Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
VW has the same thirsty engine problem with their 2.8L VR6 engine . . . they use it in the Eurovan and manages 17/20. Fortunately, VW offers very frugal TDI engines in Europe and (with any luck) soon will offer more in the States.
However, I suppose they could make a SOHC version and take some weight out of the heads.
But I'd hate to seem much weight come out of the Duratec, because it is sufficiently over-built right now, and can take forced induction upto say 450HP on the stock crank and the journals that support it. You need new rods and pistons to push that kind of power, but it is nice to know the bottom end is overbuilt in that fashion.
TB
That's a 15% bump. If we could do that without taking a huge hit in gas mileage or emissions, that would really be a winner. VVT would prolly get us most of the way there.
Mazda could then claim more power per pound than any other stock mini-van, which I think would sell. Psychologically, the gap between a 240 hp Odyssey and a 230 hp MPV would be negligible, too.
I picked 230 because it would get you over the rule-of-thumb 6 hp per 100 lbs of curb weight needed to get that "abundant power" feel. The Ody currently has about 5.4, the MPV about 5.2.
I'd even be OK with that spec needing premium, so long as it would burn regular safely, like the old Sienna.
-brianV
The MPV is smaller and for the most part lighter than the competittion, and therefore doesn't require the copious amounts of HP the others are shooting for. They are bigger and heavier, so when I c 240HP for an Ody, or 230 for the new Sienna, I don't feel bad bcuz they need that extra power just to get around adequately. The MPV right now is probably the Most Perfect Vehicle in regard to power-2-weight ratio in the minivan class. Those bigger, more power engines require more gas more often.
Also, (absolute) power corrupts..which means the more the powerful the engine, the more tempted one gets to rev'er up! I know power is good for passing on hills, highways and when u have a full load, but I think all the MPV probably needs added to improve in these areas is more torque made sooner in the rev range than horsepower. GM is a good example (I know, oxymoron) of having vehicles with low amounts of HP, but high torque that comes on early and strong.
Right now, the most HP/torque u can get out of the MPV is 200/200. now if u could get 200HP/250 lb-ft, with max torque working from a torque curve of say 1950-5000 rpm (i.e. Volvo), then that might be more adequate. Torque is the force that gives the impression you're moving fast anyway.
Finally, keep in mind that the MPV is front wheel drive, and with more power comes a greater chance of torque steer problems (i.e. most Nissans). I know it can be overcome with the right suspension setup, but then u have more weight from that suspension, and lose whatever power gains u wanted 2 get from the increase in HP/torque bcuz u have to add beefier parts or additional parts (i.e. limited-slip diffs).
Pretty pictures
Actually, you can get better fuel mileage with the turbo engine, since you don't need to downshift as much, just crack the throttle a bit more, let the boost spool up and you climb effortlessly over the hill.
Of course if you put your foot to the floor all the time, you will burn copious quantities of fossil fuels.
Once I get the bugs worked out of my Turbo Duratec (on my car, not the van) I expect my highway mileage to improve over pre-turbo figures.
I'm not too far away now, with it running way rich at 3000+ RPM part throttle cruise.
TB
I told them I had seen some ads from other Mazda dealers for the same car around that same price. They basically said I was lying. I went home and re-checked what I saw and was correct.
You'll find the MPV you want, at the price you're happy with.
Be sure you get a LX, not LX-SV. Some dealers intensionaly mix up these two models and try to sell you LX-SV at LX price.
Good luck, mbs7.
I understand the rebate is going to expire in september and not sure if mazda is going to extend it beyond september. Should I get the 03 or take a chance and wait for the 04 and hope mazda will extend the rebate beyond september?
Also, what is LX-sv i hear about. What are the major differences between regular lx and lx-sv? How about the automatic sliding doors. I see honda and toyota owners continue to have problems with their sliding doors and how about the mpv? Is it worth paying extra to get the auto sliding doors?
thanks in advance for any suggestions.
16" alloy wheel
pravicy window
floor/cargo mats
power sliding door is not a standard option for MPV. I don't it is worth to pay extra for it.
Whatever happened to those garage exposes like the Canadians recently did? (watch out for Canadian Tire). Didn't Sears have to pay out a bunch in a class action for pulling stuff like this?
Grrr, sounds like outright fraud.
Steve, Host
I didn't really think the dealer's quote was that out of line, but you can do a pad replacement yourself in about an hour, and you should have the rotors turned. However, you can pull the rotors yourself (since you're 90% there already when you replace your pads) and take them to a shop to have them turned for under $40. You'd be back on the road in no time... for about $100 if you DIY.
Still, I'm surprised the Midas shop said that. It's been my experience that local Midas shops are the greediest repair shops around... recommending tons of repairs when you come in for just an oil change or alignment.
I agree... call the GM of the dealership... and maybe Mazda.
Madza MPV: Prices Paid & Buying Experience
Wherever you talk about your dealer, please just mention the dealer/city/state - more looks like advertising. Thanks!
btw, Java, I very good luck with Midas in midtown.
Steve, Host
JD now I get why you were ticking. Dang it I used to for less restrains from somewhere else.
Hope it's better now, Steve? ;-)
Steve, Host
You need more of those TOU letters to wallpaper your computer room, just like me...yeah, well notice a ref to, ahem, this website, didn't get omitted at 'another' website. And don't think it didn't go un-noticed. <evil laugh>
I'm sure he's not making fun of you Steve (don't tease (feed) the hosts!)... that'd just be crazy-talk!
java - who is still nervous about what was in that Idaho reservior water he went jetskiing in...
You might want to take off the tire and look for your self. Just a thought.
If the market gods swing our way, we may be in the MPV way for good and all (javadoc is shaking his head saying I'll believe it when I see it) and I'm wondering if anyone knows yet what's happening after Labor Day...
I can't see why they'd get any worse on the 2003 models, Ajacat. I'd rather you buy THIS WEEKEND, but I'll think good market mojo thoughts for you nonetheless. Glad you're still in the hunt though!
is this a misprint? or is there some other explanation? how exactly is payload determined. is it passengers plus cargo. or cargo alone.
any info. would be greatly appreciated.
GVWR = 5,867 lbs, Curb Weight is about 3,900lbs, so that gives you almost 2,000 lbs of payload capacity when properly distributed, which includes passengers. IIRC, the rated payload is 1,800 lbs, but I could be mistaken...
Back in my day, spiffs were $50... inflation I guess.
Steve, Host
Anyway, one other thing, anyone notice some clunking or "indecisive shifting" at slower speeds. I've got 13K miles on my 03 now and noticed it happening more and more. Seems it can't figure out what gear to use between starting up and 25MPH at times. I sure hope this isnt the start of the Chrysler syndrome of bad trannys in minivans!
Don't get me wrong, I do love this mini better than my old DC, but I'm concern over some of these characterstics.
One last thing; anyone know of the changes coming for 04? I saw in a auto mag that MPV is going to have some face and tail lifts for 04 with new fender lines too.
Some people had luck when the dealer did Re-flash the TCM for them. There is a TSB, but it has more symptoms to it. Anyway I think that it should be under warranty, try to take it to the dealer. If you want to look up the TSB, here is more details: US BULLETIN No: 05-011/02 SUBJECT: MIL and O/D OFF light illumination or DTC P0757 AFFECTED VINs: Lower than JM3 LW28** *0 340736
Was it written in the magazine or waz there a picture. If there was a picture, could you scan it and oput it online somewhere? For the changes check this press release, there is a paragraph about MPV http://media.ford.com/mazda/article_display.cfm?article_id=16113 .
I still like the style of our "OLD" MPV's now, but imagine that things will be more streamlined on the new ones. Smaller more contoured headlights, more sculptured lines on the side rear fenders and a racier rear end probably like the new Quest or Sienna's. I saw a new Nissan the other day and couldn't believe the changes they had made in that one!
exterior color - interior color
RALLY WHITE - BEIGE / BLACK
BLACK MICA - GRAY / BLACK
SUNLIGHT SILVER METALLIC - GRAY / BLACK
TSUNAMI BLUE MICA - GRAY / BLACK
TSUNAMI BLUE MICA - BEIGE / BLACK
WHITEWATER PEARL - BEIGE / BLACK
NORDIC GREEN MICA - BEIGE / BLACK
COSMIC SAND - BEIGE / BLACK
RAZOR BLUE - GRAY / BLACK
RAZOR BLUE - BEIGE / BLACK
TITANIUM GRAY - GRAY / BLACK
-Brian
Personally, I don't know why Mazda does this... not allowing interior color choices for most any color. I see no reason to do so, imho.