Subaru Crew - Meet The Members II

1412413415417418692

Comments

  • salbaby1972salbaby1972 Member Posts: 165
    Great news Pat! Now all of you can get some rest and starting eating again. Recovery will be slow but ya'll hang in there...

    --Sal
  • ozman62ozman62 Member Posts: 229
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Pat, Rita, and Ann Marie,

    I am so happy to hear the great news. While it will be tough ahead, the fact you are all together will help immensly. If you can, look into the nurses aid- they definitely help.

    Mark
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    I am new to the "Subaru" chat forum and have owned 4 Sub's. My latest is the Impreza outback sport wagon. I was watching TV yesterday morning and saw an add for the "NEW" Saab 9-2x and choked on my corn flakes because it looks almost exactly like an Impreza. After further research I found out it is!!! How pathetic that Subaru let GM and their 20% ownership put the Saab badging on a beautiful Subaru. They should have just eliminated Saab completely ...I can't believe that Subaru has gotten involved in the old bait & switch car game like most American car makers do to fool buyers. I think its pathetic and GM should have just put their efforts into improving Subaru and flushed Saab right down the porcelain vortex where it belongs....NOw we have the "COO" & "CEO" of Saab introducing the NEW 9-2x. She has all these great credentials , like Harvard grad etc.....well any two bit hustler on the street can steal a car and put a different logo on it. very very sad.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Put yourself in Subaru's position: GM wants to buy Imprezas and market them in a segment where Subaru does not normally compete -- the high end compact car. If the car is a success, great, more money is made off the Impreza platform (which is in the last part of the current generation too). If it fails, no biggie. I see it as a no-lose situation for Subaru. The way the 9-2X is configured, it may steal a few WRX sales but I doubt it. Most of us who have a WRX are not interested in a $30K premium compact wagon -- we just wanted something fast and fun for $24-26K.

    Craig
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Glad to hear the continued progress and good news. I agree with the others, don't hesistate to get some hired help if it is financially manageable. it could improve the situation markedly for all three of you.

    Craig
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    What Craig said :)

    It's a positive move.
    Re-badging it as a Cavalier on the other hand...

    -Dave
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Subaru (of America) really had no choice. It was a deal between GM and FHI, Subaru's parent company. They're planning on selling just 8,000 9-2x models per year, which should be easy enough.

    It does help Subaru with economies of scale, at least. OTOH, some fear that it limits how far upscale Subaru can go (no leather, no moonroof, no AWP on US wagons for instance).

    The Saab gets the AWP and a leather and moonroof option on the WRX wagon, basically, things you cannot get at your Subaru dealer. Cornering lights, too.

    -juice
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    To echo some of what's been said, it's not as cut and dried as it first seems. Some customers would have liked leather, factory 17's and better braking. Had Subaru bothered to offer a "touring/sport" (or whatever the marketing hacks want to name it) package with those options, many including myself would have taken it.
    OTOH Subaru - which is hoping to move upscale - gets to test the market waters for a tarted-up version of its product while GM/Saab takes the risk.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    There's very little risk here, just 8000 vehicles annually with minor changes on the same production line in Gunma, Japan. Minimal investment.

    -juice
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    I hope this is not a duplicate post. I got logged off by accident when I went to add these follow up comments: Subaru does not need any "Help" from GM and Subaru's whole philosophy is not just about the "Bottom Line" and if you have seen the latest 05's in particular the Legacy GT Limited Sedan loaded to the gills..its only 31K and smokes the Audi 3.0 , The BMW 3 and the Benz C-320 away in ALL categories so Subaru does not need to be "Upgraded" by adding the badging of a perfectly pathetic car called "Saab" that has a recent history of nightmares that don't end. The Legacy Outback Sedan 3.0 flat-6 is also a beautiful car that rivals all the German competitors..so Subaru is doing just fine on its own. I just returned from Japan since my Wife is Japanese and I've seen some of the newer Sub's that havent arrived here yet..they are stunning. Saab is going to destroy Subaru's gene pool of intelligent,practical and well built cars....anytime an American car company gets their mits on anything to do with foreign
    cars they ruin it and they will do that with this Saab. When they start falling apart because they are asembled here in haste by people that dont care about the end product or have proper experience
     ...the blame will got to Subaru...if they stay tight like Imprezas do (since they are completely built in Japan)..IT will be GM's credit. I say they keep their greedy little mits off of the awesome Impreza that has taken 30 years of refining and hard work to evolve into a near perfectly balanced all around great car. Americans should stick to making food and building weapons which is all we can seem to do correctly....cars....look at the depreciation of ANY american car ..after 1 year.they are worth squat. They are disposable razors.
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    I digress....they are being built in Japan...yet my feeling remains the same......stay out of the Subaru gene pool with your "new" refinments so that GM can make more $$.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Saab reliability has actually pretty good lately, CR recommends a few models IIRC.

    Subaru need GM's capital and their buying power (economies of scale). Now GM wants payback, and 9-2x production is the first payment.

    I hold a moderate view, that it's OK as long as no GM products infiltrate Subaru here. I just don't want to see yet another Blazer clone or even worse something minivan based with VersaCrap.

    -juice
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    Subaru didn't need GM...because GM cant build a car that will hold together or retain its value. IT was a political gesture that Subaru made in order to stay in the good graces of the US and keep a good relationship.....look at GM's Corvette! The STI makes it look like its standing still in the 0-60 and the 1/4 mile and it has four doors + a trunk for 30K
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    actually I kinda agree. the saabaru will make it difficult for near-luxury trimmed subarus to sell.

    ~c
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    it will put a ceiling on how high up-market Subaru can go, as Saab will always be positioned above Subaru in the marketplace.

    Bob
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    So Volkov...what did you buy...and where have you been. Wrx's handle better than Porsches and leather is available. ...or Get the STI....It was not Road and Track "READERS CHOICE" car of the Year 2004 for nothing... beating the BMW 5 series- Porsche 911 and a lengthy list of other very expensive cars that cost less than $100,000 that didn't make the cut!How much does the STI coat again...$30K? Subaru did that without one scintilla of help from GM. It was Subarus engineering team in Japan that did that feat. Japan has the best engineers in the world- hands down. GM is a parasite on the Subaru name. If they had the engineers to build a great AWD wagon they would have done it. Take a look at the AWD "Vibe" by pontiac for example....why didnt they use that engine and underpinings? 10 guesses ...the first 9 don't count...the VIBE is GARBAGE!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Some of those Saabs sticker at $31 grand. So a 9-2x Aero is might close to an STi in price. Or a Legacy GT. Both much better values.

    The key is to look at the VOLUME, we're talking 8,000 cars per year. Someone did the match in another thread and it amounts to a few cars per dealer per year.

    If Saab can give dealers a small car to round out the lineup, and most shoppers get a 9-3 anyway, that's probably just fine with them. Saab had a record year for sales last year. It shouldn't be hard to them to sell 22 WRX wagons per day.

    I feel differently about the 9-7. Most Saab service staff have probably never even touched a truck.

    -juice
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    So Volkov...what did you buy...and where have you been.

    I bought a WRX wagon.

    I've been here. Where there is no factory leather. Maybe you've been in Japan?? Point was, the Saab brings some options that SOA/SOC have refused to offer to it's cutomers, but which some of us would like.
    Don't bring up the STi. It's a sore point with me - if the Sti wagon was here, there'd probably be one parked in my driveway.

    Nicholas
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    Unfortunately rsholland ...Saab has been three steps behind everyone for several years now and in bankruptcy. The novelty of having the key on the center console just didnt seem to keep people excited for long.
    Back in the 80's Saab had its best moments and even then the Turbo's were unreliable and problematic. Saab has been a lost child for the last 10 years and a liability...The only people that place the "Saab" name in high regard are the same people that think Jaguars are great cars because they fit some yuppie niche from days gone by. Those in the know are aware that if you want reliability, high resale, outstanding performance and dollar for dollar the finest value around...its Subaru....others hung up on nametags dont buy subarus because they once were considered a poor mans car that was slow...but always reliable. Times have changed and GM is well aware that Sub is about to launch past the German's ....in fact they just did. If you have a BMW or Benz or Saab....keep the windshield fluid full because you will need it to see through the vortex of dust that gets blown across your windshiled as you get smoked by just about any Subaru.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You have some pretty radical views! :o)

    Keep in mind Saab just had a record year, best ever.

    -juice
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    The STi and the Saab 9-2X are very different animals despite their similar price. They will attract very different buyers too. If you want to be on the bleeding edge of performance, sacrifice day-to-day comfort, and don't care about luxury features, the STi is the car for you. On the other hand, if you want comfort and numerous small but desirable luxury features combined with WRX levels of performance, go with the 9-2X.

    Craig
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's an easy decision for me. :-)

    But I'd go for Door #3, the one with a Legacy GT behind it.

    -juice
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    I'm not happy about the Saabaru deal either but the way I see it Subaru didn't have much choice in the matter. Rebadging a Subaru as a Saab may actually help Subaru's image (to the detriment of Saab's) but I agree it also imposes a type of glass ceiling on how well WRX wagons can be equipped. I'm also thankful that Subaru hasn't had a rebadged GM whatever foisted on them (at least not yet).

    -Frank
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    If the Subaru Traviq (Opel Zafira) is sold here, boy, they have no idea how harmful that would be to Subaru's image.

    They know better than to go mainstream, though. I hope. :o)

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I just got around to reading your post and I feel your concern for early discharge. That's the downside to our medical system.

    But look at it on the bright side. Your daughter has made it out! That's just tremendous news!

    Ken
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Nothing wrong with it. It gives you the chance to get the leather, wheels, and a different look than the traditional WRX. I know a bunch of folks who bought aftermarket leather for their WRX but would have bought the saab for the leather and looks over their WRX.

    -mike
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    through it! We'll keep you all in our prayers until you post that you've all gone out dancing!

    Patti
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    I believe that eventually SOA will benefit. GM has a lot happening with hybrid technology that would be tough for us to re-do as a small company. I believe that GM will be sharing that technology with us in the near future and - in the long run- that will save us and our customer's money when these cars start becoming available.

    There are many varying opinions about this at the office, but - if you can't beat 'em...

    Patti
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Saabaru- Nothing wrong with it

    Huh? Is this the same Mike who use to rail against the evils of even the slightest hint of GM meddling in Subaru's affairs as that would be the precursor of the Detroit giant sucking the life force out of Subaru and discarding the shriveled husk in the graveyard of has-been auto manufacturers ala Isuzu? Or have you had a change of heart? ;-)

    -Frank
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I have nothing against saab, not to mention saab has Zero to do with the 9-2x it's a rebadge all the way.

    GM will suck the life out of Subaru in the long run, but at this point there is nothing you or I can do to change that. So having a wrx re-badged a bit upscale is cool with me, cause subaru refused to make a more upscale interior.

    As I've posted before, I'd love to see Saab become the Lexus of Subaru.

    Then you'd have Subaru = Toyota and Saab = Lexus they can share technology, etc.

    -mike
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    very good point about hybrid techology Patti. I've mentioned before here in these forums that I didn't think that FHI should be spending money on that right now, but GM definitely has the money to do it, and should.

    FHI should concentrate on making their vehicles the very best performance per dollar spent in their niche.

    ~c
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    promotions. For the most part, you need to have an original coupon sent to YOU in the mail. The maintenance coverage is also provided by the "special lease" incentives. If you bought a car and were not given the consideration, please send an e-mail with the new car VIN to us at the Contact Us section of Subaru.com. Please write in the message that I sent you and want to review the information with them and we'll go from there.

    I hope this helps!

    Patti
  • luck11luck11 Member Posts: 425
    Patti, I know this is probably a stupid question, but do you have any idea if an offer that resembles the one being discussed here will be offered in Canada?
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    Saab needs to be eliminated. Its going to destroy the Subaru gene pool. and as for a "record year" for Saab that means they are possibly going to get the vendors paid this year and meet payroll for once in the last 10 years. They should call it the frankenstein-x2 its like range rover ...cant build an engine worth a plug nickle so they steal the BMW and still build a heap that handles like a pig and is a service nightmare that has parts falling off like beads from a mardi gras float. Subaru needs to distance itself from Saab and get GM's stock back. The japanese are the best engineers in the world and Saab is just a dying quail even with a stolen drivetrain from Subaru.
  • drovemalldrovemall Member Posts: 29
    Subaru dosent need an "Upgraded" image anyway. People like Subaru's because they are unpretentious yet have an outstanding AWD system that functions with timeless reliability.We(Subaru owners) don't want to be associated with the likes of Saab,BMW,Benz snobs anyhow.
     You want a luxury car Saab...then go build one. Lay off the Subaru's. I makes me want to regurgitate.
    And if you want leather ...get the aftermarket...its cheaper and higher quality than Saabs factory payless cardboard they call leather anyhow. This merger is a desperate last gasp for Saab...and if everybody is saying Saab had its "best year ever" then why are they now making a new car thats a subaru? Desperation...the worlds worst cologne...now worn by Saab.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Aftermarket leather generally is NOT as good as OEM. The leather in the 9-2x is from Subaru, not Saab. And finally, why would you not want subaru to have an up-scale brand? I guess you'd rather SOA move Subaru upscale so you can't afford it anymore? I rather see a split where some folks can buy the striped down model and others who want the creature comforts can still stay in the subaru family. I guess you don't like the SVX at all, afterall it's got leather.

    -mike

    PS: I'm a die-hard Subaru fan owning 3! But I'd still like a fullsize sedan/luxury sedan from SOA/FHI.
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    For those of you who followed our adoption trip to China last Fall, you might consider watching "China's Lost Girls" on National Geographic Ultimate Explorer. It premiered last Sunday, but is going to be rebroadcasted this Saturday, 6/26 at 8pm on MSNBC.

    http://www.nationalgeographic.com/ultimateexplorer/weekly/lostgir- ls.html

    The 1 hr program follows a group like ours, but also discusses the social implications of China's one child policy.

    Amazingly, of all the cities in China that Americans are assigned to, this show happens to follow much of our own adventure in the adoption of Annie!!!

    Our port of entry was Hong Kong, this group flies into Beijing. From that point on it is our trip - they fly to Nanchang in JiangXi province, stay at The Lake View Hotel and do their paperwork in the same room at the Registrar's Office in Nanchang (although we received our babies the night before at the Lake View). They get to see the orphanage (Nanchang Social Welfare Institute) standing in the same spots we stood, and meet with the foster parents that temporarily cared for their new daughters.

    They travel out to an abandonment site (town of Xinyu) which was were several of the babies on our trip were from. Our afternoon trip was to a different village, but the street scenes were virtually identical.

    They then fly on to Guanghzou, stand on the street in front of "Jennifer's Place" were we bought some gifts, stay at the White Swan Hotel, and do their exit paperwork at the US Consulate before preparing to fly home.

    A flood of emotions swept over us as we watched essentially our own trip being filmed.

    (and now back to our regularly scheduled Subaru / Saab debate)......

    Steve
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    That looks like a Cafe subject.

    ~c
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm with Patti on the hybrid issue. Let's face it, GM's budget for swiss cheese at Happy Hours is more than Subaru's entire R&D budget. :o)

    The catch with mike's plan of Saab being Subaru's Lexus, is that sort of stunts the whole "upscale" idea. The Legacy should have been a Saab, if that's the case, and then Subaru could have gotten a more budget priced model without all the upgraded interior materials but with a price cut.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    The catch with mike's plan of Saab being Subaru's Lexus, is that sort of stunts the whole "upscale" idea. The Legacy should have been a Saab, if that's the case, and then Subaru could have gotten a more budget priced model without all the upgraded interior materials but with a price cut.

    I agree. The more I think about it, the reason the WRX wagon doesn't get the Premium Package option, is because the 9-2x offers those features. I also bet if the 9-2x were offered in a sedan, the WRX sedan would never have gotten the Premium Package option.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Out of curiosity, will the Saab 9-2x be sold in Canada? Because they do get that stuff on the wagon.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://www.saabcanada.com/ssi/english/vehicles/saab/saab.html

    However, those features were offered on all Canadian WRXs from day one, long before the 9-2x was even a pipe dream.

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I bet that if the 9-2x does well for Saab we will see a further split and/or strip-down of the legacies to allow lattitude for saab to take the high end. The 9-2x could be a trial run for them. Also my idea on Saab/Subaru Lexus/Toyota thing was my suggestion rather than what I am convinced that will happen. I think it would be a good move, likely to happen, 50/50 I'd say.

    But if the 9-2x sells well I wouldn't be suprisde to see a legacy/9-3 around the bend at some point.

    -mike
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Colin - The Nat'l Geo special has way more to do with Meet the Members than a Saabaru rant does.
    :-)

    -Dennis
    p.s. - Hey, Mike. I need a skid plate!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The Saab 9-4x? Could be a Legacy with HIDs and Nav.

    I might be out of character here, but I'm hoping Subaru can hold on to the value equation and not go upscale, so in a strange way I'm hoping they don't start adding all this fluff that I don't want.

    The Saab idea might contain costs a bit for Subies.

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I definitely don't think they can compete in the same space. look what's happened to Audi after VW started really packing in the luxury options!

    it would be fine by me, though, if the Subarus didn't offer luxury.

    ~c
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Me too.

    Actually, I'm OK with it as long as they also offer a value model.

    I'm still waiting for my Forester XT with the unpainted cladding, with deletions for the climate control and a few others things.

    -juice
  • salbaby1972salbaby1972 Member Posts: 165
    Don't you think Subaru has too pack in some fluff? Nissan, Toyota and Honda do, leather, sound, heated seats, dual air and Nav on top-line models just to keep pace with the value players?

    So people are amazed by these things even though they can't/won't buy them, but some do like those who get Accord V6 EX with leather and Nav.

    Just my 2 cents.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I don't want the fluff, but some people do. Honestly I think 50% of people ask for a Nav option but probably 5% would actually pay $2 grand for it.

    When you're as small as Subaru, it may just not be cost effective.

    Just make it an option, so the 95% can opt out.

    -juice
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.