Mazda MX-Flexa / Mazda5

1101113151641

Comments

  • jazvanjazvan Member Posts: 106
    Subearu, you are right about the drive ratio. I saw 4.388 final ratio with the same 5th gear ratio as the Mazda3, .755. The Mazda3 is already a high winder (which is one criticism I have of it) with a 4.105 ratio and the 5 is even more so. The MZ5 will be spinning 4000 rpm at 76mph!

    This very much explains the mediocre gas mileage.

    - Jaz
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Focus seems almost too conventional. I dunno if people will cross-shop these.

    The 5 will likely have the higher vantage point so many people like, and more upright seating.

    Sounds like a 6th ratio might do the trick to lower highway revs and improve mileage, eh?

    -juice
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Give it a super tall 6th gear so it is tolerable on the highway. I get so tired of close ratio trannies without a cruising gear.

    Even a Corolla has a tall enough top gear that it is going 2100 rpm @ 60 mph. That would be about 2,800 rpm @ 80 mph. 4,000 rpm at 76 is absurd.

    While I am very impressed with the 5 - especially the available manual tranny. I would take the very nimble and efficient (and more practical to me) Focus wagon over it any day. I can also order it just how I want it with leather, no sunroof etc. Is the Focus perfect - no, if it was I would have one now. As it is I will keep driving my perfectly servicable Integra hatch (177,000 extremely reliable miles)

    If the 5 had the option of a real seat for 3 in the middle and got better gas mileage it would be near the top of my list.

    People are not dumb. They compare the little minivan to a larger one, and when the little one offers less space with no real improvement in fuel mileage many people do not see the point. It may handle well, but the Odyssey is moderately nimble, as are many sports wagons that compete with the 5.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I don't think it'll feel anything like the Ody. That thing weighs a whole bunch more, and it just a lot larger overall.

    I had my cousin's for a week when she traveled overseas, and it was hard to get used to such a large vehicle.

    I swear, those things should beep in reverse!

    MPV is more manageable but still a lot bigger than the 5.

    I don't think they'll drive the same, not at all IMO.

    -juice
  • jazvanjazvan Member Posts: 106
    Can you verify any of these numbers?

    21-28mpg MT
    20-26mpg AT.

    4.388 final drive ratio.

    No DSC.

    Thanks.

    -Jaz
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    I saw those figures (including no DSC in the U.S.) on another forum site.

    -Brian
  • npaladin2000npaladin2000 Member Posts: 593
    The small 1.5l Scions spin high at highway speed. When you take a small engine and make it work hard, it's just going to happen. The Scion xB should really have a 1.7 or 1.8 engine...the Mazda5 probably needs Mazda's old 2.5l V6. But the fact is, all Ford and Mazda have to put in there in that size range is the 2.3L. The next step up is the Duratec-derived 3.0L V6 which would be way too big and a HUGE MPG hit.

    Possibly FoMoCo needs to come up with a "tweener" engine somewhere between 2.3L and 3.0? Somewhere around 2.5-2.6L? It'd probably also make a good base engine for the Mazda6, since I hear the 2.3L really isn't enough engine in there, and the 6 is supposed to get bigger at some point.
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    M/T 22/27 MPG
    A/T 21/26 MPG

    M/T final drive 4.388
    A/T final drive 4.416
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Actually I don't see why the engine needs to spin. I have the first gen Odyssey with a 2.2l and it cruises at 80 mph all day long with no problems. It is heavier than the 5, has less power, and has more air to push out of the way. Despite that it is geared much taller. Will it do well in a drag race? No, but who cares.

    A 5 will do fine on the highway with taller gearing.

    21/26 is about the same as Sienna and Odyssey and they weigh about 1,200 lbs more, and have much more air resistance. They also have large V-6 engines.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That Ody never sold very well, though. I'm sure Mazda is hoping for better.

    -juice
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    I think the old Ody was one of those vehicles that were ahead of their time. It was conceived during the rise of the minivan, and specifically, the rise of the trend towards bigger and bigger minivans.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Perhaps, but even with Almighty Honda marketing it, it never really met expectations.

    -juice
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    I don't think they ever marketed it. IMHO, it was a simple plug in product and they hoped that it would sell. Even the "Almighty Honda" makes mistakes occasionally. ;)
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Part of the reason the first Ody never sold was it cost as much or more than the larger vans. People just didn't feel they were getting good value for their money. Chrysler was king and they were cheaper.

    The number of units sold does not change the fact that it did fine on the highway without super short gearing despite being larger with less power. I have driven ours over the Rockies with 5 people and absolutely jammed with luggage. Yes it had to downshift, but we always kept up with traffic.

    I still get a giggle when people doubt that the 4-cyl 6 (or Accord Camry etc) will do well on the highway. The darn things go 130 mph - how fast do people drive?
  • jazvanjazvan Member Posts: 106
    DudleyR, I agree 100% that the MZ5 does not need the crazy gearing. The 2.3 has balance shafts and is pretty smooth, so Mazda's strategy is just to spin the crap out of it and they will no doubt get better acceleration. But even in the MZ3, I find highway driving annoying, because you do sense the excessive spinning of the engine. This is like some of the old 8K rpm Acuras that could really accelerate with small engines, but they were truly annoying on the highway. I do a lot of my driving in the 70mph range and I don't want a car that is spinning at 4K rpm - it is absurd.

    A 6-speed could fix it, but the MZ3 final drive ratio which is already too high would seem a better choice and maybe the MPG numbers would have been a little better. It is not going to be a fast accelerating car anyway.

    So now it appears that we will have a car that is probably not a good highway cruiser, mediocre MPG and not even traction control all based on simple and bad decisions. It seems the need for traction control is more pronounced on this car because they added 100's of pounds to the back of the car, so the drive wheels carry a reduced proportion of the overall weight. DSC is such a natural and I can't get over this really poor decision when the Premacy Site makes a big deal of the superiority of DSC, and yet there it is on the same assembly line going into the Japanese 2.3 MZ5's (Premacy's).

    It looks like all the stats we have are pretty well verified now, so the MZ5 at least in it's introduction configuration is off my short list.
    This has me seriously considering an Ody. Not the same driving experience, but the same MPG, DSC standard on the base model, higher resale, excellent safety.

    -Jaz
  • big_guybig_guy Member Posts: 372
    Ford did (does?) have a "tweener" engine. The 2.5L Duratec V6 used in the first MPV. It was tagged as underpowered for the MPV but may be about right for the Mazda5 ... the bigger problem is that the 2.5L wasn't very fuel efficient in the MPV (17 city, 23 hwy if I remember right).

    I don't mind the 2.3L engine as the power plant for the 5 if it is done right. A test drive is the only way to determine if it fits the bill or not.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,770
    I don't know if a V6 will fit in the 3 chassis, but not sure.

    To me, if this thing is buzzing close to 4K at 76 mph, it is immediately off the list. Cut the gearing, and up the MPG and comfort level.

    That gearing is even worse than my Miata, which certainly was buzzing along on the highway. Even makes my Scion tC look good 9and it is geared much shorter than it needs to be), since it will do ~88 mph at 4K.

    If you gotta work the little engine this hard to keep up, just put in a bigger engine, which if geared normally, will give better performance and MPG.

    But, if they drop in the powertrain from the speed version, I might come back.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    They used them as NYC cabs. Oasis clones also.

    The 5 seems smaller, I dunno. I saw it up on the stand at NAIAS, so I did not get in it or even next to it.

    -juice
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    "If you gotta work the little engine this hard to keep up, just put in a bigger engine, which if geared normally, will give better performance and MPG."

    That's exactly what I've been saying.

    I'm beginning to get the picture that Mazda is targeting this car for families which are on a budget but need a people-mover -- hence cost-cutting measures such as: no DSC, 4-speed auto, 4-cyl motor.
  • lancerfixerlancerfixer Member Posts: 1,284
    Darnit. A promising little people-mover that gets out-MPGed by a 2wd Freestyle.
    The crazy final drive ratio seals the deal for me...I'm not listening to a 4,000 rpm buzz on our annual family road trip from Iowa to Massachusetts, thankyouverymuch.
    So close...
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I wonder if real-world mileage will be better than the EPA numbers.

    But noise is more of a concern to me, I wonder if it'll be quiet at 70.

    I had a buzzy engine in an Escort GT, that revved high and it did get annoying on long trips. I'd do 14 hour spring break drives to Florida. Those were the days.

    Get ear plugs? :-)

    -juice
  • lancerfixerlancerfixer Member Posts: 1,284
    That's my main concern, too, juice. During my single days, I made a couple South Dakota-Massachusetts runs in my 5 speed Integra, and that buzz got annoying after a while. I was 20 and had the stereo cranked then...I won't have that option with Mrs. Lance and the kiddies in the car!
  • jazvanjazvan Member Posts: 106
    If you want a good idea of what the Mazda5 will feel like at 76mph, test drive a Mazda3 hatch at about 82mph (just take her up to 4krpm) and see what you think. It is a smooth engine (at reasonable rpm's) but you definitely get the feeling it is spinning 4,000 rpm.

    -Jaz
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I could have wrote that post myself. Mrs. juice and two kids won't tolerate loud music, either.

    Besides, "Best of Sesame Street" sounds worse than loud engine revs. :-)

    -juice
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    Hmm...maybe Mrs. Juice should hook up with Mrs. Lance and share a ride, along with Mr. Dressup and Bert and Ernie, leaving Mr. Juice and Mr. Lance to raise hell in their M5's. :)
  • bigworld2000bigworld2000 Member Posts: 11
    Wow, I'm surprised at the number of posters here (including myself) who are ruling out the 5 based solely on its low MPG.

    Doesn't Mazda research this stuff?

    There's a big audience here in the US just waiting for a reasonably big yet high-mileage vehicle.

    Nothing else seems to be coming down the pipeline. Think I'm going to look at a Vibe tomorrow.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Being in SD myself and driving a 5 speed Integra, I resemble that remark. Now that the speed limit is 75 and 80 is the average speed, that engine noise gets awfully tiring. Boy do I want a 6th gear.

    Yes, nobody (car makers) seems to get that there isn't much point in a small vehicle that gets worse mileage than a much larger one (and is noisy to boot). Something like an Accord or Camry wagon would be very comfortable for 5 (or the Mazda 5 if configured correctly) and would have a ton of space. Both these vehicles get 24-26 EPA city and 33-34 highway (in sedan form), so why does the similarly sized Mazda 5 use so much fuel. Gotta gear it taller. It is a 4-cyl wagon/van, nobody is gonna drag race it. It will be faster than my firt gen Ody even if it keeps the gearing from the 6.

    I have high hopes for this segment (largish wagon/smallish van)- hopefully Mazda will spur other entries. What I fear though is that they will set it up for failure by undermarketing and offering options/combos that people don't want.

    I still find it absurd that some companies will offer 7 or 8 suv's but only have room for 1 minivan.

    Vibe would be close for me too, but since it is 7 inches shorter than the Corolla it is based on, luggage space is not very good. A corolla wagon (available elsewhere) has much more cargo area.
  • lancerfixerlancerfixer Member Posts: 1,284
    Gotta ask, dudleyr, where are you in SD? I was stationed at Ellsworth for 3 1/2 years and sold my blue '92 as I got out of the Air Force...I've always wondered what happened to my old car.
  • lancerfixerlancerfixer Member Posts: 1,284
    If I were gonna roadtrip without Mrs. Lance and the kids, it certainly wouldn't be in any minivan. :-)
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I am right smack in the middle - the Capital city. Was just out in Rapid a week ago. Beer cheese soup at the firehouse - yessss! That place is growing. They totally changed Rushmore - North by Northwest will seem out of place.

    Mine is a white 1990 that we purchased new. Not too many others around - ours is the only one in town. I saw a light blue 4 door of that vintage a few years ago. What color what yours.

    Rapid city is the nearest Mazda dealer at 175 miles away, so I may have to rely on reports from others once this thing hits dealers.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,770
    Actually, the 5 is not supposed to be much heavier than a 4 cyl CamCord. Since the engines are comparable, seems like they could get away with similar gearing, hence similar MPG (and comfort level).

    But, if they need the short gearing to keep up around town, add a gear to each one to calm it down at highway speeds.

    I was just reading the review on the new BMW 3 series, and always read the MPH/1K RPM chart (especially after ending up with a tC that's geared too short). ANyway, 3K in 5th gives about 69MPH, but about 82 in 6th.

    You want solutions?? I got your solutions right here!

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Bingo - seems like whenever a sixth gear is added though they (most manufacturers) keep the top gear the same and add an extra cog in between.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Wonder if the new MX-5's 6 speed would fit? It comes with the related 2.0l engine.

    -juice
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    It might, but the MX-5 is one of the worst culprits. It turns something like 3100 rpm @ 60 mph in 6th gear. It barely turns any slower than the 5-speed when cruising. Maybe the brand new model will be different though.
  • lamjplamjp Member Posts: 18
    Mazda5 is targeted to be an inner City CAMPER in downtown densely populated cities like New York City, Toronto, Montreal.
    Base model starting under $20,000 Canadian, available early Summer 2005 in Toronto Canada.
    Keep it simple, under 180 inches bumper-to-bumper and still seats 3 split rows with great mileage is good science ... like the VW Microbus Diesel.
    Image hosted by Photobucket.com
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That cargo space does look pretty huge. The wheel wells don't intrude much, either.

    The seats appear to fold neatly, unlike the Element's, which you'd have to remove to have that kind of space.

    -juice
  • wheelz4wheelz4 Member Posts: 569
    As someone pointed out in the Mazda Canada Mazda5 forum, that's a kid's bmx bike, so looks can be deceiving. Also, where are you getting that 45 mpg figure....wishful thinking? I don't even think the Mazda3 with the 2.0 litre engine get's that. It would certainly put all the mpg complaints in this forum to rest if it did.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Probably Imperial Gallons, and they may not reduce the mileage numbers in cananda like they do here (22% for highway).

    What are some other cars rated in Canada for comparison?
  • lamjplamjp Member Posts: 18
    180 inches bumper-to-bumper; 64 inches height top-to-bottom; 9 inches road clearance.
    Image hosted by Photobucket.com
  • lamjplamjp Member Posts: 18
    Wish more cars have fully reclining split rear seats such as the Mazda2 to lounge in.
    Image hosted by Photobucket.com
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    9" road clearance?!
  • lamjplamjp Member Posts: 18
    Image hosted by Photobucket.com
  • bean3422bean3422 Member Posts: 183
    Mazda has never been about gas mileage...if that is what you are after, go shop Toyota.

    The 5 will be just like the MPV...a family hauler with that little extra Mazda something. Just like my old Protege...sure it was buzzy at speed and did not get the same mileage as a Corolla...but it won or came close to winning almost every comparison because it was so much fun to drive.

    We have enough Toyota clones...be happy with the ability to stuff 6 people in there and still have a little more fun than the next guy with the mongovan.

    It is all about subtleties!
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    You can have your cake and eat it too. Fun to drive does not have to come at the expense of economy. Mazda has an excellent example of this themselves - the 3. With the 2.0 engine and a manual tranny CR got it at 42 mpg on the highway (steady 65) and 8.6 to 60 (from an idle - no clutch dropping). Most importatly it handles very nicely.

    Fixing the buzziness on the highway is as simple as adding an extra gear. Those who want instant throttle response on the highway don't need to use that gear.

    Volvo used to have button for their top gear in a manual tranny. You shifted the first 4 gears normally and then when you were cruising on the highway you pushed a button on top of the shifter to put the car in 5th gear. This was to hammer home the fact that the top gear was for fast highway cruising, and was not part of the everyday shift pattern.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    This thing is an SUV! LOL

    The 2nd row captain's chairs do look very comfy and that interior looks very versatile.

    -juice
  • forbes3forbes3 Member Posts: 7
    Where are these gas mileage numbers and gear ratio numbers coming from? I have yet to see anything posted at any Mazda site. It seems to me that a lot of debate has been instigated by mere conjecture and not fact. While I agree that mileage is important I would want to have the official numbers before commenting.

    BTW I would love to have this vehicle with a common rail diesel engine. Wonder which company will be the first to bring one over to this side of the pond in a minivan. My bet is Daimler-Chrysler.
  • jazvanjazvan Member Posts: 106
    See Message 623.

    It's from a Mazda dealer who got his info from Mazda. There is a verifying source on another site which was refered to further back in this thread. That source also comes from Mazda.
    I also hope the numbers aren't right but the sources are solid and I think they are correct.
    Anyway, we don't have to decide until the car comes out.

    -Jaz
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I would love a diesel as well but would settle for an efficient gasoline engine.

    Was reading about the Avalon recently (yes different class, but it is huge inside) and it gets EPA 22/31 with a 280 hp V-6. One of the car mags got it at 6.5 to 60 mph. Quite impressive on power for that efficiency.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,770
    My "05 Ody is epa rated at 20/28, but most owners are reporting getting well under that. it wouldn't surprise me however if the 5 beat iss rather conservative numbers.

    My tC is geared short too, and is rated at 29 (I think) highway, but I was able to easily get 33 on a trip at normal speeds.

    Some cars test well, and some real world well. They aren't always the same.

    Forgetting the MPG (still better than a normal van or SUV), it's the buzz factor that would ice me out.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • jazvanjazvan Member Posts: 106
    Put me on the top of the list for a Diesel for sure. What I know about it is that it is virtually impossible for mfg's including the experts at Daimler and VW to meet the CARB standard. The CARB standard is for the 5 green states. In either 07 or 08 (I forget which) the US goes entirely to the same CARB standard. However, by September 2006 most of the Diesel at the pump nationwide will be low sulfur and way cleaner that what we have now. I don't know if that will allow the mfg's to meet CARB standard or not. So Diesel automobiles continue to be possible in non-CARB states for 2-3 more years, after that, I don't know. Also trucks over 6,000 lbs meet a lower standard so you can commute in a big Honking Dodge RAM Diesel even in CARB states now, but not in a VW TDI.

    -Jaz
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.