Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
http://forums.aaca.org/f115/
Good luck...those cars have great instrument panels, especially for the period!
I don't know off the top of my head how many they built, but can look it up when I get home tonight. It would be a lot more than 800, though, I'm almost sure. The Electra was a fairly popular car that year in spite of the fuel crisis, as there were plenty of people who wouldn't give up their big cars unless you pried their cold, dead hands from the steering wheel. And at around 221" long, the Electra was about as big as it got that year.
Having the 350 would make it a bit rarer, and a bit more valuable I'd think. Presuming it's the gasoline 350 and not the Diesel! The standard engine that year was an Oldsmobile 307 with 140 hp, and that's how most of them were built. I think the Buick 350 put out around 155 hp. Doesn't sound like much difference, but it had a lot more torque, so was better suited to a car this size. There is a chance that it might have an Olds 350, if the car was originally sold in California or a state that used the same strict CA standards. The Olds 350 had 160 hp that year.
My guess would be that if it's the coupe model, they might've made 8-10,000 of them, and if it was the 4-door, maybe 20-30,000? I'll look it up when I get home.
**Edit: I just found that Buick made 68,480 Electras for 1980 (source: http://www.motorera.com/cadillac/cad1980/CAD80.HTM down towards the bottom of the page)
I can't remember if the Electra came in three trim levels or two that year. In some years, I believe they had just Electra, then Electra Limited, and Electra Park Ave as the top trim level.
Your car would probably score in the "average" category.
He even washed it for me, it will get waxed and detailed up a bit this weekend in preparation for the local MBCA show coming soon:
At the shop parked by the fintail was a gorgeous dark gray 560SEL, 80K miles and it looked nearly new. I was drooling. Also saw a Porsche 914 on the road, a TR6, and at a completely unrelated location, a TR3.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
I am baffled by your reference to "gold eagles" on the fenders. I am unfamiliar with those.
The value range quoted earlier sounds about right.
They are nice cars if you are willing to put up with what is a truck-sized vehicle by today's standards.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
The car is far from mint, but mint from far :shades:
Maybe they can post a pic of their car.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
The best way for an older car to be.... so it can be driven without destroying the value.
As for the radiator, running hot at speed could certainly mean an obstruction. Another could be a bad fan clutch. Thermostat and upper/lower hoses at the time of the radiator repair, would be a natural IMHO.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
So, there were 54,422 sedans built (Limited and Park Ave combined) and 14,058 coupes (again, Limited and Park Ave combined)
And in this car I certainly don't worry about rock chips etc - way too late for that now. Also, when there's not a huge value to begin with, there's less to sweat about. It's just a fun driver, but gets the attention of cars many times more expensive. My mechanic mentioned it got some compliments while sitting around the shop for a few weeks. I don't think the car was too happy to sit outside for most of that time.
Car might also get new tires next year, but I count that as a consumable and not a repair. Tires on it are from 1999, I think. I get uneven tire wear from drivers side front, too...can't wait to see what that is.
Exception: If the high speed overheat is FAST and unstoppable, one must suspect a head gasket.
A water pump with eroded impeller might cause this.
Also in your case I believe you have a transmission cooler tank on the bottom of the radiator? This should also be inspected.
The car actually broke a transmission cooling line back in 1998 - I remember it down to the day as it stranded me. I don't know the mechanics of the system, but I will remember that.
However, my fascination with the '75-79 Seville faded the first time I sat in one. The car does a great job in hiding its Nova underpinnings in every respect except one...the seating position. I found it to be lacking in legroom, steering wheel was too close for my comfort, and so was the windshield. There was no denying that this thing was a compact car.
In contrast, the '80-85 Seville felt much more comfortable, more like they started with a full-sized car, and narrowed it a bit. Legroom was great, both front and rear, and the steering wheel/dashboard position, in relation to my body, was better as well.
Unfortunately, the Seville pretty much hit its sweet spot in 1980. I think they actually made the Olds Diesel standard that year, but many buyers opted for the 368 V-8, which was a reduced-displacement version of the old 425 (which itself was derived from the older 472/500). It put out around 145-150 hp, and a good amount of torque. I think California buyers got the Olds 350 with 160 hp though, as it was a cleaner engine.
Motortrend tested an '80 Seville with the 368, and got 0-60 in about 10.6 seconds, which was good for that era. If that test could be repeated with consistently similar results, that would actually put it as faster than the '75-79! I heard that the first-gen was supposed to do 0-60 in around 10-11 seconds, but I've seen tests that put it at more like 12-13.5.
Unfortunately, 1981 brought the V-8-6-4, and heavier reliance on the Diesel. If the V-8-6-4 acted up, you could disconnect the cylinder deactivation fairly easily, so it wasn't a total loss. But then for 1982-85, they stuck this ~2 ton beast with a tiny 125 hp aluminum 4.1 V-8! It was unreliable, slow, and a bit of a guzzler.
Yeah, that's about how I'd want it. I could deal with the two-toning, if it was a tasteful combination though. And I think the Seville is one of the few cars that can actually wear a carriage roof with some dignity, although I'd much prefer it without!
on a bike ride yesterday, a pair of 70ish Vette convertibles. Both in nice shape. And more rare, a 71-73 vintage Mustang. Fresh looking paint. A notchback, with a nostril hood. no badging indicating any special model, but it did have a "unique" paint job (blue with gray spears).
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
I also found a reference to the inspiration this car had on the 1980 Seville.
While I wasn't totally turned off by it (at least they *tried* to stop making boxcars in Detroit), still I thought it smacked of that typical faux-luxury, pretentiousness that the Detroit "luxury" market was so famous for. A car fit for Elvis, but not a real king.
I could also take a 79-85 style Eldo similarly equipped - no wire hubcaps, no vinyl top, no faux RR grille...a fairly nice clean design when the bric a brac is removed.
I saw 5 VW bus campers within 15 minutes, today... all rust free.. :surprise:
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I know a '79 or '80 is the best choice, but I do like on the '84 and '85's (I think), the body side molding is completely the color of the car...no chrome base or beading...which makes it appear that the car doesn't have a side molding. A clean-looking touch.
But..I'd give that up for a reliable engine!
But..I'd give that up for a reliable engine!
Well, if you ever buy a '79-80 Eldorado, I'll get you a couple cans of Dupli-Color for Christmas, and you can paint it to match! :P
I just checked my old car book, and it says that model of Eldorado was called the Touring Coupe, and actually came out for 1982! It also had aluminum rims and fatter, lower-profile tires. I didn't realize it came out that early, and had always thought it was a hasty response to the 1984 Lincoln Mark VII LSC.
I'm impressed that Cadillac actually attempted to make a nod towards performance and handling. One small nod for luxury cars, but a giant nod for Cadillac!
One is a '65 or '66 AMC Rambler 4-post sedan, somber black and it's next to a '66 Pontiac GTO hardtop in metallic blue with Torq-Thrust style aftermarket wheels, otherwise stock looking. No "For Sale" signage visible on either car. :confuse:
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I still see a pristine Datsun 810 wagon around my area too...I almost wouldn't mind having that, if I had some huge garage. They apparently weren't the worst car, and there are so few left.
I am from Germany.
My grandfather Lon Fleener has worked at Studebaker.
Do you know more about it, they still have more pictures?
Greetings from Germany
Current drive article
Original review
Today's oddballs - green and white Volvo Amazon wagon, a blue 65-66 or so Stingray convertible, and a first gen Kia Sephia.
"Fancy, Comfortable"
Unloved style
Top of the line battleship
Rare
Pimpy
Clattery red
They all end up on ebay...but it's nice
Good luck finding parts
I wonder how this art deco gnat got here
The last of the elegant ones
BMW looks
Big red, with wheels
I could see Andre in this
Frankencar from hell
"Xtremely rare"
This'll keep you busy
Kill it with fire
And today's oddity - a small bumper BMW 2002 with the sought after "Automatic" badge :shades:
'77 Buick---it may be fancy and comfortable, but it really needs a higher bid that $202.50. That's so sad.
54 Cadillac Fleetwood Special---well for THAT asking price, it had damn well better be "mint".
81 Cadillac Diesel --it's a rather scary thought that there are still 3 people loose in the world who would pay as much as $5,800 for one.
1970 Mazda Luce BMW look-alike: well let's hope it runs better than a BMW Bavaria.
51 Bristol--- congratulations to whomever took a potentially $50,000 car and turned it into a piece of junk.
1985 Merkur---yes, definitely a time capsule...and what do we usually do with time capsules, class?
1982 Bat/Sphinx/Whatever --- I kinda like this one. It's not quirky, it's not odd--it's totally nuts.
The Century sedan is indeed quite rare. Most had the frames rust out in the rear after a few years due to bad design, thin metal, and poor rust protection. You can see the cheapening that GM did on these in the interior trim - look at the poor quality vinyl upholstery used in the seat bolsters and the ill-fitting interior pieces.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Looks like a Buick with an Olds engine, and a Pontiac with a Buick engine? For wanting $9K, you'd think the seller would have at least cleaned up that engine bay some! I swear, my $500 New Yorker looks better than that under the hood!
I really like that Bonneville. I drove a '79 once with the Buick 350, and it seemed fairly sluggish, so I imagine the more common 301 must have been really slow by then. The '79 with the 350 felt about as quick as my grandmother's '85 LeSabre, which had an Olds 307, but was most likely helped a bit with the 4-speed automatic and improved emissions controls. It wasn't enough of a dog to turn down a nice one, though...it's just that this particular one I drove was owned by an old guy who was just going to donate it, it needed work, and once I really looked at it, I didn't think I'd be any better off with it than with my grandmother's '85 LeSabre, or the '89 Gran Fury I had at the time.
As for that Century, I kinda like it in an underdog sort of way. It has some nice features, such as the somewhat upscale interior, and 305 V-8. Power windows would have been nice, though. Other than the headliner coming down, seems okay. And yeah, the interior workmanship was getting a bit sloppy, but to be fair, I think everybody was starting to lose it by then.
I wasn't aware of the poor rust protection...around the DC area, those downsized intermediates held up pretty well. Usually didn't start to show rust for at least 10 years. Which, by the way, seems to be about the age that I STILL start to see Accords and Civics with some rust on 'em! But, I guess if it has any flaws in the rustproofing, a few Canada winters will really point them out!