By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Have any of you ever seen this page? http://www.madisoncountydodge.com/1.html
David has been through hell and back with this truck. Now the dealer is suing HIM because of his website! It should be the OTHER way around with their incompetence. I'm sure that David would appreciate a word of encouragement if you think he's right in what he did by posting this website. HOW else can you get a dealer to take your problems seriously when they think that none of us know what we're talking about when we bring our vehicles in for service.
Thanks.
fastdriver
Thank you in advance!!
Your finances are certainly none of my business and I invite you to take this with a grain of salt, but, if four hundred dollars one way or the other will make or break the deal for you maybe you're stretching your budget a little. They'll be just as good next year when you've saved a few more bucks.
Hi currently have a 93 YJ and i am very intersted in buying a dodge dakota within the next year. I will be graduating and will be eligible for the $750 grad rebate.
I am looking at the Dodge Dakota C/C and would want basically a full load with the full time 4wd and the amazing 4.7 V8. I drove the new cherokee with it and its a really quick truck. I have driven the 99 with the 5.2. they both had different gear ratios and one was really slow.
Does anyone have the new 4.7 and how does it compare to the old 5.2? Does anyone have any figures on performance for the 4.7?
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks for your time.
The mechanic at the dealer where I got my Dak is really high on the 4.7. He said forget the 318 or even the 360 "it's the 4.7 all the way!" I have a 4.7 and can attest to it's smoothness, drivability and power for conventional use. I haven't had it long enough to determine it's reliability; however, it was designed, so mopar says, to last 150k. The mileage is average. It has never been at full throttle and, barring an extraordinary emergency, never will be--that's not where I'm at now.
I opted against full time 4wd because of the added expense for gas and tires. It is a marvelous technology for going in the snow, it really handles well. But unless one lives in a snow zone and needs it constantly I think it's a poor trade off to be stuck with it the rest of the time on bare roads. Even in the snow prudent operation requires it only to get going from a stop and old fashioned engaged 4wd does OK for that. The real challenge to driving under reduced traction conditions is stopping not starting anyway. For that what you need is good tires, ABS and caution behind the wheel.
I was looking at the Chevy s-10 ZR2 also but i am leaning more towards the dodge because of the bigger engine and size.
I am also stuck on whether or not to get the club cab or quad cab. Does anyone know the price difference for the two?
ordering a new Quad Cab. This short experience left
me wondering why I want to even buy a Dodge. This
dealership treated me very badly. I just wanted to
find out the procedure to order the Quad Cab. They
started off by telling me they expected a profit of
$1200 on any ordered truck. I laughed at that.
They then went on to ridicule me for using the
internet to research my purchase. They insinuated
that if I succeeded in making a purchase for $500
over invoice that I would somehow regret it later.
That the dealership would somehow rip me off in an
unseen way. I must now find another dealership to
order from. If you choose to visit this dealership
please be aware of the response you will get by
trying to be an aware and informed consumer.
The only answer right now is to wipe it out every few days. The more cold starts... the more often it needs to be wiped out. I usually soak a paper towel or two every few days.
Some people have built a metal 'shield' to reduce the constant cold blast of air that comes around the passenger-side of the radiator. One guy even drilled a hole in the filler-cap. The problem stems from this area also being the 'uplift tube' for the PCV (Positive Crankcase Ventilation) system so any 'steam' from the crankcase ends up re-condensing within this area. I suspect the REAL fix will be to insulate the filler tube from the cold blast so no re-condensation takes place in that area.
DC has been deafly silent about the whole thing!
Thank you in advance.
Anyway, I'm back but don't have time to read the 1,000s of posts I missed on various topics - so if anyone asked me something sorry, I missed it, but feel free to ask again.
-Ryan
-Ryan
Bookitty
I was wondering if you tried your insulating method without putting anything in the cap?
Instead of trying these backyard mechanics solutions to your NEW truck, why don't you raise HELL with Chrysler??? Call Auburn Hills directly- NOT the "customer service" number, but corporate headquarters if all the "local" people- dealer, factory rep etc. are of no help!
You should NOT have to be applying home remedies to ANYTHING that new!
Just my .02!!
fastdriver
Also, my browser freezes a lot when I access Town hall, hence the 3 postings. And there are 4 bolts holding the oil filler tube, not 3 like I originally posted.
After I wrote that comment about "backyard mechanics", I thought to myself- maybe he is a mechanic. I did not mean to imply that you didn't know what you were doing or to put you down. Sorry if it came across like that. All I meant is that you spent your hard earned money on a brand new Dodge and should not have to resort to these tactics to solve the foaming problem. I would be on the phone to every division at Chrysler, including their Corporate offices, until I found someone who was able to resolve the problem if the local yokels have no clue like many "5-STAR" dealers!!
There's no way I would accept anything less then fixing the problem! I guess everyone's different. Hope Chrysler finds a solution instead of trying to come up with yet another lame response to our concerns.
fastdriver
It almost seems like the tube is acting like a flue on a fireplace, the heat a moisture is rising to the highest point in the engine with no place to go. I tend to agree 100% with fastdriver about turning the problem over to the engineers with Chrysler, they designed it and they should be able to come up with a solution. It obviously is a macho thing to try and resolve the problem ourselves...after all we ARE men, grunt, grunt, grunt.
I remember the old Chevy 283's and 350's that had the long filler tube extending from the intake manifold but I never remember any condensation or foaming problems. Anybody have any ideas what the difference might be ??
If anyone has an address or phone number for a department at Chrysler-D that really cares I would appreciate the information. As previously stated....why pay all that money for a very nice truck and then find ourselves trying to solve someone else's design problem. Good point! But you don't know how bad I wanted to find the cure. :-(
>>I remember the old Chevy 283's and 350's that >>had the long filler tube extending from the >>intake manifold but I never remember any >>condensation or foaming problems. Anybody have >>any ideas what the difference might be ??
The filler-tube on the Dakota is also the 'uplift' tube for the PCV system. As its name implies, the Positive Crankcase Ventilation system produces a constant flow of filtered air from the Air filter, into the rear of the crankcase, up the filler-tube and into the intake manifold (High vacuum) to be burned inside the engine.
(Check for yourself... follow the finger-sized tube from the air-filter-housing. It splits into 2 tubes, each go into the 'firewall-side' of the 2 heads. The PCV valve is a 1/4-twist to remove from the oil-fill and that tube goes to the intake- manifold)
Perhaps this is the old Chevy V8s did not use the filler tube in this manor.
Also, on the Dak, this tube is directly behind a huge 'hole' (On the passengers-side of the radiator) that allows cold outside air blow on the filler-tube.
For that we might have to ask one of the Dakota owners up North about that.
Andy are you there??
Jim
Automatic is definitely mandatory for full time 4wd - in my opinion so is more money than sense - but that's a different issue.
The 3.92 thing seems to be getting more confusing by the day - the last I heard 3.92 was mandatory with the manual transmission because of concerns over the engine / manual tranny combination being too much for the 3.55. Course I'm going to say that I think 3.92 is a better bet anyway - but rotondim I assume you have already considered that choice.
Thanks for the responses. I am from New Jersey so it does get cold but that's relative... I also checked the specs from Edmunds site and found no conflicts for option Z5B but if you look at AutoSite.com it eludes to the Full Time Transfer Case(DHC) and 3.92 Axle ratio(DMH). The dealer gave me a print out of my options, on the sheet is the following:
Z5B-1800# payload, 600# GVWR....
11"x2" rear drum breaks(w/23_ or 26_Powertrain, DMH Axle Ratio REQ:DSA Sure Grip Axle)
SURE GRIP AXLE NOT DESIRED
DMH-3.92 Axle ratio(w/26_Powertrain REQ:DHC Full-time Transfer Case or DSA Sure Grip Axle)
This certainly is confusing...!!!
Andy, I thought that the 3.55 Axle ratio was a better choice for gas mileage and being I'm looking at the V8 I thought that wouldn't be a problem. From your note it appears you recommend the 3.92.
Of course with all the hub bub about foaming on the 4.7 I'm wondering if it's a good idea.
3.55 vs. 3.92 (apologies to anyone who has heard this before). 3.55 will give you better gas mileage, 3.92 will give you better acceleration and towing capabilities. On the other hand, if you take the 31x10.5 tires in conjunction with the 3.92 you have close to the same effective ratio that you had with the 3.55 and stock tires. Of course you could also put the larger tires on the 3.55 and have even lower ratio. For me there is just one choice - 3.92 with 31x10.5, but that is because of what I want the truck to do.
croos - as far as I'm aware there is a low range in the full time transfer case - can't imagine why there wouldn't be. Mind you I can't imagine why anyone would buy a full time transfer case either.
up here in the great Canadian north it's a 16 week wait. Hope it's worth the wait!! I test drove one a few days ago,and loved it . It's nothing like My old 91 power wagon,mind you that truck would go anywhere. If anyone's got comments on the 2000 Dakota's drop me a line. thank's Crazycanuk
As I live in West Texas (it was 84 here today: rode my Midnight Special to the courts, played tennis, got sunburned) maybe the foaming thing will manifest itself in the 'higher' summer humidity (about 50%) readings; otherwise, I've not seen (in mine) or heard of this problem. Or the ticking. Or the weird transmission shifting I've read about. I drive the Quad at speeds of 80 to 90 to our oil/gas lease about 75 miles from here twice a week. Absolutely no problems to date - except the speed limiter (which I've remedied).
;->
4 lever positions. from front to back, they are:
4WD-LO N 4WD 4WD-LOCK
the "4WD" position is driving both axles thru an open differential at a front/rear 48/52% torque split. This is the "normal" position for the xfer
case. The "4WD-LOCK" position locks the xfer case
and therefore is the traditional "part-time" 4WD
position.
themacguy,
Makes sense to me too - all the foaming is (I believe) is condensed vapor. A breather would therefore work, but omay cause emissions issues. Pragmatically, I'm not sure how big a deal the foaming is with regular oil changes - but that's just me.
Bookitty
As bookitty pointed out, full time 4wd tends to impact efficiency and can increase wear of tires and the 4wd system. To my mind the additional cost (to buy and ongoing) isn't worthwhile for the minimal benefit. I haven't yet found a situation where I was 'surprised' so quickly by conditions that I couldn't shift to 4wd in time.
If 4wd systems are not shift on the fly I can see a lot more benefit, but given the ease with which we can shift I don't see the need.
All that said it was immaterial for me anyway as you will never catch me driving an automatic.
will not be using the truck for towing anything
other than a stump grinder or firewood splitter,
once every couple of years maybe, which I assume I
can use the bumper for this light work. The truck
will primarly be used for weekend lawn work, mulch, and the local lumber yard as well as an occasional trip for firewood. I was planning on going for the 4.7 V8/Auto but with all the talk about foaming and engine ticking I wonder if the 3.9 V6/Auto would suit me just fine. The truck may also be used on the beach to get to the many good fishing spots New Jersey has to offer. Any input would certainly be appreciated. Thanks to all.
also i wanted to get an idea of what you guys are getting on your trucks, i have a quad, 4x2, 4.7, auto, 3.92 rear and at 55 mph my rpm is 2000, whats yours? and also have any of you reached 3000 miles yet, they said at 3000 my rpm would drop from 600rpm to 500 rpm, which it has done but it also will sometimes be 700 or 600 rpm, kinda confused.
thanks,
robert
Bookitty