Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
CR reliability:
I think Mazda suffered big time in that because of some of the heavily Ford influenced models. It's interesting because the Escape/Tribute were the worst in their class and Mazda sold a whole lot of Tributes. No doubt the Tribute's poor performance brought the whole company's rating down, especially since they sold so many. OTOH, the Protege holds it own in the reliability contest. Honda, Toyota, Subaru, Nissan etc. for the most part make their own cars. Mazda gets stuck with the Ford models.
I have an '02 and the chrome on the rear doesn't really move me one way or the other. But, having said that, since my car is silver, it doesn't stand out as much. If I had another color, I might feel differently. Now, the dealer showed me chromed wheels for it and I thought those were hideous! I told him the wheels should come with faux racing stickers to put all over the car.
Ron B.
Mazda changed their corporate philosophy to go back to their racing roots and create cars that were fun to drive and involved the driver with every nuance of the road. The Protege engine has a far more useable powerband than the Corolla or the new Civic. In fact, the current Protege's most closely resemble the Honda's of the 90's in terms of overall performance. The 1.8L Pro engine has no issue with revving to 6,000rpm. After that, it starts to get out of breath. It is certainly loud and buzzy, but does not vibrate wildly and still pulls the car effortlessly.
How does this make it unrefined? Just change the gearing and powerband or pop a 6 spd. shifter like they did in the Miata and the buzziness goes away.
I will agree with you that if there is one weakness with the Protege, it is certainly the engine. However, not from a lack of refinement, but from the need for more horsepower and torque and an adjusted powerband to make it more useable at higher rpm's. In that essence, more like the Protege's from 1992 through to 2000.
Please simply do not compare a Porsche with a Protege. I do not sit hear comparing my WRX against the Pro because that simply would be silly. I come in here because i truly believe the Pro is an outstanding little car for the money and that Mazda really is on track. They have really eaten into a market segment that used to be dominated by Honda. Economical cars that were a blast to drive. Zoom, zoom.
To back me up, for Mazda, I'll quote Car & Driver magazine from its review of 13 small cars in 2000 (when the Protege won the contest):
"BMW verve for less than half the price. What's not to like?"
And I'll quote auto.com in its week-old review of the brand-new Corolla -- which, granted, it raved about, but here's the part that I think interests us:
"Tuned for a soft, comfortable ride, the Corolla isn't as fun to drive as the Ford Focus. Nor is it trying to be. Instead, the car is rewarding to drive. Toyota does offer an S model with higher-performance tires, slightly stiffer suspension and a peppier interior look. And if fun is the priority, Toyota is nudging drivers toward the new Matrix, a hatchback that uses the Corolla's platform and engine.
"But if the handling isn't razor-sharp, it's something just as valid in this class: balanced, poised, effortless. The ride is amazingly posh, the cabin tranquil."
Now, I know every small-car buyer in the world isn't like me or us. Some don't want a sporty, stiff ride; some are wannabe Camry, Accord and Taurus owners who just can't afford them. So they want a "posh" ride in a small sedan. Well, now they've got the new Corolla to pacify them.
But I think Honda has lost the heart of its sporting style altogether. I mean, come on -- the last-generation Civic SI LOOKED as well as drove sporty. But look at that new SI -- it looks like an overgrown Daewoo Lanos or some kind of Pokemon character. It's so bland I probably wouldn't give it a second look on the road.
Meade
Mazda is going the other direction...
I'm sorry some of us don't know the model number of our engine and our bore and stroke or valve clearances by heart. Maybe some of us just enjoy DRIVING THE CAR! And what the heck is wrong with that?
I, and I would "assume" some others here, went through the typical car-buying experience -- we went to a dealership, test-drove the car, and enjoyed the experience so much -- after comparing it to others in its class -- that we decided to buy the car. I know that I didn't leave in my new car thinking to myself, "Well, this car would be perfect except the engine is buzzy and runs out of breath at high rpms -- it's nothing like a 1983 Porsche and really would benefit from balance shafts, which I gladly would've paid another $500 for." Actually I was quite blown away with what a wonderful and fast ECONOMY CAR engine the car has!
It's like computer owners -- some are techno-geeks and some are just plain USERS. I guess I'm more of a Protege USER than a mechanic. As long as I do my maintenance and the car stays out of the shop, I will continue to talk about how much fun it is to drive with the windows down, blow away the occasional Sentra and Civic, and generally zoom-zoom with the car. You know, I actually look forward to my commute home in the afternoon. Maybe it's Mazda's fault some of us are like this -- they went and gave the car a personality in an era when most cars in this class are viewed and marketed as appliances or technological marvels. What other economy car out there right now is marketed as a grown-up toy?
Whatever the case -- I'm not going to let discussions about someone's vague definition of "buzziness" or "smoothness" change my opinion of the car. My 35,000-mile 2000 ES 5-speed is smooth, fast, and a blast to drive. Absolutely the best bang for my 15 grand. I'm in love with this car!
Meade
Or maybe the fun content has migrated over to the Yahoo! group for some reason .....
;-)
Meade
Love is not a term I'll use to describe my Protege. For the money a very good car and best in class. I'll leave it at that.
Ron B.
Yes, sure, the pro ain't going to win any drag races, but at least you don't have to slow down any for corners. :-)
I used to believe that Ford, Chevrolet, etc. had a stockpile of millions of 'em they got "a great deal" on.
Mazda gives everyone the same engine and suspension in the Protege, they should have 4 whl disc across the board. But, unlike others, at least it is available at all!
Ron B.
Ron -- I'm sorry you don't love your car. I sincerely hope the feeling's not mutual.
;-(
P.S. OH GOD, not the old disc/drum debate again! You can count me OUT of this discussion. Why don't we all go out and beat a dead horse, just for fun?
Meade
Geez, I'd have thought that one look at the interior of the Spec V and the Pro ES would be enough to make the decision. Nissan can't add enough hp to make up for the "lava lover" interior!
I've had my ES for just over 1800 miles now, very good car.
Congratulations again.
Ron B.
Couldn't pass up the deal on the pro. Engine isn't as nice, but ride is just about as tight, road feel seemed better, more stable through a corner (the independent rear really does make a difference), shifter feel seemed quite a bit better - yes, my pro is a 5-speed - quite a bit less expensive to buy and to operate, and a heck of alot better looking inside and out.
A question, if you will, with respect to engine noise - its pretty mellow compared to the last 4 cylinder I owned (88 Ford Escort), but sometimes gets a little buzzy for my taste. I wonder how much of this is exhaust note, and if it could be quelled with sound insulating mats in the rear of the vehicle. Any thoughts?
Let's start by saying that I have owned 2 '96 Proteges, and still own one of them. Great Little Car (oops..pun intended!).. underpowered, but acceptible... I passed them to 2 of my 3 teenagers as they came of driving age. When it came time to replace my wife's car, she wanted a little something bigger, quieter and..well..more luxurious...bought a 2000 Toyota Avalon...met all our preceived needs...VERY quiet car, great highway ride...except it was WAY too softly suspended, way too insulated...on and on...traded it on a 2000 Camry 4 cyl (put money in pocket)...still bland, but does have some road feel compared to Avalon, and cheaper insurance. My point so far? Everything is relative to ones needs/wants at any time...
About 6 months a go, I found myself needing to get a replacement car for my Tacoma, as I was giving/selling it to my son as his 96 Pro was needing some major body work. (gotta love teenagers!) I recently have seen the $ benefit of buying a one year old car, and I started my search with used 2000/2001 Proteges, Civics and Corollas. Corolla was out, way too small in back seat. Civic seemed too much money and Proteges, well, there just were very few of them avail. used in my area of the Desert SW. Looked at new Pros, with all the incentives, looked at Civics without incentives. What to do? By luck, an auto broker in town called me back with a 2001 Civic EX 5spd with 4500 miles...would sell it to me a great price.. SOLD! Love the car. Yes, a few rattles inside (have all been fixed) but great mileage, fun to drive...(wouldn't have bought a pre 2001 as too hard riding/too noisey on road).
My whole point of this post? Protege and Civic are very comparable in many ways. After weighing all factors I could think of, they ended up virtually equal in my mind. Each has its plusses amd minuses, but none enough to eliminate the other...I would have loved to get a 2001 Protege LX or ES, but found a nice Civic in my price and time frame. However, based on the support/friendship of this forum, I feel like this forum is enough to tip the scales in favor of the Protege! Civic has a lot of aftermarket support, but this forum is the greatest Plus so far! Anyone want to buy 2001 Civic? Just kidding...maybe in a year or so...
One last question, and sorry for the long post...
My daughters '96 Pro just needed its SECOND set of plug wires in 50,000 miles...arching. First set replaced at 29,000 miles while she was still home two years age this month, and second last week in Michigan. Is this a trend with the 1.6L engine? Has anyone experienced this? What could be causing it.
Thanks and keep up the great forum.
Jeff
I know you will love this one, Meade. I had to haul my stair stepper in my Jetta the other day because I lent it to a friend of mine (I have access to a gym at work, he doesn't). You know I had to fold down the back seat in my car? Not so in the Protege. It was definitely roomier than my car is inside.
These engines are designed with the plugs down inside the head. The wires have to travel through a grommet in the top of the head and then continue down a few more inches to reach the top of the plugs inside the head. It is very common for moisture or just plain wear (or cheap aftermarket plug wires) to cause shorting. With my 1992 LX, replacing the plug wires every 30,000 miles was actually called for in the car's maintenance schedule in the owner's manual. So two sets in 50,000 miles doesn't sound that far from normal.
Next time you replace them, ask your dealer or your NAPA guy or whoever you go to if they have a set of heavier-duty wires that fit your car. It's been 8 years, so I can't remember, but I got a great set of plug wires from NAPA that lasted me nearly 40,000 miles on my '92 LX.
Hope this helps a little, and thanks for dropping in!
Meade
We all know you've settled for less car than you want. You've told us that. OK, fine. That's your decision. But for some of us, this car is all we want or need, and it has all the performance we want or need. And if I feel the need to drag race old ladies in 1984 Buick Skylarks, then let me brag about it.
This car CAN beat other cars from a stoplight. And while you may be dreaming of Porsches, Acuras and Infinitis, I'm being more level-headed and racing cars in the same class. I do it all the time and I have seen many Civics, Sentras and similar cars receding in my rear-view mirror.
So chill out, OK? Let us have fun talking about our cars in the context of what they are without you swooping in to tell us all how stupid we are to think this way. I'm on my third Protege and I just helped my wife buy a Protege5 -- for a reason. I've been a Protege owner since late 1991. I wouldn't keep coming back if the car wasn't doing something right for me.
If you feel the need for more performance, then go out and get it and enjoy it. But I'm frankly getting tired of hearing how my fun-to-drive economy car doesn't have balance shafts, disc brakes and a $30,000 engine.
Respectfully,
Meade
Ron B.
Jeff
Meade
On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 is paramount importance....about 1 or 2. For comparison what my mechanic friend thinks ranks at 7 and what my father thinks ranks at 5. The driving dynamics of a car as I perceive them rank at 8. I do look at CR for things like washing machines and blenders and in some cases TVs but thats as far as it goes. But even then its just a nice place to see all the features compared.
I guess if you keep in mind that CRs reliability rating is a survey not really a reliability rating then it may mean something. Sometimes it can tell you about car but I suspect that it really tells you about is what people think of their car. The two do not always go hand in hand. I know how my friends who own Subarus fill out their survey. They seem to have some type of selective memory when it comes to repairs. I'm not ripping Subaru owners as we own a 2k Outback Ltd and its a pretty good car but reliability is not its strong point. Subaru owners are really loyal to Subaru. Sometimes I think its like a cult . Our Outback had lots of little problems which have required numerous annoying trips back to the dealer. So have most of my friends yet when they talk about their cars you would think nothing ever goes wrong with them. The same could be said for my sister and her new Camry. She claims is super reliable because its a Toyota BUT I know (because I asked her husband) that its also been back to he dealer several times. By the way my 01 ES has only been to the dealer for its 7500k oil change and the next time it goes back it will be for its 15k oil/air filter change (its got 11k now).
It would be better if CR just got raw numbers of each type of repair (or recall or whatever) from car dealers and then expressed them as a fraction of the number of cars sold. No surveys, just get the raw data directly so you have the complete pool or at least a much bigger chunk. Then it would mean a lot more but would also take more time AND I dont think that car makers are all that happy to give out the actual repair data.
Then how do I take reliability into account? I dont. Its pretty low in any auto buying decision that I make. Its down there with resale value. To me cars are disposable. Its not like a paper plate but its got a finite useful life. I keep them about 7 years (I always get a 7 year warranty) or 100k and then sell them. I do the minimum maintainance required to keep me in the warranty. The second aspect is strictly stochastic. Its random. You could get a perfect Mazda. You could get one that has to go back to dealer every 10k miles for some problem. Sure your chances may be are better if you get a Corolla but do you like the Corolla enough to care?
Jeff
You ever wonder about this? Mazda's models are and have been, for the most part, less expensive than their competition. The Protege has always had a slight price advantage over the Civic and Corolla, the 626 has always been less expensive than the Accord and Camry, etc. So therefore the Mazda dealership attracts more frugal and, to put it bluntly, POORER car buyers. People who work hard for their money and often seem to think they don't get their money's worth when they buy something. So when the survey comes around, they may be more apt to criticize every little problem they've had with the car.
Now, hang on everybody. I'm not saying Toyota and Honda buyers don't expect a lot for their money. But there are probably more Toyota and Honda buyers out there who buy the car because they believe in the brand than there are loyal Mazda enthusiasts. I'm pretty sure my case (four Proteges) is not the norm.
And I can tell you from experience that people who buy cheaper cars brand-new DO expect a lot from them. I purchased 1987 and 1988 Hyundai Excels. My 1987 Excel cost me a whopping $7,100 -- and it was a mid-level GL model; you could get into a 3-door Excel back then for $5,995! And I used to sit in the service department's waiting area listening to the other low-income Hyundai owners complain about the most trivial of things. I of course wanted to say, "What do you expect from a $7,000 car?" But they expected their cars, which they had scraped and penny-pinched and purchased generic cigarettes to afford, to be perfect! So when they weren't perfect, these people were ready to call in Mr. Nader, the NHTSA and Rush Limbaugh.
Just some food for thought. Mazda, at least for the past few years, has been an "economy" brand. And the type of people attracted to "economy" things are usually very frugal and expect a lot for their hard-earned dollar. And maybe, just maybe, they believe in "giving 'em what's coming to 'em" when they've had a few problems.
I love how CR doesn't qualify what problems are being reported -- I mean, are these people coming in with their cars on flatbeds, engines a-smokin'? Or are they coming in because their headlight burned out?
Like I said, 83,000 miles on my '92 LX -- and so far, 35,000 miles on my '00 ES -- with nary a problem so far.
Meade
Yes. They do. Let's you have the same feeling as a manual shifter.
But, if you want, simply add about 7 oz of Lubegard to your tranny fluid and see the difference.
I can bet u will come back and thank me for the advice.
It happens with alarming frequency on the SC400. Lexus denies any problem but the dealers usually help out the customer according to my neighbor. So, what happens on the CR? The car seems great because the dealer helps out. But, it does not actually represent problems that exist with the car.
Of course these things pale in comparison to his great stories! Like a few months ago when he sold an IS300 to a woman who ended up asking him to keep the car on the lot for 3 months AFTER she bought it. the reason? He son, for whom she bought it, failed his lerner's permit test and she wanted to wait for him to pass before giving him the car! 32k and he just got his permit!
On the other hand, the Toyota friend said her car was just fantastic. As reliable and trouble free as the day is long. Best car she ever had owned. Only one thing ever went wrong - she had to have the engine rebuilt at 105,000 miles (!!).
So one perceived her car as a piece of junk, the other as rock solid - bullet proof. Now, I don't know about you, but I'd much rather have rear view mirrors fall off, wipers break, and window switches go out, then have to rebuild an engine, but to hear it from them, it would sound the other way around. Why? Because one was a Dodge, the other a Toyota, me thinks - pre-concieved notions following along with each.
Now, am I trying to imply that, in general, Dodges are more reliable than Toyotas - certainly not. It's difficult to generalize from two data points. The majority of the data, as you well know, suggests the opposite to be true. This example merely demonstrates the dangers of applying generalizations to the specific. They don't always carry through, though they may color our view.
Our topic for Wednesday, March 13: Stump the Technicians!
Join us with your maintenance & repair questions this Wednesday from 5-7pm PT/8-10pm ET. Some of our contributors from the Maintenance & Repair board will be waiting to hear your problems, and making Herculean efforts to solve them.
kirstie_h
Roving Host
Edmunds.com
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
What did you listen to on the way to work (or play) this morning on your wonderful stock or fully swapped-out Protege stereo?
Meaded kicked us off with Spyro Gyra (actually saw them perform live about 20 years ago, kiddo!)
I'll chime in with: Snoop Dogg (from a CD made for me by a co-worker).
Anybody else?
Let's stay on top, people!
--Dale
You mean that little slot takes CDs? Hot damn!
Has anyone looked into the XM radio. I would be interested in hearing others thoughts on this. I know I personally would pay $10/month to listen to better radio programming, especially when I can listen to the same stations no matter where I am!
On my way to work I had U2's "All That You Can't Leave Behind" CD in my stereo. Good band I'd say...
I'll wait til someone comes out with a standard size head unit (that also does CD/AM/FM) that costs less than $300, then we'll see...
A couple years ago, I started the MPV after church and some smoke comes pouring out of the radio. I quickly shut it off and pulled the fuse so we could get home. I pulled that radio out when I got home and proceeded to take it apart. I found about a dollar's worth of change stuffed into the radio and one just happened to land in the wrong spot. My poor daughter put all that money in and never got a single song out of it.
Sure glad to have a warranty on that one.
Now if I do put a CD in, it's probably going to be Metallica, CCR, or the Stones...nice mix, eh?
H said what I was thinking....Never figured Dale for a Snoop Dog fan!! I hope this doesn't want to make her bust a cap in my...uh...posterior?
BTW Dale, I helped organize a Spyro Gyra concert right down here in Kanawha Plaza (outdoor amphitheatre next to an old canal in downtown Richmond) last summer. Saw 'em then. BLAAAAHHHH. But I've been listening to their music and buying their albums since 1982, O Young One.
I'm a frequent U2 listener as well, and (as you're about to read) I have very diverse listening tastes. I'll listen to (and own) just about everything from classical to contemporary Christian to rock to jazz. But lately I've taken a turn toward country music. Don't ask why -- I kind of "discovered" it about a year ago. Now I've got almost 20 CDs from artists like Alan Jackson, Toby Keith (saw HIM in concert last fall -- GREAT CONCERT!!!), Dixie Chicks, Phil Vassar, Mark McGuinn, Rascal Flatts, John Michael Montgomery, and several others.
I'll also go out on a limb for potential ridicule here (but I warn you, don't knock him if all you've heard is the early '80s "elevator music" stuff), I am a hardcore Dan Fogelberg fan.
And I'm warning you -- don't knock him unless you can name one of the albums he's produced in the last 10 years WITHOUT going and looking it up on cdnow.com! I've been to two of his concerts, met him and talked with him. What a fantastic artist and person in general.
Anyway, there you have it. On any given morning you'll hear nearly anything but rap and heavy metal emanating from my Protege.
Meade
XM radio? It's cool if you didn't have to put that stupid looking antenna on your car.
ps. Dale and Snoop Dogg sittin' in a tree......
Your questions about 94 through 97 Proteges ...
94 was the old (blocky) design with very limited interioir space, but rich on features and content. Motorised seatbelts but no airbags. 95 was a redesign year - the Protege (exterior) shape was changed, they got VERY roomy inside (more so than supposedly larger cars like the Honda Accord!) and the base engine (1.5l in the DX and LX) was made smaller, while the high end ES engine was improved. Both drive quite well and happily chug along with a full complement (that's 5 occupants, not 4).
Try to look for a 95-97 LX or ES, if you like the goodies, or a DX if you want to save some moolah (I drive a 95 DX ;-) Avoid the 94 because of the old design, small interior and (potential) difficulty selling it down the line. Although the same logic would imply you should save money on buying one now! Reliability concerns are a non-issue with all of them (pre 95 as well as newer)!
If the edmunds "Used" section doesn't have enough info for you, try the reviews of old cars at cars.com.
Good luck, you can't go wrong with (most) used Proteges! Knock on wood, mine has been flawless so far (2+ years)
Also, having the 6 CD changer and being very tolerant of many styles and genres of music implies that i am never at a loos for something to listen to, in my car.
Not to mention that it may not be a smart investment because
1. XM has competition, and no one knows which one will outlast the other and become the standard
2. I may keep my car for less than one more year (!)
3. I don't like the idea of paying money for broadcast radio, and not having a choice about what I get to listen to.
4. Some of the channels are ad-free, some still have targetted advertising - and considering XM's privacy agreement, and the fact they can tell what station you listen to, this does not bode too well!