Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?

13233353738473

Comments

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited February 2011
    My '82 Tercel was .13 a mile for gas (I haven't owned for over a decade now). Lifetime TCO was .18 for it which was pretty good over 114,000 miles - that's the cost, insurance, registration, repairs, etc.

    My '99 Quest is running .18 a mile for gas last I ran the numbers (over a year ago).

    The '97 Subaru supposedly is coming in at .10 a mile just for gas as of a year or so ago. That number seems low to me but I don't have time to audit my spreadsheet right now. I don't track actual gallon costs for each fill, so I just plugged in $2.40 for the gas, dating back to 2003 when I got it. Put in $2.80 and it pops to .12 a mile. (Gas back in '03 was running around $1.60 in the Rockies so a lot of those miles were with "cheap" gas).

    9 cents a mile is really cheap. You're getting down into barge country. :-)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    edited February 2011
    My 07 Sequoia has 23270 miles on it. The cost per mile is at $.18 per mile. If I had bought the GL320 CDI I would probably be at about $.14 per mile. You have to put more miles on a vehicle for the diesel/gas argument to make much sense. I still like the torque of the diesel and the long range between fuel stops. It is rare that we need to make a potty stop at the same time as a fuel stop. Besides we prefer the fast food restrooms over most gas station toilets.

    PS
    I keep track of the gas price and total per tank. So it is pretty easy to figure cost per mile. 5700 of that 23K was on one trip with cheap gas most of the way and averaging close to 18 MPG.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    ULSD today was $3.84 corner store (highest ULSD has been in a long time) . It posted a shade over 48 mpg. Per mile driven that is .08 cents.
  • alltorquealltorque Member Posts: 535
    Good point, well made. Here in the UK, my '06 Volvo S60 D5 Geartronic, (185bhp a mountain of torque and all the toys), runs at circa $0.25 per mile on diesel, (conversion done for USmpg and Forex). Might look rather high but we're paying the equiv of $7.72 per USGallon of ULSD.

    With Hybrids I think the battery costs ultimately kill the whole idea...............at least for the poor folk who take 'em on later in the cars' lives.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    In the states, the (the same) math might reveal (actually hide in plain sight) that there are a fair amount and percentage of folks that CHOSE to pay close to, if not more than what you (in Europe) are paying @$7.72 US per GAL !! (per mile driven) So for example an SUV getting 15 mpg/3.47= .2313 cents per mile driven. So the actual is more like $7.10 US per gal (per mile driven) .
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I think the other portion is that there are two power generators that have to be dealed with when they break down. I think we already know there is a potential of 3,000 to 6,000 on the hybrid battery side. Not much is made of the conventional engine repair costs. Presumably it is the same cost as any conventional engine replacement. You also need to consider the interface portion. So all in all the POTENTIAL costs seem to sit behind a very opaque curtain.
  • altair4altair4 Member Posts: 1,469
    I've always liked the cost per mile information. Running premium in our '03 Passat has yielded a lifetime cost per mile (fuel only) of $0.116. 'Course, this year it is running higher at $0.146. I've been looking at Edmunds at new cars (our other vehicle is a long-in-the-tooth 97 Accord) - I fully expected that by now another player (in my price range) besides VW would have had a significant diesel offering. So far, I'm hanging tight, hoping for something better to hit the market. The first player that shoves a turbodiesel into a minivan will have my money.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    ,Indeed I also find per mile driven: (whatever) useful. Yes I have read in passing the 2012 VW Passat will have a (TDI) diesel in the line up. Now to me it would make sense to offer both a 2.0 TDI I-4 AND a 3.0 TDI V-6. This would be in keeping with VW offering V-6's in Jetta's (for example) .

    Either I am looking in ALL the wrong places or not using the correct search words, but it seems to be short of a state secret that app 9% of the US passenger fleet are "required " to use PUG (premium unleaded gasoline) Given that the 08 figures were 257.4 M vehicles that puts the number @ app 23.166 M vehicles, vs the passenger diesel CAR fleet of 1.272 M cars or a shade less than one half of one percent. So the folks that use more PUG and more OF PUG are roughly 18.2 TIMES greater.

    Absolutely, a TDI mini van makes all the sense in the world (over a gasser mini van).
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    "The first player that shoves a turbodiesel into a minivan will have my money."

    I sure concur with that. Make mine Mazda5 sized. With a stick, great seats, (heated, including steering wheel) highend audio and no sunroof or auto lighting/dimming stuff.

    Re these cents/mile you are calculating...what are the entered criteria? Are you including insurance, licensing, routine maintenance, annual emission testing etc?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Just from reading, it appears fuel only ($ gal/miles=) cost per mile driven: fuel.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited February 2011
    Yeah, if you add all in everything, you're lucky if you can keep your cost per mile under fifty cents for most cars.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    When calculating fuel cost per mile it would be just fuel costs. Total cost to own is much more complex. If you have lots of repairs or high insurance. Big payments have to be calculated into TCO. Edmund's does have a TCO on most vehicles. Comparing a Top of the line Golf TDI hatch to a top of the line Prius the Golf costs 56 cents per mile and the Prius 59 cents per mile. There are some variables in the Edmunds TCO that are hard to understand.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    It is not unlike what Senator E. Dirkson once said: a billion here, a billion there and pretty soon you are talking about real money. (He was an optimist, given our times)

    But yes the IRS business deduction figure is pretty acurate. Too bad it is a mere deduction rather than a tax credit.

    BUT on a smaller but just as serious scale,... truly this can be a game of percentages (of pennies). So for me another reason why I like the diesel. The cost per mile driven: oil lubrication (aka OCI) is (4.88 qt * 4.5 qt = $21.96+ $4.50 filter= $26.46/ 30,700 miles =)

    $.0008618 cents per mile driven lubricated (DIY).

    Oil changing has never been fun for me, but I have to admit that topside evacuation and replacement of new oil that takes all of 5 mins (including cartridge filter replacement) is a real hoot !! I actually spend more time (15 to 20 more minutes) cleaning up the recycling stuff, and reattacting a dress only cover (plastic) plate.
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    Right, I should have done the math before asking the question..duh ha ha

    So just checked the CRV stick. Made 2, 10 mile return trips (ambient was a mild for Feb, 30) and one 30 mile return trip (ambient was 10), on 35 to 50 mph roads and a small amount of in town use. Speeds were about 35 on the 2 short trips which equaled 4 cold starts. Speeds were 35 to 50 to 60 but mostly 50, 55 on the 30 mile trip. That one had only 1 cold start. Did 26.42 mpg on our big gallon. Pump price was $1.079/ litre, so $4.91/Imp gal. (or $4.08 for your gal)

    All 3 trips and intown was 90% gentle.

    So .186 cents per mile.

    Had it been in my friends new Golf wgn TDI, i am guessing diesel was about 1.119 to 1.139/litre. (I forgot to look but it is usually a dime/litre hit like premium is) So using the larger price, and a very fair and realistic 48 mpg on winter fuel, would have been .111 cents/ mile.

    And about 5 years ago, when diesel was about 80 cents/litre and his older Jetta 1.6 turbo (the newer bigger TDI's do use more fuel than the pre TDI days) delivering a 64 to 66 mpg most times but for the sake of a fair comparo here with colder temps and winter fuel, let's say 54 mpg, cost would have been .0673 cents/ mile
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    Is there a typo in your post? The 30,700 mile oil change interval caused me a pause there..
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    No, that is not a typo. 30,700 miles, 49,407 kms.
  • coontie66coontie66 Member Posts: 110
    My thoughts exactly. Some other company bring on a Diesel please. I had a VW rabbit and will have real problems buying a VW of any kind. I won't even registered to win one.
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    " I won't even registered to win one."

    haha now that is true contempt if ever I read it, lol
    not to rub salt in old wounds tho..
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    My father was just over last night and filled me in on the latest adventures of 2 of his coworkers with Jetta TDI wagons. He has told me before that both have had problems with the HPFPs. The newest news is that 1 of them had their 2nd HPFP basically disintegrate and shoot metal througout the engine. Toasted engine. 15k miles.

    He's now been informed that VW refuses to cover it under warranty. The reason being that the fuel he was using does not have enough essential lubricants. Meaning the ULSD required by US law is bad for VW's diesel engine and they won't warranty it ... yet they sell it here.

    Wow!

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116

    The "hybreds" I have looked at are made of thin metal, cheap-feeling materials and do not drive like a German car. Oh- and dont forget to "run the numbers" on replacing the battery-pack.


    While I concur about the driving experience of most hybrids (especially the Prius and the Insight) I find the Fusion Hybrid feels very much like a real car. I found the CVT to be much more instep with my driving habits than the Prius. My mom has the Fusion and my MIL has the Prius.

    As far as the battery argument, the fears about the battery pack seem unfounded at this point. There are enough 8-10 year old 100k+ Priusususs puttering around town that I don't see the battery issue as real. Unlike my laptop battery, its not designed to be discharged all that much and the charge cycles aren't as invasive.

    All that said, I would rather have a diesel.
  • coontie66coontie66 Member Posts: 110
    Please would GM, Ford, Honds or a TOY car company come forward and make me a diesel car. I won't even register to win a VW after owning a 80 Rabbit
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    There are very nice diesel offerings from BMW and MB. Both cars and SUVs. It is very common to get 40 MPG in the E320 CDI. If you don't care to pay the premium for a new MB, let someone else take that hit and buy an older one. Those posting their mileage on the fuel economy website are averaging 33 MPG overall with the E class diesels starting with the 2005 MY. I would be happy getting 30 MPG in the ML class diesel out on the highway. It would double my current Sequoia mileage and improve my overall driving experience.

    PS
    Where can I register to win a VW TDI. The one I had was great. If it had been an SUV I would not have sold it.
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    "There are enough 8-10 year old 100k+ Priusususs puttering around town that I don't see the battery issue as real."

    But how would you know if the batteries had been replaced? No way to tell from just observing at a street level.

    I would be a lot more impressed if you see those same cars, with the original batteries (and associated running bits), in 20 years with 200+k because that more closely represents a true life cycle.

    "Unlike my laptop battery, its not designed to be discharged all that much and the charge cycles aren't as invasive. "

    Are you sure? That's the first I have heard that. Any hybrid driven on a highway trip I think depletes that crucial voltage range in a way not much different than any other voltage-aware device would. The batteries don't get depleted to 0 volts. I doubt they would have the engine supplying a charge to the battery any sooner than necessary as the load draw on the engine (which is actually best suited for city use more so than highway) already infringes on the highway FE. And those used in cold climates probably cycle a lot more often.

    Sorry, I guess I am just so not a hybrid fan. If hybrids worked as long as IC and on as few dollars over the life of the vehicle, then in their own way it would seem too good to be true. And we all know what happens when we make that assumption.
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    I find this news about VW not stepping up for the HPFP issues and blaming it on the fuel, pretty disturbing. I wonder how sensationalized this is so far? Surely if there is some truth to this, (ULSD being the cause) then MB and BMW should be having the same premature failures. VW advertises they want to be the world's #1 automaker by ...what is it? 2016 or something? Well this doesn't sound like a good way to get there. Is Europe's diesel also ULSD and to the same degree? I still smell a rat here with NA ULSD. Somewhere, somehow they want to discourage oil burners here. Why would manufacturers invest in the tech necessary (eg GM bringing a diesel Cruze here) to have to warranty diesel engines for export to here if they have to jump through ridiculous $hoops to survive on a too restrictive fuel content? Maybe in future we will see a re-assessment of our fuel and they will relax this ULSD.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    According to Washington State University study most ULSD has to have additives for lubricity. Or bad things happen to your fuel pump. The key is VW making that clear to people when they buy a new TDI.

    Most refiners use a hydro-treating process to de-sulfurize diesel fuels. For the most part, refiners will extend this process to meet the 15 ppmw specification. Diesel fuels that are more difficult to de-sulfurize could be subjected to intense hydro-treating. This process can reduce trace components containing nitrogen and oxygen that provide a natural lubricity. (Ref.1) This reduced lubricity could result in excessive engine wear without the addition of a high lubricity additive, like biodiesel. To avoid any problems, ULSD users should make sure that the fuel lubricity meets equipment manufacturers specifications.

    http://www.energy.wsu.edu/ftp-ep/pubs/renewables/Fuels.pdf

    So if you can find a dealer that sells B5 ULSD you should be fine. If not better use additives. I used Powerserve in both my Mercedes Sprinter and Passat TDI. I did not keep either long enough to assess the results.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    Per msg #1677, if you can get those people to file their complaints with the NHTSA, they would be #'s 161,162 respectively.

    This issue is by no means confined to diesels. BMW has had HPFP issues with some MY's in their GASSER lines.

    ..."In at least the US market, the N54 engine has been characterized by a very large number of High Pressure Fuel Pump (HPFP) failures, leading to many BMW NA vehicle Lemon Law "buy backs" and reduced customer goodwill. On some engines the HPFP was replaced four times within the first few years of service.[citation needed] BMW has instituted a 10-year, 120,000-mile (190,000 km) warranty on the part, but only for 2007, 2008 and 2009 model year vehicles with the N54 engine. Other model years, to include 2009 models, continue to report HPFP failures.[10] As of late 2009, the low pressure fuel sensor has become suspected of causing some premature failures of the HPFP by engine tuners such as AMS and CP-E."...

    link title
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    On the 03 TDI, I have been using Primrose 405 C (3000 to one dilution ratio) for app 155,000 miles. It is now just getting to a 50/50 ratio of (early and majority) LSD to ULSD use. I frankly can then nor now, tell much difference, maybe a .25 to .5 mpg difference. I will be the first to point out this can be just one to one of many error variables. I can also tell no difference in Primrose 405 C use or non use, between tank fulls.

    VW over the years have not recommended the use of additives and/or have been silent; even as VW dealers have sold Standyne OTC for many years.
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    edited February 2011
    What additive would you recommend adding? Or is there a combo? I want to make sure my friend who recently bought a new 2011 Golf TDI. He hasn't driven much since buying it due to some health problems and it is a certainty he will run out of wty time before wty miles.

    I also want to mention to my neighbours who use various diesel machinery and tractors and ask them if they are aware they should be using extra lube.

    edit- great minds...thanks, I just asked you that very question. So that one additive is thee one?
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    Thanks. I'll send him the link. Although he said they were looking into the pending class action lawsuit.

    I agree about others having HPFP problems not related to diesel. But those, as far as I know, are covered under warranty. It is not the failure itself I find disturbing, it is the manufacturer's response.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    A 2011 Golf TDI requires "low saps", so mass market wise, Power Service in the (80 oz ) gray bottle might be one product. They also make anti gel and Diesel 911. There are a lot more "boutique" type stuff available both on line and brick and motar. I should probably leave that to the more "interested" as I want to stay out of the TMI mode. :shades:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    VWA does not do themselves any favors with their stereotypical reaction: blame the customer. Indeed given their "American" goals, they seem to delight in trying to "shoot themselves in the foot with a fully loaded automatic weapon" so to speak.
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    thanks, but AFAIC, no such thing as TMI.
    I'll let my friends know. Not sure what you mean by low saps tho..
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    Oops, my bad. Sulfated ash, ppm (removal @ every level: fuel, use, lubrication, etc.)

    Diesel Kleen (400 to one)

    Total's take
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    What would be the harm in burning furnace fuel in a farm tractor? HAs FF also fallen prey to low sulphur?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    In the context of the diesel passenger car, that is basically unregulated and probably not related.
  • zambaqzambaq Member Posts: 14
    I'm not a hybrid fan, either. But Consumer Reports just posted the results of a performance test it conducted on a 2002 Prius. Here's the concluding statement:

    "Based on data from over 36,000 Toyota Prius hybrids in our annual survey, we find that the Prius has outstanding reliability and low ownership costs. But we wanted to know if the effectiveness of the battery degraded over the long run. So we hooked up a 2002 Toyota Prius with nearly 208,000 miles on the clock to our testing instruments and compared the results to the nearly identical 2001 Prius we tested 10 years ago.

    Conclusion: We found very little difference in performance when we tested fuel economy and acceleration."


    You can use this link to see the post and the results:
    http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2011/02/200000-mile-toyota-prius-still-per- forms.html
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    In the case of the Prius, I think you have to give Toyota credit for taking or havng or finally getting the correct attitude. For all the various small and BIG problems it has had since the 2003 MY (that I am acquainted) by and large they have usually come around. This has NOT been true throughout its model lines. It has probably faded from most Prius owners memory's, but I remember HOSTs of unhappy 2004 Prius owners who were told 60 to 50 mpg, scooped them up, and got more like: ... 40-45 mpg (still nothing wrong with that, even as the 03 TDI gets 48-52 in similar commute scenarios !!) . Indeed that bru ha ha was instrumental in getting EPA tests that favor hybrids enacted. The result is normally now diesel's exceed their EPA's and by a good percentage, despite regulations designed to make them less fuel efficient. But again in all fairness the Toyota Camry Hybrid (power and mpg wise) is the like for like competitor. Prius is more a luxury Corolla/Civic, etc. However my 04 Civic posts 38-42 mpg and a tad more than half the cost.
  • altair4altair4 Member Posts: 1,469
    You wrote: "The key is VW making that clear to people when they buy a new TDI."

    This gave me pause for thought. I have an '03 PAssat 1.8T. Never once in the purchasing experience was the fact that premium fuel was recommended or that synthetic oil was mandatory.

    Now, I had done a ton of research before I bought the car, so I was well-aware about the fuel issue. But the synth oil thing was a bit trickier. Earlier model years apparently didn't spec synth (when the cars were first sold - they changed that later with an addendum to the owner's manual). Even the owner's manual was very written in a obtuse manner - there was no "put it right out there: it needs synthetic oil." Instead it was caged in a manner that required you to google specific VW specifications. Geez, even after VWoA issued that revision to the manual, their own dealers were (as documented here on Edmund's) pouring synth blend or conventional motor oil into 1.8Ts for several years.

    In a land where most owner's manuals lay in the glove box still in the original shrink wrap, that's not a good approach to the issue. 'Course, telling people that you will need a hard-to-find version (none of the "Stuff-mart" stores around here sell 5w-40) of synthetic oil doesn't sell cars, I suppose. And while using regular fuel (versus premium) might not kill an engine, using less than the specified synthetic oil sure heightens that possiblity.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    "There are enough 8-10 year old 100k+ Priusususs puttering around town that I don't see the battery issue as real."

    But how would you know if the batteries had been replaced? No way to tell from just observing at a street level.

    I would be a lot more impressed if you see those same cars, with the original batteries (and associated running bits), in 20 years with 200+k because that more closely represents a true life cycle.


    My sample belongs to friends and friends of friends. Many of them were handed down from parent to kid as newer, more interesting things came out on the market. None of them has ever had any major work done.

    Are you sure? That's the first I have heard that. Any hybrid driven on a highway trip I think depletes that crucial voltage range in a way not much different than any other voltage-aware device would. The batteries don't get depleted to 0 volts. I doubt they would have the engine supplying a charge to the battery any sooner than necessary as the load draw on the engine (which is actually best suited for city use more so than highway) already infringes on the highway FE.

    Yes, I am sure. There are kits you can get for the Prius that convert them to Plug in hybrids and also kits you can get that allow them to run more in BEV mode to further reduce fuel consumption. Hybrids are tuned to protect the battery, not maximize mileage or efficiency. These aftermarket kits (which will void warranties) will adjust that trade off for someone so inclined. If they were willing to sacrifice battery longevity they could get more efficiency out of the system.

    Sorry, I guess I am just so not a hybrid fan.

    Me neither. I don't own one, and I don't plan to, but fair is fair.
  • zambaqzambaq Member Posts: 14
    "He's now been informed that VW refuses to cover it under warranty. The reason being that the fuel he was using does not have enough essential lubricants."

    Really? Did your father's coworker get that response in writing? From what I've heard and read, VW has been denying warranty coverage on grounds of "bad fuel", "contaminated fuel", or "gasoline in fuel". This is the first I've heard of their citing insufficient lubricity as reason. I don't see how they could get away with that, esp. in the context of the ongoing NHTSA investigation. For that to hold up, I should think they would need an amended warning plastered on the car: "ULSD fuel only, and ONLY ULSD with a minimum 460 scar wear rating"!
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    edited February 2011
    the running cost just for gas is $0.08/mile (8 cents per mile) with gas at $3.20/gallon as it has been where I live for most of the past year. Gas is now up to $3.60/gallon here, so I am up to a whopping 9 cents a mile. When gas was (and will be this summer) at $4/gallon, the running cost was still only $0.10/mile for gas, something which I very much appreciate.

    That seems to rival and best pretty much all the claims made here by owners in the last 50 posts or so. Yes, my car is a small (non-hybrid) Japanese car, so for the German car fans out there mine is a "fake" car, but fake or not, it has taken me everywhere I needed to go, and often friends and family along with me, for years and years. And that without needing new fuel pumps, new engines, special additives to the gas, or $100 oil changes. Or any repairs at all, in matter of fact.

    Automakers CAN do that without adding a diesel or hybrid powertrain at great additional cost, they just choose not to because not enough Americans demand it.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    For me ONE of the things I like most about the Jetta TDI is it is built for the autobahn, yet .... gets the 50 mpg without much fan fare. Indeed on longer trips, if I do 75 mph with bursts of 80/85 mph, it will post 59 mpg.

    Indeed if you are more into commuting and don't need the room nor the "power" a 3 cylinder 70 mpg diesel is probably a landscape changer. That will make a Prius look like a GAS guzzler !!??
  • crkyolfrtcrkyolfrt Member Posts: 2,345
    "Yes, my car is a small (non-hybrid) Japanese car, so for the German car fans out there mine is a "fake" car, but fake or not, it has taken me everywhere I needed to go"

    But it would not have taken you to my door, 5 out of the 12 months in a year. Probably within 700' of my door, but that is a still a long way on foot to make numerous trips in the pouring rain with groceries etc etc. On Friday I made about 12 trips to the car while unloading it after a big shop in town. A lot of the items were heavy, and I also bought gas in cans for around the home use, cuz am anticipating gas is going to keep going up in the next months.

    I find that anyone who lives in temperate climates have a hard time appreciating the need/expense for more comprehensive drive-trains, so can't readily relate.

    And to be fair, there was a fairly broad range of examples that were given here, so it is not fair to compare your 2300 lb 2WD car with other AWD capable ones that weigh practically twice what yours weigh. And for those vehicles, diesel makes the most sense by a huge margin. All you have to do is relate to what form of fuel is the most efficient to use when work must be done. And the answer always ends up being diesel. But, as a bonus, it also just happens to have very desirable traits that contribute to the driving experience. If you have ever driven any turbo'd engine, you will know what I'm talking about. It provides an almost visceral feeling that few, if any, gas jobs can match.
  • puffin1puffin1 Member Posts: 276
    Why, $7k cheaper than the TDI alot of gas. Plus this Golf I have has the least problems than any VW's. The Tdi is telling owner when their fuel pumps blow apart and they need a new engine it's the fuel they are using. BS to me.
    I always owned Acuras but Acura shot itself in the foot by doing away with them and the RSX. I loved my Type S (leather was cheap though.)Ever had a GSR what wheels?
    I can't believe I bought a VW and I like it because of all the bells and whistles that Mazda would have you buy a 24K GT.Grab bars,lumbar, multilevel heated seats, bluetooth moonroof and find me a Ford, Mazda,or Civic that offers those.Hyundai and Focus 2012 comes close.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I'm beginning to think the diesel costs per mile need to be recalculated to include the added expense of using synthetic oil and additives in the fuel.

    That Primrose stuff runs about $12 a quart.

    My gasser burns ethanol laced regular and gets a nice fresh batch of oil once a year - usually Supertech unless something cheaper is on sale at Wally World that day.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    Did your father's coworker get that response in writing?

    That I couldn't tell you. Just passing along 3rd-party info. I suggested he tell this guy to sue. Should be an easy case, I would think.

    I've also read where they are accusing folks of putting in gas and screwing it up that way. In this case, this guy happens to be a truck driver for my dad (who is the shop supervisor), so I think the odds of him mistakenly putting in gas are pretty slim. He even pointed out to the dealer he is a truck driver and goes to the same stations as with his trucks, which have never had a mechanical failure like this.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    Indeed the cost per mile driven: lubricated should ALWAYS be included !! I really can not imagine any car being bought without it part of the projected operating figures !! The 03 Jetta TDI has seen .0008618 cents per mile driven: lubricated ( DIY, 4.5 qts @ 4.88 per qt+ 4.50 oem filter = 26.46/30,700 miles)

    The numbers on the 04 Civic see .0011275 cents per mile driven: lubricated (DIY 3.5 qts 4.80 per qt+ 5. FRAM filter+ .75 washer= $22.55/20,000 miles) or 30.83% more per mile driven.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited February 2011
    Not to quibble, but Edmunds.com lists the difference as $5,230 ($17,995-$23,225).

    And really Golf TDI or gasser seems to be a bright spot in the line up. This is especially true as they have gotten rid of or solved the issues on the former gassers, 2.0 L and 1.8T engines, oil drinkers and sludge monsters. I would have gotten neither, nor a VW for that matter: if they did not have the 03 TDI 1.9 T engine. Indeed the extra premium really makes the TDI start to make sense app 20,000 miles per year.

    I generally have to add 1/2 to 1 qt during the 04 Civic OCI vs .25 to .5 qt for the TDI. Normally I just change the TDI's oil and forgo adding.
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,618
    edited February 2011
    Me neither. I don't own one, and I don't plan to, but fair is fair.

    Amen.

    As I've said a number of times, if any one of several small-displacement diesels (with a manual transmission) available all over the rest of the world were made available here in the land of EPA & CARB (fat chance), I'd buy it tomorrow.

    Since VW is the only show in town, it's interesting to read here about potential issues with the fuel pumps. This is one of the most useful boards (to me) on Edmunds.

    Thanks to all who participate.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    There's still some Jeep Liberty Diesel's around.
This discussion has been closed.