Mazda6 Sedan

1289290292294295342

Comments

  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    pubdef: those pictures are very informative. What kills me is that I can see seam sealer on all the main door seams and joints, it's just very clearly missing from the weatherstrip channel gap.

    The steel used for those weatherstrip channels must be pretty crappy for it to rust so easily even where painted (like on the edges). Seems like it was not treated/primed or something. Could just be poor quality steel.

    Craig
  • jstandeferjstandefer Member Posts: 805
    It is really hard to tell, but it seems the "staining" has grown slightly since the last time you took pictures. I was comparing your new ones to the ones that you sent me last month. Unfortunately, the lighting conditions are completely different. Can you confirm?
  • 3and143and14 Member Posts: 36
    I am considering a 3 year lease of a 6s. Of course this rust issue concerns me somewhat, but I am wondering does it seem to occur and advance quickly enough that I would need to worry about it during just a 3 year term where resale is a non-issue? I realize asking someone to predict the future is of course very inexact.

    I just test drove a 6s for the 1st time today and liked almost everything about it enough that it's at or near the consideration list. It's a shame to hear about this issue within hours of being so impressed.
  • pubdefpubdef Member Posts: 14
    I just looked throough all my pictures and I think what you're seeing are areas of doors that were not photographed until today that are worse than the ones that were originally posted. (The original post ONLY had the rear doors.)
  • jstandeferjstandefer Member Posts: 805
    You should be fine on a lease. If you can get a decent lease rate... check the numbers with your dealership. Considering relatively low sales numbers (popularity) and the low resale value of Mazda in general, it probably won't lease that well. I looked into leasing my previous Protege and a 626 a couple of years ago. In both cases, the lease payment was considerably higher than the loan payment. When I was selling Mazda's, the only time they leased well was when Mazda was running a lease special to move a certain vehicle. Even the Miata, with its good resale, failed to lease well.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    "This problem could be the one to finish Mazda for good."

    They don't seem to think so. They appear to think that they can save money by using this cheap, band-aid approach. Refinishing or replacing the doors would cost a lot more. Unfortunately their approach has considerable risk because if it doesn't work and the rust returns, the car mags and Consumer Reports will be all over this like flies on you-know-what. That will be a PR mightmare for Mazda that will be hard to recover from. Still, looking at the current remedy, it appears they are willing to take the chance to save some money. Maybe the people that came up with this TSB are the same guys that were in charge of making sure the rusty doors were finished properly at the factory.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    I'm not so sure the lease would be a "safe" way to go. If you get one of the rusty cars, the lease company could say that you didn't wash the car properly and that's why it rusted, or you must have done something else to make it rust. After all, how else could a 3 year old car have rusty doors? Then they would charge you extra for the decreased residual value of the vehicle. Don't forget, Mazda is calling this "staining" and hasn't admitted it is rust (which it obviuosly is). So, as far as Mazda is concerned, if there is rust it is not caused by a manufacturing defect.

    So, if you are going to lease you should make sure that you get a car built after they fixed the problem at the factory.
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    When you save money it comes back to bite you 99% of the time. Honda did with that Xenons and there was so much theft of Xenons in NJ and in NYC that it was just of control a year and a half ago. What would happen is the Xenon light you used in the TL could be put into a headlight of an Accord. Scary, Scary, and more scary.

    Anyway this is not Ford's fault this is a manufacturing defect and yes it well could finish Mazda. I don't think it is a cost cutting move but I'm just pointing out cost cutting is a dangerous thing in the automotive world.

    As Mazda failes to speak about the 6's rust problem and as they are selling more 6's they will face more problems with unhappy customers that show up at Mazda customer service centers with rust on their vehicle. By not speaking out about this now Mazda is really taking a chance. If Mazda drops out only Chrysler and VW would be left for making sporty cars. Honda has watered down their exterior styling to be more excepting of the American public with more GM and Ford elements to their styling.
  • unixxusunixxus Member Posts: 97
    "This problem could be the one to finish Mazda for good."

    Unfortunate as the Mazda6 rust issue may be, I seriously doubt if this spells the end for Mazda in North America. It seems some people on this board with rust on their cars will not be satisfied with any solution offered by Mazda except for a buy back similar to that offered on the RX-8.
  • aromasaromas Member Posts: 314
    I don't expect a buyback, I have rusted doors on a new car and I want new doors. It's pretty simple request if you think about it. If they have a problem with doing that THEN I guess I should be getting a buyback since they're not replacing a defective part on my car. Their solution is to hide rust that is visible not permenantly eliminate it. Call me silly but I somehow don't think this is satisfactory. I think I'm letting Mazda off easy because I have to live with mismatched paint but I'll take that over rust anyday.

    If you bought a new house and some shingles blew off your roof after 6 months are you going to request they replace the missing shingles. Not me because that tells me that they were negligent applying the shingles in the first place and I want a new roof and done properly. If that costs them more than they want to spend fixing it, you know what, I really don't care. This isn't a toaster it's a car and the 2nd biggest purchase for most of us. If I have to contact the king of Mazda to get it done, again I really don't care, I didn't spend 35KCDN on this car so they can put playdoh on my channels and cross my fingers that it works. Anybody that thinks I'm nuts going overboard on this I'm thinking the exact same about you just sitting there and taking it. In fact I'm shocked. Right now H.O. knows me on a first name basis and they're going to get to know me alot better in the next few months. O.K, time to get off my soapbox.

    Every friend I've shown this problem to have asked when are they replacing the doors. When I tell them that they want to paint over it instead they look at me and laugh and I laugh (and cry) along with them.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    With all due respect, if you buy a house and shingles blow off the roof six months later, NO seller would be obligated in most any state to buy you a new roof.

    I understand your being upset over the Mazda6, but seller obligations in the real estate field do not extend to being a guarantor of the roof, especially since the shingles may have blown off in a world class storm or not otherwise have been defective in any way. You had an opportunity to inspect the roof before purchase. All of which assumes you aren't claiming the seller knew the shingles were defective and fraudulently did not disclose that.
  • aromasaromas Member Posts: 314
    jonhclineii: I meant a brand new home from the builder not a resale.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Okay. That makes much more sense!
  • hbcalifhbcalif Member Posts: 3
    Do we know if Mazda discontinued using the "soapy solution" in July because they knew it was causing a problem (staining)? If so why did it take so long to figure out how to fix the problem. Also if they knew about it, weren't they selling cars with defects that were on the lots with build date of pre 07-03 after the problem was found? Sorry if this was brought up before.
  • markjennmarkjenn Member Posts: 1,142
    Request: If you've made your point once on this board, then don't repost the same opinion and rationale over and over. We heard you the first time. This cuts both ways on this rust issue.

    - Mark
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Mazda did a buyback on the RX-8 because there was no way to repair the problem (i.e. incorrect advertizing). In the case of the Mazda6, it's a problem that can be properly repaired, but Mazda is trying to minimize the cost by using this cheap fix using the sealer. I have done quite a bit of body work myself, and I know that the rust will return if the area is not completely sealed off from moisture, which is nearly impossible. So, on some cars water will get behind the sealer, and it will rust from behind. Unfortunately this means that on these cars the rust will continue, only now you won't see it as much because the staining from the rust has been greatly reduced by the sealer. So now you will have hidden rust that will reappear when it seeps out from behind the sealer or finally penetrates the door, months or years down the road. The proper fix would be to sandblast the affected area, then reprime and repaint the area, then seal it. Mazda surely knows this but is taking this course of action because it's way cheaper, even though it has some risk. Then they can do the ones that rust again the proper way. While this may make good economic sense for Mazda's execs, it's bad for owners and could be a PR disaster for Mazda if rust reappears on too many cars.

    Apparently Mazda is feeling lucky or maybe their execs have become blinded by the recent increase in profits. I would suggest to Mazda leadership that they rethink this solution, and maybe dip into the funds for the bonuses they were planning to give to these misguided execs.

    I would suggest to Mazda6 owners that you get together and get a lawyer to write some letters and rattle some cages. There's strength in numbers.
  • microrepairmicrorepair Member Posts: 508
    as "mazda6s" stated. Unless it is removed by sandblasting or grinding, it will return again, but it might be many years before it shows up.

    The soapy solution mentioned previously was probably used to remove the oil based coating on the raw steel and it wasn't properly removed prior to painting. All steel comes from the mill with a thin oil based coating on it to minimize the development of rust prior to being fabricated. Once an assembly such as a door frame is fabricated it is essential that all surfaces of the assembly be cleansed of the contaminants prior to painting by use of solvents or "soapy solutions". Then the solvent or cleaning solutiuon must be properly dried off before putting any paint on the steel. If they are left in the "wet" state then they are painted, that can cause problems with paint adhesion and that opens the gate to rust showing up.

    Judging from the photos, it looks near impossible to get deep into the seam with sandblasting. Therefore any applied sealant will only be a stopgap solution. The rust will come back someday..
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    The soapy solution was used to aid in installation of the weatherstripping (ie, to make it slippery). This was done after the car was painted.

    Before priming/painting, car bodies typically go through a bath for cleaning, but they are thoroughly dried before painting.

    You're correct, sandblasting is not even an option here. In fact, there's not a whole lot that can be done in this case. I think Mazda is suggesting about the only "practical" fix, though it's clearly not perfect. It will probably satisfy the basic rust warranty on the car, and that's it.

    Craig
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    http://densionusa.com/merchant/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store- _Code=DU&Category_Code=IA

    this is a system that allows a direct plugin of an Ipod into your factory system. This would be a cool sort of setup for the Mazda3 and 6.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    "The soapy solution was used to aid in installation of the weatherstripping (ie, to make it slippery). This was done after the car was painted."

    If this is the case then I don't believe the soapy solution is causing the rust, because it would have to eat through the paint.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    the fact is that there is none to neglible amount of paint in that small gap. Either that gap should not be there, or it should have been filled with sealant before delivery.
  • jstandeferjstandefer Member Posts: 805
    I would assume that Mazda's VIN range is the TSB corresponds to when the "soapy solution" was changed in the assembly process. Unfortunately, the highest VIN in the range equates to sometime near the end of May.

    Examining pubdef's pictures of the "soapy solution" residue, I looked at my car on Saturday for the same thing, in addition to looking for any new rust that has appeared due to the recent rains we have had (first rain in over 6 months!). I found a similar residue on mine, and it did feel like dried soap. I can also see the same residue on the paint in the sash rails (weather stripping channels), particularly as it transitions from horizontal to vertical, such as near the exterior mirrors on the front doors. The residue is yellowish-white in color and I found absolutely no degradation of the paint or rust in the those areas. This just confirms my belief that the "soapy solution" has nothing to do with the rust.

    I also found some new rust spots which have not been discussed here before. There are many circles (barely visible behind the paint) that are spaced along the sash rails. You have to remove the weather stripping to see them. These look like the areas where the sash rail is spot welded onto the door frame. In several of the spots where the weld is, I have found rust. Because of my cheap digital camera, they are hard to see in pics because I can't control the exposure and contrast. But you can see them here and here, highlighted by the red arrows. They are much larger and much worse in person; I apologize about the picture quality. In the second pic you can see a ventilation/drainage hole. There are several of them and I can see rust forming on the inside edges of them as well.
  • lstar1lstar1 Member Posts: 5
    Am considering purchasing a new 6S within the next couple weeks, but the rust problem is a concern. Is there a 'guarantee' or other warantee term/condition that I can insist upon as a condition of sale? Thanks!
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    Has anyone been called by their local service department regarding the rust "fix"?

    My service manager told me that he'd call as soon as they heard back from Mazda and they haven't called yet.
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    I'd wait a while.
  • mrjex43mrjex43 Member Posts: 14
    I'd just like to say thanks to all of the Mazda6 enthusiasts, owners, insiders - and even company lurkers and reps - for providing such comprehensive coverage on this 'staining' issue. Thanks to you all, I've officially taken the Mazda6 out of my 'final 3' to purchase this winter; the other two being the Mazda3 and Acura TSX. I love the 6's handling, responsiveness, design and ergonomics; unfortunately I'm just not ready to drop 23k on a vehicle that may show rust within the first 3 years (or 3 months).

    If I can resign myself to less horsepower and options - not to mention the fear that what started with the 6 will follow with other models - I'll go for the 3; if not, Mazda has just lost another customer due to their mishandling of a serious manufacturing issue.
  • mrjex43mrjex43 Member Posts: 14
    This is completely off-topic, but since regfootball posted one on this, I felt I had to respond.

    The company that produces the ICElink adapter for iPods is charging $200 for what - around $60 in merchandise? Correct me if I'm wrong, but other than a $30 ProClip mount, a $16 CD-changer bus to AUX adapter, and a $13 AUX to miniplug adapter, what are you getting?

    I agree with regfootball that Mazda should step up and offer front inputs for mobile MP3 players; this is a demographic of 1 million plus (and growing every day!)
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Seeing the unsatisfactory solution Mazda has presented to this 'staining' problem (they can't even say the word rust let alone fix the problem right!), I would hold off on purchasing a '6'.
  • glideslopesglideslopes Member Posts: 431
    I agree completely. Very troubling.

     Mazdaman, any opinions?
  • mazdafunmazdafun Member Posts: 2,329
    Note that 6 built in Japan aren't exhibiting the rusting, so far only those built at AAI.

    The 3 will come from the plants that made the Protege, and these have been very reliable.
  • bostongiobostongio Member Posts: 52
    I put my preorder in today for the Mazda6 5-door. Call it faith in Mazda or at least recognition that in this new model, they'll have fixed all these issues by the time mine gets built...

    After driving this car and others like it, I just couldn't find anything that drove as nicely for anywhere close to the price. Can't wait!!
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    Someone in the other Mazda6 forum was asking about the 5 door and somebody else responded:

    "It's just one more door to rust"....lol

    I'd wait anyway. I'd wait to see how Mazda is doing after everybody knows about the rust issue. You couldn't possibly screw up worse than Mazda did in this case. A rust issue on a new car is the worst problem I can think of. VW couldn't even do worse....
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Being a former VW owner, I don't know about that. How about a car that started rattling at 1900 miles and never stopped? Those VW interiors might look nice, but they need to learn what the words 'quality control' mean. ;)

    As far as the '6', I hope for the owners' sake that Mazda does come up with a more satisfactory plan of fixing the 'staining' (rust) issues on it. And God forbid the press get a piece of this, because it just might hit Mazda harder than they thought.
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    It seems EVERY new car is prone to having rattle issues, even Camrys and Accords. I'd count my blessings if rattles were the only problem I had with a brand new car.

    FWIW, I checked on KBB to see what my Mazda6 is worth. I stopped when I read the definition of a car in "excellent condition". The car has to be rust free in order to be in "excellent condition".

    Geez, my car doesn't even have 5000 miles on it yet and it's not in "excellent condition" anymore. Bummer.
  • combustible1combustible1 Member Posts: 264
    we're in the same boat, you and I. My only options for consideration have been the 6, the 3 and the TSX as well.

    Not sure which way I'm gonna go yet. Have to see the 3 in person first.. if I can wait that long. Plus, the TSX is at a time right now when there is the least amount of discounting since it's introduction. There are way too few of them available to meet the demand out there.

    My opportunity (lost when I was waiting to see what was going to happen with the 'staining' problem) to find the exact set of options for the 6 have come and gone, and I'm not sure if I'm willing to make any sacrifices now.
  • jstandeferjstandefer Member Posts: 805
    In Mazda's U.S. October sales results, they show 12 Mazda3's being sold.
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    it's kinda old, but it makes me want my Hofu Protege back......

    http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/MAZDA/4/e980331.html
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    I don't buy the "soapy solution" explanation either. Looking at the photos and reading owner's reports, it just doesn't make sense. But, it's easier for Mazda to blame something like that than to say "we did a crappy job prepping and painting the doors".
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    A few years ago a fiend of mine bought a Chevy Z28. The paint job on the hood was crappy, so he took it in and they repainted it. He thought they did a poor job, so he took it back and they did it over again.
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    I sure keep reading post from people who don't like mazda's explanation....but I have yet to see one shred of proof from the nay-sayers that it isnt what mazda say's it is.

    So, that said.....where is the PROOF that mazda's explanation is false or fix won't work?? If it's not what mazda is saying, I want to know about it.

    anyone??
  • pubdefpubdef Member Posts: 14
    Well, I left my car at the dealership this morning. Although the service manager seemed to be toeing the factory line about "stain" versus "rust," he was eager to assure me that whatever needed to be done would be done, no matter what the stuff actually is. He went as far as to say "if my body shop tells me you need a new door, you'll get a new door." I'm sure there's little chance of that, and it was a case of him doing some grandstanding to appease me. He sees the problem as a body shop issue from the beginning (which is at odds to some extent with the factory bulletin), and he expressed some disdain for the factory's method, which is somewhat encouraging. He said he was asked by some people on the mechanical side of his shop whether or not they should order the sealant; he told me his response was basically "to heck with that, only the body shop is touching these cars." His body shop had "fixed" one car pre-bulletin and he said the owner was very satisfied (at least for the time being, I suppose). It really sounded like he was running with the "body-shop-exception" in the bulletin as an opportunity to go ahead and do the fix his body shop's way.

    I'll keep everyone posted as to what happens, and will post pictures of the result. I think I'll have the car back by the end of the week.

    RICH: There are areas on my car that look like a "rusty stain," and there are areas that I truly believe are rust--around the small holes in the door sashes, at the ends of the J-channel. I'm not a metallurgist, and I might even give Mazda the benefit of the doubt with respect to some of what's there. I tried to wipe it away with alcohol, and what I could reach I could remove for the most part. The problem is I'm not as confident in Mazda's position as to WHERE and WHAT the source of the staining is. Just because it can be wiped away doesn't prove anything either-- take a piece of iron or steel with a rusty area and pour water on it. You're likely to get a rusty stain on anything the water lands on or migrates to--does the fact that I could then clean away that stain mean there was no rust to begin with? Of course not. The "soapy substance" they talk about I believe I found underneath the weatherstrip on one of my doors, both on the weatherstrip itself, and on the j-channel the strip was in. In that area there is no corrosion whatsoever--so where is the negative reaction they talk about in the bulletin? See what I'm talking about on my site http://www.mazda6.us

    That being said, I have taken my car in. There's really no choice at this point but to take Mazda's offer of a fix at face value and move ahead. I don't really care whether what I see is rust or not, I just want it gone. Only time will really tell whether the "fix" is really a fix.
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    "So, that said.....where is the PROOF that mazda's explanation is false or fix won't work??"

    Where is the PROOF that Mazda's explanation is true or the fix will work?

    The problem is, we won't know for a while, or we won't know until it's too late. In the meantime, I have a brand new car that needs rust "fixed" and I get to think about whether or not it's going to come back.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    1. If the rust is really a problem, then it should come back within the warranty period of 48 months. what makes you think that if the rust does not come up in 48 months, it will come back on the 49th month?

    2. Long term: in the long term, the car will have more standard powertrain/power modules/suspension issues to be fixed,as with other cars, than the tiny rust stain problem. The rust / stain will be the least of the problems you will worry about. I mean you will be grateful if the car starts up at the first click and be very happy if it does not stop without a warning while on the insterstate.
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    rates the Mazda6 as having the best reliablity and is a RECOMMENDED pick.

    Way to go Mazda.
  • mazdafunmazdafun Member Posts: 2,329
    He seems to have the 6 made at the end of the work-week, or the one they learned everything on.

    I also think c_hunter's theory on the rusting sounds plausible.

    Time will tell how things go. Give it a try and some time.
  • 1wiseguy1wiseguy Member Posts: 120
    Aromas,
    Your rep is lying to you. I wrote Mazda Canada Oct 15 and faxed a letter to Mike Benchimol, Pres/CEO of Mazda Canada. I was called by a customer service person and they told me about the flexible sealant solution before the 17 page TSB was released. I also asked about the warranty extension and was told that it wouldnt be necessary. (except for my peace of mind, of course, which is the most important thing).

    Bottom line- you are not rhe only Canadian owner to inform Mazda canada of the rust issue.
  • midwesttradermidwesttrader Member Posts: 291
    Rich - I believe that a major part of everyone's frustration is that there has not been any official public explanation from Mazda. There has been:

    1) a 10/21/03 email sent by MNAO Technical Services Dept to dealers only outlining the issue with the subject line saying "Mazda 6 Door Sash Rust." This email only became public because a dealer employee released it to an individual.

    2) multiple emails sent to individuals by Mazda Customer Assistance refering to a "soapy water solution" as the cause for a "surface rust situation" and advising that "vehicles built after 7/22/03 are not affected."

    3) an 11/3/03 Service Bulletin sent by MNAO to dealers only with a subject line saying "Door Sash/Trunk Lid Surface Staining." The bulletin outlines only the fix not the cause for the problem. Again this info only became public because a dealer employee released it to an individual.

    So... unless an individual was lucky enough to pull all these pieces of the puzzle together from multiple internet sources they have no explanantion and more importantly might not learn that their doors and trunk were slowly "staining" away until their warranty was history.

    Call it hiding the ball, call it trying to avoid bad press, call it a secret warranty, call it whatever you want, it equals a lack of credibility on Mazda's part.

    There is no point in trying to prove or disprove the fix since everyone with the problem is stuck with it (unless they choose to try something on their own or do nothing at all) whether they think it will work or not and the end results are probably months away.
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    I understand the frustrations that some have. Remember the car probably means more to me financially than anyone else on this board. So everyone needs to keep this in mind when flaming me...but is it helpful that a few keep saying the same stuff over and over based on feelings and perceptions and not based on anything factual?

    How can you say mazda has nothing official? they have a fix for the problem...that seems official to me... I certainly don't dictate how an auto mfg should or should not operate...but Mazda's procedures for this type of problem is exactly the same as Toyota, Honda, Mercedes, Acura, Nissan and just about every other mfg. I don't see hysterical cries about their credability. Toyota has a so called secret warranty for sludge, Honda has a so called secret warranty with auto trannies, the list would go on forever. The bottom line is simple...if you have a problem, go to the dealer and they will fix it. Mazda's staining fix is no secret, we are all talking about it!!! also, if you make an appointment at your local dealer, they will inspect your car and execute the official mazda fix for the staining if needed..

    A huge part of the problem is the internet and the desire for people to beleive ANYTHING they read without checking any facts...Next think you know the slighted version of the facts turns into a rolling tidal wave of fiction...

    From my standpoint it's mazda's job to produce a fix for the staining problem...which Mazda claims they have done. Now let's see if it works....if it does not work then we have a different ballgame.
  • midwesttradermidwesttrader Member Posts: 291
    The Service Bulletin does describe the cause for the problem in very general terms.

    Rich - I certainly did not mean to flame you. Many of us very much appreciate your info and input on this board. I guess I just was hoping for more from Mazda than you would expect from the camcord folks.

    BTW, for better or worse I bought the car anyway and I love it so far.
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    "but is it helpful that a few keep saying the same stuff over and over based on feelings and perceptions and not based on anything factual?"

    Fact:

    My car has less than 5000 miles on it and is rusting. What other facts do we need here?

    "Toyota has a so called secret warranty for sludge, Honda has a so called secret warranty with auto trannies, the list would go on forever."

    First of all, who cares about Honda and Toyota? Second of all, those problems make themselves known. Your engine seizes. Your transmission takes a dump. It's pretty hard not to notice those things. On the other hand, how many people with the Mazda6 will look under their weatherstripping or even think to look for rust? Is it easier to notice a seized engine, or rust underneath the weatherstripping, inside of a small channel between the door frame and weatherstripping holder?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.