Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
General Intake / Exhaust Mods
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Steve, Host
K&N has good marketing I'll give them that.
If it is so great a product and increases hp so much, how come the Acuras and Lexus of the world don't use it as OEM?
Something doesn't add up here.
They tend to only come as standard equipment on high end high performance vehicles.
P.S. Still love my FIPK kit.
Thanks.
tidester, host
tidester, host
This reminds me of the STP additives and special spark plugs that people used to buy . .
By your reasoning then why don't the car companies put synthetic fluids in all their vehicles, use Optima batteries, twin spark plugs for each cylinder, better exhaust systems, etc... straight from the factory?????
Why, because it costs too much once you add it up for every car they sell, so they let the consumers enhance things later if they desire. Most don't care and leave their vehicles pretty much as they were when the bought them.
BTW, since you're running the K&N have you cleaned your throttle body lately?
The airaid I installed on my '02 Denali. I also ordered the tube for the airaid. The resonance is much worse with the airaid tube than the K&N. Either way though it was money wasted. I removed the airaid tube off the Denali cause the resonance was really irritating. Left the airaid setup on.
Last week, I cleaned the throttle bodies of both and found a lot of black residue.
mac24 "Jeep Wrangler" Jun 7, 2004 3:39pm
Steve, Host
However, swapping out the entire intake tube system and filter has been proven in tests to improve power over the OEM setup. Some OEM systems are extremely restrictive in an attempt to cut down on intake noise. I've seen independent magazine tests where they have gained anywhere from 10 to 15 hp by swapping out the OEM system for an aftermarket high performance intake system. That and the benefit of not having to replace the filter was more than enough reason for me to switch to K&N.
Steve, Host
Steve, Host
And it's less messy and I don't have to worry whether I over-oiled the filter and that my downstream sensors are going to get ruined.
Thanks for the post, Bigfur! <g>
Steve, Host
I do my own oil changes (with regular oil), but that's at 7,500 miles and I rotate the tires then. The air filter gets switched at 15k.
Otherwise my rides are lucky to get washed and waxed twice a year.. I've had 4 cars since '82 and minimal maintenance seems to be paying off. ymmv :-)
No offense taken, but doesn't it take some time (hours?) to air dry the filter after you wash it? And Karl's article indicates it takes at least 20 minutes for the cleaning and oiling part of the process (link).
Steve, Host
It takes me roughly 10 minutes to clean and reoil mine. I do it in the evening and then just let it sit in the garage overnight while I sleep, so I have zero actual downtime.
You don't want to know how long I'd run synthetic oil :-)
Steve, Host
"The Filter Minder is placed between the air filter and air intake of an internal combustion engine and measures how restricted an engine's air intake has become."
It's new to me, but sounds like a way to insure that whatever air filter you are using is still clean enough. Although some Usenet posts think it's worse than worthless.
WCCO-TV
Steve, Host
Very disappointed I wasted money on it.
so even economically it's a good choice :-)
They found that for most of the engines that they tested, there was some improvement in HP , and it increased when a special intake was added. However, the amount of gain in HP depended on the original engine design. Some already allowed freeflow of air, so a K&N or other air intake systems did not produce much improvement, since it was NOT the limiting agent on the engine. However, for most engines, they got a gain in HP, becuase air intake was part of the problem limiting the engine efficiency.
The article somewhere under the stack of magazines that I read...I'll post the source, once I dig thru it ( it needed cleaning anyways, to provide more flow for future reading material)
Interesting.
A cannister type air filtration system has more science behind it, since you can get a ram-air effect. But here again, without a special intake manifold and injection work, the net effect is going to be pretty slim pickins'.
If you want some real HP, you have to spend money. Otherwise, it's hardly worth the trouble for 1-3 HP if you're lucky, maybe a little more with a ram-air, at high rpm and under optimum conditions...possibly 8HP or so?
The down side of these ram air systems is that they suck air from pretty far down under the grille and present a danger of picking up water in a rainstorm---causing hydro-locking and a very dead and damaged engine (water enters cylinders and bends connecting rods).
I'm not endorsing this system but just giving you an idea of what seems to work.
It costs $369, so $30-35 per HP is pretty darn good. Of course it takes some time to install it...it's not just a drop in filter.
PS: I don't know if they make this for your GTO...maybe only the C5
MrShiftright
Co-Host
Chip Upgrades.. worth it?
Steve, Host