By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I did experience my last Navigator well past he warranty period (drove it to 65,000 miles) and never had to put a dime beyond routine service into it - oh, and tires. Depreciation on the car over 4.5 years was $18,000, from sales price to sales price.
Is there a "loyalty incentive" for people who own old beater Lincolns who get a 2003 LS?
no1trust, the "fail safe cooling", IIRC, refers to a feature that allows the car to run (safely to the engine" 50 miles after a complete cooling system failure, i.e. all the coolant leaked out. I have no idea what other cars have it. I would think it would be more common on luxury models than mass market ones, just like the "running flat" tires.
Nice touches, nothing over the top. The one we saw was in the vivid red with chrome flat spoke wheels.
I know it's there on the V8, but I'm not so sure about the 6. Hope it is, since that's what I've got.
What is amazing is how fast the temperature shot up! Of course, I did not try to limp home - but shut the engine off immediately. Fortunately, the thermostat "unstuck" so normal temperature control was restored. Mechanic checked the computer log, and instantly knew it was the thermostat.
Too many cars in the market means the value is pushed down. Lowering the price on new LS's will also push the price down, but so will a large supply of unsold used cars, in the used car market (how many people choose between a new LS vs. a used LS?).
I know someone who had a GS-430, paid $48K for it and one year later he had a hard time selling it and finally had to settle for $40K.
I don't know exactly how many days he had it, but I'm sure it ended up being over $20 / day in depreciation.
It just doesn't make any of its competitors say ouch, well except when it is next to the curb.
In short this is what I aspire to do to my Sloop. I can't get the thought out of my testosterone saturated grey matter of having a Mustang Cobra 00 or newer power plant firmly ensconced under the hood. Of course it would be bolted on to thier 6 speed manual along with a drive shaft and rear end replacement.
I asked my wife for a Ducati 999 and was denied as expected but this was by design because my absolute intention all along was to get her so worked up about my not having a bike that what ever I asked for next would most certainly be approved. So now I have the blessings of my CFO and am ready to go shopping but really do not know where to start.
I now open the floor to this perverse concept in hopes that out here in cyberspace someone shares this fervor of sick modifications.
-Don't give up the ship.
I had it 3 times in one day while driving from Detroit to Dallas on Friday. In our caravan to Detroit at least one car per day would chime in. Lincoln say it gives the car personality.
The changes:
* Lincoln owners will receive complimentary oil changes, tire rotations and inspections for one year or 12,000 miles, down from three years, 36,000 miles. Parts such as wiper blades, spark plugs and engine belts will not be replaced.
* Emergency roadside assistance will be limited to four years and 50,000 miles. Through 2003, there had been no mileage limit.
* Emergency travel reimbursement, destination assistance and trip planning service have been eliminated from the program.
* The Lincoln Commitment package is no longer transferable to other owners.
I currently own a BMW 3 Series (AWD) and my first thought was a new 530i. I've read about the LS beating out the 540 with performance issues.
I've test driven the LS and it feels really big compared to what I'm used to. But my key criteria are: comfortable yet enthusiastic drive, acceleration, handling, luxury, space for 4 easily, and RWD/AWD.
I'm looking at:
G35 Sedan
BMW 530i
Lincoln LS V8
Cadillac?
Anybody care to offer up their comparisons? My purchase probably isn't until early next year, so I have time, but any personal experiences would be appreciated.
-Paul
First, the LS V8 is significantly bigger than not only a 3 Series, but it is also larger than a 5 Series, sort of half way between the 5 and 7 series, so it definately feels bigger than a 3 series.
If I had a 3 series, I think I'd be dissappointed going to a G35. Don't get me wrong, the G35 is very sporty feeling and it is pretty darned fast, which is why a lot of the car rags love it. But it's ergonomics are horrible and it feels like the G35 is inherently unstable. I test drove 2 of them and both hopped sideways pretty bad when cornering over bumps. CR mentioned this and another car rag, was either Autoweek or C & D advised never to drive it with the stability system off. The G35 lacks some of the luxury items and its rear seats don't fold down. A G35 Coupe would be a fun 2nd car to have, but I think I'd get tired of a G35 as a daily driver pretty fast.
530i is still a very nice car, but expensive. At street price equivalently equipped it will run $10K - $12K more than a LS V8. It also is smaller than a LS and for me has a pretty small trunk, all depends what size car you really want and need. The 530 is still the standard and you're going to pay for it, especially when you ad in higher sales tax, property tax (if you have it) and higher insurance.
The CTS was a bit of a disappointement. I'm sure the new 3.6L will help and it has a very nice auto trannie, but I just did not warm up to driving it. It has a very high belt line, which made me feel like I was sitting in a bath tub. You can option yourself to death on a CTS everything is an option including the fold down rear seats. The interior looks and feels like it belongs on a $20K car not a $35K car. Of the 4 cars you mentioned, I found the CTS is the least fun and least rewarding to drive.
If money was no object I might consider a 530i, keeping in mind that new version of the 5 series will be out this fall. But I keep coming back to the LS, especially given its street price. The Lincoln LS may not excel and any one thing, but overal it's still a fun car to drive and it has the best all around combination of Luxury and Performance.
Obviously My idea didn't come into play...
The original business case to leave out the paint? Saves $1.11 per car. Brilliant, huh?
Course now they also gotta come up with $$Millions of dollars to pay Magic Johnson to say he likes Lincolns. Brilliant, huh? Probly gonna start leaving out the back seats altogether to pay for MJ.
The whole idea of decontenting is to make it transparent to the customer, or at least, to make it an issue that is so insignificant that it won't cost sales. So not painting an interior part ought to be ok. Sometimes things don't work out quite so well. But I remember how GM made seats for my 80's Cadillacs that were painted inside, but were so thinly reinforced, that my large friend would bend the seat permanently back if he sat in the car. Happened in 3 of my GM cars. I'd rather them not paint.....
And above all, drive each car in the conditions you use most. Notice that the LS is laser-straight on X-way cruising, even in gusting winds. When you set it into a corner, road surface irregularities do not affect your line AT ALL. Try a panic stop on all the vehicles you're considering, and note the amount of nose-dive.
And, if you're a techie, look at the underside of the LS. You'll see a very unique suspension system, the engineering of which explains its outstanding driving characteristics.
The LS is a driver's car that also carrys three more people in quiet luxury.
I think I misunderstood what you mean, because this didn't make any sense to me. If I did misunderstand, I apologize.
http://www.blueovalnews.com/2003/trucks/expy.rustedseats080403.ht- m
nvbanker: "not painting ought to be OK" ??? trying not to be disrepectful, but wouldn't you rather NOT have rust on the seats? Why would u give Ford a free pass to save a buck by affecting the quality and life of your vehicle? To me this kind of nickel/dime beancounting is horribly counter-productive. If Bill Ford thinks he can save the company doing this, well, he ought to "Look again."
My criteria for choosing my car was based on the following: 4 door sedan, safety, performance, semi lux to luxury, under $45K.
I visited the dealership several times and enjoyed the test drives. Sure the 0-60, on the LS, wasn't the best but it satisfied my appetite. The emergency stop test was impressive though. 60-0 in a straight line without nose diving! I really felt in control. Having been in a bad tractor trailer accident, 3 years earlier, I knew what the benefits of that extra ounce of protection were. It was till about a month after I bought the LS till i was able to get on to the interstate and see what kind of cruise ride and passing power it had. This car has amazing passing abilities. The handling is fantastic! We have an old 5 mile road near my home that has more twists, turns, ups and downs then you could imagine. Using the select shift in 3rd gear it was perfect. Press on the gas once you were in that banking turn and you pushed right through the curve! It was the best roller coaster ride ever! Back to the safety part. If you look at different insurance agency and their polls on the safest cars to drive you will see that the Lincoln LS has been in the top 5 every year.
I know times have changed and there are new models that weren't available 4 years ago. But that car left a lasting impression on me. It would be very difficult to get me to sway from the LS V8 sport. If money was no option well... maybe the Maclaren version of the LS.
ps
the LS was my first American car. others were Japanese or European.
I have a Honda and Jeep as well. My concerns about the American quality make me wonder, but with a car 4 model years into production, I would think most kinks have been resolved. My E46 3 Series is a 2002 and 3 or so years into that model. It's been solid as a rock. My Honda Si is a typical Honda. My Jeep, my only American car, has had some issues. My Pontiac had issues as well. So I guess my only reservation is with the American quality stigma.
Has anybody used the nav system in the LS? How about the THX stereo? In my test drive, I thought the stereo was very full sounding, but I'm by no means an audiophile.
-Paul
"Ford isn’t sure which direction Lincoln is headed — except it’s not chasing Cadillac into the stratosphere.
by Joseph Szczesny"
That has been the problem for years. When the LS first came out and people were paying sticker or more (that's when I bought mine btw) Lincoln didn't know what to do. How to market the car or who to appeal to or even how to get the dealers to order it and sell it. IMO, Bill Ford has done a poor job so far. First Lincoln was a PAG brand, then it wasn't. It would be sold over seas, then not. It just goes on and on. The same article says the Aviator will be out of production by the 2005 model. And don't forget that hot seller the Blackwood. I will be hesitant to get another Jaguar when my lease is up as I feel Ford will screw up that brand too!
One was a visit to Fords Romeo proving grounds. We were allowed to "flog" the 03 LS in both V6 and V8 versions of two test tracks, accompanied by professional drivers. What was interesting is one course was flooded with an inch of water. We were taught to drive to the limits of traction with advance track on and then with it off. I don't think a single driver made it trough the course without incident with advance track off. Then again, that's what we were supposed to do. It made a believer out of everyone who drove that day.
The next event was for us to race (yes race) our LS's at a race track. We first went out with professional racing drivers who taught us breaking points and apex entry, exit etc. Then it was off to the races (literally). It's one thing to see a race car lose it but seeing a fellow members $40K LS pulling a 360 on the front straight is quite another matter.
I lost mine entering the back straight too aggressively and got sideways at around 80 mph. I caught it but also realized that in a normal car, I would have been on the roof.
Both experiences of driving this car near its limits takes you to a level you would never understand otherwise.
Then we hopped in and drove 1376 non stop miles from Detroit back to Dallas and felt great when we got home.
Well done Lincoln!
They are both good systems, but the LS is significantly better. One reason is that it has voice control (both nav. & audio). It also has MANY more points of interests. The LS has 72 recognized voice commands (only 22 documented in the owner's manual) Some examples are: "Rest Area", "Auto service", "Golf course", "School", "University" ...
I'm not an audiophile, so I have to report second-hand information. My wife says the THX in the LS is better than the Lexus Mark Levinson. My grandkids say "Wow, the sound seems to be coming from EVERYWHERE".
Another factor with the nav/sound system is the ease of changing CDs. With the LS, the nav screen moves out of the way to reveal the 6-CD loader. Changing a CD is easily done at a stoplight. Not so with the glovebox-mounted changer in the Lexus.
I do wish Lincoln would get focused..but for now, they fill my needs perfectly. Give Bill a chance. Nothing he does will really be noticed for 3 more years, except financially, which is noticed every single day.
The Aviator is being replaced by a cross-over vehicle, which appears to be the where that market is headed. The Aviator has also gotten pretty good reviews on everything but its price.
If if were not for Ford buying Jaguar, Jag would have gone bankrupt and folded its doors. Jag quality in the 80's was an absolute joke. Ford has managed to save Jaguar, including its spirt while funding the development of vastly improved Jag cars with vastly better quality and reliability. The main thing Ford needs to do with Jag right now is gets Jag's production costs in line, (probably need to consoladate production in one plant) which is no easy feat given how protected jobs are in the UK.
You are absolutely right about the Jaguar purchase and ensuing Ford guidance. They are in fact doing some consolidating moving the Range Rover (Freelander I think) into the same plant as the XType which has a good quality rep and room for increased production.
These cars all share some things in common as I see it:
1) They all were criticised for being overpriced.
2) They all were compromised in some way by bean counters and this affected their acceptance in the marketplace and gave support to (1).
3) They all were victims of horrible marketing. Absolutely pathetic.
4) They all are now strongly rumoured to be going away in 2005. (Well, except the Blackwood:>)
Do I believe they're going away? Not that it matters, but I strongly doubt the Aviator will be dis'd in 2005. It's sales are not that bad. The Marauder? maybe. But a Supercharger would solve ALL the issues with that vehicle and make it a big success (IMHO) The TBird? Looks like it will go. (Does that affect the LS?) The Blackwood? - Yeah, I believe that one's a goner! :>)
So, Ford spends a HUGE amount of money creating these 4 vehicles. $$HUGE$$ Then the bean counters compromise them, eg:
T'bird dash = LS dash. Come on, a little fresh thinking please.
Aviator styling = Navigator styling. Not that that's real bad, but heck I can't tell em apart till I can read the nameplate. Also, some givens were left out of the luxury Aviator like power seatbacks and auto-dimming mirrors. Lots of folks complaining about those.
Merc Marauder - a muscle car without the muscle? What's up with that? WHY did they do that?
Lincoln Blackwood - No 4WD offered. For starters ..
So I wonder long and hard why Ford can afFord to develop these cars, yet can't afFord to go the last mile to make the cars unique and at least marketable, if not best in class, can't seem to afFord to spend any $$$ to market them intelligently and can't or won't at least keep quiet about their potential early demise.
And the early demise is the most puzzling of all. Hell, except for the T'Bird, all of these vehicles were given death sentences within about a year of their introduction! The T'Bird closer to 2 years. Is this a better idea? Except for the Blackwood, these vehicles could and should be big successes with a few more $$$s for mktg and a wee bit more on the vehicles themselves. Instead, they throw in the towel?
I wonder, does Bill Ford have nightmares about the Edsel?
Heyjewel - Ditto on what you said.
Lincolns issue has been it's lack of focus (not the car). Everytime it's headed in a direction, new management comes in and alters it. Let's take into account that everytime new management comes in, it's 2-3 years before we see progress or results. So consider the current situation to be the after effects of the plans of few years back. It's not till another 2 years where we'll see new results of todays plan, as in 2-3 new vehicles for Lincoln. But it's definatly headed in a positive direction.
Same as Mercury. Now with Elena Ford giving it some direction, Mercury's mission will not be altered anytime soon, and if there were another game plan to occur, it will not enter managements head till the next 4 years.
The "focus" we saw in 2000 was Lincoln building up grass-roots positive good word of mouth about the LS -- from the enthusiasts and trade publications that had credibility -- rather than reliance on massive hype and ad buys (not that they skimped on that, either). Now the product line is launched - and they feel they have reached all the "drivers" they can -- so they are trying to broaden the market to appeal to non-enthusiasts (move a lot of cars to those old-timers who objected the LS did not have a compass -- or overcome the car renters who objected to the storage space and interior room.
Enthusiasts alone don't make a successful mass-produced car. Right now, Detroit decided low prices is the way to move vehicles -- along with a hyped up sticker price and a massive, advertised "one time only" rebate.
Who are they fooling?