Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
If so, you got ripped.
The wiring problem may have existed prior to work if that is case, or it might have been just a dead computer, far less than what you paid. But this does not make a lot of sense. Did the vehicle actually have torque converter lock after they worked on it?
You need to clarify some of these points and I would start by writing down what you can remember of order of events as soon as possible. Then get the vehicle to someone that will inspect the wiring visibly for a crush problem. Maybe take some pictures of it.
I ran into a situation that had me ready to kill someone, afterall they almost killed me and my wife. I bought a used vehicle and it had a braking problem that was unknown to us. She had two incidents, one of which had her skid off road, over curb and barely missed a power pole, coming into her side. I was on a three lane bridge, center lane controlled by lights. As I approached the top, here comes someone in the middle lane. When I hit the brakes the car also skid sideways on me, again putting the driver side to the impending danger. I was back at the dealer and mighty irate. The claimed they fixed the problem, but I later learned they had not. I talked to a lawyer, I wanted to sue them till their doors slammed shut. What the lawyer told me is that basically, "no harm, no foul". If we had gotten killed then our kids could have sued them. So there is a large loop hole allowing shoddy workmanship. That is you have to catch them and prove damage. I got rid of the car because no one could find the problem, but several months later I learned the problem because of a picture in Chilton manual. The picture showed the tool in place on the brake diverter valve for bleeding brakes. And having learned that the previous owner had crunched a rear quarter panel, it was very certain that the tool got left in place at the Ford plant.
So why the blog? It just occurred to me that you may have had a specific warranty on the transmission rebuild, but is there any place in the contract that says they are not responsible for damage they cause. I'd bet not, afterall, who would take their vehicle to someone that says that. They'd be saying they could damage all sorts of stuff and you'd have to pay to get it fixed.
So if it is a damaged wire bundle that had to be gotten at while work was being performed, I'd say you have a case. Maybe not big enough to get an attorney to look at, not enough money. But you could handle through small claims.
BTW, that wire bundle segment I mentioned previously, it also goes to EGR and O2 on the left bank (front side of vehicle). Depending upon year, you could have as many as four O2 sensors. Left bank, right bank, combined pre catalytic, and aft catalytic. The code should tell you which one.
Thanks again for all your info!
Q-2 Any special tools needed?
Thanks.
Skeeter in Texas
1 - The front bank of plugs is a piece of cake. The rear bank is an entirely different story. I found replacement much easier by removing the ignition module (flat plate to which the four coils mount). The engine cover is easy to remove. Patience is key. It will take a while for you to figure out how to get to the rear plugs. Expect the boots to be difficult to pull off.
2 - gapping tool, spark plug socket, ratchet with extensions, universal joint may help, torque wrench
Use only ACDelco replacement parts.
Les
Had tune up, got better, had to replace injector and a coil.
Runs like a rapped ape again.
This is first money had to feed it in year I've had it.
Great car in weather, live in Chicago area.Drive 130 miles for work each day.
main computer. The dealership was former olds dealer and the tech was experienced with the aurora. He replaced the main computer with 3 or 4 factory rebuilds which gave erroneous codes saying bad transmission. The tech put the old one back in and got different code reading. I did not have to pay for all the extra work since it was a GM dealer using GM parts. They spend considerable time consulting with Aurora factory engineers who finally sent new (not rebuilt) computer. I have posted complete details including codes previously to this site. I don't have file handy now, but if you need I can get it out of storage.
I researched the issue a lot and found a lot of people were having the transmissions rebuilt because transmission shops like ammco (sp?) and even GM dealers were advising transmission was bad, when it was only computer-and the codes the computers give are not always correct. Some cases I have read spent over $5,000 for the transmission rebuild and it did not fix the problem. The transmission shops would tell them to read the fine print and they are not responsible if the problem is computer related, even if they made a misdiagnose.
From what I remember of the way the unit is connected, I'd guess it was the bolts holding the rack in place. Did they break or did they back out?
Either way, I'd bet the bolts were not properly torqued.
Les
Has anyone else had these problems
thanks MIke
That gasket under the intake is easily replaced if you don't have to deal with fuel rail. Also you need a torque wrench that works with in-lbs. You are dealing with plastic manifold and improper torqueing can damage or crack it. The manifold is very high priced. I would regret letting a mechanic do it, manifold cracks later, and he says it is not his fault.
Also at the front end of motor is a valve in the manifold. It is actually a flapper door for back-fire. There is a seal under the flapper, but I think you have to change the whole valve instead of replacing just that seal. It is not real expensive, but it might be difficult to get out. The whole valve assembly is released by about a 1/4 turn, but might be difficult to extract because of build up inside the manifold. And mine had a lot. I used a couple of cans of oven cleaner to eat the gunk and flushed with water. Brake clean may also be useful, but it can be rough on rubber such as the O-ring sealing the flapper valve assembly and the seal under the flapper, so try to remove it before using solvent.
You did not link this message to other posts so I am not sure if you are the guy who mentioned having a bunch of codes.
And the fact that it only starts acting up when the car is warm, closed loop, is a hint as to the trouble. But, interpreting it can be difficult, and one of the first steps is ensuring there are no leaks.
Warming of the engine might cause a leak and it seems unlikely that it would be exactly at the temp of change -over to closed loop.
Ken
1. Rear seat cushion.
2. Negative battery cable.
3. Upper radiator shroud.
4. Right and left cooling fans.
5. Accessory drive belt from P/S pulley then generator.
6. Top alternator bolts, disconnect cable and regulator connector.
7. Ground strap and P/S line bracket to gain access.
8. Lower generator bolts (raise vehicle).
9. Lower radiator hose (drain radiator).
10. Air inlet duct.
11. Generator through top left side of engine compartment.
INSTALL OR CONNECT
1. Generator through top left side of engine compartment.
2. Air inlet duct.
3. Lower radiator hose.
4. Lower generator bolts.
5. Ground strap and P/S line bracket.
6. Generator Mounting Bolts. Tighten
o Front Studs to 38 N.m (28 lb. ft.) .
o Rear Bolts to 47 N.m (35 lb. ft.) .
7. Generator Output Terminal Nut. Tighten
o Nut to 20 N.m (15 lb. ft.) .
8. Voltage regulator connection.
9. Accessory drive belt.
10. Right and left cooling fans.
11. Upper radiator shroud.
12. Negative battery cable.
13. Rear seat cushion.
14. Fill cooling system.
1. Bezel finish cover from door handle bezel by unsnapping upper tab with thin-bladed tool.
2. Door handle bezel by removing one screw, unsnapping bezel and lifting it off and over door handle.
3. Two screws from lower door under map pocket.
4. Trim panel by lifting up on trim panel to disengage hooks on backside of panel.
5. Electrical connectors.
INSTALL OR CONNECT
1. Electrical connectors.
2. Trim panel by engaging hooks on backside of panel into door inner panel.
3. Two screws under map pocket.
4. Door handle bezel by snapping into position and one screw.
5. Bezel finish cover.
Of course you will.
Ah, door handle parts--that could be very tough. I'd say google the internet for Oldsmobile parts, then try eBay search, then see if someone on your local craigslist is parting out an Aurora, then try a large wrecking yard in your area, or a "Pick a Part".
With chips, I think it's always a good idea to talk to someone who has installed that very same chip in their car.
With CAI, you have to be careful of how low they place the air intake, since there is the danger of sucking water into the engine from a deep puddle, etc. So placement of the air filter is an important engineering feature for you to investigate.
If your engine inhales water from a puddle, it'll seize up in a red hot minute.
If you are willing to do that consideration, you will gain a lot of torque at lower RPM because the 4.0 seems to be a down-stroked twin. You will have to carefully research such things as weight and physical size to see if it is do-able. Any great weight changes would need to be considered with suspension. A heavier, longer through crankshaft would add weight, but partly offset with shorter connecting rods, I'm assuming. They might even use the same heads? But then I would not be surprised if the 4.6 had bigger valves or a different valve timing. Also cooling capabilities need a close look. If you have the one with oil cooler, you might consider a radiator w/o one and a way to mount the current oil cooler in front of radiator.
Then learn the intracacies of wiring. There might not be any differences due to the similarity, other than computer programming. That is they may use the same computer, but then there may be differences to programming for non-powertrain items. You could overcome this by knowing someone who has the programming equipment and changing the parameters coded in.
Also there is a final drive issue to look at, comparing to the Cadillac with the 4.6. The Aurora came in a autobahn version. As near as I could find, the only differences were the requirement for V rated tires and the final drive ratio was different, allowing more RPM per MPH. It seems the standard setup did not have enough torque or HP to push it 150+MPH. And of course the RPM limiter was either removed or raised to a much higher point.
I'm not saying the final drive of the standard Aurora 4.0 is the same as the Cadillac with 4.6, or even the autobahn version. Something to consider and weigh according to your end desire. That is I can't even say if the fuel mix parameters were the same for the autobahn version or if the computer automatically took care of that and certainly something to consider if you start swapping final drive ratio.
Good Luck.
I'll go one further and say it will come apart. Water does not compress so you will likely have one of the following.
Busted piston or broken rings.
Broken connecting rod.
Broken Crankshaft.
Damaged cylinder wall.
At least damaged bearings.
Cold water sucked through intake might yield:
Warped or cracked heads.
Cracked valves.
Cracked block.
Jack
Butyl-rubber might work, but it is messy to work with.
Any ideas?
Strictly speaking, '95 Auroras are the only ones with a replaceable chip. Later ones could be reprogrammed, but I have yet to see success stories.
I have never seen an advertised "CAI" that I believe could work as claimed. Yes, they bypass the stock airbox, but I believe they pull in hotter air than stock and those heat baffles are a joke. Aurora underhood temps are quite high.
Check the archives back 5 years or so. Several of us experimented with airbox mods plus K&N filter. There are dyno results showing ~10 hp gain.
I wanted to have a true 'CAI' like the late '60s Olds 4-4-2 W30s (either through the grill ('66-'67) or under bumper ('68-'69). I have not been able to find the space. I thought maybe removing the left fog light would provide access -- but not without more sheetmetal mods than I was willing to make. That leaves hood scoop of some kind, but I never wanted to butcher my Aurora.
If you find a solution, let us know.
Les
CAI favors larger displacement engines, but only at wide open throttle, since all gas engines have a throttle plate that's in the way anyway during most normal acceleration.
If the air isn't colder than in the stock filter system, it's a waste of time, I agree.
Also it would be necessary to learn how the MAP sensor effects the system when the pressure is higher than normal. Otherwise, other sensors would try to maintain the mixture by adding more fuel because of the extra air.
This is the "perpetual motion" idea. Similar to why HHO generators can't work. It costs more energy to make the teensy bit of hydrogen you might produce than you would gain back.
I never saw road tests showing acceleration time differentials between the lower (higher numeric) autobahn vs standard gearing but have to assume the lower autobahn gearing would produce tangible positive results.
Another thought would be on the exhaust end of things to help the breathing (backpressure) while requiring little if any modification. I've been thinking about that since my 98 Autobahn is still on the original exhaust system.