Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I dunno, sounds like a lot of taxi talk in here. This is the way to do it, this is the way that it's done. It won't work any other way, this is how we train you and this is how you'll do it and none of our customers expect anything different. And it's impossible to test for non-continuity (that's a Latka reference I suppose).
Then one day you look up and you're run over by Uber.
You may end up with a car full of Microsoft "bloatware".
But with a plan in place and a collection of clues to guide the way.......
I need a job at Ford. They get it.
"In 2004, Ford Motor Co.’s resident futurist, Sheryl Connelly, led a team that imagined what would happen if an economic shock and a rapid increase in the price of gasoline led to a crash in automotive sales."
Think Like a Futurist to Be Prepared for the Totally Unexpected (WSJ - registration link but a search on the headline may flop up a free version of the article)
What can cause a car to break?
Hm, miles of electrical wiring exposed to a harsh environment.
What's the fix?
Someone not invested in the way stuff currently works won't focus on improving the wiring, they'll figure out how to eliminate the wiring.
Your profession and most of the upstream engineers are addressing the actual failure, not really working to prevent it in the first place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law
Rocks law explains why.
Making a perfect car might be possible some day, but who would be able to afford it?
We can't afford not to expand the possible.
Anyone wanting to be an auto tech or engineer these days better learn how to code first. Or at least learn how to tell the proggie how they want something coded.
Meanwhile there was this tidbit. "Actually practicing futurism, even if only for a day, showed me the reason the future is so confounding: Aside from the fact that anything can happen, those unexpected events rapidly compound on one another. This leads to second, third and nth-order effects that can seem completely beyond the realm of plausibility until they happen. Hence the impossibility of predicting financial crises, wars and technological revolutions."
Which is why just being able to wiggle a harness or simply look at the location of some random failure will fail to reveal the fault more often than it succeeds. But take a logical, disciplined approach and any problem can be solved.
I suggested a way to fix the problem based on limited personal experience. If the car had been in my garage, I might have been able to crawl around, remove some plastic and find the rub. Other mere mortals may throw parts at it or find the fix on YouTube or a car forum or in a TSB.
There's more than one way to skin a cat and it can help not to box yourself in. The pro repair sites are full of similar shortcuts that are posted to help other techs - if your '99 Chevy does this, take a look at the whizzenjammer first.
"If the car had been in my garage, I might have been able to crawl around, remove some plastic and find the rub"
Except for the annoying little detail that you didn't have any legitimate reason to begin looking at any given point on the car. If there was any validity to your assertion you should have recommended doing that a week ago, and what about the next car that comes in with the instrument cluster acting up would you be putting that one in the air and pulling panels off of it because of what was found this time? You may never learn that the short-cuts or silver bullets as they are known are traps that at the very best discourage younger technicians from getting continuing educational training and developing real career skills. At the worst they cause someone to shotgun parts and when that doesn't work they have no-where to turn because they didn't put enough effort into building the skills that they needed to do it the right way the first time.
Be careful what you wish for, is the lesson here.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I don't agree with Steve that some kind of voodoo telemetrics is going to fix cars in the near future, but I do agree with him that some of the systems engineering in modern cars seems very wrong-headed indeed.
A defect in your power steering harness should not make dash gauges dance. That's just nuts. It should be possible to isolate faults like this from screwing up the entire system. It's like your windshield washer fluid somehow intermingling with your transmission oil through a vacuum leak. What engineer would be proud to have allowed that to happen?
There are boundaries to this discussion that have to be recognized and the first and most important one is that you don't get to take the solution for any car after it has been provided and attempt to short cut the diagnostic like Steve tried to do. Why? There was no legitimate reason to look at any part of the car for any type of a failure until enough data was collected in order to guide someone to do it. It was only after the observation was made that the fault could be manipulated by changing the drivetrain torque that it became logical to inspect the under-hood wiring harnesses for damage. That relatively simple observation couldn't be made until after the communication voltage waveforms were being measured with the digital oscilloscope.
No matter how someone tries to manipulate this, there was just one way to efficiently come up with the solution for this vehicle failure and nobody else provided any of it other than me. It's also safe to say that no-one else participating in or just reading these forums has the skill, experience, tools and discipline to have succeeded in analyzing that failure. FWIW, I do know other techs who would have figured this communication problem out too, but they aren't here. This vehicle failure was also shared with them including how the observations and testing progressed and the majority of the opinions from them came down to they were glad that it wasn't them that took this challenge on. That's a pretty normal emotion among top techs because we have all been beat up so many times during our careers that we all know that any one of these problems can eat us alive if we falter even slightly. Nobody ever held training classes to teach us how to do what you just got to see a part of here with that post, we have had to create these kinds of routines completely on our own
When it comes to O.E. trouble codes and diagnostic charts they only work while the problem is present and are useless when it isn't. The routine you saw here works whether the problem is there all of the time or not provided that it does in fact occur or can be made to occur.
The next thing that needs to be addressed were some of the arguments presented that didn't have anything to do with solving the problem with Neil E's car. It is totally irrelevant what any other group of people are doing inside their own realms (the futurists for example) in the context of this discussion. Whether cars can be made someday that don't suffer the failure that this one did has nothing to do with Neil being able to get to work on Monday morning. Any attempt of an argument that ignores that consumers immediate needs is a waste of effort in this forum beyond the angle that nonsense like that has been used towards making the career undesirable and less likely that Neil would have someone available to him to actually fix his car instead of being forced to get a different one.
So all we need to do now is hook the car up to a scanner and have some tech in India diagnose it for $8?
Works for me.
Meanwhile, I'll keep eyeballing and jiggling stuff, and taking stuff apart and putting it back together, whether it's my car or my bike or my computer. I've fixed a lot of stuff over the years just by "looking at it".
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
People will always try to fix their stuff, whether it's their cars, houses or bodies. And that's why there are millions of YouTubes out there. And there's always more than one way to solve a problem and who's to say they have the one and only right way patented?
"According to IBM’s studies, cars are increasingly becoming:
1) Self-healing: Vehicles that are able to diagnose and fix themselves and even fix other vehicles with issues without human help."
BMW Group to Start Research With IBM Watson (hpcwire.com)
How Self-Healing Electronics Could Change Everything, from Smartphones to Space Stations (allaboutcircuits.com)
"Current generation electric vehicles manage batteries by monitoring individual battery cell performance connected to a central BMS master via cables and wiring harnesses. A new proposal from Linear Technology suggests that future vehicles will manage battery conditions with the help of a wireless BMS."
BMW i3 Concept Car Relies on Wireless Feedback of Individual Battery Cell Performance (powerelectronics.com)
Step up, or bow out.....
For the moment, the self healing circuits. Do you see how large that is and once broken it doesn't restore full current flow sufficient to fully illuminate a simple LED? Lets say they solve that, what would happen if you put multiple circuits like that side by side by side? Will they try and connect to the other circuits where they don't belong? If they solve the problems of size and cross connections, that would be great, BUT we are only talking about high resistance failures or opens at this point. How will that help anyone when a circuit creates an illegal connection such as the Focus was doing? Then you have the inevitable challenge that reducing the work that the techs do serves to diminish the technical skills. With fewer failures to fix there would be fewer techs to handle any problems that did occur. Keep in mind fewer can go all the way down to no techs, but failures will never be totally eliminated.
The BMW i3 CONCEPT CAR Sure getting the battery modules to report to the central HV module wirelessly could eliminate some complexity, while it creates yet another entire level of it. How tolerant will the system be if one of the transmitters for modules fails? By design cars have to be very fault tolerant or else warning lights would come on more often then they already do. Lets talk about the receiver transmitters for each battery module. The uC Smart mesh system will essentially be connecting a Galaxy 5 to each battery section, what did that do to the cost and complexity if any part of the system acts up? Warranties aren't free, their cost is figured into the purchase price of the vehicle so trying to suggest that making the manufacturer simply guarantee it for some extended period of time doesn't help the consumer in the end. In fact it shifts the burden of the expense all the way to the front side of the purchase.
Watson...The best they can do with that is program in historical data and it can retrieve it. The Focus failure now published could be logged in but that isn't a valid use of the information because that failure is very unlikely to re-occur and any time spent just looking to see if it happened again will routinely be wasted. What's more that failure could never be logged in before it happened and can only be logged in AFTER a technician encounters it and publishes it. But you want to get rid of the techs and if you got your way that step in the process would cease to exist meaning it would never have been published and therefore never existed in the first place to become retrievable. When engineers write trouble trees they can write the tree with regard to the CAN low wire going open and staying open. They could also write it with regard to the wire grounding and staying grounded. Those failures could be written into the database that Waston could draw from. But they CANNOT write the tree for the random failure that you saw demonstrated in the video, and they never will be able to do that simply because first an engineer would have to imagine every possible failure for every millimeter of every circuit and then design a circuit with multiple extra wires to allow a module to continually test every segment of the circuit. We had that discussion in the past and your response was something on the order that you weren't talking about adding extra wires but that is exactly what it would take to have self diagnosing circuits. If you tried to do that wirelessly you not only still have additional wires you also added the additional complexity of yet another RF signal in an environment that is already electronically speaking very noisy.
Back to the Prius. P0A0D. When the failure occurs the car will not turn on. You can get to the ignition on, but not the Ready mode. When the problem occurs while driving, the vehicle can be driven until it is turned off and then won't restart unless the problem self corrects. If the problem didn't self correct it would be easier to figure out what is wrong, but since it does trouble trees are useless. So much for self healing circuits........
Next????
Van got smashed in the LR tire, new axle and body work. After taking delivery I noticed that the sliding door doesn't fit. They've adjusted it once and I told them to keep trying. I'm worried about structural stability and safety. There was no obvious damage to the door. When closed the top seams aren't "flush" with the roof and it's obvious when you look, especially when compared to the right side slider.
https://techinfo.toyota.com/t3Portal/document/rm/RM2490U/xhtml/RM000000OZQ04MX.html?sisuffix=ff&locale=en&siid=1483462969967
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khDrAr2gog8
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
First pic is the front top corner and the second is the gap at the top of the B pillar. May not mean much without a reference shot of the other side.
Now consider that the failure could be anywhere in the circuit depicted in the service information and since it doesn't fail and remain failed for a long enough period of time you cannot use the trouble tree linked.
Got to love how they write this stuff. Under "Trouble are"
Wire harness or connector
Power management control ECU
Service plug grip
Inverter with converter assembly
Frame wire
Inverter terminal cover
If all you are capable of doing is looking at these you might guess the right thing to look at first, you might guess the right thing to look at as the last possible choice after you looked at the rest. Of course there is also the possibility that just looking at it won't reveal the cause. BTW to "look at" the Power Management ECU you have to disassemble the dash, to look at the service disconnect socket and pins you have to remove and disassemble the battery pack.....
Now if you choose to test it the right way, you will start putting your plan together with nothing more than this.
Two questions:
What are the requirements for the initialization of Ready mode?
What specifically does the self correct do? (I bet there is no record of this, but you can tell us.)
I am unclear about the self correct: Are you able to reproduce the failure and have some troubleshooting time before the self correct kicks in? Or do you get no time at all to analyze the failed state?
If you get zero time to troubleshoot during the failed state because of how fast the fault corrects, then it seems you must look at the Ready mode requirements and start making some pretty fancy guesses to move forward. But then you say guessing is not allowed. So I feel stuck. Maybe answers to the above will help. Or maybe I will just flunk out.
Speaking of which, I've done just that on my Volvo and its nonworking AC. I've checked for leaks everywhere else and the last place is behind the dash, a common failure point. I'm not willing to go through the effort on a 19-yr-old base model Volvo with 2 deer strikes against it, so I'm just going with no AC until I donate the car to charity probably later this year.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
You are actually getting the benefit of the description of the failure being filtered based on both product knowledge as well as having located and repairing the fault. Had it been left to the description from the owner it would have been much more cryptic and amounted to "Sometimes the car wont start, but if I try to shut it off and turn it back on a few times it eventually starts up, but even then sometimes it turns back off all by itself" To achieve ready mode the system has to energize and test the SMR's (system main relays) and part of doing that it needs to monitor the HV interlock circuit for any faults. If a fault is detected in the interlock circuit, the SMRs will be turned off if the vehicle is not moving, or will be allowed to stay energized if the vehicle is being driven. (The assumption there is that since the car is moving it is a circuit failure and not someone disturbing one of the safety switches or covers)
If I tell you what the "self correct" is really doing I'll be answering the question as to what was wrong with the car. By saying "self correcting" imagine a functioning circuit failed, but then resumed normal operation without any action from an outside force. I reproduced the failure four times for a total duration of about 12.6 seconds. That was enough to prove what the failure was. It did however take a week and close to ten hours of driving the vehicle to get that 12.6 seconds of failure. You need nothing more than the schematic, and a good game plan as each failure event is observed.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
Whatever. One of us does this for a living and teaches advanced routines to other technicians. My advice is get a job as a tech and see how it works out for you and maybe in 20-30 years we will see if you have changed your mind or not...
Haha. No, thanks. I had my taste of it working my way through school. I much prefer what I do now. But I greatly appreciate all I learned from the pros I got to work with. It has saved me countless dollars over the years since.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
Picture you were working on something and something happened and either the repair didn't solve the problem or another issue was then revealed and you end up stuck unable to figure out what is wrong. Now you need another techs help, or maybe that tech simply takes over and goes to work on the problem. I do exactly this for other shops and the first step is to forget everything else that has been done or what someone else thinks the problem is and I concentrate on exactly what the car is doing right now and set out to prove why. In other words I start at the beginning without any assumptions and I go straight at the problem, every single time whether they caused it or not. You should see the looks I get when it takes me less than a half an hour to solve a problem that someone else might have been fighting for a couple days......
My "intuition" tells me I am dealing with a voltage spike or variation out of spec, and not a bad sending unit. I really don't think pulling the sender out and testing it for continuity is going to do me very much good here, but perhaps careful inspection of the plug-on might.
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport; 2020 C43; 2021 Sahara 4xe 1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i Son's: 2009 328i; 2018 330i xDrive