Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Oldsmobile Intrigue

1103104106108109238

Comments

  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Just thought I'd mention I tested a pre-production Saturn VUE yesterday. It was an AWD 3.0 model, fully loaded. Very nice vehicle, though I will be shopping for the 4 banger if I buy. The V6 was very peppy, but we just don't have the $ right now.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    I truly enjoy the reviews from Robert Bowden of "The Car Place". He is independent, therefore he doesn't have a problem telling it like it is. He is the "Bill O'Reilly" of automotive reviews....No spin doctors allowed!

    Check his website out:

    www.thecarplace.com
  • rc52rc52 Member Posts: 27
    Your post about K&N - was that for the 3.5L?
    Which filter - the 33-2086 or the 33-2059??
  • focusfocus Member Posts: 225
    most of them are just lip service; like those lobbyist in washington, the more money you have, the better you are heard.
    I like "what car" and other car mags. from UK.
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    I love watching "Top Gear" on BBC. May not be able to get most of the cars here but is sure is fun watching Tiff push supercars on a race track. With the war situation, it is tough to catch it anymore and I've heard rumours of the show's demise.


    For those of you with high speed access, some amazing videos from the show are available at

    Taner's Top Gear Clips

  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    It was the 33-2086 and it's for the 3.5. Again, K&N does not list a filter available for the Intrigue, but if you cross reference the AC(or even try another brand) part number, their book lists the 33-2086. Which is also the K&N filter which another poster found worked with the Intrigue. As soon as I can find one(Pep Boys and Advance did not have this size in stock) I'm going to pick one up for the Intrigue.
  • garnesgarnes Member Posts: 950
    K&N will not "list" a model year that has not been tested by their people. Even if the part number for the air box is the same for several model years, they will only list the model year they looked at. I've asked them about it. They are almost too careful.

    Interesting note - the Impala 3.8 and Aurora 4.0 are both listed as taking the same paper filter, but K&N has two different filters. Upon inspecting them I noticed the rubber "frame" was indeed a bit different on the two and they were not exactly interchangable. K&N gets really weird about exact custom fits and no air leakage. They are often a really tight fit to close the box.

    As before, I second all the comments on the car mags. Teo - you got it. I've been in the camry and accord and own an Impala. Scooter vs Harley is pretty accurate. Same could be said for how they compare to the Intrigue. There is just a lot of "emporer's new cloths" mentality in the car mag circles. Blinded by a lot of bias also fits.
  • swagledswagled Member Posts: 195
    When I bugged them, all they would say is "our filters are application specific". I couldn't even get an answer as to who or when or why or why not on the 3.5L.

    Sounds like somebody will eventually just "take the plunge" on the 3.5L and see what happens, because K&N isn't gonna tell us.

    Myself, I'm very shy of monkeying with the air filter on my own. Modern cars are very picky about air fuel mixture, because of all the computerized stuff that's done to get the most efficient mixture. Maybe after somebody else tries it for a year without problems, I'll give it a go.

    P.S. - We're back in the top 10! That seems to happen when JGriff de-lurks. I guess he's good for something! ;-)
  • winter9winter9 Member Posts: 98
    I share some of the same suspicions as Dindak, namely that reveiwers may get kickbacks or get some pressure to rate higher the products that pay big advertising revenues. It's a hard thing to know but I bet a mag writer that "told it like it is" may validate this suspicion.

    Anyway, I did notice one interesting thing in the C&D comparo: The Impala and the Buick blew the field away in the 30-50 mph acceleration test. It is hard to beat the ol' 3.8 Torquemeister down low. Impala did it in 3.6, Buick in 3.4. Rest of field was 4.0 and above. Even the "mighty" Altima V6 was 4.3.

    GM powertrains are awesome, now hopefully Lutz can help make the rest of the vehicles just as good.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Intrigue's 30-50 time is scary fast. Probably less
    than 3 seconds. I know mine would practically take
    your head off at 30 mph.
    Wonder why the impala was .5 secs. slower than the regal. Also 8.6 is about the slowest time i have seen for the impala.
  • jg28jg28 Member Posts: 257
    and it seems to be just fine. The Intrigue has a computer adjust for air intake so it wouldn't be a problem. It's performed great. '

    My stbs and sway bars have made a tremendous difference. I can't make the tires squeal around turns if I tried. She's tight and rigid yet the stbs seem to soften up the bumps, make them less jarring.

    I've had quite the few problems with her this month. I was ready to give up a few weeks ago but we'll see how it goes. I can't say I feel too happy with Intrigue or Oldsmobile or my dealer right now.
  • ketchketch Member Posts: 217
    Have read nearly all the auto mags since a child, and C&D has definitely fallen. Just look at their writers- Bedard, who postively hates Olds, esp the Intrigue, and then thiers Yates, a joke as much as his picture suggests. Bedard BTW is not the final word on Olds at thier rag, as others do like the Intrigue alot, and highlight the differences. On this, Bedard is nearly alone both inside and outside the biz, except those who really should be reviewing Maytags anyways.
    Yates, and his "Hollywierd" background (Cannonball movies et al), is pure material for lining my cat's litterbox.

    Reading the road test of family sedans was humouros. They end the Honda love fest by exagerating the Altima's faults, and ignoring its purer sports sedan performance as holding significant weight. They then put the new Camry second, which really should have beat the older Honda anyways. I too believe they are stuck in a rut, one which cannot be excused.

    R&T it is then, except when i can find my favorite, CAR, but thats overseas coverage only (but great).
  • oscarz2oscarz2 Member Posts: 153
    Do you have the 3.5? If so, did the stb fit okay and did you do it yourself?
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    It sounds all too convenient that the Accord, in the last year model of the current incarnation, "wins" in a test comparison... :^/

    And across the board it seems that reviewers are more than happy to bash American-made cars for the tiniest flaws, the same and often less severe than some on imports that are very easily either overlooked or rationalized about.

    Sometimes I think that those reviewers belong to the same club of Cassandras blaming the US for 9/11... :^P
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    jg28 : I'm still a bit nervous about the K&N. That said, I'm interested in which one you put in.

    winter : I could be wrong, but I'm suspicious. Then again, CR has no advertising and their tests suck half the time.
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    I agree, I think the Intrigue would have blown the competition in the 30-50 mph test. Too bad the C&D didn't think the Intrigue should be included in their test. I'm guessing if it had been included it would have come in 4th or 5th. The newer and quicker Altima would have surely beat it and then there is the holy grail Camry and Accord. BTW, did anyone notice how high the Altima's as tested price was? And the one they testes didn't even have leather interior or climate control A/C.
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    As soon as I can find the 33-2086, I'm going to put it in mine. I'm not worried about increased airflow as if anything, this should help performance. The mass airflow and MAP sensor should help the PCM adapt to any changes in airflow. Thats the true beauty of computer controls on a modern engine.
  • jg28jg28 Member Posts: 257
    Dindak? Why are you worried? Yes, oscarz I have the 3.5 (2000 GX). I ordered the air filter from macromotive.com part# 33-2086. I figured out the measurements from fram.com and found something nearly identical measurements wise. I posted about this last month. The differences we're talking about are miniscule and it forms a tight seal.

    There hasn't been a major boost in horsepower but I have noticed some, particularly in the bottom half, you know before our "turbo" kicks in at 3500.

    The strut tower brace fits without any drilling and could easily be installed by a novice. Both the sway bars and stbs came from grandprixstore.com

    I do have a caution for you. The front stb will touch the power steering pump hose. This will "broadcast" the steering pump noise and make it sound like it's a bad steering pump. Alas, I found this out after they'd replaced my power steering pump twice and the rack and pinion as well. My friend spotted the problem right away and I bought some soundproofing tape from soundproofing.org, wrapped the bar and it's reduced the problem. I seem to remember someone mentioning a GM stb that wouldn't touch the hose. Maybe this might be wise for at least the front one but I heard it required drilling. The stbs were very easy to install (well the front one was). Luckily my bro (who is a tech at a Subaru dealer) is smaller than me and fit in the trunk to put the back one on. Similarly, the rear sway bar was fairly simple. The front sway bar was the most difficult to install. You may want to keep the existing front sway bar and just get the polyurethane bushings for it (at grandprixstore.com). My dealer screwed up the front sway when they had to take it out to replace the steering and then tried to charge me $84 for it cause it was aftermarket. If I know one thing, it's that dealerships are out to swindle you. I'm feeling rather skeptical about keeping this car. The things that I've had replaced on it would've cost me a fortune had it not been under warranty. She feels creakier by the day. I can't decide whether to keep her and risk major repairs or have the stress of a new 25K loan.

    I just ordered 12 oil filters (they come in packs of 12) from gmpartsdirect.com Fram actually makes an oil filter for our cars now but you have to order it, so I decided to go with these. 12 oughtta be enough for a lifetime. Does anyone wanna buy them from me if I dump my Intrigue? Oh and by the way Fram also makes a passenger compartment air filter for the Intrigue too. For those of you that have GXs before 2001 models, you can easily install a passenger compartment air filter. It's the best "modification" I've done to my car and pretty cheap too.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    The only reason I worry is because K&N told me directly that they do not have a filter for the 3.5L yet. I figure if another car's filter worked they would have told me. Then again, it could be a liability issue.
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    It seems like the Intrigue is a black sheep as far as K& N is concerned. When I checked on a filter for the '98 3800, they claimed they were working on it. Nothing yet. They made it sound like it was in the works. Meanwhile, the 3.5 was rolling around in Intrigues across the country. Still nothing for that either. Then the Aurora comes out and they have a filter, not only for the 3.5 but also the 4.0.

    What I don't get is how the Aurora, that doesn't pretend to be a luxury performance machine, had K&N's listed in the catalogs but the Intrigue, which has had the 3.5 since '99 still doesn't have anything.

    In short, if you're waiting for K&N to officially provide a filter for the Intrigue, don't hold your breath.
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    http://www.auto.com/industry/iwirx17_20011117.htm


    Here's a question that was asked that I'd be interested in knowing our view on:


    What about all-wheel-drive, because GM is talking about bringing out more high-performance engines soon?


    Any thoughts?

  • ketchketch Member Posts: 217
    In fact, I always wondered why GM, esp. Olds, didn't go more after Audi for example, and
    offer AWD. Today the Versatrak system under a hi-pow version of, lets say an Intrigue, would have been awsome. It would also have validated Olds historic technology background. Another GM miss in my estimation. With Olds gone soon, they should still get some AWD cars, not more trucks, as they are already too truck-centric, as Lutz feels rightly. Here's hoping...
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,284
    It would absolutely have made sense for Olds to do an AWD version of the Intrigue or Aurora if GM had any clues as to their own heritage. Olds always was GMs innovator when it came to new technology -- just look at the Toronado, the Rocket V8, etc. Unfortunately I think there's nobody left at GM who remembered any of that.

    Re. the K&Ns -- does anyone know how well they filter the air? I wouldn't want my engine breathing in a lot of junk.

    Teo was asking how the Intrigue is. Fact is, I don't have one. I came here about 18 months ago because I was thinking of a purchase. Then a bunch of things changed, not the least of which was the decision to kill Olds. It was bizarre on the day that was announced... I run the Olds email list (about 600 members, mostly with owners of V-8 powered Oldses from the 60s thru 80s represented) and on the day of the announcement I got calls and emails from all sorts of reporters. It's scary to think how easy the net has made it to track people down. Anyway, I got quoted in the Denver Post and the Detroit Free Press, which was nice, even though the reason sucked.. ;-)

    An Intrigue purchase still might be in the cards, but nothing's for certain. But I still like it here, so I'm hanging around.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I don't see there being a lot of current car models that could use AWD. The most obvious choice would be the Saturn LW series. Others that could work would be the Corvette, CTS, Seville and the Grand Prix maybe. I think the vans all have AWD options now so really there isn't much else there IMO.
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    It's been nearly a year since the day GM made the dreaded annoucement. I wonder what would have happened if Lutz had just taken over then and someone "ran that idea by him."
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    Cadillac needs AWD more than Olds or another GM division. This would really give them as ace on the market. I agree that Olds was once the technology leader at GM and they still were pretty forward thinking, but competition pretty much dictated that Cadillac would need to be the innovator. In the old days, Cadillac only had to worry about Lincoln and Chrysler. In today's luxury market, simply having the biggest cid engine or the largest tailfins doesn't cut it. How could one justify a $50K Cadillac when an Oldsmobile for much less has more technical innovations. I think Olds was headed in the right direction with the DOHC engines and getting them before Buick and others, but it would be very hard for GM to justify Olds being their technology leader in today's market.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I disagree. I think Cadillac is and has been the technology leader for some time now. Almost all new GM innovations start in a Cadillac.
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    Was reading the Regal board and someone is having the same problem that b4z has detailed and others have had. The person has a '99 Regal GS. Their forum isn't nearly as lively as ours. So others may also be having this problem and just not reporting it (as is what is usually the case with Japanese car owners). What it does indicate is that the problem is probably a design issue shared by all the vehicles on that platform for that year.

    But at least it's not because the Intrigue is a "crappy" machine.
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=4394


    We've read a lot of articles on Lutz but this article sounds like someone on this forum wrote it. It is SOOOOOOO refreshing to read that someone with credibility openly says Zarella is an idiot when it comes to cars.


    Just to whet your appetite, here's a clip:


    Lutz's answer for how to get [Cadillac] on the right path without making Zarrella look foolish was to keep the "art and science" strategy, but change everything else about the strategy-- the design template of the cars and the marketing direction.


    If I were Zarrella, I would have gone back to the eyeglasses and contact lens business too, especially if the company was falling all over themselves to offer me whatever I wanted to run the show.

  • winter9winter9 Member Posts: 98
    I ordered a new GL last week Tuesday, and I am told the tentative production date was 11/19 (yesterday!) Dindak, you were right when you said in post 5158, "I'll bet if you order you will get it faster than 6 weeks as they are NOT busy." I sure didn't expect to get it that quickly!

    I actually wish it would take a bit longer as we are just getting the '99 Intrigue paid off and wanted to have a little breather before making $600 payments again (I'm opting for 100% financing with 36 month, 0 interest).

    With the holiday and all, I should be able to take delivery by the end of the month. Now I have to sell my '90 Probe. Any takers?
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Great news on the new Intrigue. I would love to have a Probe GT from the last year of production. What a great car! Ford blundered by killing that car just when it was getting really good.
  • white6white6 Member Posts: 588
    had a small article on a couple of one-off Impalas that were very interesting. One had a less-than five liter version of the LS1 V-8 (275-hp) and another had a 5.3 liter (300-hp) V-8 under the hood. Most folks don't realize that the all-aluminum LS1 5.7 V-8 is only about 50 lbs heavier than the 3.8 iron block V-6. Biggest problem I see is that STUPID FRONT WHEEL DRIVE! I drove a 300-hp Seville STS once; punched it from about a 20-mph roll and it literally jerked the steering wheel out of my hands! Just my humble opinion. ;)
  • garnesgarnes Member Posts: 950
    I've rambled here before.

    First, the increased air flow is no different than switching a very dirty paper filter to a new clean paper filter. The mass air flow sensor adjusts for all of that. Changes in air flow due to a different filter are nothing to worry about. There are millions of K&N's probably out there.

    Second - they work. I dyno'd and Aurora and it added +7 HP to the peak (at wheels) over the clean paper. You probably won't "feel" much, but if you were really trying to take somebody at a light or pass, you would probably see a half car length to a full car length.

    Third - The fact that K&N doesn't list one for the car is troubling. I'd compare air boxes and filters for other GM's that are K&N listed. Sounds like you guys are doing that. If it fits tight and seems to drop in and cover the entire rim or lip of the box, you're probably OK.

    I just want to second, third, fourth, and fifth all the car mag comments. You guys have listed out my exact thoughts.
  • white6white6 Member Posts: 588
    I did a brake job on the 99 GL last Saturday. Easiest brake job I've ever done. Took a little over an hour. Of course, after pulling the pads I could see that I was premature... probably still had a good 20,000 miles left on them (car has 54,000 on it). Oh well, they should last as long now as the 80,000 mile Goodyear Aquatread III's. I'm also thinking about getting seat heaters installed as a birthday present for my wife (she drives this car 95% of the time). My only reservation is that "marginal" alternator issue. I can see Oldsmobile using the seat heaters as an excuse for not covering the alternator/electrical system.
  • tblacknitetblacknite Member Posts: 5
    Well my 2000 GL turned 60K a week ago and it was time to change the tires. I probably could have gotten a few more miles out of them but also needed to get the rotors turned because it was starting to develop vibration. 60K on the original tires and this is the first time the rotors have been turned. The pads were fine, but I decided to have them replaced too. I replaced the battery at 54k miles and apart from a couple of 'Service Engine Soon' lights, nothing else has needed attention. The front end is a little loose at slow speeds so I think the steering shaft may need to be replaced one day. This is a great highway car and I hope to put many more miles on it.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I think I will have my steering shaft replaced next year before the warranty runs out just for good measure. Is there a service bulliten on the 2000's?
  • winter9winter9 Member Posts: 98
    I just wrote to K&N. I told them I wanted an air filter for both the 3.8 and the 3.5. If those of us on this board who would like an "approved" filter took just 2 minutes to write them at tech@knfilters.com , it may send a big enough message to them to act on it. This car deserves it. Give it a try folks, let's see what happens.

    Happy Thanksgiving to all!
  • ketchketch Member Posts: 217
    #5282 of 5 Hard to believe by oldsman01 Nov 19, 2001 (04:45 pm) wrote:

    "It's been nearly a year since the day GM made the dreaded annoucement. I wonder what would have happened if Lutz had just taken over then and someone "ran that idea by him." "

    ...wondering the same thing...I'd say his thought would be BUICK instead. He recently commented on its disturbing avg. buyer's age (67 or something close to it).
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I wrote K&N a couple of months ago and they told me they were not able to give me a time frame on a filter for the Intrigue. The said to "check back in a few months".

    Here's me, not holding my breath.
  • limadeltalimadelta Member Posts: 49
    I remembered seeing a posting here a couple of months ago regarding a replacement air dam for the radiator that would increase ground clearance. My '00 GLS hits that air dam every time I drive over through a transition from a street to a driveway.

    Is this a GM fix? If it is, what is the service bulletin on it so that I can take it to Olds for the fix.

    Thanks
  • jg28jg28 Member Posts: 257
    Limadelta, yes. There is a TSB for the new air dam. Here is the number: 00-08-63-006 AUG 00 Front Air Deflector - Improved Design.

    Mine still scrapes sometimes but is supposedly made of a quieter material so when it does scrape it's less noticeable. And it doesn't scrape as much as it used to.

    I won't be writing K&N, I already have a filter from them and it works fine. They couldn't possibly list the filter for the Intrigue because it doesn't EXACTLY match what we have. But it's close enough, mine even fits better than the original. I can't understand the hesitancy by anyone here. Every car guy I knows has a K&N and can't sing enough praise for them. With a little boost in horsepower, why not? K&N claims it filters the air EVEN BETTER than the paper air filters. Even so, I for one would rather breathe through gauze than through paper anyday. I'm sure our engines do too. Again, we're talking milimeters difference and my K&N filter actually fits better than the OEM one. Just get one.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    jg28 : Maybe I'll try it next time. I just replaced the air filter, so I'm not doing it again for a while.

    Happy American Thanksgiving to all of you down in the U.S.
  • limadeltalimadelta Member Posts: 49
    jg28: Thanks for the TSB on the air dam. What is the K&N part number for the air filter?

    You are have the 3.5L, correct?
    Happy Turkey Day!
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    Since last Sunday I have been unable to access the Town Hall using IE 5.5. I get an "error in script" message. Everything else in the Edmunds site works fine as do all other sites I visit. I made no change in my IE settings. I've emailed Edmunds twice but the emails were returned as undeliverable both times. I have no problems with Netscape.

    Regarding the air dam: can I just go to my dealer and ask to have it replaced or does it need to be damaged?
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    I hope everyone is having a great Thanksgiving. Since it is Thanksgiving and I usually start my Christmas decorating shortly after, I broke out some Christmas CDs to listen to. One thing I noticed with the Intrigue's Bose system is that with classical type music, the system seems to lack just a bit of low end bass. Even with the bass up all the way, it seems as if it is lacking just a bit. I've never really noticed this listening to other types of music. Ideally, the system needs a sub and this would solve that problem real quickly. Otherwise, it is a great sounding system.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    What address are you using that comes back as undeliverable?

    Something did happen on Sunday - I have no idea what! - that has caused some folks that difficulty when using IE. I believe that if you delete all cookies that have "edmunds" or "townhall" in their name that will fix the problem. If you are using autologin, deleting these cookies will turn it off, but it's easy enough to re-enable it.

    You can either email me if you have further questions, or click here to go to a better place to discuss this problem.

    Good luck - let me know what happens, and I'd really like to know what address you are using that is bouncing, and how you got there - we need to fix that.

    Pat
    Host
    Sedans Message Board
  • focusfocus Member Posts: 225
    Oldsman01 - the stereo in the intrigue can compare with any stock system that's out there, except for the mark levinson that's in the Lexus.
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    This is the address when I get the script error:


    http://townhall.edmunds.com/cgi-bin/townhall


    You were right. I deleted all my cookies and temporary files and now it's OK.


    Thanks.

  • fossil1fossil1 Member Posts: 1
    I found this on www.alero.org incase you guy missed it. It concerns the new, 2002 OSV (Oldsmobile Specialty Vehicle) Alero engine, which is base upon the intreque engine. It will give you "mod" guys something to strive for. Check it out

    "The 3.5 DOHC has been thoroughly balanced and blueprinted internally. With better breathing through intake modifications including K&N filtration and a full Borla exhaust system handling the spent gasses, the Alero OSV produces more than 245 horsepower."
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Glad it worked!

    Actually, I was wondering what the email address was that was bouncing, and whether you got it from a link, or where. I'm concerned that somewhere we might have an email address that needs to be updated.

    Pat
    Host
    Sedans Message Board
Sign In or Register to comment.