becomes replaced with unmitigated greed, sadly. How any one person can be worth in the millions at a job is a complete mystery to me...especially when they make that much and then leave the company in ruins.
My Dad worked at the Post Office (recently rated 'the most beautiful post office in the U.S.'--not bad for 5,900 people--by a post office fanatic who has visited 1,300 post offices and was featured on NPR last year), and came home for lunch every single day. My grandfather was foreman of pickling at Greenville's Chicago Bridge and Iron plant and walked to work.
No one can tell me that things, overall, in the big picture, are better today than then. I make an excellent living but I sure long for those days in the big scheme of things.
BTW, I remember when single candy bars went from a nickel to a dime, and when Hostess cakes (Twinkies, cupcakes, etc.) went from 12 cents to 13 cents. I was born in 1958.
I sure knew more folks who could, and would, buy a new car every three or four years then, not because they needed one, but because they wanted one, than do now. Because new cars were priced reasonably, generally, and cars tended to hold their original value better than today.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
Nah, I've never seen anything like that in person here in Maryland. The most "furrin" Chevy I've seen in recent times is a Chevy Epica, which I think was an update of the old Daewoo Leganza. Or maybe the Suzuki Verona (which itself I think was based on the Leganza?).
I tried googling pics of UK Chevies though, and it looks like a model called the Chevrolet Orlando.
The Orlando is available here in Canada, haven't heard anything bad about it. It is a competitor to the Mazda 5. I've seen a couple and except for the slightly awkward styling ( especially at the back ) it is a preety good alternative as far ad I can tell ( and the reviews were pretty good as I can recall). It is built on the same platform as the Cruize so is decent to drive. I think this size of people carrier sells better up here, and GM decided not to bring it to the states due to the apparently small market for this type of cat ( they decided after the Kia Rhondo failed I believe, I think it is still available up here, or was for a few years after it disappeared from your market anyway). In any case it is possible you will see one at some point.
Cigarettes are like $8 a pack around here anymore. Needless to say, I don't smoke! The .gov thinks if it taxes cigarettes enough, people will quit smoking.
Candy bars range from $1.00 to $1.50.
A can of Coke = $1.25.
I guess Big Brother taxes these items well beyond inflation for our own good!
The cheapest I can get cigs in Maryland is around $6.45 per pack. So, whenever I go to PA or VA, where they're cheaper, I always make sure to pick some up. About a month ago, I found some in Etterberg, PA, for around $5.10 per pack.
I'd imagine that it's mainly taxes that drove up cigarette prices, but they also have a lot more chemicals and such in them today, that probably makes 'em more expensive to produce. Then, there's probably lawsuit funds and such that drive up the prices.
As for sodas, sometimes I'll find them on sale at the local Giant, Three 12 packs for $11. That comes out to about 31 cents per 12-oz can. Get 'em at BJ's, Costco, etc, and they're even cheaper. But that's at the grocery store, not at a restaurant/drugstore/whatever.
I can't even remember the last time I bought a candy bar. I remember in the early 80's, you could get a 6-pack of Hershey bars for around $1.25-$1.50.
I think GE is probably buying up the Volt production to make POTUS look good..Sad day when "Golf carts" rule the industry..GM is discounting heavy to look good, very little debt on the books after screwing over the public on the bankruptcy deal..
In Motor Trend issue, May 2012, a Buick Regal GS was awarded 8th place out of 8 cars tested..$38,720 4 cyl, turbo, acceleration like a turtle, and drank premium fuel. Sad company..
Just a few weeks after General Motors curbed production of Volts, Chevrolet dealers in California are scrambling to get the extended-range electric cars on their lots as sales surge because of special state incentives for electric vehicles and West Coast gas still above $4 a gallon.
"I've had more people talk to me in the last couple months about the Volt than I have in the last year," said Bill Cumming, general manager of Ron Baker Chevrolet in National City, Calif., a San Diego suburb. "Currently, I have none in stock."
U.S. sales of the Volt remain mediocre at best -- just 1,680 in May. But the car is gaining momentum in California, where hybrid and electric car owners are allowed to use carpool lanes no matter how many people are in the car.
Good thing that's a big market (at least while the incentives last, and access to HOV lanes, not to mention Cali gas prices that still average above $4 a gallon).
What were the other seven cars? A Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, McLaren, Bugatti, Mercedes AMG, and BMW M5?
Yeah, the average driver is going to think 0-60 in 6.7 is slow. Next time I'm blasting down North Broad Street at 140 mph in heavy city traffic, doing the slalom on Roosevelt Boulevard, or taking on the hairpin turns on the Schuylkill Expressway, I'll tell you what a lousy car the Regal is.
Well, here's the article. Main reasons the Regal finished last were because, while it had the most hp of any car in that group, it wasn't the fastest. But, it wasn't the slowest, either. FWIW, they got 0-60 in 6.2 seconds. A couple cars in that test were more like 7.2 and 7.5 seconds.
It was also the heaviest car in the group, heavier even than the AWD Audi A4. It was also the thirstiest. Oh, and the MT testers didn't like some of the chrome inserts and lack of a backup camera. Even though the car stickered at $38+K, they still called it a fairly good value.
Is MT or Car and Driver that always seems to get the best 0-60? They must abuse the car pretty good!
Well here is a surprise, a BMW wins a comparo. How is even fair to compare an upscale car that needs to check every option box to hit near 40K with upper 40-50K cars. Oh, and 50K for a 328? Really? I thought the 335 would hit 50, but not the 28.
It was also the heaviest car in the group IMHO that is something that Buick needs to work on. My LaCrosse is a bit of a porker, weighing more than some full size cars from years past.
Half the cars in that test shouldn't have even been there...
328i, Infiniti G37, C-class...
Buick's mission for the Regal is cloudy to say the least. Obesity, a lackluster engine lineup, and lack of AWD partners well with their next-to-nil marketing efforts... :sick:
GM has completely dropped the ball with this model and failed to give their so called "Sport Sedan" the reflexes and performance it needs to go up against the class stalwarts. Although, part of the blame should be put on the magazines for making such an absurd comparison, GM wants to claim the Regal as a valid alternative, then they are going to have to work harder to bring their entry up to snuff.
But part of me also believes if they did so, they would risk crowding own their cohorts over at Cadillac who are trying to release their own 3-series wannabe. Which is probably why the Regal has been nutured so much from it's Opel counterpart...
Oh ya, and meanwhile, they have created a model that doesn't fit the blue hair image that Buick has built... Stick to building cars for cruising the piggly wiggly GM, Buick's so called "rich" performance history is just that...
History.
IMO, Buick trying to recapture the glory days of the GNX is only going to further damage whatever steps Cadillac is trying to take to claim its own spot in the luxury performance arena...
BTW, what do you guys care anyways? It's an import... :P
I don't get the Regal either. It is not a premium car in the home market, why would it be here? Previous attempts at making a normal European car a premium car here (Merkur and Catera) failed, I can't see how this will be different. In Germany, a Regal (Opel Insignia) falls in the market kind of where an Impala does here. It does not compete with the premium labels.
Well the Regal was suppoed to be the next Saturn Aura but due to BK, Saturn got the boot so I'm thinking that plans were too far along to cancel bringing it over to the states so they just looked at their remaining brands and said "Well boyz, what do you think about trying it out as a Buick?"
And why not I guess. Pontiac was killed off, Saturn was toast and Cadillac surely doesn't need another front drive car nor would I bet they'd risk a case of "Catera 2.0"...
Plus, outside of the Lambda rebadge, there isn't a Buick in the stable that can't trace it's roots to Germany (Or Korea, or China...) so the Regal is a natural fit.
I think it's a decent car stuck in an odd position. Would have made a much better Pontiac or Saturn. I rented a standard one (but still well equipped - leather roof etc) and although it had a few drawbacks, it was a nice car - seeing them blown out for like 22K at the end of the year seems like good value.
I agree, in tat it seemed a bit like comparing your high school homecoming queen to a Victoria Secret runway model. They are both female, young, etc... , but in different classes.
On the 50K+ 328, the car comes available with a lot of features not seen on many cars in its category, such as heads-up display.
A very nice 328 can be had for much less that $50K.
Comments
My FIL is 84 this year and likes to harken back to those days. But then he realizes that he made so little money compared to today that he snaps out of it. It usually happens when he is at the lumber yard with me as he was a contractor.
Cars vs incomes are pretty high nowadays too, but you do get a lot more for that money, even with GM cars :shades:
I wonder if, on average, people's take-home pay was higher, as a percentage of their gross income, in the old days? Maybe that made them feel "richer", if they kept a higher percentage of their earnings.
Heck, even in my time, I've seen what's happened with health insurance. When I first got hired full-time in 1994, my policy was $10 per week. Today, it's $30.28 per week. It would have been about $40-45, but last open season, I opted for a slightly cheaper policy.
And, if I want to retire anytime soon, I have no choice but to contribute to my 401k. In contrast, my grandparents probably couldn't spell 401k! :P They all got pensions. Same with my Mom, Dad, and stepdad. So, that's money coming out of my paycheck that they never had to deal with, although I know Mom did contribute to her gov't thrift savings plan. And, while she had to contribute to her gov't pension, something like 7% I think, she didn't have to contribute to social security.
As for Social security, back in the old days, wasn't the amount you had to contribute a bit smaller? I know we're only contributing 4.2% for 2011-2012, temporarily, and I'm sure it'll go back to 6.2% soon. But, in the past, I think the amount was lower than 6.2%.
I know my grandparents, as well as my parents, carry on about how expensive things are compared to the "good old days". Some of it might just be the old "rose tinted glasses" thing. Heck, I find myself doing it sometimes! For instance, in videogames, I've been hearing for years now, people complaining about these $60-70-80 video games and how that's just too much. And then, I remember for my birthday in 1982, Mom bought me an Intellivision, which she got for around $229 on sale. Games for it were around $30-35, and by that time, prices were coming down! I remember reading that one of the games, Chess, originally cost about 50 bucks! The reason was that the standard ROM chip they used for the cartridges wasn't big enough, so they had to add another 256 bytes to it for the chess game!
I also remember as a kid, saving up and buying a VCR in 1984, which cost around $379+ tax. And my 19" Toshiba color tv, from earlier that year, which was also around $400.
And, to keep it somewhat automotive-related, there was my grandparents' 1982 Malibu Classic Estate wagon, which was $11,000 out the door brand-new. With a vinyl interior, weak 110 hp 229 V-6, an ECU that fried itself twice in 2 1/2 years, and oh, let's not forget the non roll-down windows in the back doors! But, it was a beautiful shade of midnight blue, with fake woodgrain on the sides, and a stand-up hood ornament...so at least we looked classy as that car bucked and sputtered and couldn't get out of its own way, and fried in the back seat because we didn't have a roll-down window on those hot days where Granddad was too cheap to turn on the a/c! :P
IMHO, they felt richer than today because they had simpler lives. They were happy with a 3 BR ranch or cape without granite counters and a spa bath. They went on simple vacations to the shore or mountains. They didn't commute 60 miles a day.
Granted, wages weren't anything like today, either. I remember a college instructor saying to gauge the price of gas by what a gallon of milk and a gallon of laundry bleach costs. By his gauge, gas isn't overpriced...
I think the big difference back then, as compared to today, was that, then, there were limited consumer items available for people to but if they wanted to "keep up with the Jonses"... House, boat, and a car.
Since then, there's been an explosion of consumer items, tons of electronics, etc. and, they all cost $$$.
Also, mass marketing has changed our expectations on what we "should" have .vs. what we thought back then, which was based far more on understanding what we really needed. I would say in the 60-mid-70's, at least in the South, most folks thought a single TV in a house was practical. Finding a house with a single TV nowadays is difficult, I would imagine.
Like air conditioning, no one ever missed it until they had had it for a while...
Healthcare, food, and education have exploded in price compared to wage gains, that gets people pining for the good old days. I suspect overall taxes aren't any better either, unless you are a "high earner" who must be coddled.
An additional factor that contributes to complaints about gas prices is probably the distance that many people travel for fun, and travel for work. I remember my dad travelling 7 miles one-way to work, and we thought he worked way out in the sticks. When I lived in St. Louis a few years ago, my one-way commute was 22 miles (from a suburb to the main city). The suburb I lived in didn't even exist 20 years ago, and neither did many other 'burbs that were that far out, so I suspect the average commute distance & time, especially around larger cities, has increased.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
Look at original IBM PC in 1982. It was priced at $3,000 and relatively crude by today's computer standards. What would $3K 1982 dollars be in 2012 dollars?
No question that today's cars in terms of economy, safety, power, features, handling, etc are a better bargain than cars of 30, 40 years ago. Look at the offerings of GM, such as Vega or Citation of years ago compared to the Cruze or Malibu of today.
A couple different jobs I had a while back were 50-55 miles one way. Pay was good and distance was mostly on Interstate roads, so no concern. Flex time let me avoid most rush hour traffic.
A pack of cigarettes was 45 cents and they'd sell 'em to an eight year-old kid! I remember my Mom or Dad sending me to the store with a 50-cent piece to buy a pack of Tareytons or Vantage and coming home with a nickle change. Yesterday, I saw a guy who was clearly over 21 get carded by the clerk for cigarettes at a convenience store.
According to my handy dandy inflation calculator, $3K in 1982 is equivalent to about $7200 today.
Oh - so about the price of a MAC!!
I remember running into my high school girlfriend's father recently who worked about 1.5 miles from his house his entire working life. He couldn't believe that I commuted 40 miles a day round trip and thought nothing of it.
"JD Power reliability survey 2012- the worst car brands"
Some other surprises in there as well, including one that is currently recieving a lot of "Positives" lately... :surprise:
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f70/gm-reports-highest-monthly-sales-33-month- s-111191/
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
The earliest transaction I remember was in 1973, and went like this, at a snack bar at school:
me: How much is an ice cream sandwich?
she: A dime.
me: TEN CENTS!? How much is a fudgesickle?
she: A nickel.
me: I'll have one of those.
Love telling my kids that story. They crack up every time!
I live in a little apartment in an expensive neighborhood, close to work, I am frugal (and single) so I can travel now and then and indulge a hobby or two, and I feel fortunate.
I'll stick to my DC suburbs, even if traffic does suck.
The GM cars were the best and no hint of a ToyHonHyunKia! The rest is history! :sick:
Regards,
OW
Now I get a dime each for Coke cans and bottles. :shades:
They must be biased just like CU..... :P
My wonderful little hometown was negatively affected by NAFTA, too...Greenville Steel Car Co. built railcars there for 80 years, until one year after NAFTA when the parent company moved them to Mexico...where their first orders were so screwed up they had to be rebuilt for the customers.
There is a resurgence in the townsfolk to do something new there, but it's hard without the kind of employers that used to be there...the ones that paid a decent wage.
I don't deny someone their success at all..but at some point reward for success becomes replaced with unmitigated greed, sadly. How any one person can be worth in the millions at a job is a complete mystery to me...especially when they make that much and then leave the company in ruins.
My Dad worked at the Post Office (recently rated 'the most beautiful post office in the U.S.'--not bad for 5,900 people--by a post office fanatic who has visited 1,300 post offices and was featured on NPR last year), and came home for lunch every single day. My grandfather was foreman of pickling at Greenville's Chicago Bridge and Iron plant and walked to work.
No one can tell me that things, overall, in the big picture, are better today than then. I make an excellent living but I sure long for those days in the big scheme of things.
BTW, I remember when single candy bars went from a nickel to a dime, and when Hostess cakes (Twinkies, cupcakes, etc.) went from 12 cents to 13 cents. I was born in 1958.
I sure knew more folks who could, and would, buy a new car every three or four years then, not because they needed one, but because they wanted one, than do now. Because new cars were priced reasonably, generally, and cars tended to hold their original value better than today.
I tried googling pics of UK Chevies though, and it looks like a model called the Chevrolet Orlando.
$0.22 = $1.65 today
$0.05 = $0.38 today
$0.06 = $0.45 today
Guess there is more than inflation affecting today's prices!
Candy bars range from $1.00 to $1.50.
A can of Coke = $1.25.
I guess Big Brother taxes these items well beyond inflation for our own good!
I'd imagine that it's mainly taxes that drove up cigarette prices, but they also have a lot more chemicals and such in them today, that probably makes 'em more expensive to produce. Then, there's probably lawsuit funds and such that drive up the prices.
As for sodas, sometimes I'll find them on sale at the local Giant, Three 12 packs for $11. That comes out to about 31 cents per 12-oz can. Get 'em at BJ's, Costco, etc, and they're even cheaper. But that's at the grocery store, not at a restaurant/drugstore/whatever.
I can't even remember the last time I bought a candy bar. I remember in the early 80's, you could get a 6-pack of Hershey bars for around $1.25-$1.50.
In Motor Trend issue, May 2012, a Buick Regal GS was awarded 8th place out of 8 cars tested..$38,720 4 cyl, turbo, acceleration like a turtle, and drank premium fuel. Sad company..
Yup. That glass is always 2/3 empty! :P
http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f13/california-cant-get-enough-chevy-volt-sal- es-surge-111289/
Just a few weeks after General Motors curbed production of Volts, Chevrolet dealers in California are scrambling to get the extended-range electric cars on their lots as sales surge because of special state incentives for electric vehicles and West Coast gas still above $4 a gallon.
"I've had more people talk to me in the last couple months about the Volt than I have in the last year," said Bill Cumming, general manager of Ron Baker Chevrolet in National City, Calif., a San Diego suburb. "Currently, I have none in stock."
U.S. sales of the Volt remain mediocre at best -- just 1,680 in May. But the car is gaining momentum in California, where hybrid and electric car owners are allowed to use carpool lanes no matter how many people are in the car.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Good thing that's a big market (at least while the incentives last, and access to HOV lanes, not to mention Cali gas prices that still average above $4 a gallon).
California can't get enough of the Chevy Volt as sales surge (Detroit News)
Yeah, 0 to 60 in 6.7 seconds. A junker for sure.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
Yeah, the average driver is going to think 0-60 in 6.7 is slow. Next time I'm blasting down North Broad Street at 140 mph in heavy city traffic, doing the slalom on Roosevelt Boulevard, or taking on the hairpin turns on the Schuylkill Expressway, I'll tell you what a lousy car the Regal is.
It was also the heaviest car in the group, heavier even than the AWD Audi A4. It was also the thirstiest. Oh, and the MT testers didn't like some of the chrome inserts and lack of a backup camera. Even though the car stickered at $38+K, they still called it a fairly good value.
Is MT or Car and Driver that always seems to get the best 0-60? They must abuse the car pretty good!
Well here is a surprise, a BMW wins a comparo. How is even fair to compare an upscale car that needs to check every option box to hit near 40K with upper 40-50K cars. Oh, and 50K for a 328? Really? I thought the 335 would hit 50, but not the 28.
It was also the heaviest car in the group
IMHO that is something that Buick needs to work on. My LaCrosse is a bit of a porker, weighing more than some full size cars from years past.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
328i, Infiniti G37, C-class...
Buick's mission for the Regal is cloudy to say the least. Obesity, a lackluster engine lineup, and lack of AWD partners well with their next-to-nil marketing efforts... :sick:
GM has completely dropped the ball with this model and failed to give their so called "Sport Sedan" the reflexes and performance it needs to go up against the class stalwarts. Although, part of the blame should be put on the magazines for making such an absurd comparison, GM wants to claim the Regal as a valid alternative, then they are going to have to work harder to bring their entry up to snuff.
But part of me also believes if they did so, they would risk crowding own their cohorts over at Cadillac who are trying to release their own 3-series wannabe. Which is probably why the Regal has been nutured so much from it's Opel counterpart...
Oh ya, and meanwhile, they have created a model that doesn't fit the blue hair image that Buick has built... Stick to building cars for cruising the piggly wiggly GM, Buick's so called "rich" performance history is just that...
History.
IMO, Buick trying to recapture the glory days of the GNX is only going to further damage whatever steps Cadillac is trying to take to claim its own spot in the luxury performance arena...
BTW, what do you guys care anyways? It's an import... :P
And why not I guess. Pontiac was killed off, Saturn was toast and Cadillac surely doesn't need another front drive car nor would I bet they'd risk a case of "Catera 2.0"...
Plus, outside of the Lambda rebadge, there isn't a Buick in the stable that can't trace it's roots to Germany (Or Korea, or China...) so the Regal is a natural fit.
Examining worker to executive compensation trends over the past 30 or so years might unearth some problems of what ails us.
On the 50K+ 328, the car comes available with a lot of features not seen on many cars in its category, such as heads-up display.
A very nice 328 can be had for much less that $50K.
My lowly 40K LaCrosse has that
I see your point, BMW has some costly options that can spike up the price really quickly.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic