Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
My friend's 'new '64 R1 was priced two months ago at $29K by a dealer, but it is probably a 2 or 2+ car, built on the last day of production (although the dealer seemed to know nothing about that). I doubt they got $10K off the asking price.
Avantis I see for under $10K usually need hog trough or at least rear frame crossmember repair, fiberglass repair, that kind of thing, and often have aftermarket interior pieces, etc. Not things that keep the car from running well (like electrical gremlins could in a car with 'all the toys').
I've sold three Larks, one that was rusty for $4K, one for $12.5K and one for $15K, without even paying for an advertisement.
I need to also look where you're looking, apparently. With 4,500 Avantis built almost 50 years ago, I never see them for sale 'all the time'.
But, to each his own, apparently.
2021 Jeep Wrangler Sahara 4xe Granite Crystal over Saddle
2024 Audi Q5 Premium Plus Daytona Gray over Beige
2017 BMW X1 Jet Black over Mocha
I agree! I always get a kick out of the 'this was when cars were cars, not identical like they are now' lead in to that '50s test. Folks who grew up with a certain vintage of cars (or have taken them up as a hobby) know them inside and out, and can tell them apart. Really has nothing to do with the type of designs that were made. Me, I find pre-'56 or so cars very hard to identify. Why? They're before my time, and I've never developed an interest in them. Show me some '60s or '70s cars, I know I'd do better.
I was also a bit unsure about the Willys and the Henry-J, but figured the uglier of the two was the Henry-J, and guessed right!
That test also seemed a bit DeSoto-heavy, so that probably helped me some.
If you really want an Avanti R1, let me know and I'd be glad to look for a good deal for you!
Thanks for the offer. I would want an original color, original interior, excellent hog troughs and frame, and a solid runner. Probably not for awhile, although I've just sold my '66 Daytona.
There's not a single Studebaker Avanti on eBay right now. There are several '60's Lincoln convertibles, at fairly attractive prices IMHO.
For 71 Avanti R1s sold in the last few years on eBay, we find the following averages:
Excellent:$21,888
Good:$14,304
Fair:$10,746
Which I think is pretty accurate for the Avanti R1 market analysis.
Naturally, professionallly restored, rotisserie show winners can bring more, but it takes a lot of $$$ to build such a car.
Whenever I say "so and so car is not worth restoring", I'm not commenting on the car's merit---I'm just saying that the cost of restoration exceeds the car's market value by a wide margin.
some guys can beat that formula by doing much of the work themselves and putting 0 value on their skilled labor--which is fine, great hobby right?
But a full restoration of a real wreck can take 3,000 hours!!
Nonetheless, nice early Lincoln convertibles ala the Kennedy style are pushing $80,000 now....I mean, super nice ones. I don't think the later converts would be worth that.
A guy I know in the Studebaker Club had his parents' '65 Lincoln convertible 'til a few years ago. I seem to remember him saying some of the big PITA issues involved vacuum, but for the life of me I can't think of exactly what he complained about.
If you want a driver that's nothing to be ashamed of, but with needs, $25,000 should do it.
Although there have been several instances of crazy selling prices of Golden Hawks ($80K and up), I'm generally not a fan. I like the clean '53-54's better and the later, formalled-up Gran Turismo Hawks even better than the '53. Function of my age probably.
A couple notes: The owner of that blue '51 Studebaker with "Chicken Hawk" painted on the doors, I've met and in fact he is the guy who annually runs a dark brown, one-owner '64 Lark Challenger R3 at the Pure Stock Muscle Car Drags and has downright shamed several other better-known 'muscle cars' in the quarter-mile. There are several videos of this on You Tube. The car is known as "The Plain Brown Wrapper".
Also, that maroon '52 DeSoto Custom is a dead ringer for one my low-income widowed aunt drove when I was a kid--probably into the mid'60s.
I like the GT Hawks much better---the early Hawks are rather clumsy cars--the GT Hawks are more modern, more comfy cruisers, with more amenities and better handling (for the times). Build quality is so-so.
2 - Boat tail Riviera - for sale sign on it, metallic brown
A gold Pontiac GTO with 'The Judge' trim. Not sure if it was real. I thought they were all orange.
A 56 Black and White Chevy, 2 door post i think, immaculate and with heavy sounding engine.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
This gold one had light minty green and black decals. It seemed more like the court stenographer edition.
Scorpio was a nice enough car, but not simple to maintain like an American Ford, and it was expensive, so it too faded away. Both cars were examples of the idiocy and vanity of Detroit execs too - touted as prestige cars with prices to match, but at home were normal cars. The XR4 was a Ford Sierra at home - typical middle class car, and the Scorpio was the full sized model, maybe slotting between the Taurus and Crown Vic in an equivalent market in Europe. Not intended as a lux or performance car to pursue MB or BMW, but the marketers insisted otherwise. Ford Scorpio in England was even a common independent taxi cab.
Similar vanity based rebadges exist today too - Buick Regal, touted as special and sporty, is a normal Opel Insignia at home, their equivalent of a typical full sized car. Acura TSX is the Euro Honda Accord.
It was raced successfully and the car does deserve some praise.
http://www.rmauctions.com/AuctionResults.cfm?SaleCode=HF12&SortBy=RO&View=Normal- &Category=Cars&Currency=USD&tempstartrow=26¤tpage=2&Collection=
'55 Studebaker President Speedster, same selling price as '55 Chrysler 300-C and 11K more than a '53 Packard Caribbean Convertible, all in stunning condition. '66 Lincoln Continental convertible, $41K.
The Chrysler 300C on the other hand, was sold way way below market, and plotted over time it should have sold for about $120,000 ...IF...it were a show car, which obviously it was not. Something was wrong with that car, I would imagine....or maybe the whole crowd was in the bathroom and someone stole it? I dunno, wasn't there.
Again, unless we are there looking at the cars, auction prices have to be looked at as only a database of "one".
The Packard Caribbean I would guess was a real dog, selling at 1/2 historical value.
Caribbean:
http://www.rmauctions.com/CarDetails.cfm?SaleCode=HF12&CarID=r180&Currency=USD
300-C:
http://www.rmauctions.com/CarDetails.cfm?SaleCode=HF12&CarID=r222&Currency=USD
While this is only one sale, there are no results more recent than this.